SantaC
Member
Intel CEO Gelsinger Says AMD Is "In the Rear-View Mirror" After Alder Lake
The war of words escalates.
They kill Intel's CPUs in their 30% market cornerEhh grim what I’ve heard the new AMD cpus absolutely destroys intel’s offering.. but that’s just hearsay at this point.
Ehh from what I’ve heard the new AMD cpus absolutely destroys intel’s offering.. but that’s just hearsay at this point.
As this thread already shows, AMD haters will believe anything.If he was correct that would be one thing. But he's not correct so he just comes off as a delusional idiot.
At what power draw?Well it’s cool to see Intel with a bit of a fighting spirit.
AMD kind of poked a dragon. It took 3 gens of Ryzen on the best foundry node on earth to surpass a 14+++++++++++++++nm. I mean, great for both sides, but the engineers at Intel are fucking insanely good at what they can put in transistor density on a problematic node. Can’t imagine how it’ll go with TSMC 5nm (and they are securing for 3nm).
Bring on a much needed CPU war.
You guys are so into the “nm” naming game. Intel should just call their next node “-854nm” to impress people like Larogue who fall for naming conventions like “mega super plus pro MAX”Zen 4 coming later this year using TSMC's N5P node (world's best silicon, period).
It will be a bloodbath against Intel's 13th gen 10nm+++
Intel already did that last year.You guys are so into the “nm” naming game. Intel should just call their next node “-854nm” to impress people like Larogue who fall for naming conventions like “mega super plus pro MAX”
Yeah that is my current take after looking into a new CPU/Cooler/mobo/memory option for my PC.Ehh from what I’ve heard the new AMD cpus absolutely destroys intel’s offering.. but that’s just hearsay at this point.
Apple M1 is really impressive.Mostly the confidence is coming from Raptor and Lunar lake CPU.
Intel biggest hurdle is Apple performance per watt figure which will take few years.
I dunno, they (Intel) should probably start to produce 7nm processors first.AMD as a company is still nothing compared to Intel. When Intel will start producing 3nm CPUs using TSMC fabs, around 2023, AMD will go back to insignificance.
Intel's process is actually more dense than AMD's. So essentially even at 1nm, Intel's 5nm will be competitive.I dunno, they (Intel) should probably start to produce 7nm processors first.
I wonder if Intel will have some features in their GPU that would allow to leverage e-cores.But in the desktop space, most of us would rather go 12P (or more) with zero E cores, and instead use a % of a GPU for DirectStorage decompression. The price tiers for these chips in desktop don't make sense to me to be charging a premium for the unimpressive E cores and certainly is making me consider going AMD for the first time ever.
This right here is called delusional fanboy drivel.AMD as a company is still nothing compared to Intel. When Intel will start producing 3nm CPUs using TSMC fabs, around 2023, AMD will go back to insignificance.
people don't realize how Intel is big compared to AMD. Intel actually sold more CPUs in 2021 than 2020 but at a lesser price.This right here is called delusional fanboy drivel.
people don't realize how Intel is big compared to AMD. Intel actually sold more CPUs in 2021 than 2020 but at a lesser price.
AMD is still made out of clay, its sudden surge may fade away as quick as it came.
net income for 2021,
intel: $20 billions
amd: $3 billions
Nm branding means absolutely nothing now. This has been mentioned multiple times. Density and performance figures are more important than NM brandingI dunno, they (Intel) should probably start to produce 7nm processors first.