• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Joe Biden predicts he will run for president in 2020, but not yet 'committed'

Status
Not open for further replies.

Maxim726X

Member
You don't want to here what? That this was a super narrow loss? That policy was NOT what lost the election? That no one in their right mind would nominate Corey Booker (or any NJ politician for that matter?

Is this real life?

She lost to a joke candidate. I don't give a shit how much she lost by, it's embarrassing.

Is this what liberals are telling themselves to feel better about their party? Holy shit.
 
I'm fine with Biden but I want one of the new/young faces to run. Harris or Masto would be great, or maybe Klobuchar (though she's obviously on the older side and isn't new).

That said, trying to say what's electorally feasible in 2020 is a bad idea no matter how tempting it is to do so. I'm guilty of it, but trying to say "we can't do establishment, that's broken" is not a great idea since we have no idea what 2020 will look like.
 

giga

Member
Someone sell me on Joe

8fISEv1.png
.
 

Gigglepoo

Member
Is this real life?

She lost to a joke candidate. I don't give a shit how much she lost by, it's embarrassing.

Is this what liberals are telling themselves to feel better about their party? Holy shit.

The argument was "politics don't matter because Trump won." It's important to recognize that significantly more people voted for Hillary. How could politics not matter if the politician got more votes?
 

kirblar

Member
Is this real life?

She lost to a joke candidate. I don't give a shit how much she lost by, it's embarrassing.

Is this what liberals are telling themselves to feel better about their party? Holy shit.
I don't care about how embarrassed something makes you feel. I care about what actually happened.

Lots of factors played into an incredibly, incredibly narrow electoral loss. The problem isn't policy.
 

Maxim726X

Member
The argument was "politics don't matter because Trump won." It's important to recognize that significantly more people voted for Hillary. How could politics not matter if the politician got more votes?

No... It's not important to recognize that. Is she the president or not?

Winning California by a bajillion votes doesn't really help her very much, does it?

It appears no one wants to look introspectively here- Her loss was a repudiation against establishment candidates and what people perceive to be elitists who don't give a shit about them (among other things). This party needs to refocus, and move on from establishment candidates.

Sanders was right- She should have won by 10 points. I don't care how many votes she gets, she still lost. Enough.
 

kirblar

Member
Who's the Missouri Dem everyone's high on, again?
Kander, but he lost his race. He'll need to win whatever race he challenges for in 2 years to be able to have a platform to launch from. (Though he's super young and probably better off waiting a few, since Dems do not like repeats.)
 

B33

Banned
Is this real life?

She lost to a joke candidate. I don't give a shit how much she lost by, it's embarrassing.

Is this what liberals are telling themselves to feel better about their party? Holy shit.
Clinton received more votes than any other presidential candidate to date and had the popular vote... But she didn't get the Rust Belt, Florida, etc. and therefore lost the electoral vote.

Only four times in history has the popular vote been the inverse of the electoral vote and this is by far the largest margin yet.

She likely won't run again, but it's important to note how everything happened.
 
Jason Kander

That's the guy. Wonder what we see from him in the next four years.

Kander, but he lost his race. He'll need to win whatever race he challenges for in 2 years to be able to have a platform to launch from. (Though he's super young and probably better off waiting a few, since Dems do not like repeats.)

If I'm him I wait it out, don't chance losing another election, and see what the POTUS roster looks like on the Dem side.
 
I'm fine with Biden but I want one of the new/young faces to run. Harris or Masto would be great, or maybe Klobuchar (though she's obviously on the older side and isn't new).

That said, trying to say what's electorally feasible in 2020 is a bad idea no matter how tempting it is to do so. I'm guilty of it, but trying to say "we can't do establishment, that's broken" is not a great idea since we have no idea what 2020 will look like.
I think a bunch of people are going to run. I would be very surprised if there was another "invisible primary" that narrowed the field heavily after what happened this year.
 
Dems need to run with Tammy Duckworth. I would pay real money to watch Trump try to argue that he has real military experience with her in the room.
 

Gigglepoo

Member
It appears no one wants to look introspectively here- Her loss was a repudiation against establishment candidates and what people perceive to be elitists who don't give a shit about them (among other things). This party needs to refocus, and move on from establishment candidates.

Other establishment types (Obama, Bill Clinton, Biden, Bernie) were screaming at Hillary behind the scenes to get away from major cities to speak to rural voters. Just because Hillary screwed up doesn't mean the country hates the establishment. How many senators won re-election? How many Representative? Governors? Mayors? There wasn't major upheaval last month. You're taking one presidential loss as a widespread condemnation of the status quo instead of looking at the most obvious reason -- Hillary wasn't a good candidate.
 

Draper

Member
Clinton received more votes than any other presidential candidate to date and had the popular vote... But she didn't get the Rust Belt, Florida, etc. and therefore lost the electoral vote.

Only four times in history has the popular vote been the inverse of the electoral vote and this is by far the largest margin yet.

She likely won't run again, but it's important to note how everything happened.

Does Obama not exist in this world?
 

Maxim726X

Member
Other establishment types (Obama, Bill Clinton, Biden, Bernie) were screaming at Hillary behind the scenes to get away from major cities to speak to rural voters. Just because Hillary screwed up doesn't mean the country hates the establishment. How many senators won re-election? How many Representative? Governors? Mayors? There wasn't major upheaval last month. You're taking one presidential loss as a widespread condemnation of the status quo instead of looking at the most obvious reason -- Hillary wasn't a good candidate.

One presidential loss??

State governerships? Senate? House?

Are we going to ignore the fact that the party got slaughtered by Trump and a dysfunctional Republican party? Looks like it.
 

Ether_Snake

安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
Biden is the right choice for 2020 if Trump is doing "ok" or great; someone new won't beat Trump in that context. If Trump is doing horribly, Biden or someone new is fine, Biden would have good chances, and people need to realize it's more important for the Dems to win than get the ideal candidate.
 

Gigglepoo

Member
One presidential loss??

State governerships? Senate? House?

Are we going to ignore the fact that the party got slaughtered by Trump and a dysfunctional Republican party? Looks like it.

You do realize that democrats gained ground in Congress, right? And no one is ignoring that the Republicans control most of America's government now. I have no idea why you think that's the case.
 
Is this real life?

She lost to a joke candidate. I don't give a shit how much she lost by, it's embarrassing.

Is this what liberals are telling themselves to feel better about their party? Holy shit.

So we should just ignore the concept of math going forward because one asshole managed to erk out a victory?
 
The argument was "politics don't matter because Trump won." It's important to recognize that significantly more people voted for Hillary. How could politics not matter if the politician got more votes?
Narrow margins in 3-4 states won it for Trump. Overall he got trounced. This was a 30 year smear campaign come to fruition.
 
Then the party is truly screwed.

I should have added, at the moment.

Seriously, who else is there?

Sanders? He's older than dirt and lost the primaries to Hilary. I don't want to hear about what could've been had he went against Trump because he lost the primaries and not even by a little.

Booker? Dude's closet is so full of skeletons he's lucky he hasn't buried himself already.

Warren? Also old and not as charismatic as people would like to believe. She's done well so far but would likely trip over herself on the national stage.

Ellison? C'mon now, you know he ain't winning no Presidential election.
 

Maxim726X

Member
You do realize that democrats gained ground in Congress, right?

Has this become 'lowered expectations- the thread'?

Democrats were supposed to retake the executive branch and the Senate. There was even an outside shot at the House at one point, though that was always a pipe dream.

Again- The party got soundly defeated by a Trump 'led' (if you can call it that) Republican party. Moral victories mean jack shit.

So we should just ignore the concept of math going forward because one asshole managed to erk out a victory?

...Whew. Okay. You guys do you.
 

Jerm411

Member
Does Cory Booker still have a lot of juice behind him....? I remember when he was going to be the next big on the Dem side, curious as to where he stands now....
 
Joe had other plans.

Then his son died.

And Obama asked him not to run.


"The DNC" is not some shadowy cabal. It's an arm of the administration.

This is literally not true and is repeated in every god damn DNC/Biden/democrat/etc thread.

Obama simply laid out the facts, which were that the entire democrat establishment was behind Clinton and he didn't want to see Biden get embarrassed. It's not particularly different from what happened to Romney, where Bush consolidated much of the establishment money and pushed Romney out of running.

If Biden's son hadn't passed he would have run. And he would have lost to Clinton.
 

Gigglepoo

Member
Narrow margins in 3-4 states won it for Trump. Overall he got trounced. This was a 30 year smear campaign come to fruition.

An ant-Hillary smear campaign combined with widespread voter suppression and a poorly run campaign by Clinton. That's the most concise explanation for what happened.

Has this become 'lowered expectations- the thread'.

Not at all. I'm trying to make sure we know the facts. You said democrats got slaughtered so I pointed out that they gained ground in Congress.
 

Blader

Member
Obama asked him not to run?

Obama didn't sit him down and tell him face to face not to run, but he had aides subtly, and then more overtly, discourage Biden from mounting a bid.

And frankly, he waited too long anyway. October was way too late to mount a bid, by which point the vast majority of the party support had already gone to Hillary. Biden wouldn't be playing insurgent outsider; he'd need the establishment support structure that Hillary had already taken.

Hate to admit it... But yeah.

The true Goat would have been Warren, but it really seems like at this point she doesn't intend to aim for higher than Senator, for some reason.

Joe would do great imo vs Trump.

BECAUSE THE SENATE IS IMPORTANT

Warren can serve in the Senate for years and years and years. As president, she is done after eight. She's one of the Democratic Party's most important figureheads now. Keep her in a position where she can do some good, and where the party can, slowly, inch back up to control.
 
Has this become 'lowered expectations- the thread'?

Democrats were supposed to retake the executive branch and the Senate. There was even an outside shot at the House at one point, though that was always a pipe dream.

Again- The party got soundly defeated by a Trump 'led' (if you can call it that) Republican party. Moral victories mean jack shit.



...Whew. Okay. You guys do you.

I'm not saying that there are no lessons to be learned from this election but you do understand why paying attention to margins is an important part of figuring out what went wrong right?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom