Politico has a long article on it citing sources.So you're just making assumptions. Got it.
You don't want to here what? That this was a super narrow loss? That policy was NOT what lost the election? That no one in their right mind would nominate Corey Booker (or any NJ politician for that matter?
Is this real life?
She lost to a joke candidate. I don't give a shit how much she lost by, it's embarrassing.
Is this what liberals are telling themselves to feel better about their party? Holy shit.
I don't care about how embarrassed something makes you feel. I care about what actually happened.Is this real life?
She lost to a joke candidate. I don't give a shit how much she lost by, it's embarrassing.
Is this what liberals are telling themselves to feel better about their party? Holy shit.
Someone sell me on Joe
Right guy, wrong time. 78 is too old. Pass.
He's done too.
Doesn't this fucking party have anyone interesting under the age of 70?
Let's find out.
The argument was "politics don't matter because Trump won." It's important to recognize that significantly more people voted for Hillary. How could politics not matter if the politician got more votes?
Jason KanderWho's the Missouri Dem everyone's high on, again?
We could try again with Clinton
Kander, but he lost his race. He'll need to win whatever race he challenges for in 2 years to be able to have a platform to launch from. (Though he's super young and probably better off waiting a few, since Dems do not like repeats.)Who's the Missouri Dem everyone's high on, again?
Clinton received more votes than any other presidential candidate to date and had the popular vote... But she didn't get the Rust Belt, Florida, etc. and therefore lost the electoral vote.Is this real life?
She lost to a joke candidate. I don't give a shit how much she lost by, it's embarrassing.
Is this what liberals are telling themselves to feel better about their party? Holy shit.
Jason Kander
Kander, but he lost his race. He'll need to win whatever race he challenges for in 2 years to be able to have a platform to launch from. (Though he's super young and probably better off waiting a few, since Dems do not like repeats.)
I think a bunch of people are going to run. I would be very surprised if there was another "invisible primary" that narrowed the field heavily after what happened this year.I'm fine with Biden but I want one of the new/young faces to run. Harris or Masto would be great, or maybe Klobuchar (though she's obviously on the older side and isn't new).
That said, trying to say what's electorally feasible in 2020 is a bad idea no matter how tempting it is to do so. I'm guilty of it, but trying to say "we can't do establishment, that's broken" is not a great idea since we have no idea what 2020 will look like.
Someone sell me on Joe
.
Thank Jebus, Biden is the only one at the moment I believe can save us.
It appears no one wants to look introspectively here- Her loss was a repudiation against establishment candidates and what people perceive to be elitists who don't give a shit about them (among other things). This party needs to refocus, and move on from establishment candidates.
Clinton received more votes than any other presidential candidate to date and had the popular vote... But she didn't get the Rust Belt, Florida, etc. and therefore lost the electoral vote.
Only four times in history has the popular vote been the inverse of the electoral vote and this is by far the largest margin yet.
She likely won't run again, but it's important to note how everything happened.
Other establishment types (Obama, Bill Clinton, Biden, Bernie) were screaming at Hillary behind the scenes to get away from major cities to speak to rural voters. Just because Hillary screwed up doesn't mean the country hates the establishment. How many senators won re-election? How many Representative? Governors? Mayors? There wasn't major upheaval last month. You're taking one presidential loss as a widespread condemnation of the status quo instead of looking at the most obvious reason -- Hillary wasn't a good candidate.
One presidential loss??
State governerships? Senate? House?
Are we going to ignore the fact that the party got slaughtered by Trump and a dysfunctional Republican party? Looks like it.
Is this real life?
She lost to a joke candidate. I don't give a shit how much she lost by, it's embarrassing.
Is this what liberals are telling themselves to feel better about their party? Holy shit.
Narrow margins in 3-4 states won it for Trump. Overall he got trounced. This was a 30 year smear campaign come to fruition.The argument was "politics don't matter because Trump won." It's important to recognize that significantly more people voted for Hillary. How could politics not matter if the politician got more votes?
Then the party is truly screwed.
You do realize that democrats gained ground in Congress, right?
So we should just ignore the concept of math going forward because one asshole managed to erk out a victory?
Joe had other plans.
Then his son died.
And Obama asked him not to run.
"The DNC" is not some shadowy cabal. It's an arm of the administration.
Narrow margins in 3-4 states won it for Trump. Overall he got trounced. This was a 30 year smear campaign come to fruition.
Has this become 'lowered expectations- the thread'.
Obama asked him not to run?
Hate to admit it... But yeah.
The true Goat would have been Warren, but it really seems like at this point she doesn't intend to aim for higher than Senator, for some reason.
Joe would do great imo vs Trump.
Has this become 'lowered expectations- the thread'?
Democrats were supposed to retake the executive branch and the Senate. There was even an outside shot at the House at one point, though that was always a pipe dream.
Again- The party got soundly defeated by a Trump 'led' (if you can call it that) Republican party. Moral victories mean jack shit.
...Whew. Okay. You guys do you.