Did you miss Jimmy, he's in the first movie as well.
Gas leak, John?
Question: Is there anything (spoilers from the first movie)in this one? I had to skip that part like a wimp in the first one...super depressing like his dog getting killed
does he actually kill someone with a pencil in this?
does he actually kill someone with a pencil in this?
Question: Is there anything (spoilers from the first movie)in this one? I had to skip that part like a wimp in the first one...super depressing like his dog getting killed
Yeah saw him. But after that I've see nothing which is weird.it's like they are avoiding these assassins
It's gold. Which would probably be the best currency to use if you're an assassin.Have they ever explained what those coins they pay for everything are worth? He gave the gun guy 1 for 4 guns, the blueprint guy 4 coins for the prints and they payed for their 2 drinks with 1 coin.
Holy crap. Take a breath.Do you really care about this shit?
I'm honestly asking, because seriously, I think it's pretty obvious they just wanted something that looks cool and a bit weird but still understood as money. It gives texture to this surreal world and it sidesteps the issue of people thinking things like "well that a lot of money for cleaning up a house" which is not what you want your audience to be doing.
Do you really think a movie like John Wick needs an expository dialog explaining how their monetary system came to be?
Yeah, you could come up with something, it's fiction, you can pull whatever you want out of your ass, but I think it will almost certainly be more boring than the light mystery that we have now.
That mindset is what got us the fucking Star Wars prequels and Matrix sequels.
I'm not saying you're responsible for them, that would be silly, but I am saying the Jar Jar Binks is 100% your personal fault and you should be ashamed.
Only small complaint I had was that Ruby Rose felt off the whole movie to me. Not threatening, not a badass, just a sarcastic asshole who was. Ms. Perkins from the first movie was a much better character for me.destined to die at Wick's hand
Yeah saw him. But after that I've see nothing which is weird.it's like they are avoiding these assassins
Do you really care about this shit?
I'm honestly asking, because seriously, I think it's pretty obvious they just wanted something that looks cool and a bit weird but still understood as money. It gives texture to this surreal world and it sidesteps the issue of people thinking things like "well that a lot of money for cleaning up a house" which is not what you want your audience to be doing.
Do you really think a movie like John Wick needs an expository dialog explaining how their monetary system came to be?
Yeah, you could come up with something, it's fiction, you can pull whatever you want out of your ass, but I think it will almost certainly be more boring than the light mystery that we have now.
That mindset is what got us the fucking Star Wars prequels and Matrix sequels.
I'm not saying you're responsible for them, that would be silly, but I am saying the Jar Jar Binks is 100% your personal fault and you should be ashamed.
Only small complaint I had was that Ruby Rose felt off the whole movie to me. Not threatening, not a badass, just a sarcastic asshole who was. Ms. Perkins from the first movie was a much better character for me.destined to die at Wick's hand
Only small complaint I had was that Ruby Rose felt off the whole movie to me. Not threatening, not a badass, just a sarcastic asshole who was. Ms. Perkins from the first movie was a much better character for me.destined to die at Wick's hand
The Rome, however short it was, represented the essence of Hitman far better than both of the official movies combined.assassination
So good.
I'm guessing John can cash that in as a get out of jail free card or something from the Continental. Maybe won't call off the contract, but he can make a blood oath with someone so that he will return the favor down the line. I imagine someone out there will want John's skills over his bounty so it may come in handy. I don't know how it would work out, but a Wick and Cassian team up would be awesome. I'm actually surprised they didn't team up to take down Bad Guy. But I guess he had a knife in his aorta.
gonna blood oath girl and Girl + Wick as finale film to trilogy.
B O O K Markit.
So are Cassian and the female bodyguard definitely dead? Or both still alive? Or one of the other? It seems a little cheap that they kept death ambiguous for the both of them. Kill a character or don't, but it is cheesy to try and have it both ways for two of the principal villains......especially when you do it the same way both times, with a knife stuck in each one's chest.
Do you really care about this shit?
I'm honestly asking, because seriously, I think it's pretty obvious they just wanted something that looks cool and a bit weird but still understood as money. It gives texture to this surreal world and it sidesteps the issue of people thinking things like "well that a lot of money for cleaning up a house" which is not what you want your audience to be doing.
Do you really think a movie like John Wick needs an expository dialog explaining how their monetary system came to be?
Yeah, you could come up with something, it's fiction, you can pull whatever you want out of your ass, but I think it will almost certainly be more boring than the light mystery that we have now.
That mindset is what got us the fucking Star Wars prequels and Matrix sequels.
I'm not saying you're responsible for them, that would be silly, but I am saying the Jar Jar Binks is 100% your personal fault and you should be ashamed.
Damn
John Wick 2 was everything I wanted it to be. Fantastic action, a deeper look at its world, and style to spare.
Do dogs die again in this movie? A simple yes or no pls.
Do dogs die again in this movie? A simple yes or no pls.
I'm heading to see this tonight.
Question - my older daughter hasn't seen the original, but has expressed interest in seeing this (and the first film). How dependent on the first is this, outside of world building? If the story leads off it I might try to snag it on Netflix this week and watch it with her, but if she won't be lost we might go together tonight.
I'm heading to see this tonight.
Question - my older daughter hasn't seen the original, but has expressed interest in seeing this (and the first film). How dependent on the first is this, outside of world building? If the story leads off it I might try to snag it on Netflix this week and watch it with her, but if she won't be lost we might go together tonight.
But in the sequeljohn is only brought back into the game because of the deal he made years prior with the Italian gentleman, he tells Keanu that he wants his sister to be killed so he can have a seat at the big table this does not have any real ground to stand on as the supposed force behind john for chapter 2. John could have simply ended him and taken on the consequences for not keeping his end of the bargain. Instead he chooses to become excomunicado from the continental. And loses everything. Now he is forced to always look over his shoulder. The writers broke the one rule, never, ever write yourself into a corner so that your story cannot continue accordingly. This was disappointing to me, as I think this will make chapter 3 either be the bomb of the franchise or it will at least hinder the writers from filling out the world in which john wicks story was being told.
3 in Tokyo please or a cameo from Donnie yen
Just got back from seeing chapter 2. As someone in the industry I was more than excited to see the sequel to john wick. But a few things stood out to me that definitely could have been handled better. Remember this is just my opinion. What makes john wick work is that he has drive. A force behind him that causes him to do what he does. In the original it was him losing his wife and dog. This is relatable to people in the sense of wanting revenge. But in the sequeljohn is only brought back into the game because of the deal he made years prior with the Italian gentleman, he tells Keanu that he wants his sister to be killed so he can have a seat at the big table this does not have any real ground to stand on as the supposed force behind john for chapter 2. John could have simply ended him and taken on the consequences for not keeping his end of the bargain. Instead he chooses to become excomunicado from the continental. And loses everything. Now he is forced to always look over his shoulder. The writers broke the one rule, never, ever write yourself into a corner so that your story cannot continue accordingly. This was disappointing to me, as I think this will make chapter 3 either be the bomb of the franchise or it will at least hinder the writers from filling out the world in which john wicks story was being told.
They already worked together in Man of Tai Chai as well. Iko could work well asOr Iko Uwais from The Raid.
They already worked together in Man of Tai Chai as well. Iko could work well asan master assassin/bodyguard for when John goes after the entire international High Table
Only small complaint I had was that Ruby Rose felt off the whole movie to me. Not threatening, not a badass, just a sarcastic asshole who was. Ms. Perkins from the first movie was a much better character for me.destined to die at Wick's hand