Gameplay aside, if you're tacking numbers on the end, I think the public is going to view it as a sequel. We can argue what makes the game a sequel as far as the gameplay/developer/whatever goes, but at the end of the day, I think Mega Man 2 can, for all intents and purposes, be said to be the sequel to Mega Man, just as Goldeneye 2 is to Goldeneye...in name alone, if nothing else.
This thread is about sequels...not games based on the same liscense that plays NOTHING like the game it's based on and is more in common with one of the most overrated and overhyped games this generation
Not that it counts, but I'd love to see a REAL Back to the Future game, on a current console - that was like the movies with delorean and all that fun stuff. It'd rock, It'd rock hard.
I think it's a great example regardless if it itself was a sequel. I don't recall there being any rules stating that the game had to be an original title. Sequels can still get more sequels as we all know. DOTT was an awesome game that did very well for LA back in the day. There have always been rumors of DOTT2 but nothing's ever materialized unfortunately (and probably never will considering their new stance on this genre).
I think it's a great example regardless if it itself was a sequel. I don't recall there being any rules stating that the game had to be an original title.