Move on lolI don't think anyone's confronting him with the intention of changing his opinion; that'd be fairly vain. John Wick came out and got the reception it deserves from critics as well as the general audiences. He and his ilk are background noise at the most. My issue (I imagine others' as well) with what he's said lies here:
He's accusing the rest of us of seeing John Wick in an unjustifiable light, as if he (and his fringe peers) is the only one capable of seeing it for what it really is. If he's going to do that, then he should at least have the decency to say why. But as I'm sure you can see, he's above that, whether you ask him to nicely or not. Where he comes from, explaining why you think the things you do is not standard procedure in a discussion/debate. Asking for that apparently demonstrates entitlement.
He's absolutely not obligated to explain himself, but by the same token, he shouldn't expect what he says to hold any weight or value to the rest of us.
Move on lol
Derailing the thread again
Ok then move onThere's no need to play traffic officer, dude; I've already moved on. I'm merely making my previous actions clear.
I wonder what John wick would of been like with Jason statham
I am a fan of crack and trainsporter but it has been years since I watched themKeanu is perfect for the role, but if not him then Statham would be a decent choice. While Statham makes a lot of average/poor movies he's usually the best part of most movies he's in (including Spy). The Mechanic is probably the only real Statham action movie that I'd argue is really good, however.
Most uncomfortable experience I've ever had watching a movie in IMAX...
Mine, too, if I can ever get out of work to get home.UHD of the first just arrived, hype levels rising!
I am a fan of crack and trainsporter but it has been years since I watched them
What about war
That Every Frame a Painting vid has to count for something. Surely more than making claims you are incapable of backing up?
But if I've not contributed anything of worth thus far, then let me change that:
Expertly choreographed action sequences and adept camera work are a given in a John Wick sequel, but I don't really see many people talking about how pretty John Wick: Chapter 2 is.
Rome is stunning, of course, but it's not just that.
It's like the club aesthetic was taken from the first movie and draped over the second. Everything is so colorful, vibrant, and modern-looking - it's a great eye-catching compliment to the highly kinetic and energetic nature of the movie. The set designs are really gorgeous, too. This movie's a real looker in every respect I can think of.
See. I'm not all snark.
Wait what is jw?Transporter 1 I liked, but the others I enjoyed, but wouldn't say that they're really good. Crank is such a ridiculous buy crazy ride that it's definitely good. I forgot about that one for some reason.
Other than that I'd probably put Parker and Safe toward the top of my Statham list. As much as I like Jet Li I didn't really care for War.
Can't wait for JW2. I suspect it will do quite well at the box office as JW really caught on after its theatrical run ended.
Wait what is jw?
Lol wow I feel dumb. But yea I am hyped for it.Sorry. I didn't really transition well to talking about a different topic. JW = John Wick.
This movie looks amazing.That Every Frame a Painting vid has to count for something. Surely more than making claims you are incapable of backing up?
But if I've not contributed anything of worth thus far, then let me change that:
Expertly choreographed action sequences and adept camera work are a given in a John Wick sequel, but I don't really see many people talking about how pretty John Wick: Chapter 2 is.
Rome is stunning, of course, but it's not just that.
It's like the club aesthetic was taken from the first movie and draped over the second. Everything is so colorful, vibrant, and modern-looking - it's a great eye-catching complement to the highly kinetic and energetic nature of the movie. The set designs are really gorgeous, too. This movie's a real looker in every respect I can think of.
See. I'm not all snark.
Sheeeeeeeit.
The Fury Road of 2017
The Equalizer was a laughable, overly-serious cliche fest with severe tonal problems and a narrative that was all over the map and couldn't decide when to end (movie has, like, three different ending moments). It's also 20-30 minutes too long. The villain was hilariously over-the-top in just how evil he was; entirely one-note. The movie fucking cuts from him brutally strangling a prostitute to a super corny baseball game.
Movie was also predictable as all hell and fell back on the "mysterious stranger with a heart of gold and a badass past" trope, which has been done ten times better by The Man from Nowhere.
John Wick puts The Equalizer to shame.
If only Dredd caught the action sequel wave ;_;
I feel very strongly about this, so I'll say it again:
The Raid
Dredd
John Wick
Fury Road
These are the four pillars of the action genre now. I feel these films are the reason the genre isn't on life support. They are classic masterpieces that are worthy of the same conversation as films like Die Hard.
John wick and dredd are not on the same level as the other. Classic masterpieces fee wrong to sayI feel very strongly about this, so I'll say it again:
The Raid
Dredd
John Wick
Fury Road
These are the four pillars of the action genre now. I feel these films are the reason the genre isn't on life support. They are classic masterpieces that are worthy of the same conversation as films like Die Hard.
Totally agreed though I'd put John Wick and Fury Road ahead of the other two.
There it is.
John wick and dredd are not on the same level as the other. Classic masterpieces fee wrong to say
I feel very strongly about this, so I'll say it again:
The Raid
Dredd
John Wick
Fury Road
These are the four pillars of the action genre now. I feel these films are the reason the genre isn't on life support. They are classic masterpieces that are worthy of the same conversation as films like Die Hard.
I like those, but no, they're not on the same level as those fourNot even one of the Fast and Furious movies?
I like those, but no, they're not on the same level as those four
Film nerds? Is that what they are calling us now. I just prefer the term movie buff. And widely accepted by who? i know all those films are widely praised but I have never seen someone put dredd and john wick on the same leve as fury road till now.Uh, most film nerds agree with that sentiment? Doesn't feel wrong to say in the slightest when it's a widely accepted opinion.
What F&F does best is 1) somehow continue to reinvent and top itself with each sequel while still maintaining what makes the series good, something most action franchises seem unable to do, and 2) puts an insane amount of effort into practical effects and stunts. Those elements are its legacy within the action genre IMOYeah. I'd say that when it comes to pop-culture and cinema, the F&F films have their place and time, but none of them can really stand as "classic" action cinema.
This is a study in which films are directed with a deft hand and a keen eye for holding shots and allowing incredible choreography do the work. It's when a honed and focused narrative comes together with energetic pacing, gorgeous cinematography and camerawork, and insane action.
Choppy editing almost always disqualifies an action film from being considered "GOAT" material.
Film nerds? Is that what they are calling us now. I just prefer the term movie buff. And widely accepted by who? i know all those films are widely praised but I have never seen someone put dredd and john wick on the same leve as fury road till now.
WHY DOES THIS HAVE SO MANY CUTS!?!?!
Almost causes motion sickness...
EDIT And the climbing gif above is even worse.
The Fury Road of 2017
Bad OpinionsSo it sucks
I would assume There would be more articles and threads about it giving the sequel comes out this Friday.I've read a few articles in the last week which talk about John Wick 2 and discuss how the first film became an instant classic.
So it's not just me saying it. I'm not pulling this out of my ass.
All I'm saying is, there's a reason you're seeing John Wick being talked about today to the extent people are, and not The Equalizer.
What F&F does best is 1) somehow continue to reinvent and top itself with each sequel while still maintaining what makes the series good, something most action franchises seem unable to do, and 2) puts an insane amount of effort into practical effects and stunts. Those elements are its legacy within the action genre IMO
So it sucks
What F&F does best is 1) somehow continue to reinvent and top itself with each sequel while still maintaining what makes the series good, something most action franchises seem unable to do, and 2) puts an insane amount of effort into practical effects and stunts. Those elements are its legacy within the action genre IMO
Fast 5 is legit but it's plagued with shitty prequels and over the top sequels.
Except Tokyo Drift. It had charm and ridiculous shit like a Hulk Car. I cannot hate Tokyo Drift.
5 is a legit entertaining action movie though.