I can't believe people actually think like this.
I can't believe (insert something snobby here).
I can't believe people actually think like this.
And regarding Brady, the only thing I need to know about his Super Bowl record is this: Prior to the Patriots getting caught and fined for filming opponent walkthroughs, Brady won 4. Since they were caught and fined, he's won 0. I don't find this coincidental...
They went undefeated in the regular season after getting caught and only lost in the Super Bowl because of one of the most ridiculously lucky plays of all time with the Tyree catch.
What a bunch of garbage.
3 not 4.
And regarding Brady, the only thing I need to know about his Super Bowl record is this: Prior to the Patriots getting caught and fined for filming opponent walkthroughs, Brady won 4. Since they were caught and fined, he's won 0. I don't find this coincidental...
And regarding Brady, the only thing I need to know about his Super Bowl record is this: Prior to the Patriots getting caught and fined for filming opponent walkthroughs, Brady won 4. Since they were caught and fined, he's won 0. I don't find this coincidental...
Fine, let's just throw out Super Bowl rings, because I guess if they don't work in your favor they don't matter. I wonder why any team bothers with the super bowl, it seems to mean jack shit to some of you.
Fine, let's just throw out Super Bowl rings, because I guess if they don't work in your favor they don't matter. I wonder why any team bothers with the super bowl, it seems to mean jack shit to some of you.
Take the 1989 Super Bowl against the Cincinnati Bengals. The San Francisco 49ers were down by three points with 3:20 left when Montana spotted -- no, not an open receiver -- but a personality. "There, in the stands, standing near the exit ramp," Montana said to tackle Harris Barton. "Isn't that John Candy?" And then he led the 49ers 92 yards, throwing for the winning touchdown with 34 seconds left.
No, we should put that onus on one player out of 56 on a team. That makes more sense. Because, of course, the QB is responsible for tackling, special teams, FGs and all blocking.
Football. It's a one person sport.
Maybe it's just me, but I don't care about rings at all when looking at an individual player. It's a team sport. Look at someone like Adrian Peterson. He's one of the best RBs in the league, but he's not going to even make the playoffs because his team is so poor.
It's not a one person sport, but without a good QB you're not going anywhere.
Also if say Michael Jordan has never won a championship, but had all the same stats, do you think people would still think he's the greatest?
Trent Dilfer wasn't good, barely average.It's not a one person sport, but without a good QB you're not going anywhere.
Also if say Michael Jordan has never won a championship, but had all the same stats, do you think people would still think he's the greatest?
Nah bro. Kevin Faulk is GOAT. He's got like, 4 rings.
Basketball is not football. MJ played all sides of the ball. Call me when Brady or Peyton are playing D every game.
Keep moving them goal posts.
Brady loses points because of one thing. When he went down, the team still won 11 games. When Peyton went down, the Colts won 1.
Peyton>Montana>Brady>Marino
In discussion: Elway, Favre, Young
No, we should put that onus on one player out of 56 on a team. That makes more sense. Because, of course, the QB is responsible for tackling, special teams, FGs and all blocking.
Football. It's a one person sport.
...you don't understand what that phrase means, football, or basketball, it seems.
Nether do you it seems. You go from saying Payton was the colts reason for winning, to it's a team sport. You just say whatever you have to win.
1. John Elway
2. Dan Marino
3. Joe Montana
4. Peyton Manning
5. Brett Favre
...
xx. Eli Manning
...
xx. Jay Cutler
xx. Christian Ponder
xx. Tom Brady
Maybe it's just me, but I don't care about rings at all when looking at an individual player. It's a team sport. Look at someone like Adrian Peterson. He's one of the best RBs in the league, but he's not going to even make the playoffs because his team is so poor.
Fine, let's just throw out Super Bowl rings, because I guess if they don't work in your favor they don't matter. I wonder why any team bothers with the super bowl, it seems to mean jack shit to some of you.
He's clearly the best of his era, and I find the rings argument pretty silly considering the circumstances that go into the winning of each one. There's so many factors outside the QB's control.
Besides, he took a fucking Jim Caldwell team to the Super Bowl.
Brady cheated. Sorry, he doesn't belong on ANY list, nonetheless the hall of fame.
He should have been banned from the sport a long time ago, along with Belicheat.
Jim Caldwell was responsible for a character from Sesame Street having the greatest postseason in NFL history.He's clearly the best of his era, and I find the rings argument pretty silly considering the circumstances that go into the winning of each one. There's so many factors outside the QB's control.
Besides, he took a fucking Jim Caldwell team to the Super Bowl.
It's not a one person sport, but without a good QB you're not going anywhere.
Also if say Michael Jordan has never won a championship, but had all the same stats, do you think people would still think he's the greatest?
You can't honestly think what they did was unique to them.
Steve Young is the greatest ever.
Looks like Dexter morphed with a younger Arnold.
Steve Young is the greatest ever.
in what world are the 2000s colts not a well run franchise? or was this sarcasm?
The one where they had the best QB in the league and failed miserably in the post season?
Let's be honest though. The Broncos will find a way to fuck up in the playoffs and Manning will be called a choker no matter his personal stats