lol whatever
Colbert has blind spots just like anyone else. He though the shock humor value was more important so he went for it and he knew everyone else would just roll with it.
It's possible for someone to be a generally great person and still fuck up sometimes, which he did. You guys kiss Colbert's ass too much
Oh yeah Late Late Ferguson is my fave
lol whatever
Colbert has blind spots just like anyone else. He though the shock humor value was more important so he went for it and he knew everyone else would just roll with it.
It's possible for someone to be a generally great person and still fuck up sometimes, which he did. You guys kiss Colbert's ass too much
NBC was the top network in Monday ratings, as The Voice led the network to a 2.0 in viewers 18-49, and a 7 share. That topped the 1.5/5s put forth by ABC and CBS.
The Voice did a 2.4 across two hours on NBC, off a tenth of a point from last week, and The Brave was a flat 1.2.
ABCs Dancing With the Stars slipped 19% to 1.3 from 8-10 p.m. and The Good Doctor was down 21% at 1.9.
Theres nothing wrong with criticizing what someone did, but the overwrought responses to this event by some people is just silly.
Ill never forgive Colbert for what he did!
Give me a break.
I mean, there is a difference between saying that and "FUCK COLBERT" and "Colbert did LITERALLY THE SAME FALLON WITH BUT WITH SPICER". Those are completely nonsensical statements that ignore actual reality.
The base of the joke is fine (Spicer being a lying shithead). Execution wasnt great. It happens. But comparing it to Fallon's literal coddling of Trump and saying "FUCK COLBERT" is ridiculous.I guess if you thought it was funny then there's really nothing else to say.
.Fuck Jimmy Fallon
His interviews were so good.
Late night shows are pretty dead now after Letterman, Stewart, Ferguson all gone and Conan fired to TBS. Stephen Colbert was great on The Colbert Report i dont like him nearly as much as the replacement for Letterman.
Why was Jay Leno so popular tho.
Oh yeah Late Late Ferguson is my fave
His interviews were so good.
You know he's good when you never heard of half the people he interviews but still found the conversation to be interesting... whereas Fallon has A-list celebrities and their conversations are like overhearing your annoying office co-workers talk on a Monday morning.
lol whatever
Colbert has blind spots just like anyone else. He though the shock humor value was more important so he went for it and he knew everyone else would just roll with it.
It's possible for someone to be a generally great person and still fuck up sometimes, which he did. You guys kiss Colbert's ass too much
I guess if you thought it was funny then there's really nothing else to say.
Can we just hate James Corden more please?
Literally the only thing I've seen from him is his response to the concert shooting which was great, so nope!
This moment single handedly ended any positive thoughts I had about him and I haven't watched it since. I'm sure I'm not the only one.
This doesn't feel like a response to either of the two things you quoted.
james corden fucking sucks
People are willing to overlook how pointless and in some ways insulting it was for Colbert to have Spicer on the Emmys because he usually does good work. This, combined with the reaction people had to Coates being frank with him about his lack of hope for America leads me to believe that Colbert can do no wrong in the eyes of some.
Seth Meyers deserves a better lead in.
Leno was better. LENO.
Right, but those posts you were responding to were not questioning whether Colbert can be called out in as much as they were questioning whether the response is proportionate to the perceived offense.
I'm not surprised. Jimmy Fallon is a seriously unfunny guy.
I think the defaulting to the most extreme responses shows that they felt any response other than praise was unwarranted.
Even though the quote from me that you quoted literally said theres nothing wrong with criticizing Colbert.
It is indeed a shit ride. It replaced the Twister Experience so at least we didnt lose too much.
Yes, after your initial post about purity tests
But what you quoted clarified my original post. I have no issue with someone being unhappy about that Emmy thing. My personal issue comes from how overboard some have gone with their displeasure.
As Steve Youngblood put it, the reaction doesnt fit the supposed crime, imo.
Consider this: you're one of the many groups targeted by the Trump administration, the mouthpiece of which was Sean Spicer. You watch and enjoy Colbert, then hear he's going to host the Emmys, so you tune in. Then you see Colbert bring out Spicer and find out it was in fact his idea to have him there.
Maybe you have a pretty strong reaction to that, and most likely a stronger one than someone not in the crosshairs.
Consider this: you're one of the many groups targeted by the Trump administration, the mouthpiece of which was Sean Spicer. You watch and enjoy Colbert, then hear he's going to host the Emmys, so you tune in. Then you see Colbert bring out Spicer and find out it was in fact his idea to have him there.
Maybe you have a pretty strong reaction to that, and most likely a stronger one than someone not in the crosshairs.
And Id understand being upset or disappointed. But angry? Over what was, at worst, a tasteless joke that landed poorly?
Not every perceived slight is a declaration of war.
Or maybe some of the people finding those reactions over the top are in the crosshairs as well?
I find it a bit presumptuous to assume anyone who points out that the stuff that went down with Spicer doesn't negate everything good Colbert has done over the years is not targeted by Trump and his abministration in some ways.