• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

James Cameron godfathers new Terminator film, Tim Miller to direct

Status
Not open for further replies.

TAJ

Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
I think they should kill two birds with one stone and do RoboCop v Terminator. Reboot two franchises at once.

That's RobertCop vs. Termiantor.
 

Anung

Un Rama
I just hope they cast actual actors in this one. Jai Courtney gave a more wooden performance than Plank from Ed, Edd n' Eddy.
 
Huh! I don't really see the point of this, other then $$$, but I'm interested, especially with Cameron actually returning and not given his so-called high opinion on the film.
 

Jarmel

Banned
Can we call it the terminator cycle. Like the sonic one we fall for

The only post Terminator 2 movie people have been hyped for was Salvation and that's due to the concept art. Nobody expected Genisys to be good and I didn't see much hype for T3.
 

Busty

Banned
"Godfather" = Sit in on one script meeting in which he'll spend all his time checking emails on his phone and being passive aggressive to everyone.

All the heat Tim Miller got from Deadpool and he's using it on this, another fucking Terminator film that no one asked for and China thought was okay?

Nah, don't buy it.

Expect to see this project rematerialise in 18 months with Cameron nowhere to be seen and directed by a 19 yo who did a Skrillex video on his iPhone that one time.

#drunk
 
So like Genisys?

Or are you saying they'll do two movies with the first being the future war and the second being the reboot?
Two movies.

First movie with Tim Miller will be future war entirely and end with Reese going back to 1984 to set up complete reboot movie of the original Terminator set in 1984.
 

strafer

member
Not sure what to think.

Trying to think of Cameron-produced projects that haven't had him directing that have actually turned out good.

If anything, I see this as him giving his name to the next film in order to boost its appeal/legitimacy since he'll now be more invested in its success/back end receipts since the rights will be his again.

With the four Avatar films, Cameron is way too busy to be heavily involved in this. So I'm not really expecting anything special.

This is like Spielberg lending his name as producer to Super 8.

What about that cave horror movie?
 

Busty

Banned
I'd be interested if this were an R rated 'future war' film with a budget of less than $50m directed by someone hungry for their first big hit.

But it won't be.

So I'm not.

Years ago Andy Warhol famously said 'Everyone will be famous for 15 minutes'. Now it's more like 'Everyone will executive produce a Terminator reboot at some point'.

Please PM when it's my turn.

Cheers.
 

Farmboy

Member
I bet it's going to be future war with Kyle Reese going back at the end which sets up the reboot set in 1984.

After Genisys (which had the right idea in BTTF2ing the original, then screwed it up completely) I've long thought that straight up telling Reese's story ending in the final assault and Reese's return to 1984 is the way to go (this would obviously retcon Genisys).

Also had the idea that they should do this practical-effects-only, because the future scenes were never more sinister and creepy than in the original. Bit gimmicky perhaps, but I'd love to see it.
 

Buckle

Member
Reboot and conclusion obviously means it's going to be future war and end with Kyle Reese going back to 1984.
God, I would love to see a film about the future war done right.

It killed me when Salvation turned out to be bad. It was nice to finally get something that seemed to move things forward and was different instead of Arnold just going back in time again and punching another robot in modern day.
 

Jarmel

Banned
People were absolutely hyped for Terminator 3.

I'm not sure why other than the Terminator name. The director wasn't exactly some hotshot and the trailers (I rewatched them just now) weren't pure hype. I guess people were thirsty enough though and weren't used to the shovelware Terminator shit yet.
After Genisys (which had the right idea in BTTF2ing the original, then screwed it up completely) I've long thought that straight up telling Reese's story ending in the final assault and Reese's return to 1984 is the way to go (this would obviously retcon Genisys).

Also had the idea that they should do this practical-effects-only, because the future scenes were never more sinister and creepy than in the original. Bit gimmicky perhaps, but I'd love to see it.

Some of the concept art for Salvation looked really on point but the movie was obviously a mess.

PHsegztx1NKrvz_1_l.jpg
 

Sanjuro

Member
I'm not sure why other than the Terminator name. The director wasn't exactly some hotshot and the trailers (I rewatched them just now) weren't pure hype. I guess people were thirsty enough though and weren't used to the shovelware Terminator shit yet.

I'd say that is accurate. I think beyond any trailers or director, it was still a followup to T2 with Arnold. I remember people being very excited around that period.
 
A conclusion huh? I have always been refining my own perfect way to end the series based on the course of the first two and Cameron's interviews on future films. If it's set entirely in the future, doesn't revolve around John Connor and delves just a tiny bit into how Skynet ticks, I'll be so happy.
 
A conclusion huh? I have always been refining my own perfect way to end the series based on the course of the first two and Cameron's interviews on future films. If it's set entirely in the future, doesn't revolve around John Connor and delves just a tiny bit into how Skynet ticks, I'll be so happy.
I've always thought the third film should've always been a Saving Private Ryan- type future war film that followed one unit and made the Terminator a legitimate horror threat again. It should've ended with Reese going back to '84.

The first film was about Reese and Sarah. Second film about Sarah and John. Third film should've been about John and Reese. Perfect family trilogy capper.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom