• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

James Bond: Blood Stone |OT| 00-fficial 7hread

dark10x said:
Seems extra harsh. The actual footage they show of the game actually looks very compelling (much more than the Goldeneye game).
Got to agree, but I'm waiting on a handful of reviews because if the good bits center around driving chases which last maybe an hour or two and the rest of lacklustre fight scenes then there's no way I'm taking a risk on it. I don't know why they bothered adding the multiplayer, either.
 

jett

D-Member
That score seems unnecessarily harsh, glossing over the review the writer admits that it's not a bad game at all.
 

dark10x

Digital Foundry pixel pusher
Xater said:
Score is not entirely unexpected. The Club was garbage and obviously Activision has something to hide the way they released this title.
I actually thought The Club was pretty damn fun. :\ Never understood the hate it received.
 

kodt

Banned
HamPster PamPster said:
Nope. Thinking about it maybe Moore should be on top since Moonraker is the best bond movie. So hard to choose, but theres an Off Topic thread for that

You have got to be trolling. Moonraker is arguably the worst Bond movie.

I think Sean Connery is generally accepted to be the best bond.

Moore was good, but he took the role less seriously.

Brosnan was great, but Goldeneye was really the only good bond movie he was in. TWINE was not bad.

Dalton was the worst bond.

edit: sorry for the derail.

I think I will rent this, can't spend $60 on 5 hours.
 

SapientWolf

Trucker Sexologist
Visualante said:
Game just hit Steam, 30 quid for a PC game that seems to be reviewing very badly. Also what is up with every review/preview not mentioning the PC version?

Totally not taking that risk as much as I love Bizarre.

:I
It's getting average reviews, if we're only going by IGN.
 
I don't mind if it's an average third person shooter. I'll still get it after the price drop. 5.0 seems a bit too low even if that does represent 'average' though.
 
HamPster PamPster said:
Shouldn't Goldeneye be the Pierce Brosnan of video games considering hes the best bond? (he also happens to be in it! Coincidence? I don't think so)

Yeah... I went there

hopefully your joking there bud...

HamPster PamPster said:
Nope. Thinking about it maybe Moore should be on top since Moonraker is the best bond movie. So hard to choose, but theres an Off Topic thread for that
t

your just killing me now...please stop w/the troll bait

back on topic this game is much better than 5/10
 

Dreohboy

Junior Member
Kittonwy said:
NO

NONONONONO

HELL NO

NO

NOOOOOOOO

Ummmm...

NO

Indifferent2.gif
+1

Connery...best evah.

Sad about this game. Still, when it goes on it's STEAM HOLIDAY SALE I'll pick it up for cheap.

The PC in general is SOOOOOOOOOOOORELY lacking in quality 3rd person shooters. Not happy.
 

dark10x

Digital Foundry pixel pusher
jett said:
That score seems unnecessarily harsh, glossing over the review the writer admits that it's not a bad game at all.
I feel kind of bad for the team at Bizarre. Let's be honest here, this is probably the end of Bizarre as we know it. Between this and Blur, I think Activision has no reason to keep them afloat. The situation is not dissimilar to that which Raven recently found themselves in.

Regardless of quality, this game received little to no attention from Activision marketing.
 

Seventy5

Member
Got my PS3 copy a couple hours ago, I'm digging it. I played the first mission, it was fun even after watching the whole youtube video of it. I've been playing the multiplayer since then and having a really good time. I friended two guys that are playing and partied up, it's been pretty fun. There aren't many people playing online though, and only DM games are going on. I'm anxious to try objective games, maybe after I get home from work there will be people playing. IMO, it seems a bit better than QoS online. Solid so far, I'd give the MP a 7.5, maybe an 8 if the objective modes are fun.

Also, good shit for the R2 reload. Been playing a shitload of Uncharted 2 lately, so it's been easy to adjust :lol
 

Dreohboy

Junior Member
Zenith said:
Dalton was best.

If you're talking about in that Flash Gordon movie, then ok.

If you're talking Bond...heck Daniel Craig is better than Dalton was.

Best to worst

Connery
Brosnan
Moore
Craig (even though his Casino Royale is one of my two favorite Bond films)
Dalton
.....that other guy


Waiting for the inevitable price drop on STEAM

Once the price drops I'd be happy to face off against you guys with some PC multiplayer.
 

rvy

Banned
I always find it very ironic how these reviews always bang on the animation system for every game other than Fallout. It's funny, I don't know.
 

Jive Turkey

Unconfirmed Member
LiK said:
Waiting for reviews and inevitable price drop
It'll $10 no later than 12/26/10.

Dreohboy said:
Connery
Brosnan
Moore
Craig (even though his Casino Royale is one of my two favorite Bond films)
Dalton
.....that other guy
LAZENBY! And Lazenby wasn't a bad Bond. He was just a victim of his own ego.
 
Dreohboy said:
If you're talking about in that Flash Gordon movie, then ok.

If you're talking Bond...heck Daniel Craig is better than Dalton was.

Best to worst

Connery
Brosnan
Moore
Craig (even though his Casino Royale is one of my two favorite Bond films)
Dalton
.....that other guy


Waiting for the inevitable price drop on STEAM

Once the price drops I'd be happy to face off against you guys with some PC multiplayer.

That other guy was Lazenby and he starred in one of the best Bond films of the entire series.

My list:
Connery
Dalton
Lazenby
Craig
Brosnan
Moore

Truth be told, I like them all just fine. I appreciate their different versions of the title character.
 

mik

mik is unbeatable
Dalton was my fave too. He was the least poncey--despite having some of the ponciest lines to deliver.
 
DoctorWho said:
That other guy was Lazenby and he starred in one of the best Bond films of the entire series.

My list:
Connery
Dalton
Lazenby
Craig
Brosnan
Moore

Truth be told, I like them all just fine. I appreciate their different versions of the title character.


^thats pretty much my list of best bonds too except i would move moore up a bit and keep brosnan as dead last...

its no so much he is the worst bond its just his movies were the worst scripts in the bond franchise (will never put them in my collection)
 

MiniDitka

Member
Played up to the credits which included some gunplay, a boat and car chase and I'm liking it so far. Seems like there might be a little to much hand holding but hopefully thats just because its early in the game.
 
I've finished the first two chapters. I think it's fun. Gunplay is quick and fast but you can use a lot of stealth if you want. The graphics are solid but the music is awesome. My only complaint are the driving sections. Their heavily scripted so your constantly crashing into stuff and you don't feel like much of a badass until you can remember where everything is.
 

dark10x

Digital Foundry pixel pusher
So although they are kind of ugly, are the cutscenes at least real time? Those pre-recorded scenes that always seem to show up in recent Bond games are always ugly, poorly encoded pieces of shit. That PC shot makes it seem that they are actually real time.
 

boingball

Member
HamPster PamPster said:
Shouldn't Goldeneye be the Pierce Brosnan of video games considering hes the best bond? (he also happens to be in it! Coincidence? I don't think so)

Yeah... I went there

:lol
Best joke of the day. Thanks for the laugh.
 

Stallion Free

Cock Encumbered
dark10x said:
So although they are kind of ugly, are the cutscenes at least real time? Those pre-recorded scenes that always seem to show up in recent Bond games are always ugly, poorly encoded pieces of shit. That PC shot makes it seem that they are actually real time.
Mixture, mostly pre-recorded.
 

JdFoX187

Banned
ImperialConquest said:
007 went from a top-ten-all-time game with Goldeneye... to a 5.0 on IGN with this?


Smh.
Activision got its claws into the franchise. But let's not ignore the travesties that EA put out, including Rogue Agent. Blood Stone is a hell of a lot better than what IGN says.
 
Played one game of team deathmatch online. I'm ranked 184 in the world. :lol It's alright though. It's got your standard ranking system with unlocks and it reminds me of Qos multiplayer because of the cover system.
 
Azar said:
If you don't love Dalton and The Living Daylights, you're a bad Bond fan, I say.
"We've nothing to declare!" :D

I can respect anyone that picks Connery, Dalton, or Craig as their favorite Bond. Pierce was excellent as well (and probably "my" Bond), but he only one one really stand-out movie, unfortunately. Lazenby did a great job with what he had, but you can't become the best if you've only got one movie to his name. Moore...not a huge fan of his Bond. No sir.
 
DoctorWho said:
That other guy was Lazenby and he starred in one of the best Bond films of the entire series.

My list:
Connery
Dalton
Lazenby
Craig
Brosnan
Moore

Truth be told, I like them all just fine. I appreciate their different versions of the title character.

Yes dude. Just switch Lazenby with Craig and you got it right. And I'd put Moore above Brosnan, because Brosnan was just a rehash of the Moore one.

Brosnan has no edge to him like the Bonds at the top have. Goldeneye's one of the best Bond films of all time, but it has a mediocre Bond.

And I'm enjoying Brosnan in films outside of the 007 series now. I totally forgot he could act until I saw Matador and Ghost Writer.
 
I sounded unnecessarily harsh against Brosnan there, but truth be told I find him to be an awful Bond. And yet he's so interesting outside of the role (and in some cases in similar roles such as Thomas Crown and Panama).
 

dark10x

Digital Foundry pixel pusher
Decided to give it a shot, and I'm glad I did. Game is way better than the IGN review would suggest. What they totally failed to note is that it simply feels fantastic to play. The animations are great, controls snappy, and everything makes sense. It never devolves into samey corridors or repetitive sections, rather, focuses on well designed set piece areas that actually offer some decent freedom of approach. They weren't wrong that it can feel like Splinter Cell Conviction at times, but really, it feels like Conviction mixed with Uncharted 2. Furthermore, it's infinitely more polished than the clunky, choppy mess that was Conviction on 360. Driving is really good as well. Feels natural and designed by a team that understands driving games. It's just one of those games that feels great to play.

Pretty good presentation too. Visuals are pretty hot in motion and the sound is fantastic. Did anyone know that Richard Jacques handled the score? I sure didn't, but he did a damn good job.

If you're on the fence, really, it is worth giving a shot. I don't know what that IGN reviewer was thinking, but he was way off base.
 

trinest

Member
JdFoX187 said:
Activision got its claws into the franchise. But let's not ignore the travesties that EA put out, including Rogue Agent. Blood Stone is a hell of a lot better than what IGN says.
But I liked Rogue Agent
 

Stallion Free

Cock Encumbered
dark10x said:
Decided to give it a shot, and I'm glad I did. Game is way better than the IGN review would suggest. What they totally failed to note is that it simply feels fantastic to play. The animations are great, controls snappy, and everything makes sense. It never devolves into samey corridors or repetitive sections, rather, focuses on well designed set piece areas that actually offer some decent freedom of approach. They weren't wrong that it can feel like Splinter Cell Conviction at times, but really, it feels like Conviction mixed with Uncharted 2. Furthermore, it's infinitely more polished than the clunky, choppy mess that was Conviction on 360. Driving is really good as well. Feels natural and designed by a team that understands driving games. It's just one of those games that feels great to play.

Pretty good presentation too. Visuals are pretty hot in motion and the sound is fantastic. Did anyone know that Richard Jacques handled the score? I sure didn't, but he did a damn good job.

If you're on the fence, really, it is worth giving a shot. I don't know what that IGN reviewer was thinking, but he was way off base.
I agree with all of this, but especially the bolded. I'm playing on PC with the 360 pad and it feels really fucking tight. They really nailed how Bond handles. The snow levels look stunning on my TV.
 
dark10x said:
Decided to give it a shot, and I'm glad I did. Game is way better than the IGN review would suggest. What they totally failed to note is that it simply feels fantastic to play. The animations are great, controls snappy, and everything makes sense. It never devolves into samey corridors or repetitive sections, rather, focuses on well designed set piece areas that actually offer some decent freedom of approach. They weren't wrong that it can feel like Splinter Cell Conviction at times, but really, it feels like Conviction mixed with Uncharted 2. Furthermore, it's infinitely more polished than the clunky, choppy mess that was Conviction on 360. Driving is really good as well. Feels natural and designed by a team that understands driving games. It's just one of those games that feels great to play.

Pretty good presentation too. Visuals are pretty hot in motion and the sound is fantastic. Did anyone know that Richard Jacques handled the score? I sure didn't, but he did a damn good job.

If you're on the fence, really, it is worth giving a shot. I don't know what that IGN reviewer was thinking, but he was way off base.


how does it run on your rig?
 

S1kkZ

Member
finished it, took me about 6 hours on normal. no unlockables (only secret intel you can scan in the levels).

-fantastic soundtrack
-great controls
-awesome vehicle levels. only downside: they have some trial and error. the vehicle sections are by far the best part of the game, they really nailed it.
-graphics in the 3rd person levels are a bit inconsistent. most areas look great but there some levels that look off (2 areas look awful). no slowdowns, tearing or other bullshit (some minor texture fade-in in some cutscenes), playing the 360 version.
-i dont like the grain filter, too bad you cannot turn it off.
-some faces in the cutscenes look horrible (M). it gets better later on.
-story is good. nothing spectacular but it would make for a good bond film (hell, i liked it much more than quantum of solace).
-no bond feeling, huh ign? the game feels more like bond than the last two films. story and setting feel more like a brosnan bond (a bit over the top). too bad that there is no good villain.

there is a multiplayer but i did not play it yet. very good bondgame, the ign rating is a joke. i would give it a b-.
 
...

I'm just now seeing The Club hate. It's one of the best and most original shooters to have been released in quite some time. Solid controls, great presentation, and an awesome soundtrack. Probably my favorite shooter this generation alongside Vanquish. I guess this is a "to each their own" situation.
We're right.

Anywho... It's really good to see some positive impressions for Blood Stone. I actually had no idea until about a week ago that Bizzare Creations was the developer. Would've been on my radar much sooner.
 

SapientWolf

Trucker Sexologist
FrostuTheNinja said:
...

I'm just now seeing The Club hate. It's one of the best and most original shooters to have been released in quite some time. Solid controls, great presentation, and an awesome soundtrack. Probably my favorite shooter this generation alongside Vanquish. I guess this is a "to each their own" situation.
We're right.

Anywho... It's really good to see some positive impressions for Blood Stone. I actually had no idea until about a week ago that Bizzare Creations was the developer. Would've been on my radar much sooner.
Everything about The Club is awesome except the shooting.
 

D2M15

DAFFY DEUS EGGS
It's definitely The Club-esque, but multiplayer feels just as much like a chummier version of the mall shootout from Manhunt; that is to say, awesome.

Also, more games should let you rock a waistcoat, suit and tie to a gunfight.
 

MiniDitka

Member
I've put in a fair amount of time with Bloodstone and Goldeneye and while I like them both am having more fun with this.
 
whatevermort said:
Transformers was a pretty decent shooter that deserved much better. And Blur was a great racer that deserved much better.

Perhaps that could be the new company slogan?

ACTIVISION: OUR GAMES DESERVE BETTER.

I follow videogames like nobody's business, and I had never heard about this game until it went up on steam today.

Good job, Activision. :lol

JdFoX187 said:
Activision got its claws into the franchise. But let's not ignore the travesties that EA put out, including Rogue Agent. Blood Stone is a hell of a lot better than what IGN says.

But EA put out a pretty fun and acclaimed Bond game. Activision has yet to do that much.
 
TouchMyBox said:
But EA put out a pretty fun and acclaimed Bond game. Activision has yet to do that much.
It wasn't "acclaimed" but I loved Quantum of Solace. It was fast, crazy fun and you could put silencers on every weapon and sneak around in some stages. It had some good looking guns too. The multiplayer was only decent, but that wasn't an issue for me. I don't think it got nearly enough credit, but I don't really care. I loved it, and I suspect I'll really like Bloodstone too.
 
Top Bottom