Popped in to comment on this. iOS 6 feels really inconsistent across the board in terms of its visual aesthetic. Some things like the Music app and Phone dial buttons have adopted the new white gradient look while others have remained with the glossy looking buttons/skinning of previous versions, and sometimes there's even a clash of styles within the same app.
Makes everything look sloppy and hacked together, they need to better unify the style across the OS.
Yup. I think the main issue is the bottom navbar. You see the itunes/app stores and music app adopt a new 'pushed button' style with the buttons being squared matte, but then other apps using the pushed outward/curved gloss style with rounded square overlay buttons. That's the main issue.
On the topic of the music app and the phone though, it's weird because they adopted the white gradient look for the keypad, but then go ahead to the contacts list and you still have that grey alphabetical arrangement, with transparent separators and all that. Why not just use the music alphabetical view for some consistency with the keypad? It's just a mess.
The default assets should be pinned down, as it really is a clash between the old gloss and the new matte. All the apps should adopt the new navbar look, as well as the music app's listing view. Just jumping between the phone app, to the photos app, to the videos app, then to the music app, really illustrates how clashing it all is.
Can't view your own account with that Jasmine app? Inferior youtube experience confirmed.
Popped in to comment on this. iOS 6 feels really inconsistent across the board in terms of its visual aesthetic. Some things like the Music app and Phone dial buttons have adopted the new white gradient look while others have remained with the glossy looking buttons/skinning of previous versions, and sometimes there's even a clash of styles within the same app.
Makes everything look sloppy and hacked together, they need to better unify the style across the OS.
Yeah a lot of common sense repurposed applications have been completely overlooked, just like how they could have used the new keypad buttons in the Phone app and applied them to the lock screen passcode keypad.
One that bothers me the most (as I see it most frequently) is Music, seeing the new matte and metallic-looking buttons in-app vs. the old glossy ones when controlling music from the lock screen is annoying. It really is a bit of a joke in some spots, for as much as Apple touts their UI design.
Honestly, i'd be fine with the lock screen being the only place that retains the glossy elements. It's outdated anyway, but they're certainly not going to get rid of the gloss there, so no need to update it.Yeah a lot of common sense repurposed applications have been completely overlooked, just like how they could have used the new keypad buttons in the Phone app and applied them to the lock screen passcode keypad.
One that bothers me the most (as I see it most frequently) is Music, seeing the new matte and metallic-looking buttons in-app vs. the old glossy ones when controlling music from the lock screen is annoying. It really is a bit of a joke in some spots, for as much as Apple touts their UI design.
Yup. Jasmine is awesome. Worst part about it is the app icon. :/
I still can't believe it's the exact same shit as the beta. Such a conflict. The black gloss does not flow well at all with the gradient blue textures or the 'soft' white buttons. smh
I'm on a 4...I don't see the option to Tap to Post to Facebook in Notification center.
what am I missing?
Did you enter your Facebook login info?
Settings > Facebook > enter your login info.
It means you haven't downloaded the episode and possibly you are not connected to the Internet. Or you need to manually close the app from memory.Dude, fuck the podcast app. Anytime I even TRY to listen to a show, it just keeps on skipping through the entire library on loop. So ridiculous.
Flyover is a great feature. I don't get people who keep posting screenshots of its limitations and places where it didn't turn out right and say "Huh huh, Apple fail."
Flyover is a great feature. I don't get people who keep posting screenshots of its limitations and places where it didn't turn out right and say "Huh huh, Apple fail."
It's entertaining spinning Toronto around via the CN Tower.
Otherwise, I don't think I'd ever use flyover for anything practical.
Havin a weird problem. I can sync all my songs, but the actual playlists don't show up.
Not using iTunes Match, if that's what you mean. When I expand my iPhone 5 in the iTunes Devices list, it shows my playlists. They're just not showing up in the Music app. Argh.Assuming you're using iCloud for your music then I had the same problem during the beta, I fixed it by renaming my playlists and then renaming them back to whatever they originally were.
Yeah, exactly my feelings.Yup. Jasmine is awesome. Worst part about it is the app icon. :/
But you need iPhoto or Aperture for that, right? And do I need to choose "Backup with icloud" in itunes?
Dude, fuck the podcast app. Anytime I even TRY to listen to a show, it just keeps on skipping through the entire library on loop. So ridiculous.
Flyover is a great feature. I don't get people who keep posting screenshots of its limitations and places where it didn't turn out right and say "Huh huh, Apple fail."
What? It's not just for giant skyscrapers you know. It really helped me visualize even the smallest of builds like CVS stores or small restaurants. To say it's worthless because it can't help you identify anything just isn't true. I like the feature, being from houston it's pretty neat to dive into places you've been and places you were going to go, etc. I think it is a useful feature, and not a total throwaway as you're making it out to be. I don't get the hate for the sake of hate, tbh. It's actually pretty amazing.I'm still not sure if people actually believe this, or just think that they should believe this. The feature reminds me of google earth in delivering aome initial wow factor when viewing a few places you know. But it's so limited in scope it is barely worth mentioning. And I sincerely doubt it will help anyone find anything since outside key landmarks seeing the size of a random building seems worthless. I wonder how many resources apple will spend to provide fly over for just their iOS devices
This podcast app is horrid. I don't know what compelled Apple to separate podcasts from the rest of the music app. It organizes the podcasts out of order and doesn't continually play once the previous podcast ends. Fuck, this app is awful.
Flyover is a great feature. I don't get people who keep posting screenshots of its limitations and places where it didn't turn out right and say "Huh huh, Apple fail."
It's one thing to be amazed by a tech demo, another to actually have the demo in your hands and finding utility or worth in it. So yes, how they're able to reconstitute 3D data out of 2D imagery is amazing, but is it really the massive improvement over what's already available via Google Maps as they claimed? In an area with dense, tall buildings like NYC the feature is practically worthless for most.Sentry said:I love how back when we had a reel of the company Apple acquired, showing how this tech works, everyone was aback by it and amazed, and now it's just complete trash. Flyover's ingenuity shouldn't be poo-pooed just because the maps app itself falls short in other areas. I'm not saying it's the second coming, but to say it's totally without worth is stretching it imo.
Though if I couldn't see my hometown in 3D like that, and just some random city i've never lived in, I guess I would feel it pretty useless as well. The more they expand upon it the better, obviously.
I find it both fun and useful for visualising locations. Not as useful as Streetview, but it's a feature I'd rather have than not.I'm still not sure if people actually believe this, or just think that they should believe this. The feature reminds me of google earth in delivering aome initial wow factor when viewing a few places you know. But it's so limited in scope it is barely worth mentioning. And I sincerely doubt it will help anyone find anything since outside key landmarks seeing the size of a random building seems worthless. I wonder how many resources apple will spend to provide fly over for just their iOS devices
OSM is used though:Flyover is about as awesome it was the first time you downloaded Google Earth to your device. 3D buildings! Maps! Awesome!
I uninstalled it a few days later. There's no compelling reason yet for that feature, yet they prioritized that tech over the quality of the POI data they have for their maps. I still wish they would've considered using OSM so that it'd rise up to be a very powerful opensource competitor to Google Maps. i don't know about OSM's quality outside the major cities, though.
Flyover is a great feature. I don't get people who keep posting screenshots of its limitations and places where it didn't turn out right and say "Huh huh, Apple fail."
OSM is used though:
http://gspa21.ls.apple.com/html/attribution.html
I beg to differ. Google Earth was considerably less amazing initially because only the terrain was modelled, not the buildings. I have tried it briefly with their new 3D buildings but I consistently find the gestures for the app awkward. Apple's Maps gestures feel a lot more natural to me.Flyover is about as awesome it was the first time you downloaded Google Earth to your device. 3D buildings! Maps! Awesome!
I uninstalled it a few days later. There's no compelling reason yet for that feature, yet they prioritized that tech over the quality of the POI data they have for their maps. I still wish they would've considered using OSM so that it'd rise up to be a very powerful opensource competitor to Google Maps. i don't know about OSM's quality outside the major cities, though.
It's one thing to be amazed by a tech demo, another to actually have the demo in your hands and finding utility or worth in it. So yes, how they're able to reconstitute 3D data out of 2D imagery is amazing, but is it really the massive improvement over what's already available via Google Maps as they claimed? In an area with dense, tall buildings like NYC the feature is practically worthless for most.