I'd rather have pleased and relaxed soldiers than blue balled hyperstressed ones.
Yeah, what do you expect? If I was 18 and given shore leave and some stuck up officer says, "these places offer loose women, cheap sex, underage drinking and drugs along with cheap thrills, neon lighting and loud music. Do not visit them!," well, what are you supposed to do?
They should be given mandatory presentations on human trafficking and forced prostitution instead. The military is already a institution that regulates morals and this seems like just one more to add to the list.
But more important is that South Korea start taking care of it's own and stop legislating sex trafficking. I go back and forth on the idea of legalized prostitution but what is unquestioned is that the state should minimize exploitation and slavery. A place like SK can create a a semi-regulated grey zone at the very least that respects human rights.
Stay away from juicy girls.
The article is right, soldiers having sex with prostitutes in foreign lands sounds extremely unnatural. When did this phenomenon start?!
Clarify on the term "love boats". Because all sorts of things happen on Navy ships. One of the carriers(Bush I think? Was one of the East Coast carriers I know that, since I've heard several people talk about it) a few years back had a legit prostitution ring going on, while we are on the subject.
I don't know, is it? That's not what I was getting at at least. I just mean that I'd prefer to have clear-minded individuals in my squad and/or as protection instead of having to rely on raving madmen with only pussy on their minds xD I don't condone rape or anything.That is the definition of abuser logic.
Their girlfriends/wives are cheating on them at home too so it all evens out.
Their girlfriends/wives are cheating on them at home too so it all evens out.
Reality is that most likely when you join you'll see "the other world" once the bullets start flying.Isn't one of the allures of the military is to join to see the world and bang all the girls therein?
depends on the career fieldReality is that most likely when you join you'll see "the other world" once the bullets start flying.
I don't know, is it? That's not what I was getting at at least. I just mean that I'd prefer to have clear-minded individuals in my squad and/or as protection instead of having to rely on raving madmen with only pussy on their minds xD I don't condone rape or anything.
Their girlfriends/wives are cheating on them at home too so it all evens out.
This is absolute truth. When I served in the USAF, I personally knew a large handful of women who were cheating on their boyfriend/husband while he was deployed. Made me paranoid to be honest lol.
brothels forming up near military camps? Happens literally everywhere soldiers are stationed and like others have alluded to is older than recorded history.
As long as pimping isn't involved I don't see a problem.
As long as pimping isn't involved I don't see a problem.
A lot of joking around in this thread when the article explicitly says that the women involved may very well have been sex slaves and taken advantage of.
This is absolute truth. When I served in the USAF, I personally knew a large handful of women who were cheating on their boyfriend/husband while he was deployed. Made me paranoid to be honest lol.
You guys can't be real.
I'd actually argue that regulating the prostitution to make sure there's no sex-trade/human traficking involved would solve a lot of the problamic stuff going on.
Actually the smart thing was that the base commander made the drinking age 18, which cut down significantly on people leaving the base. You got to remember a lot of these soldiers are not even 21 yet.
You guys can't be real.
Reality is that most likely when you join you'll see "the other world" once the bullets start flying.
Care to explain your line of thinking please? Abuser logic is a new term for me and I don't see the problem in my reasoning. Of course, if some soldiers are married or in a relationship, having another on the side is most likely not okay even during war times.It is. And your explanation only makes it worse.
You guys can't be real.
Care to explain your line of thinking please? Abuser logic is a new term for me and I don't see the problem in my reasoning. Of course, if some soldiers are married or in a relationship, having another on the side is most likely not okay even during war times.
But at issue are also the broader American military culture, and the sexism and patriarchy found in the United States, Korea and much of the world. The behavior of men who take advantage of exploitative sex industries is often excused as a matter of boys will be boysas merely natural behavior for male soldiers. In fact, theres little about the behavior thats natural. Men on military bases and women in camptowns find themselves in a highly unnatural situation, one thats been created by a series of decisions made over time (mostly by male military and government officials). Those decisions have created a predominantly male military environment, where womens visible presence is overwhelmingly reduced to one role: sex.
Ah, hell no, that's far from what I meant :/ I understand it might've sounded like that, given the thread context, sorry. I was thinking of sex with mutual consent, like if the soldiers happened to meet a girl at the club or something. Prostitution is rarely voluntary of course. Although I stand by my statement that I'd still prefer clearheaded soldiers having my back, it can't be regardless of how that's achieved. Trafficking is never okay.So, from the OP:
You're okay with trafficking and the abuse of women for sex work as long as soldiers get their rocks off?
The abuse is primarily due to the combination of greed and the lack of regulation of the sex industry, or even enforcement of the laws on the books. The demand is going to be there as long as people have both dicks and money. As has been the case for several millennia. Prostitution is estimated to be a 10+ billion dollar industry in SK alone, and there aren't enough foreign soldiers around to even represent a sizable fraction of that revenue.So, from the OP:
You're okay with trafficking and the abuse of women for sex work as long as soldiers get their rocks off?