mrklaw said:
I liked it. Watching interviews with the exec. producer (and main writer), its pitched firmly at this generations 6-9 year olds, with nods and winks to their dads.
What offends me most about this claim is that they weren't saying that when it went into production. Clearly they've decided that a kid audience is all it's good for. The effects are nonsense, the writing laughable and the story a total joke. The acting in everyone (except the leads, Ecclestone and Piper did very well considering what they were given) was DREADFUL.
I think people saying 'well, that's how it was back then!' are kidding themselves, because, frankly, it wasn't. There was no Stan Winston back when Dr Who hit big, no Lucas, no Spielberg. So Dr Who pioneered the use of costumes, make up and bluescreen on the BBC, or a CGI opening sequence - no other shows had done it, back then it was unheard of and particularly exciting to see. It was the UK's equivalent of Star Trek TOS, if you will. Cut to now and somehow we've got exactly the same thing. I'm sorry, where's the evidence of this huge (in UK terms) budget? They've shot it on video, and it shows. Even the last series of the League Of Gentlemen was shot on film.
And that's without going into the plot errors and other poor production work on show in the pilot.
Apparently, it hits its stride from the next ep onwards - I should bloody hope so.