nVidiot_Whore
Banned
Evlar said:Depends on what you want to do, I guess... Some people were talking about streaming music from iTunes Match over 3G. 200kbps is probably too low to accomplish that without pauses. Really, any kind of streamed content will benefit from higher download speeds, i.e. pull-down maps for a navigation app, video, whatever.
Web browsing and email probably benefit little from higher speeds.
I honestly think one of the main differences could be ping time for actual web browsing.
My HSPA pings were almost always ~300.
My HSPA+ pings on my 4S are now all closer to ~200.
This thread, analyzing the HTML.. has the potential to make up to 70 requests to the server.
Now.. just for data analysis, the raw data:
70 x's 300 = 2100 milliseconds.. or 21 seconds just for the latency of each request if made synchronously.
70 x 200 = 1400 milliseconds.. or 14 seconds just for the latency of each request if made synchronously.
Now obviously the browser will make many requests at once, and the majority will only get accessed once and then cached for a time period.. but it still can make a fairly large difference.
From what I've seen Verizon 3g tests have much better ping times than AT&T's.. could make up for the lack of overall bandwidth, since the majority of those requests would probably download faster than the ping time.
The page only had 456kb total size.. so file size wise the entire site would download in barely 2 seconds even on a 1.5Mbit connection.. making bandwidth differences somewhat nominal.
