GiantEnemyGoomba
Member
Glad to finally confirm that I am in fact a liberal college student.

I think his Socialist views will come under fire from most Tea Party activists but that's a fight I'm ready to get behind.
Bernie is going to have to figure out a way to appeal to moderate conservatives if he wants to become President. Wanting to raise minimum wage and increase corporate tax rates isn't going to make that very easy.
The thing about illegal immigration in the US is that the US image in many third and second world countries is one of great prosperity where everybody's rich. As a result we get a bunch of people who try to get in the US any way possible, and as most of the legal routes are literally backlogged by years (I've heard several lines are like 17 years long) many come across illegally. Most illegal immigrants struggle immensely to make a living, and when you dig into the topic you hear a lot of heartbreaking stories--a seven year old boy sent by his parents to escape crime ridden Central America, a father who hasn't seen his children in 10 years but sends them most of the money he makes in the US, stuff like that. I personally believe we should have less restrictive borders, let more people in regardless of their abilities to work in the US (iirc our current system prioritizes those with higher education and more work related skills) and allow those who enter the US a path to citizenship no matter how they entered, but a combination of racism and fear that lower income labor will decrease the number of available jobs already available in the US is what prevents those changes from happening. I'm sure there's also good economic-based arguments that show that illegal immigration is a very bad thing, but the only one I've heard of is that one Heritage Foundation study that willingly ignored any economic benefit from an increased population and focused on how illegal immigrants, if they were to become legal, would increase government spending.
I didn't know the future was in stone
The party is not what it used to be. It is in name only. Nothing elseI grew up in a pretty Republican family. Although, they don't really identify with some of the crazier Republicans recently.
It's shocking to see how my views have changed over the years. I'm 94% aligned with Bernie Sanders and 84% with Hilary Clinton. I never would have expected that of me 5 years ago. The lowest for me was Ted Cruz.
The party is not what it used to be. It is in name only. Nothing else
Why libertarians?
My father took the test & got 90% Rubio. Not surprising since he is pretty hardcore Republican.
The thought is the immigrants can do what they want, but the government shouldn't exert extra effort to accommodate them should they choose not to learn English.I was randomly looking through some of the comparisons and this one seems weird.
Why libertarians?
Most of the Republicans here are getting Rubio. He has more weight and momentum going into the primaries than I expected, and Bush will have a bit of a run for his money with him.
Then vote for Bernie, and if Hillary wins votefor her at nationals![]()
If only Bernie had a chance in hell I'd vote for him with no hesitation. Hillary it is.
Oh well, I love Hillary, I'm just not 'in love' with her like I am Bernie.
I didn't think it would be that high for Bernie for me. I knew I supported him but not to that extent. I got 97% Green Party too which I don't really know much about.
So being petty?The thought is the immigrants can do what they want, but the government shouldn't exert extra effort to accommodate them should they choose not to learn English.
True. One of my criminal justice professors always used a salad as a better comparison.I also want to point out that "melting pot of diversity" makes no sense, either. In a melting pot, characteristics blend together, so there is a single sludge that fuses all characteristics.
![]()
If only Bernie had a chance in hell I'd vote for him with no hesitation. Hillary it is.
Oh well, I love Hillary, I'm just not 'in love' with her like I am Bernie.
I was randomly looking through some of the comparisons and this one seems weird.
Why libertarians?
I actually agree with having everyone learn English.
But at the same time, there needs to be considerable and abundant free options to help learn it, and adequate time allotted.
Yeah, this was the position I took as well.
Surprised, Hillary is my highest at 77%, followed by Rubio at 73 and Sanders at 70.
I'm kind of proud to not be a part of the 95%+ for any candidate, especially Sanders. I feel like you can only get 95%+ results if you are super ideological, close-minded, or non-pragmatic (or in regards to Sanders, especially naive). But that's just my opinion.
Because if he wins the primaries, he'll get slaughtered in the general. It's too important to have the next president fit your views (and pick Supreme Court justices) to risk running a guy who is going to run something like a third party campaign, even if he fits with your views.I don't understand this line of thinking at all and it seems really common which is super upsetting. Why would you not vote for Bernie at the primaries and then Hilary at nationals if she ends up beating Bernie?
Then vote for Bernie, and if Hillary wins votefor her at nationals
How hard is that?
I don't understand this line of thinking at all and it seems really common which is super upsetting. Why would you not vote for Bernie at the primaries and then Hilary at nationals if she ends up beating Bernie?
Because if he wins the primaries, he'll get slaughtered in the general. It's too important to have the next president fit your views (and pick Supreme Court justices) to risk running a guy who is going to run something like a third party campaign, even if he fits with your views.
With the way the Republican field is shaping up (outside of Jeb), I think he could hold his own in the general. I agree he would lose handily against Jeb though. Of course it's all moot.
Because if he wins the primaries, he'll get slaughtered in the general. It's too important to have the next president fit your views (and pick Supreme Court justices) to risk running a guy who is going to run something like a third party campaign, even if he fits with your views.
If Bernie beats Hillary he can beat anybody. Its a moot point regardless, because he's not beating Hillary.
Because if he wins the primaries, he'll get slaughtered in the general. It's too important to have the next president fit your views (and pick Supreme Court justices) to risk running a guy who is going to run something like a third party campaign, even if he fits with your views.
You just called like 75 percent of the people in this thread close-minded and naive.
Actually in general I consider myself very open minded despite hitting Sanders with 95. I almost can always see two sides to every issue. It just so happens the way Sanders sees things is currently how I see things as well. You might have a point if I knew all of the stances Sanders had and purposely agreed with them but I actually I didn't really because Sanders is actually new to me. I just voted how I felt and it aligned. It sounds like many others did the exact same thing that got a 95.