They’re standalone movies.Three different directors?? why?? we don't need three different takes on a story, we need something unified.
Oh, I see. So it's 3 different time periods, and I guess this one will be a send-off to Daisy Ridley or something.They’re standalone movies.
Mangold’s film, set during that dawning period of the timeline, will tell the tale of the first ever Jedi, in what he described as a ‘biblical epic.’ Dave Filoni will direct a new film sent in the time period of The Mandalorian, culminating the conflict between the Imperial Remnant and the New Republic. Lastly, Obaid-Chinoy introduced Jedi Master Rey Skywalker, Daisy Ridley herself, who will rebuild a new era of the Jedi Order in a new film.
Mangold’s film, set during that dawning period of the timeline, will tell the tale of the first ever Jedi, in what he described as a ‘biblical epic.’
Yeh at this point I want them to explore different angles than the material that's already stretched so thin. So that sounds interesting to me.Fuck, this sounds awesome, let's go!
Im out. Hope fans get something out of this convenor belt type of production strategy...
Hopefully in the dumpster. Dude doesn't know crap about Luke Skywalker. Holdo Maneuvers other dumb stuff.Where is the Rian Johnson's trilogy?
That movie was just announced today with Daisy Ridley coming back.Lindeloffs project,
It’s not a Mando movie. It’s Heir to the Empire.The Mandalorian film would've been the film I was most interested in after S2, but they just couldn't help themselves from destroying that storyline because Baby Yoda sells toys.
Gotcha, I just saw the other thread with the Ashoka trailer and yeah that looks really fucking good.It’s not a Mando movie. It’s Heir to the Empire.
She’ll probably do the second movie in the New Jedi Order trilogy.Mangold and filini are tight. They need to let Dallas Bryce howard direct a movie. Her episodes of the mandolorian have been great.
How is Rey a jedi master? That's how the article describes her. She did a little training with Luke then it was the last movie.She’ll probably do the second movie in the New Jedi Order trilogy.
It’s fifteen years later.How is Rey a jedi master? That's how the article describes her. She did a little training with Luke then it was the last movie.
I would have called her a jedi knight. She did the cool healing power on the sand snake but what elevates you to master status? Don't you have to have a padawan?
The jedi order is obviously starting over but shit better be different
I can already see a "the first jedi" film cribbing directly from Wheel of Time with a "feminine=light" and "masculine=dark" polarized system because the "first fedi" was a woman tired of seeing other force users beat people up. The bad guys will look suspiciously like Andrew Tate, Joe Rogan, and Jordan PetersonThe Dawn of the Jedi film could be cool I suppose. However, as with everything modern Star Wars, they'll probably use it to over-explain some dumb shit that never needed an explanation. I'll keep an eye on that one and hope for an Andor situation.
Why when we’re getting Heir to the Empire.They should do a deep fake movie of Shadows Of The Empire which takes place between empire and jedi
You realize that had NOTHING to do with Star Wars right? It was an Air Force/Nike thing the rage baiters lied about to make people like you angry.Kathleen "the force is female
These movie "universes" and their announced timelines of movie releases are so tiresome. Does anyone get excited by this, announcing like ten different movies/shows at once, most of which are years away?
And how astute of a CEO to purposely piss off the core audience for the product? How many new folks did it bring to the brand versus how many did it turn away?You realize that had NOTHING to do with Star Wars right? It was an Air Force/Nike thing the rage baiters lied about to make people like you angry.
And how astute of a CEO to purposely piss off the core audience for the product? How many new folks did it bring to the brand versus how many did it turn away?
"Sides, I don't buy the "it was all a nike ad!".
This is the Kathleen Kennedy photo:
Let us pause to appreciate the shirts
THIS is the nike shirt:
what, pray tell, is different about the last shirt, not present on the shirt WORN AT A FILM FESTIVAL not, BTW, sponsored by Nike, where she said this:
“It’s a conversation we’ve had really going back to what George Lucas did with Princess Leia,” Kennedy said. “And we carried on in that tradition, and I think we’ve created some really strong females with characters like Rey in ‘The Force Awakens’ and Jyn in ‘Rogue One.’ [We’re] having strong, empowered females in these stories, and really allowing them to become heroes, which seems to be, oddly, a new concept, but fantastic— that seems to be getting some traction, so that’s what we’re trying to do.”
Hmm, that nike ad campaign tie in seems....tenuous at best. The Archer film festival was in May of '17, I don't think that nike campaign fired off till a year later in '18
But, you know, you do you.
So? I'm saying that wearing a shirt with that slogan, no branding, at a FILM FESTIVE, not sponsored by Nike (that I can tell) AND talking about female representation in Star Wars BY THE HEAD OF LUCASARTS, how thick of a marker do I need to connect the dots for you? Whatever the origin of the phrase (and I bet FOR SURE that Nike had to negotiate with Lucasrts lawyers to use "The Force" in such a context) the way she wore it was referring to Star Wars, not a sneaker.'The Force is Female' is not about Star Wars
The "Force is Female" t-shirts were part of a marketing campaign by Nike. They had nothing to do with Star Wars. The campaign was designed to get women to wear Air Force One shoes.bentcorner.com
You jest, but you're going to be upset when it ends up better than it should be.They should give Lizzo a trilogy.
And how astute of a CEO to purposely piss off the core audience for the product?