freenudemacusers
Member
Well I mean that thread was the first thing that came to mind... But I didn't want to link it lol.
Assuming these girls are legal and not being trafficked, what's the disturbing part here?
Well they're often in high stress jobs, away from their support group/family, and probably way higher paid than most in the local economy. Kind of like how in North Dakota's oil boom there was an insane rise in sex workers and strippers coming to the area from major cities.
I hear that they are a little more forward in Japan. Around bases Japanese prostitutes will sit outside looking for American men, and when one walks by they will say "Massagee?"
And American military men know exactly what "massagee" means
http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-N...rol-energies-with-prostitutes/27141368540249/U.S. servicemembers should consider soliciting prostitutes to control their “sexual energies,” the mayor of Osaka said Monday. It was a suggestion that apparently didn’t get very far with a Marine commander in Okinawa.
“There are places where people can legally release their sexual energy in Japan,” Hashimoto said during a video press conference Monday in Osaka. “Unless they make use of these facilities, it will be difficult to control the sexual energies of the wild Marines.”
Hashimoto said that the commander responded with a bitter smile and told him that brothels are off-limits to U.S. servicemembers.
Hashimoto, who has a reputation in Japan for controversial statements, added that servicemembers have abundant energy because their missions put them in life-threatening situations.
“They need to think about a way to release that energy,” he said
exactly.
man, barely any of you reactionaries have read the article, you're all railing against some imaginary article you've read in your brains. the problem isn't that prostitution exists, the problem is that human trafficking and literal exploitation of women from poorer countries is resulting from the policies the US Military and Host Nations are implementing.
There are 37 bases in Germany alone, a state with legalized and regulated prostitution but they don't have this issue.
You did say this is an issue of poorer countries and that does seem to be the point of this article. A big USA military base in a poor region will cause issues. But why South Korea? A nation with the 11th largest GDP globally. The reform and regulation of this industry needs to come from SK and they should follow the methods of other host nations.
I've actually witnessed a girl cheat on her mil boyfriend with another mil guy, move in while he was deployed, and live with the new and *his* ex while they were getting ready to get married. Not to mention all the bog standard cheating .., Oh I can't wait to go back into this lol.Although all this talk of married folks from my experience it's the younger guys with no committed relationships who go out in town looking for a lay. The most I've seen married guys do is go to strip clubs, but generally they see prostitution as not a smart decision. I've seen more people, both male and female, cheat on their SOs with other people in the command than I've ever even heard of someone cheating on their SO with a foreign prostitute.
Assuming these girls are legal and not being trafficked, what's the disturbing part here?
The article is suggesting they are in fact trafficked girls; it suggests they are being lied to and swindled by "recruiters" as well as being abused. It's suggesting that while laws were changed they are still generally dealing in girls who were taken advantage of.
Maybe read the article? Or the portion quoted ITT where it goes against your assumption?
I'm in the military, in Korea and if any of the bars around base that are accused of being involved in prostitution or human trafficking are put on a ban list that us service members are not allowed to enter (same with tattoo parlors). Doing so is an automatic visit with your commander and pretty much a reduction in rank.
USFK Off Limits list
That said, there's only so much the military can do. Once you get outside of the immediate area of the front gate, the military has little to no jurisdiction.
Lol I remember those ban lists. We would take those lists and when we got on liberty, they would be the first places that we would go.
The sobering reality. Girlfriend/wife back home takin' loads. Something fit for November Confession.It goes both ways. As a corpsman who held two NEC's with one being a pharmacy technician, I can't tell you how many times military wives came to the pharmacy to get Plan B when their husbands were on deployment.
Damn, no one is reading this article, huh
Those girls must've been fucking surgeons, cuz all I can think about is getting my dick scratched on those sharp little studs that you see on fences.This shit starts early. Friend got handjobs through the fence at boot camp..it was the thing to do.
lmaoHa. I thought this was going to be about bases within the US. Walk off a Navy base and you cant throw a rock without hitting a massage parlor.
Ha. I thought this was going to be about bases within the US. Walk off a Navy base and you cant throw a rock without hitting a massage parlor.
It's been like a thing since the first organized armies. Who do you think was in the massive camps of civilians following armies, their mom?
People paying for sex, oh the horror!
The army does this because you can't control horny soldiers. The moment you start to oppress biological sexual desires you only make matters worse. And using misogyny as the reason? Yeah how about we chop their dicks off to fix that problem! Army should hire eunuch warlords. No more misogyny and sexism!
These and many other replies in the thread, oh joy... So nobody should do anything to U.S. soldiers fucking trafficked sex slaves, because you can't oppress natural desires? Too hard just to abstain for a few months, so better fuck over people who don't have any choice in the matter.
What vile scumbaggery, and I'm saying this in the nicest manner possible.
Or maybe nobody read the OP and the link, but that's against the TOS, right?
These and many other replies in the thread, oh joy... So nobody should do anything to U.S. soldiers fucking trafficked sex slaves, because you can't oppress natural desires? Too hard just to abstain for a few months, so better fuck over people who don't have any choice in the matter.
What vile scumbaggery, and I'm saying this in the nicest manner possible.
Or maybe nobody read the OP and the link, but that's against the TOS, right?
Or maybe they are saying that prostitution is inevitable and it is the duty of the country itself to make sure it is safe and not using trafficked people. Maybe? It's certainly not as simple as 'Soldiers need to stop using prostitutes'.
I don't think anyone here is in favor of trafficking.
Same at least thats why I'm joiningI thought it was free college lol
Sure, but indifference, apathy, and 'nothing will ever change' attitudes won't fix any problems. Military can regulate every other facets of soldiers' lives, so why couldn't military police couldn't keep rampant abuse around the bases in check if there was actual will to do so? It's more likely the brass on the top view this 'vent' for the soldiers as a beneficial thing and simply don't care about the consequences.
What we need is a prostitution corps. Willing, not trafficked, men and women with access to excellent medical care to give our boys and girls the sexual relief they need. Put those traffickers out of business.
Sure, but indifference, apathy, not even checking what we're talking here to see the problems, and 'nothing will ever change' attitudes won't fix any problems. Military can regulate every other facets of soldiers' lives, so why couldn't military police couldn't keep rampant abuse around the bases in check if there was actual will to do so? It's more likely the brass on the top view this 'vent' for the soldiers as a beneficial thing and simply don't care about the consequences.
Do you want to put trackers on them, that's gonna work out greatly.Sure, but indifference, apathy, not even checking what we're talking here to see the problems, and 'nothing will ever change' attitudes won't fix any problems. Military can regulate every other facets of soldiers' lives, so why couldn't military police couldn't keep rampant abuse around the bases in check if there was actual will to do so? It's more likely the brass on the top view this 'vent' for the soldiers as a beneficial thing and simply don't care about the consequences.
That's what's blowing my mind here. Where do the incredible defensive attitudes come from when the facts about trafficking are laid out in the op article?
Do you want to put trackers on them, that's gonna work out greatly.
Because not all prostitutes are trafficked. It's often very hard to control, even here in germany where it's legal.
What we need is a prostitution corps. Willing, not trafficked, men and women with access to excellent medical care to give our boys and girls the sexual relief they need. Put those traffickers out of business.
The stories I've heard from people that were in the military. Sounds like it's worse when you're in a naval sub and finally get stationed somewhere.
You mean something like W.E.N.C.H.E.S?
These and many other replies in the thread, oh joy... So nobody should do anything to U.S. soldiers fucking trafficked sex slaves, because you can't oppress natural desires? Too hard just to abstain for a few months, so better fuck over people who don't have any choice in the matter.
What vile scumbaggery, and I'm saying this in the nicest manner possible.
Or maybe nobody read the OP and the link, but that's against the TOS, right?
Or maybe they are saying that prostitution is inevitable and it is the duty of the country itself to make sure it is safe and not using trafficked people. Maybe? It's certainly not as simple as 'Soldiers need to stop using prostitutes'.