man watching some house of crack injustice sessions is good stuff
Yeah pretty smart stuff.
man watching some house of crack injustice sessions is good stuff
man watching some house of crack injustice sessions is good stuff
Where's my eShop download Nintendo? Wtf?
Ask WB games, it's up to them after all.
Strange though, as Batman AC is on the eShop.
Edit: Just saw the commercial, eShop was on it, so it'll be up on the eshop, more than likely on Thursday.
it will be on there today.
There was a picture and I missed it?!Regarding Lobo: where did that pic come from originally? It looks a lot like a PSN download icon (square shape, blurry background, logo up top), and if that's the case, he might be releasing a lot sooner than we think.
Correction:Screw that. Lobo's original miniseries & Christmas comic are among my favorites ever. Simon Bisley's art for the character back then was godlike.
http://i.imgur.com/ASsr3KO.pngThere was a picture and I missed it?!
Catwoman is the fucking shit. I <3 this character so much.
IGN said:+ Excellent Presentation
+ Single-player Content
+ Fun for all skill levels
- Destruction too chaotic
Reviews are going up, IGN 8.2.
+ Incredible roster and story mode
+ Smooth online play
+ Fan-service aplenty
- Some spam-heavy characters
- Controls initially feel rigid
- Costumes suffer from DLC overkill
- Costumes suffer from DLC overkill
Reviews are going up, IGN US 8.2.
If a reviewer isn't a tournament player, they shouldn't review how "spam-heavy" or "well-balanced" the game is. I can't believe Injustice got docked points for that....but I don't see them docking off points because the SMGs in Call of Duty are too "spam-heavy."
I think it's fair to point out that some of the characters are clearly stronger than others, even if you don't play in tournaments. This was raised very early on when people began playing, so it reflects a general view.
It looked that way, but I can't really confirm nor deny that since there wasn't a lot of discussion about it.Can anyone confirm that Zombie mode is just character skin changes? I might sell mine off if its just that.
It looked that way, but I can't really confirm nor deny that since there wasn't a lot of discussion about it.
I think it's fair to point out that some of the characters are clearly stronger than others, even if you don't play in tournaments. This was raised very early on when people began playing, so it reflects a general view.
EGM - 9.5
Can anyone confirm that Zombie mode is just character skin changes? I might sell mine off if its just that.
What does that even mean? Give these guys vanilla Marvel Vs Capcom 3 and then see if they can do shit with Dante/Tron/Phoenix. Or Zero/Tron/Phoenix. They don't know what characters are good yet because all they can see is "oh this guy can hit me in the head over and over with a boulder. He's clearly the best in the game."
Damn, I want that Arrow skin so bad. Why would they limit that thing?
I'd like to jump in on this also.
xbl-phaonuat
I understand what you're saying, but should the reviewer ignore any character balancing entirely?
Damned casuals, thinking they can have opinions on games.
Which one? thread is moving too fast. lol
Not sure yet, and it will be the xbox one if I don't change my pre-order.How much? And is it the xbox version?
Which one? thread is moving too fast. lol
Is this game friendly for kids? Want to gift it for my brother's kid.
I don't see why it matters since their idea of character balance is likely very wrong. As stated above, Sentinel was near-unbeatable even by Justin Wong in early Marvel 3 days. Now he'd be considered one of the worst characters in the game if his assist wasn't amazing. Sentinel struggles to do well even on a casual level because people actually know how to play the game now. If they want to complain about their perceived notion of balance, that's fine but don't make that a negative in the review. Someone should go check the Tekken 3 review and see if it had "balance sucks" under negatives because you can spam both kick buttons with Eddy and Law.I understand what you're saying, but should the reviewer ignore any character balancing entirely?
Damned casuals, thinking they can have opinions on games.
Is this game friendly for kids? Want to gift it for my brother's kid.
It's rated T, I think it's okay for kids.
I understand what you're saying, but should the reviewer ignore any character balancing entirely?
To be fair, +90% of the people they are giving their feedbacks to are not tournament players neither, and will be stuck in the "casual" area of balance as well.they should ignore topic they do not understand, yes. Their job is to give the public accurate information. If they can not provide accurate and on point feedback on something, they should not give feedback on it at all.
Because he was nerfed.SmokeMaxX said:As stated above, Sentinel was near-unbeatable even by Justin Wong in early Marvel 3 days. Now he'd be considered one of the worst characters in the game if his assist wasn't amazing.