• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Is Hollywood 'whitewashing' Asian roles?

Status
Not open for further replies.

sans_pants

avec_pénis
A fair amount. People hate Tyler Perry for making movies and tv shows with black leads.

Not buying the argument of his work is not good. Because that isnt true. He is disliked mainly because he is black and putting his money into black people.

he makes shitty movies that reinforce negative stereotypes
 

LProtag

Member
Serious question here, are there any asain actor(s) and actress(es) that are recognizable(and therefore be able to draw in crowds) and fluent in english enough to take on important dramatic leading roles?

The only one I can really think of is lucy liu.

The problem is that Asian-American actors aren't given a chance to take on leading roles and often end up playing stereotypes.

See: Ken Jeong. He's in everything but his role is usually nothing more than 'crazy Asian comic relief guy'.
 

Zaptruder

Banned
Movie studios will cast people who will make them money, the sad reality is that unless it's Jackie Chan or Jet Li doing martial arts, a asian lead can't carry a film with a majority of the movie going public. Let's be real here.

This is the kind of logic used to justify repressing minorities.

People aren't getting used to seeing asians cast in those roles, ergo, we won't cast asians in those roles.

At some point, you gotta step the fuck up and stop letting the subconcious racism in society dictate your product.
 

D4Danger

Unconfirmed Member
21 is the only recent movie worth raging about, IMO. It was based on a true story with Asian-Americans in America.

I haven't read the book but was their race an important part of the story?

If not then I don't see what the big deal is. I thought the movie was ok.
 
he makes shitty movies that reinforce negative stereotypes

He doesnt.

He has one character, Madea, who is comedic in nature. Everybody runs with that and says all his work sucks. If you dont like the TBS shows, cool. But his films outside of Madea have been fine.
 

tenchir

Member
A fair amount. People hate Tyler Perry for making movies and tv shows with black leads.

Not buying the argument of his work is not good. Because that isnt true. He is disliked mainly because he is black and putting his money into black people.

I disagree. He is hated because all his movie sucks and he is not funny.
 

lenovox1

Member
Because this is the internet. Where you need to be angry about everything always.

No, you wouldn't have the biopic of Grace Kelly led by an Indian actress, for example. These were real people, in a real situation, that were really Asian American.
 

Makoto

Member
He doesnt.

He has one character, Madea, who is comedic in nature. Everybody runs with that and says all his work sucks. If you dont like the TBS shows, cool. But his films outside of Madea have been fine.
Yeah, I've watched probably more Tyler Perry media than the people who complain about him do and I agree, there's nothing really alarming about his characters.
 
I haven't read the book but was their race an important part of the story?

If not then I don't see what the big deal is. I thought the movie was ok.

. . .
I dunno, would it be a big deal if they made a movie about Muhammed Ali and cast Tom Hanks as Ali? I mean his race wasn't a important part about why he was a legendary boxer...
 
why couldn't he be black? or a dolphin?

is it important to the story?

Could be, depends on what angle they're going for. I find this kind of logic dubious though. Why must it be that if they can get away with changing the race of a character or person they will change it to white? Bankable buck? At some point you have to be disgusted at this constant prejudice.
 

legend166

Member
I can see why people get annoyed with a movie like 21 being whitewashed.

But getting angry when Hollywood adapts a foreign piece of fiction and uses white actors is just silly.
 

Korey

Member
21 is the only recent movie worth raging about, IMO. It was based on a true story with Asian-Americans in America.

Avatar: The Last Airbender is an American IP made by Americans, heavily influenced by Asian culture, using the Chinese language all over the show including the freaking logo, and the characters, while not real, are based on specific cultures...the water tribe is supposed to be like Inuits.

Anyways, it doesn't really matter if they're played by caucasians (which all the heroes happened to be, while all the villains happened to be brown skinned). The problem was in the actual production of the movie, like the casting call, they specifically asked for the leads to all be white and all the extras to be Asian and "ethnic".

That's a symptom of a big racism problem in Hollywood.
 

JdFoX187

Banned
why couldn't he be black? or a dolphin?

is it important to the story?

Considering the guy that did it is Asian...I would think that's sort of important. The movie is supposed to portray a true story. Yet, it changes a pretty big factor of that story.
 

kokujin

Banned
If it is based on a real person or is significant to the story then it's important to cast accordingly, if not then it doesn't matter.People saying Tyler Perry's works are good are batshit insane.
 

Tristam

Member
[ EXTRAS ]
Physically fit MEN & WOMEN 18-85 yr. Old – Boys & Girls 6-16 yr Old.

NEAR EASTERN, MIDDLE EASTERN, FAR EASTERN, ASIAN, MEDITERRANEAN & LATINO ETHNIC GROUPS….
No experience necessary – Martial Arts & Military Training a PLUS!

[...]

Come to our OPEN CASTING CALL, dress casually, OR in the traditional costume of your family’s ethnic background. We’ll take your photo and information -

“We want you to dress in traditional cultural ethnic attire,” [Deedee Ricketts, the casting director for the film] said. “If you’re Korean, wear a kimono. If you’re from Belgium, wear lederhosen.”

lol, is this real? Kimono is traditional dress in Japan; hanbok is traditional dress in Korea.
 
If it is based on a real person or is significant to the story then it's important to cast accordingly, if not then it doesn't matter.People saying Tyler Perry's works are good are batshit insane.

Which ones have you watched though? Not counting Madea films.
 

Nekofrog

Banned
A fair amount. People hate Tyler Perry for making movies and tv shows with black leads.

Not buying the argument of his work is not good. Because that isnt true. He is disliked mainly because he is black and putting his money into black people.

i don't know about you but i hate him because tyler perry presents a tyler perry film starring tyler perry written by tyler perry produced by tyler perry and introducing tyler perry
 

JdFoX187

Banned
Something I've been curious about in relation to this. I remember when Sony was casting for The Amazing Spider-Man, a lot of people were clamoring for Donald Glover to be cast as Peter Parker. When Marvel Studios was looking for Steve Rogers, some were bringing up Will Smith's name, among other black actors. Would such a drastic shift toward the opposite way be any better?
 
Something I've been curious about in relation to this. I remember when Sony was casting for The Amazing Spider-Man, a lot of people were clamoring for Donald Glover to be cast as Peter Parker. When Marvel Studios was looking for Steve Rogers, some were bringing up Will Smith's name, among other black actors. Would such a drastic shift toward the opposite way be any better?

Well I don't consider changing the races of some comic characters necessarily a bad thing, especially since most of them are white because of when they originated.
 

Makoto

Member
Tyler Perry essentially said screw you to Hollywood and started doing his own thing. He began appealing to a market that Hollywood periodically appeals to. Perhaps the Asian-American filmmaking community should do something similar. Seriously, why wait for Hollywood to change their ways?
 

Takao

Banned
Yes.

Dragonballevolution.jpg

Hollywood whitewashes, but Dragon Ball Evolution isn't an example. You make yourself look like a joke by mentioning that film if you realize the people in it, and behind it.

but he was an alien......from another planet.......that didn't contain asia. how was he asian?

Diving deeper, the Earth in dragonball/z is very different from our Earth. Animal people were common, it didn't really contain any locations from our Earth, etc. did the Earth of DB/Z even contain an asia?

Exactly. In Dragon Ball Toriyama never, ever notes races. He calls cities "West City", and while there's Asian cultures this is the Dragon Ball earth:

qmzFX.jpg


dragonball_n201photo.jpg



Just busting your balls.... that movie was indeed whitewashed
No it wasn't. This was the cast of the film:

Master Roshi - Asian
Yamcha - Asian
Chi-Chi - Asian
Mai - Asian
Goku - White
Bulma - White
Piccolo - White

So incredibly whitewashed that two alien characters were played by white people.

This part basically illustrate how Dragon ball character becomes "white" when gaining power.. It's hard to not see this symbolism in DBZ anyway.

Akira Toriyama is a man who writes poop jokes, and was influenced by martial arts, and science fiction films. Don't look too deep in it.
 

D4Danger

Unconfirmed Member
. . .
I dunno, would it be a big deal if they made a movie about Muhammed Ali and cast Tom Hanks as Ali? I mean his race wasn't a important part about why he was a legendary boxer...

what you're describing is a film about a specific individual and yes, Muhammad Ali's race and religion are an important part his story so casting a white person would make no sense.

21 is different because it's a story 'inspired' by the events of those MIT students. Maybe that's a bullshit answer to some but their race has no impact on the story so I personally don't care what they do with it.
 

Shouta

Member
Of course Hollywood is whitewashing asian roles. It's been going on for a long time.

Anyway, Japanese draw their characters in the way they perceive themselves. It just happens to be fairly neutral looking so it can be misconstrued as white or whatever else.

Honestly, most folks see Japanese folks and think a certain type of look, usually something with smaller eyes. Most folks are familiar with Ken Watanabe or Hiroyuki Sanada who looks somewhat like everyone's image of a Japanese person is.

ken-watanabe-2.jpg

tumblr_kxlsi0lAau1qzkrup.jpg


However, there are Japanese folks like Hiroshi Abe or Ken Hirai. Not quite the same as Watanabe or Sanada.

0002519r

b.jpg


Then of course there's Toshinobu Kubota.

TOSHINOBU-KUBOTA.jpg
 

Chiave

Member
I don't even watch movies anymore. Not because of whitewashing in particular, but because films in general are just too unbelievable and boring for me to enjoy. I don't understand how just an actor can compel someone to pay to see a film.
 

Slavik81

Member
I blame audiences who will go see movies just for an actor. We'd be better off with a more diverse set of less recognizable actors rather than a small collection of superstars.
 
It's definitely a problem, sure. Still, I like Jeff Ma's quote, "I would have been a lot more insulted if they had chosen someone who was Japanese or Korean, just to have an Asian playing me." Because that's more shameful than a business decision. Simply calling for an "Asian" actor is a bit uninformed, or lazily practicing political correctness; as if a blanket asian actor is close enough. It's like the fan casting for Prince of Persia. "Get one of the dark skinned actors from Lost or Heroes!"


Also, regarding the anime thing. Caucasian characters are often drawn differently than the regular (Japanese) characters. Sometimes in weirdly overt ways.
 

JdFoX187

Banned
Well I don't consider changing the races of some comic characters necessarily a bad thing, especially since most of them are white because of when they originated.

There'd only be two I would have a problem with. I think Superman's image is so iconic that changing it just wouldn't work. Nothing prejudicial or anything like that, but it's so ingrained in our society. The other would be Captain America. This one would be the one time where changing his race would completely screw up the origin story considering how black soldiers were treated at that time. There's no way one would ever be selected for a project of such importance in the 1940s.

I know there was a minor backlash when Jeffrey Wright was cast as Felix Leiter in the last two Bond films, despite the fact Wright is an extremely capable actor. As long as the race fits in with the setting and makeup of the story, I have no problem what race the actors are. But something like 21 completely changing the main character is ridiculous. It's not like the film was destined to do that well anyway. Hell, it could have been the launching pad for a young Asian actor.

I blame audiences who will go see movies just for an actor. We'd be better off with a more diverse set of less recognizable actors rather than a small collection of superstars.
Actually, outside of Johnny Depp, possibly Will Smith and post-renaissance Tom Cruise, there are no real bankable stars in Hollywood anymore. It's all about whether the property well sell.
 

lenovox1

Member
Tyler Perry essentially said screw you to Hollywood and started doing his own thing. He began appealing to a market that Hollywood periodically appeals to. Perhaps the Asian-American filmmaking community should do something similar. Seriously, why wait for Hollywood to change their ways?

They do. There are multiple Asian American film festivals all over the country every year. Tyler Perry had Lionsgate and Oprah on his side, there hasn't really been a heavy hitter to promote Asian American work just yet.
 

Makoto

Member
It's definitely a problem, sure. Still, I like Jeff Ma's quote, "I would have been a lot more insulted if they had chosen someone who was Japanese or Korean, just to have an Asian playing me." Because that's more shameful than a business decision. Simply calling for an "Asian" actor is a bit uninformed, or lazily practicing political correctness; as if a blanket asian actor is close enough. It's like the fan casting for Prince of Persia. "Get one of the dark skinned actors from Lost or Heroes!"
This is what I found most interesting about the controversy surrounding that film.
 
Plenty. Two I can think of off the top of my head are John Cho (Harold and Kumar) and Suzie Q (Nikita)

Um... Maggie Q? Suzie Q's are the snack cakes. Edit: Nevermind, you fixed it.

Being Korean-American, I really don't have a problem with adaptations (i.e. Akira)from an Asian standpoint. From a creative standpoint, it's the same thing I feel when I hear that Hollywood wants to remake "Oldboy" with Will Smith, or they want to recreate "JSA" using the Mexican-American border as a reference. Clearly, these adaptations/remakes will probably miss the mark, but I feel the same way when I hear that Hollywood wants to remake say "Death at a Funeral," or "Taxi." I think it's pointless but this stems more from being a film buff then anything.

The example that really does make me somewhat angry from an ethnic standpoint was 21. This was a true story where the vast majority of the team WAS Asian-American, and Hollywood blatantly white-washed it, while having the only Asian-American leads be relegated to schtick players. Considering that the fact that they were Asian played somewhat of a role in the whole ruse, the fact that they dropped it showed Hollywood's perception of "unmarketability" of Asians.
 

3dmodeler

Member
Something I've been curious about in relation to this. I remember when Sony was casting for The Amazing Spider-Man, a lot of people were clamoring for Donald Glover to be cast as Peter Parker. When Marvel Studios was looking for Steve Rogers, some were bringing up Will Smith's name, among other black actors. Would such a drastic shift toward the opposite way be any better?

Donald Glover mentioned this in Marc Maron's podcast and he made some really strong arguments on why Spiderman would work if he was black. Of course the studios weren't serious about casting him as spiderman but the funny thing was that Donald actually got death threats at the for even suggesting that there be a black spiderman.
 

Alucrid

Banned
Eh, at the end of the day as long as the movie is good I don't really care to be honest. If I had to choose between whitewashed Hollywood movies or an Asian Tyler Perry equivalent I would probably take the former.
 

JdFoX187

Banned
Donald Glover mentioned this in Marc Maron's podcast and he made some really strong arguments on why Spiderman would work if he was black. Of course the studios weren't serious about casting him as spiderman but the funny thing was that Donald actually got death threats at the for even suggesting that there be a black spiderman.

I'm a big comic geek, and I wouldn't have a problem with a black person, whether he be Donald Glover or someone else, playing the character. By his character, Parker is a guy that everyone could relate to. Being black wouldn't change anything. He'd still be a kid from New York that got incredible powers. Sure, there's wanting to stick as close to the character as possible. But if you're going to cast Garret Hedlund, the most bland and uncharismatic white dude this side of Channing Tatum, in Akira, why not Donald Glover as Spider-Man?
 

Zoe

Member
I haven't read the book but was their race an important part of the story?

If not then I don't see what the big deal is. I thought the movie was ok.

IIRC, sometimes their scam included acting as foreign Asian high rollers.
 

Tristam

Member
The Last Airbender is a problem because even in the animated style, most of the characters are clearly not caucasian. And there was that great image that went around about how Aang is actually drawn very Asian, but looks "white" to people with a terrible stereotype about Asian appearance.

With anime, it's an old issue that some folks don't know the full story behind. Anime and manga designers started using what is taken to be the "japanese" style to differentiate their characters from one another in a large cast, and manga being mostly black and white caused them to design characters who read best with light complexions.

Plus as observed upthread, anime/manga is simplified and we all read our own race and face into simplified representations. There are a number of common anime facial archtypes that are clearly not caucasian even if their skin is portrayed as being light. The issue is further clouded in that in contemporary times, many Japanese character designers try to blend features of many races together, so that their characters may have international appeal.

But there's also this classic video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKTvFhRbBt8

Good post and good video. The 'eyes' comparison in the video was pretty silly though, since they compared pictures of Western men SQUINTING INTO THE SUN to photoshoot pictures of Japanese women who may well have had some form of eye surgery.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom