Could be....I just realized I forgot Punk on that card.....lol.
So did Vince.
Could be....I just realized I forgot Punk on that card.....lol.
I don't understand why they aren't trying to do Rock vs. Brock II. That seems like the biggest match they can do with who they have.
Also please stop telling me how WWE was 10 years ago.
That was 10 years ago.
Why hasn't it evolved 10 years later?
HHH isn't going to just let Brock beat him like that.I don't understand why they aren't trying to do Rock vs. Brock II. That seems like the biggest match they can do with who they have.
I'm thinking after Mania this year it might be time for another break. I have been near the point of taking a break for the past year and stuff keeps pulling me back in, but maybe if I took off for a few years the landscape would be different when I came back.
Vince is still in charge.
They've swerved the audience for the sake of swerving the audience before, and trust me, it's much worse.While I enjoyed quite a bit of the show, the whole thing was a very "by the numbers" event. I miss the WWE that would take chances and swerve their audience... now... everything just feels so predictable.
You're right.
But it won't change will it?
Like Punk said... it'll just get taken over by his stupid family.
Haha
I'm not surprised to see the reactions here. This RR was booked for tears.
You're right.
But it won't change will it?
Like Punk said... it'll just get taken over by his stupid family.
HHH will do good, I'm confident of that. The sooner he takes over the better.
I think you missed this...
As a fellow loser, I think I'm the winner compared to you.
Well. Its until Wrestlemania. Until then, its Amblows all the way -_-
I hope the first thing he does is get rid of this law where a face has to fight a heel and vice versa.
I don't know if they did that in the Attitude Era but Vince did say in his intro to the AE that good guys vs bad guys is basically insulting the viewers' intelligence.
I'm thinking after Mania this year it might be time for another break. I have been near the point of taking a break for the past year and stuff keeps pulling me back in, but maybe if I took off for a few years the landscape would be different when I came back.
I'd add to that Rey Mysterio vs. Sin Cara. I know they want to do that, and then have everyone in the audience wear a lucha mask to break the world record. That was the plan a couple months ago at least, and can still very well be now that Sin Cara is back.Could be....I just realized I forgot Punk on that card.....lol.
So.....
Cena vs Rock
Ziggler vs Del Rio
HHH vs Lesnar
Undertaker vs Punk
Sheamus vs Orton vs Barrett
Kane vs Daniel Bryan
Cody Rhodes vs Goldust
Ryback vs The Shield
Cesaro vs Miz w/ Ric Flair
????
I know someone is going to tell me that wins and losses don't mean squat in wrestling, but dammit, I wish wins and losses actually meant something in wrestling.
It's just little things, like Cena (or whoever they're mega-pushing this month, see; Ryback) getting title opportunity after title opportunity whether he's had to work his way through the ranks or not, or a guy like Randy Orton beating the US champion in a non-title match on TV and then not getting a title shot because, lol, the belt is beneath his status.
I prefer the idea that guys want belts, want the top billings on the card, because it earns them more money. By the same token, guys should actually want to win matches to earn themselves a better pay-day and because, if wins and losses actually meant a damn thing, it would be the key to getting in the title picture.
I miss rankings in general, and no.1 contenders matches.
Ah, don't mind me, it's 5AM and I'm rambling.
But they do matter thats why Cena and Super friends never lose and when they do its never cleanI know someone is going to tell me that wins and losses don't mean squat in wrestling, but dammit, I wish wins and losses actually meant something in wrestling.
It's just little things, like Cena (or whoever they're mega-pushing this month, see; Ryback) getting title opportunity after title opportunity whether he's had to work his way through the ranks or not, or a guy like Randy Orton beating the US champion in a non-title match on TV and then not getting a title shot because, lol, the belt is beneath his status.
I prefer the idea that guys want belts, want the top billings on the card, because it earns them more money. By the same token, guys should actually want to win matches to earn themselves a better pay-day and because, if wins and losses actually meant a damn thing, it would be the key to getting in the title picture.
I miss rankings in general, and no.1 contenders matches.
Ah, don't mind me, it's 5AM and I'm rambling.
Probably setting myself up for more dissapointment but raw is in the same place where this happened
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=2OS9wZGb_3g
if nothing happens there is plenty of other promotions deserving my time and money
Nah, the AE stuck pretty closely to heel vs face all the time. It's just a matter of what the faces were allowed to do. I will say again that PG isn't the problem. The WWE was the raunchiest in 2002, and WWE sucked that year. It's just a matter of being good.I hope the first thing he does is get rid of this law where a face has to fight a heel and vice versa.
I don't know if they did that in the Attitude Era but Vince did say in his intro to the AE that good guys vs bad guys is basically insulting the viewers' intelligence.
Could be....I just realized I forgot Punk on that card.....lol.
So.....
Cena vs Rock
Ziggler vs Del Rio
HHH vs Lesnar
Undertaker vs Punk
Sheamus vs Orton vs Barrett
Kane vs Daniel Bryan
Cody Rhodes vs Goldust
Ryback vs The Shield
Cesaro vs Miz w/ Ric Flair
????
Predictable card but I'd still watch because a lot of the matches could bring some sort of entertainment, even if the results are predictable. I hope Y2J is booked somewhere.
Nah, the AE stuck pretty closely to heel vs face all the time. It's just a matter of what the faces were allowed to do. I will say again that PG isn't the problem. The WWE was the raunchiest in 2002, and WWE sucked that year. It's just a matter of being good.
Just be good.
But they do matter thats why Cena and Super friends never lose and when they do its never clean
I wonder where the SHIELD storyline will be heading now...
Nowhere. It was always a storyline of convenience to keep Punk's streak going without hurting Ryberg. Funny that supposedly they didn't want to bring Ambrose up without a concrete plan for him. Yet here we are...
Nah, the AE stuck pretty closely to heel vs face all the time. It's just a matter of what the faces were allowed to do. I will say again that PG isn't the problem. The WWE was the raunchiest in 2002, and WWE sucked that year. It's just a matter of being good.
Just be good.
So WrassleGAF, what do you give Royal Rumble? A,B,C, F scale.
Me:
Miz vs Cesaro: B
Del Rio vs Big Show: B+
Rumble: C-
Rock vs CM Punk: F
Overall: C-
Punk lost to a Hollywood star.
It didn't hurt Cena but it hurts Punk's legitimacy as a champion. 430 days or so of being the "Best in the World" except Rock comes in and buries him.
Yeah. Fuck this company.
This, gentlemen, is called "overreacting."
So WrassleGAF, what do you give Royal Rumble? A,B,C, F scale.
Me:
Miz vs Cesaro: B
Del Rio vs Big Show: B+
Rumble: C-
Rock vs CM Punk: F
Overall: C-
I mean, honestly. Wrestling is just a matter of matches and promos. Just have good matches, and have good promos, and that solves all your problems. It doesn't matter who these wrestlers are, or how long they've been on top, or what the story line is.I like good.
So WrassleGAF, what do you give Royal Rumble? A,B,C, F scale.
Me:
Miz vs Cesaro: B
Del Rio vs Big Show: B+
Rumble: C-
Rock vs CM Punk: F
Overall: C-
I mean, honestly. Wrestling is just a matter of matches and promos. Just have good matches, and have good promos, and that solves all your problems. It doesn't matter who these wrestlers are, or how long they've been on top, or what the story line is.
Have good matches with good promos, and you're done. The AE had that.
I mean, honestly. Wrestling is just a matter of matches and promos. Just have good matches, and have good promos, and that solves all your problems. It doesn't matter who these wrestlers are, or how long they've been on top, or what the story line is.
Have good matches with good promos, and you're done. The AE had that.
We don't get good matches and good promos now?
HHH will do good, I'm confident of that. The sooner he takes over the better.