LOS ANGELES A five-studio tug of war has broken out over James Bond.
For more than a decade, starting with Casino Royale in 2006, the superspy series has been based at Sony Pictures Entertainment. It has been a period of stability and prosperity for 007, as global ticket sales reached new heights. The four Bond films that Sony has released collected $3.5 billion at the worldwide box office, after adjusting for inflation.
But Sonys contract to market and distribute the films expired in 2015 with Spectre. So the two companies that control the franchise but do not distribute their own films Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer and the family-run Eon Productions have started attending dog and pony shows put on by studios that want the rights, according to five people briefed on the sessions, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss private conversations.
On Tuesday, for instance, leaders at Sony spent an hour making their case. Kazuo Hirai, the chief executive, helped give the pitch, which emphasized the studios deep knowledge of Bond and its ideas for expanding the franchises reach. In true Hollywood fashion, Sony gave its presentation inside a sound stage on a recreated set from Dr. No, which was released in the United States in 1963 by United Artists and laid the foundation for the entire series.
Why, then, do studios want to distribute Bond so badly? Bragging rights, mostly. Having a Bond movie on the schedule guarantees at least one hit in a business where there is almost no sure thing.
Bond is gargantuan: The 25 movies have taken in nearly $6 billion at the North American box office, after adjusting for inflation, according to Box Office Mojo. The series has generated billions more in overseas ticket sales, home entertainment revenue, television reruns, marketing partnerships (Omega watches, Aston Martin cars, Gillette razors) and video games.
yes singlehandedly because of sophie marceau...is it though?
...is it though?
I liked it. But I also thought that Die Another Day was pretty good...Up untill the exact moment Halle Berry appeared on the screen. It's weird how the movie turned just that fast.
I also watched For Your Eyes Only for Roger last week.
Me too. The Cortina d'Ampezzo part actually made me kinda sad because I used to go skiing in Dolomites with my family almost every year as a kid, but I haven't in a good few years.
Still waiting for Craig to sign on aren't they?What the hell is going on with Bond 25?
What the hell is going on with Bond 25?
What the hell is going on with Bond 25?
But Waltz is so good. Just abandon all the family stuff and have the pre credit scene be him escaping.
Waltz is a great actor, but this Blofeld is a terribly written character and detracted from the movie.
I feel like there is an interesting dynamic to mine in Blofeld being Bond's prisoner -- and an actual prisoner, no more of this I-planned-to-be-locked-up mastermind shtick -- and Bond needing to, say, protect Blofeld from potential assassins because he has valuable intel...on something. I'm not sure I really trust the writers on this franchise to squeeze a good plot out of that though.
But Waltz is so good. Just abandon all the family stuff and have the pre credit scene be him escaping.
I feel like there is an interesting dynamic to mine in Blofeld being Bond's prisoner -- and an actual prisoner, no more of this I-planned-to-be-locked-up mastermind shtick -- and Bond needing to, say, protect Blofeld from potential assassins because he has valuable intel...on something. I'm not sure I really trust the writers on this franchise to squeeze a good plot out of that though.
This is a really good plot. Bond will have to protect Blofeld not only from assassins but also MI-6 as well, which will make Bond stand directly against M.I feel like there is an interesting dynamic to mine in Blofeld being Bond's prisoner -- and an actual prisoner, no more of this I-planned-to-be-locked-up mastermind shtick -- and Bond needing to, say, protect Blofeld from potential assassins because he has valuable intel...on something. I'm not sure I really trust the writers on this franchise to squeeze a good plot out of that though.
I'm sure somebody is working on it. There's people at EON who's only job is to make these bond films happen.Still no word on what's going on with the Bond distribution rights? Last we heard they were going up for auction after they elapsed with Sony back in April.
The franchise seems to have gone into total limbo.
Fingers crossed they don't lazily kill off Madeline Swann either to echo Tracy/OHMSS.
Nope. I think they'll avoid it. Vesper is already his ghost.This is almost certainly going to happen.
Why single out the Philippines? There's a million beaches around the world theyve never touchedCome to think of it, are there any guidelines for which cities the production chooses for the Bond movies? Will it have to be set in a place that pays for some of the filming? Because I wonder why they've never been filming in any of the Philippines' 7000+ exotic beaches.
Because I am half Filipino. There's some bias there, and I would love to see my country represented in a franchise that I love so dearly. I was literally up in arms when Bourne visited Manila lol.Why single out the Philippines? There's a million beaches around the world theyve never touched.
It's certainly doable. They will probably just spin off Felix and introduce a female agent who will get a spin off as well.
It's not that exciting of an idea. You just have multiple spy franchises under the Bond banner instead of just one.
ThisThey already have one they can use
![]()
But I think it's an awful idea when they can't even maintain the quality of ONE Bond movie with the main character. Spectre was garbage
Interesting idea. Three-ten To Yuma plus Bond? I can see that working. Would also work with my above idea if Bond strikes a deal with Oberhauser to get him to safety in exchange for the location and activities of the real Blofeld.
So there is still zero concrete info on a new Bond?
Why is this taking so long?