IndieStatik Founder apologizes for "inappropriate" comments to female game dev

Status
Not open for further replies.
There's letting it go on and creating a big public scene like this, then there's putting that man in his place right then and there in the chat - stopping it from going any further. Thinking there's just something wrong, and that's all it is, negates the meaning of this going public.

I'm not saying that making this public was wrong, I'm just defending the other viewpoint, because I feel it's appropriate.

This doesn't really take into account the emotions of the harassed at the time does it? We don't know her motivations or reasons for not instantly telling him off and frankly they shouldn't matter because this behavior is completely unacceptable anyway.
 
I will not judge him because nobody is perfect and therefore I shall not judge another person, however reading that made me feel a little uncomfortable and I really hope that she (the female game dev) was strong to ignore all this.

Alcoholism is a serious addiction that affects many people, it's good that he is now going to AA meetings and he's finding therapy to help him with the loss of his brother. I don't now if he decided to just get drunk and be like that or if he really have a serious alcoholism problem. I hope he's not using the issue as a easy way out (he mention that regarding the loss of his brother and he says that "I’m not using my brother as a scapegoat" so that's good to know because that would be low.

That brings up his depression who is another serious condition. I'm not a professional so I can't say how odd all this sounds, maybe if someone is drunk and depressed he do not weight his own words, because he certainly didn't this time. That chat however, seems more of something a little male teen without any sexual experience whatsoever would say more than a drunk depressed grown man, yet, I don't know how the mind of a depressed and drunk person works.

The worst part is that, this is the Internet and many people with hate him more and more and he might not be able to ignore all the negativism he is going to get from random people. Another thing to worry about is the credibility that may get affected from his professional side. It's bad enough for him to write what he wrote but when these things cope together with his personal problems and his work it's never a good thing mix up and may harm both his personal and professional life. By saying this I'm not defending him, at all, but I do hope that he can learn his lesson, drop the alcohol with some medical help and may his depression ends soon. I also hope that this can brings sexual harassment a more serious note because for some people it's something light and it's perceived many times as "come oooon he was just kidding!". This shouldn't be the case, it should be a serious theme and it does not matter who does it, it's wrong.
 
He tried to initiate a bit of late night cybersex. And got no play at all.

That 5.59am message has sunk him though. If he was still 'drunk' then he must be drinking some potent stuff.
 
Why does your opinion matter?

It matters just as much and as little as that of everyone else. What I was trying to show with that post was that there is not one uniform opinion on what's offensive and what isn't so that makes it a dangerous thing to base legal terms on.
 
With these things I always wonder what the split is between people that genuinely feel for the 'victim' and people that just smell blood.

And I wonder what some posters in this thread are trying to accomplish by making blanket accusations of insincerity and putting "victim" in quotes. HMM.
 
Why is anyone defending the guy seriously, She ignored the remarks but still needed his business. That's as far as the non existent defence goes.

It's actually disheartening seeing people attempt to defend such disrespect to another human being.

Accepting his apology is one (I have no issue with that). But let's not patronise the victim.
 
How do you magically know they bother her? And if so, how much? did she feel it was "sexual harassment?" I don't know.

1) She asks "Are you tipsy?"

2) She completely ignores his weird, creepy sexual advances

3) When she does acknowledge the occasional post, she responds jokingly

4) Not once does she make a serious reply to his comments outside of "Are you tipsy?"


Those are signs of harassment. Clearly she was uncomfortable with the subject.
 
Wow Jaffe is just being despicable.

I like to think that every time a big sexist controversy happens in the game industry, it's just growing pains to a better future.

I'd hardly think that incidents like this are in anyway related to the medium at hand.

People are stupid like this in any walk of life.

Hopefully his apology is sincere and he seeks the help he claims to need.
 
I'm really really hesitant to play the "some people must identify with him" card. Like, I can't recall the last time I did. But its basically the only way I can explain some of the reactions in here
 
What a shitty way to look at the situation. You drunk text really good looking friends who are single and you know would reciprocate or realize you're drunk, or your ex girlfriend or whatever. You don't contact a "peer" in the industry and pretend to need help or information to completely sexually harass her or make her feel uncomfortable. The fact she didn't acknowledge it says it all. What do you want her to do? Write "Fuck off creep"... We don't know the power dynamic between the two. She could be a lowly dev and he a powerful founder or whatever.

Sure.. why not. I don't know their whole story but are they friends? Are they good friends? Just casual friends? Have they ever partied before? She's getting a divorce, maybe they've talked in the past. Who knows. Sorry to you it's shitty way of looking at it. I thought this story was going to be completely different. I thought he was calling her a cunt and bitch and going off on twitter or something. I didn't know it was just a dude being an idiot while drunk. After the first time he said he would kiss her vagina, she could of stopped typing to him. It's not hard to stop. It's not like they were in a car or something together.

All I'm saying is I thought this was a different type of story.. like I said. Going off calling her a bitch, selling sex tapes he made with her or something crazy. Didn't know it was going to be an amusing embarrassing jack ass type of story.

Kiss your vagina... ha! Come on man. (not you..dude who used that line) If she doesn't respond right away with something to show she might be interested... pull out! But the liquor had a hold of him. And we all got to read some embarrassing stuff from him because he did it publicly.


meh.... This dude learned a lesson. Hopefully.
 
I don't consider this to be video game news.

Why not? It revolves two people in the industry no? And the fact he initially contacted her because he needed some 'info' about a game or devs. Judging by what he said, how she responded and how some are defending this, makes it seem like this is a conversation we need to have. Really makes you wonder how many women brush off comments like this all the time.
 
I'm probably not up to date on the story but is there a reason she went for posting the texts and outing him instead of first telling him he's gone too far?
 
or people who relate with weirdo creeps

nobody should have to find a new career field because 'boys will be boys' or some other nonsense.

so you let a person that does this that you're supposed to be "friends" with continue to talk to you in this way and increase the chance of him disrespecting your females peers in the process?

Even if there's no justice in the world there is no way she would lose her job for standing up for herself in THIS situation, and if she did, she could sue and make enough to own a small island, turn evil genius and I would volunteer to be her henchman.
 
There's no excuse for what he said. His apology doesn't tell me why he should be absolved.

As for the developer, I still think that she should have known that a person digging for info while flirting with her in a creepy manner wasn't something to waste time continuing. I'm not blaming her or deriding her. Don't take it that way. She was getting feedback to her responses at that time that made it clear he wasn't taking a hint, as many of you pointed out. I don't see how pointing it out that she gave him an opportunity to continue by having a dialog with him is a bad thing.

The aftermath of this makes for good exposure on the issues female developers still have in 2014. It's sad that it's still this way. I hope it changes. Maybe things will get better since he's been exposed.
 
How do you magically know they bother her? And if so, how much? did she feel it was "sexual harassment?" I don't know.

If the other lady posted it is probably because she felt it was wrong, if she agreed when contacted by Kotaku to publish the article she probably thought it was wrong. Sexual harassment is not some isolated incident, sometimes the workplace culture support this and it becomes hard to report on this issues, and part of why its hard its due statements similar to Jaffe's trying to make this a matter of subjectivity.

There is a clear line between a professional relationship and sexual harassment, acting like those human resources rule books don't exist is not an excuse to pretend that the line is blurry.
 
What a shitty way to look at the situation. You drunk text really good looking friends who are single and you know would reciprocate or realize you're drunk, or your ex girlfriend or whatever. You don't contact a "peer" in the industry and pretend to need help or information to completely sexually harass her or make her feel uncomfortable. The fact she didn't acknowledge it says it all. What do you want her to do? Write "Fuck off creep"... We don't know the power dynamic between the two. She could be a lowly dev and he a powerful founder or whatever.

If they were not friends, that does kind of make it much worse. The conversation sounded like they were. Poor research on my part but it's almost 3AM here and I need to go to sleep quick.
Anyway. The guy is an asshole but he doesn't deserve to burn for it.
 
This doesn't really take into account the emotions of the harassed at the time does it? We don't know her motivations or reasons for not instantly telling him off and frankly they shouldn't matter because this behavior is completely unacceptable anyway.

That goes for both sides, both viewpoints. I would prefer my daughter, sisters, wife, etc tell someone to stop rather than to take it public. Only take it public if career is on the line - which apparently someone said she was afraid of and reason for not wanting to speak up to him in the first place - seems contradictory.

Women have a powerful voice! Speak up! Women can speak for themselves instead of letting the public do it for them.

so you let a person that does this that you're supposed to be "friends" with continue to talk to you in this way and increase the chance of him disrespecting your females peers in the process?

Even if there's no justice in the world there is no way she would lose her job for standing up for herself in THIS situation, and if she did, she could sue and make enough to own a small island, turn evil genius and I would volunteer to be her henchman.

And this might be getting my point across a bit better.

Still, not saying she was wrong here...I totally disagree with how that guy acted! I can't imagine saying that to someone I wasn't intimate with!
 
I don't see anything wrong with what Jaffe is saying. If anything, his position is quite logical and reasonable. I don't think he is placing blame on the female's part. People like to think that if someone isn't not blasting another according to their belief, that they are in favor of the proposed scoundrel.
 
That goes for both sides, both viewpoints. I would prefer my daughter, sisters, wife, etc tell someone to stop rather than to take it public. Only take it public if career is on the line - which apparently someone said she was afraid of and reason for not wanting to speak up to him in the first place - seems contradictory.

Women have a powerful voice! Speak up! Women can speak for themselves instead of letting the public do it for them.

How about you don't tell us when and where to speak up, and we do it when and if we're comfortable since it's not an easy endeavor?
 
How the flying fuck does Jaffe think his viewpoint is in any way rational? The lady was clearly trying to brush it off (as any normal person would do in that situation) in a non-hostile way. How he thinks that "Oh well she didn't say stop, so it's her fault for letting him say those things to her" is an acceptable viewpoint is a pretty damning indictment of him.

Probably the same logic that led him to believe a Twisted Metal game wouldn't bomb in 2012.
 
It matters a lot less than hers.

If we're going to go down that route anyone could claim they felt offended or harassed by someone else for whatever asinine reason (and before you anyone says it, I'm not saying the reasons would be asinine in this case). You could say a person harassed you just because they looked at you for slightly too long. So no, in order to draw a rational, logical line that can be used as a base for what we want to legally pursue as harassment in our society, just listening to people who think they've been harassed is not really the smartest strategy. Discussing the matter openly and rationally sounds better to me.
 
That goes for both sides, both viewpoints. I would prefer my daughter, sisters, wife, etc tell someone to stop rather than to take it public. Only take it public if career is on the line - which apparently someone said she was afraid of and reason for not wanting to speak up to him in the first place - seems contradictory.

Women have a powerful voice! Speak up! Women can speak for themselves instead of letting the public do it for them.

This seems like the biggest and best way a person can speak up if they want something to change though.
 
That goes for both sides, both viewpoints. I would prefer my daughter, sisters, wife, etc tell someone to stop rather than to take it public. Only take it public if career is on the line - which apparently someone said she was afraid of and reason for not wanting to speak up to him in the first place - seems contradictory.

Women have a powerful voice! Speak up! Women can speak for themselves instead of letting the public do it for them.

Daughter/Sister/Wife you have a powerful voice, but fuck that keep it private.
 
Well, I'm not an alcoholic. If I was one, I would probably start my day with a beer to even be able to light my cigarette (I also don't smoke FYI). Those people can drink for three days straight, it's crazy.
Anyway, let's say that he was not even drunk and he made up that apology. It doesn't matter. What seems strange to me though - why didn't she even say anything?
What he was saying was pathetic but not something that usually makes people angry, at least where I live - maybe amused. Which doesn't mean anyone needs to suffer that kind of behavior, of course. Maybe you don't like being talked to like that. But I have never seen someone who is disgusted or angry or whatever about something like this and keeps talking to the other person like a friend.
And then goes to post it all online.
She's a starting out dev so she didn't want to piss him off. Ignoring advances is a standard tactic used by women to deflect advances. Feel free to drop by Dating-Age for communication advice with women. Her friend uploaded it afaik.
 
Jaffe just reads like a person who doesn't get it.

No. The reason why Jaffe's comments are so disturbing is because they are revealing what a psycho he is re: respect towards women when he really didn't exhibit this behavior before.

It's shocking to me, and others in this thread.
 
Women have a powerful voice, speak up! ...But not publicly, there are men you might embarrass and you need to be sensitive to their delicate feelings.

I'm probably not up to date on the story but is there a reason she went for posting the texts and outing him instead of first telling him he's gone too far?

The victim isn't the one who posted these, it was a friend of hers. Sorry if that doesn't fit your preferred narrative. :(
 
I really can't see how people would try to argue that harassment is subjective while failing to acknowledge that the way people that do feel harassed is also subjective.

I know myself and the culture I'm part of enough to know that in a situation of constant sexual harassment, I'd plan his/her murder before I asked for help.

It's absurd to blame the victim because she didn't show your expected reaction to harassment while you're willing to cut him some slack because you don't know if she agrees with you on the definition of harassment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom