Escape Goat
Member
Nothing more frustrating trying to read someones chicken scratch cursive.
Bad_Boy said:i only use cursive to sign my name.
Not really worth the investment of taking time to learn it, however.AbsoluteZero said:Whenever you need to write something its SO MUCH FASTER.
Xdrive05 said:Good. My state did the right thing for a change.
Almost makes up for the whole Pi = 3.0 thing.
Meaning it's basically an awkward form of stenography, in a setting where it's rarely, if ever, necessary to write that quickly.Dead Man said:Yeah, I'm surprised they even teach cursive any more. I write cursive, but only for me since the shit is illegible to anyone else, it's just faster for note taking.
ssolitare said:I don't see what's wrong in learning cursive, teach both. It doesn't take that much time to learn.
Not just joined up, but the more flowing, and archaic forms of the letters:DeathIsTheEnd said:What is cursive writing exactly? Joined up?
If so, I thought that was just standard handwriting.
Yep.Orayn said:Meaning it's basically an awkward form of stenography, in a setting where it's rarely, if ever, necessary to write that quickly.
AbsoluteZero said:Whenever you need to write something its SO MUCH FASTER.
Cursive took up a whole bunch of time in 3rd and 4th grade.ssolitare said:I don't see what's wrong in learning cursive, teach both. It doesn't take that much time to learn.
Is Indiana even an "SAT state?" A lot of colleges in the Midwest only require the ACT.EskimoJoe said:They're gonna be fucked when they take the SATs.
They'll be fine without using cursive on the SATs or other standardized tests.... You have more than enough time to put together a competent essay on the writing portion and any savings anyway wouldn't really affect things too much, if at all.EskimoJoe said:They're gonna be fucked when they take the SATs.
The SAT recommended using print when I took it. Also no one gives a damn about the writing section anyway.EskimoJoe said:They're gonna be fucked when they take the SATs.
AbsoluteZero said:What bullshit. Cursive/Script is an important thing to learn.
GoldenEye 007 said:They'll be fine without using cursive on the SATs or other standardized tests.... You have more than enough time to put together a competent essay on the writing portion and any savings anyway wouldn't really affect things too much, if at all.
Ace 8095 said:The SAT recommended using print when I took it. Also no one gives a damn about the writing section anyway.
When composing new stuff, I still prefer to write things out on paper, and using print really ups the wrist strain after a few pages. The whole idea of cursive is not having to lift the pen so much, although more so for when pens didn't really let you.OuterWorldVoice said:Why? It was the primary way to create a lot of text quickly and legibly. It has been replaced. It served no other purpose.
As they should.Crucified said:Bet those typing classes still teach double spacing after a period, though.
Why, are they learning to type on typewriters?Dead Man said:As they should.
Two Years? We just set aside a little time each day to practice, and it never took anywhere close to that long.ConfusingJazz said:Teachers are hard pressed for what to teach, and it takes forever to teach the kids cursive. Basically reteaching them how to write for two years.
Kurtofan said:I can't imagine not writing in cursive, what a shame.
This. Cursive is pretty standard from what i've seen. Maybe i'm stuck in the past?DeathIsTheEnd said:If so, I thought that was just standard handwriting.
Unless you also teach them to recognise whether a font is proportional or not, it is better to assume not, than to assume it is, in terms of readability. But this is a debate neither of us will settle today, and it will run for many more years.Crucified said:Why, are they learning to type on typewriters?
Copernicus said:The real question is....why haven't they been teaching typing all this time....wtf?
Ugh, so true, to a tee! Luckily my school taught both cursive and typing. Learning to type is infinitely more important. I don't even pay attention to my signature anymore, just so long as the first letters of each word are readable, I dot the place where the 'i' would be; and have long ass tails on the 'y's at the end of my names, I think that's good enough.Ace 8095 said:When is was in grade school I was told I would have to write in cursive in middle school. When I was in middle school I was told I would have to write in cursive in high school. When I was in high school I was told I would have to write in cursive in college. When I got to college I was told "I don't want to read your cursive scratch". My whole life had been a lie.
Copernicus said:The real question is....why haven't they been teaching typing all this time....wtf?
That's ludicrous. Fixed width fonts are antiquated and are used almost entirely in applications where you wouldn't be writing in full sentences anyway.Dead Man said:Unless you also teach them to recognise whether a font is proportional or not, it is better to assume not, than to assume it is, in terms of readability. But this is a debate neither of us will settle today, and it will run for many more years.
Dead Man said:As they should.
You could also type out an "i" or "l" to see if you're dealing with a fixed-width font.Dead Man said:Unless you also teach them to recognise whether a font is proportional or not, it is better to assume not, than to assume it is, in terms of readability. But this is a debate neither of us will settle today, and it will run for many more years.
Indeed you could.Hitokage said:You could also type out an "i" or "l" to see if you're dealing with a fixed-width font.
Courier and screenplays smiles in your direction.Crucified said:That's ludicrous. Fixed width fonts are antiquated and are used almost entirely in applications where you wouldn't be writing in full sentences anyway.
Stalin was just misunderstood.OuterWorldVoice said:WHY?
Typewriters sometimes needed this because they don't kern, track or lead like digital typefaces. I don't mean to exaggerate, but you are worse than Stalin.
If I could get all the time and brainpower back that I had wasted removing this farcical nonsense from allegedly professional writers' work, I would have a long vacation.
Sharp said:OWV, while there's no reason to use two spaces between sentences in proportional fonts, there's also absolutely no reason to anal-retentively remove them.
I don't think you'll ever be able to enter all the instructions to a computer using just voice. Even if you can, do you really want to listen to people around you constantly talking to a computer when you're in the office, or anywhere really. It would be unbelievably annoying. Mind link is the only thing that can successfully replace manual input with computers, with no drawback. Even with that, who knows, I think most people's thought are too disorganized to communicate using them. Verbalizing or manualizing them shapes them into something recognizable.Zaptruder said:They're a bit late.
I wonder how typing will fare once voice recognition AI improves to a point where it is universally usable without training.
(Working off the - if people can do it... machines will probably be able to do it one day - rule of thumb).
Then find and replace all and it's over with in two seconds. No reason for you to make such a big deal out of it.OuterWorldVoice said:Yes there is. When it goes to print in a publication, the renderer assumes you want the spaces and you have slightly larger gaps between sentences than looks natural. And it creates more widows and orphans in an average run of text.
It's a very bad thing.