Joint Nokia/MS conference next week. *Rumor* Nokia adopting Windows Mobile

Status
Not open for further replies.
Riddick said:
I for one am glad I'm a fan of a company that doesn't rip off its customers like Apple does hence the low profit. That's why Nokia is so popular and Apple can only succeed in USA where it bombards its customers with ads in order to sell its products.

64b85
 
Riddick said:
I for one am glad I'm a fan of a company that doesn't rip off its customers like Apple does hence the low profit. That's why Nokia is so popular and Apple can only succeed in USA where it bombards its customers with ads in order to sell its products.
Classic Sega fan...
 
Riddick said:
I for one am glad I'm a fan of a company that doesn't rip off its customers like Apple does hence the low profit. That's why Nokia is so popular and Apple can only succeed in USA where it bombards its customers with ads in order to sell its products.

Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
 
Riddick said:
That's why Nokia is so popular and Apple can only succeed in USA where it bombards its customers with ads in order to sell its products.

If anything I see more adverts for Nokia phones than the iPhone in Taipei.
 
wow that would give nokia a real good shot at becoming relevant again, even though they apparently still sell a ridiculous amount of phones to somebody.
 
You may whine about my post but it's the truth. Apple is a terrible company that treats its customers like idiots.

1.Make pretty UI and hardware so that the customers can brag about it to their friends (pretty but limited)
2.Bombard customers with ads
3.Sell at twice the value of the product
....
4.Profit
 
Np468.png

You know what this says? This says that if you're going for volume you *need* other ways of generating profit in the industry.

This is why Windows Phone 7 makes sense for Nokia. They can put out the volume, and assuming they get a cut from Marketplace sales, they're sitting pretty. It's "easy" to make a nice phone, it's not easy to create an eco-system. And that's what Microsoft have managed with WP7 despite relatively low sales - the Marketplace sells.
 
Nokia's problem is that they're so big and bureaucratic that changing the direction the company is heading takes a lot of time. They know they have a big problem but the process of fixing that is a slow process.

Apparently next Friday the new CEO Stephen Elop is going to reveal the first big changes.
 
Riddick said:
You may whine about my post but it's the truth. Apple is a terrible company that treats its customers like idiots.

1.Make pretty UI and hardware so that the customers can brag about it to their friends (pretty but limited)
2.Bombard customers with ads
3.Sell at twice the value of the product
....
4.Profit
An iPhone 4 is $200, which is about the same as every other standard subsidized smartphone.

But keep polishing that pitchfork of yours.
 
Yeah, God forbid that a company makes products people actually want to buy. How diabolical.

these threads always bring out the crazies.
 
giga said:
An iPhone 4 is $200, which is about the same as every other standard subsidized smartphone.

But keep polishing that pitchfork of yours.

Going by my country's operators (smartphone starting prices) :

Bouygues: 1€ - 199€, iPhone 4: 199€/299€
Orange: 1€ - 149€, iPhone 4: 199€/299€
SFR: 1€ - 129€, iPhone 4: 199€/299€

Keep in mind that while you can find one or two phones at 199€, 149€, and 129€, the majority are well under 49€. The iPhone is much more expensive, I don't know how you can even debate that.
 
MagniHarvald said:
Going by my country's operators (smartphone starting prices) :

Bouygues: 1€ - 199€, iPhone 4: 199€/299€
Orange: 1€ - 149€, iPhone 4: 199€/299€
SFR: 1€ - 129€, iPhone 4: 199€/299€

Keep in mind that while you can find one or two phones at 199€, 149€, and 129€, the majority are well under 49€. The iPhone is much more expensive, I don't know how you can even debate that.
Well of course you can get low end smartphones. What are the prices for something similar to the hardware of the iPhone 4? Nexus S, Droid X, Galaxy S, G2, and so on. In the US these are all standard $150+ on contract.
 
giga said:
Well of course you can get low end smartphones. What are the prices for something similar to the hardware of the iPhone 4? Nexus S, Droid X, Galaxy S, G2, and so on. In the US these are all standard $150+ on contract.
On a contract? The Omnia 7 was free in the UK.
 
aswedc said:
I can't find any reputable source reporting this is a joint Nokia Microsoft event. Just analyst speculation.

Who is "The Sociable" and why are they breaking tech news?
Engadget reported on this as well and they claim to have a source that confirmed it.
More importantly, though, we've got a trusted source of our own who's now saying that the tide has turned and this appears to be happening at Capital Markets Day -- and that one of Nokia's existing platforms will be dropped as a direct result.
http://www.engadget.com/2011/02/04/nokia-microsoft-announcing-partnership-next-week-possibly-invo/

The bolded part is important. Nokia won't go exclusively with WP7 (that would be really stupid) and they're gonna keep Symbian or MeeGo. It would make sense to drop MeeGo, then use WP7 for the high-end and Symbian for the lower-end devices. They talked about it on the Engadget podcast and it seems that Symbian is too huge to just drop it like that. MeeGo on the other hand isn't even on one single product. You can only download images for the N900 and Netbooks, but that's it.

claviertekky said:
What? Windows Mobile is axed.
Windows Mobile 6.5 is still alive and kicking in the enterprise business. Motorola even released a new WM6.5.3 handset few months ago.
http://www.pocketpccentral.net/news...bile-enterprise-smartphone-coming-in-october/

btw, I'm expecting something like Silverlight 4 for MeeGo. Would be funny, wouldn't it?
 
Riddick said:
You may whine about my post but it's the truth. Apple is a terrible company that treats its customers like idiots.

1.Make pretty UI and hardware so that the customers can brag about it to their friends (pretty but limited)
2.Bombard customers with ads
3.Sell at twice the value of the product
....
4.Profit

I'm sorry, what? This just means they're able to match or exceed other manufacturers' devices, while producing them at much lower prices. What does this tell you? Your argument is invalid. If a company can sell a product in a saturated market for a much higher price than the price of manufacturing, it means they're doing something much better than the competition. See another example: Porsche.
 
Sir Fragula said:
On a contract? The Omnia 7 was free in the UK.
Windows Phones have been the anomaly. They’re heavily discounted because Microsoft is trying to make up ground. I’d imagine the old QSD8x50 SoC that they all use is pretty discounted at this point too.
 
giga said:
Well of course you can get low end smartphones. What are the prices for something similar to the hardware of the iPhone 4? Nexus S, Droid X, Galaxy S, G2, and so on. In the US these are all standard $150+ on contract.

Samsung Galaxy S - 99€
Blackberry Bold - 119€
Samsung Omnia 7 - 129€
Blackberry Torch - 149€
(Orange prices)

Those are the four most expensive one after the iPhone 4. You can also get a 3GS for 99€, but it only dropped to that after the iPhone 4 came out, used to be 199€/299€ as well. The N8 and Mozart are at 79€, and the Optimus at 69€. I've never spent more than 100€ on a phone, and I've bought an N95, an E71, a Hero, and an Omnia 7 (it was at 99€ during launch :p). The iPhone is at another level, pricewise.
 
MagniHarvald said:
Samsung Galaxy S - 99€
Blackberry Bold - 119€
Samsung Omnia 7 - 129€
Blackberry Torch - 149€
(Orange prices)

Those are the four most expensive one after the iPhone 4. You can also get a 3GS for 99€, but it only dropped to that after the iPhone 4 came out, used to be 199€/299€ as well. The N8 and Mozart are at 79€, and the Optimus at 69€. I've never spent more than 100€ on a phone, and I've bought an N95, an E71, a Hero, and an Omnia 7 (it was at 99€ during launch :p). The iPhone is at another level.
Comparing the hardware of a Bold or Torch is laughable man. The latter is about on par to the 3GS. The Galaxy S and Omnia 7 are more comparable.
 
giga said:
Windows Phones have been the anomaly. They’re heavily discounted because Microsoft is trying to make up ground. I’d imagine the old QSD8x50 SoC that they all use is pretty discounted at this point too.
No, that's pretty much the norm. I don't think I've ever known *anyone* to pay for a top of the line smartphone that wasn't an Apple device.

EDIT: Just double checked the Galaxy-S on T-mobile. Free with a regular contract.
 
That would be great news, I want to buy a Windows 7 Phone but the lack of any sort of tethering right now is holding me back. If MS just works on a few more features it will be a killer OS.
 
Sir Fragula said:
No, that's pretty much the norm. I don't think I've ever known *anyone* to pay for a top of the line smartphone that wasn't an Apple device.

EDIT: Just double checked the Galaxy-S on T-mobile. Free with a regular contract.
$100: http://www.t-mobile.com/shop/Phones/cell-phone-detail.aspx?cell-phone=Samsung-Vibrant
$200: http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Samsung...skuId=1484107&id=1218262482328&ref=141&loc=01
$200 : http://www.verizonwireless.com/droid-x-motorola.shtml

Seems like you Europeans get far more discounted options than the US then.
 
Sir Fragula said:
No, that's pretty much the norm. I don't think I've ever known *anyone* to pay for a top of the line smartphone that wasn't an Apple device.

EDIT: Just double checked the Galaxy-S on T-mobile. Free with a regular contract.
The iPhone 4 is free on contract in Hong Kong, China, Japan, and Taiwan (maybe others). And data + voice plans are cheaper.

Carriers in other places could subsidize even more if they wanted to, but customers are willing to pay, so there's no reason to subsidize. (They also act very cartel-like, AT&T just RAISED the price of a contract-free iPhone 4 to match Verizon's price)
 
giga said:
Comparing the hardware of a Bold or Torch is laughable man. The latter is about on par to the 3GS. The Galaxy S and Omnia 7 are more comparable.

Was never comparing the HW, just the prices. RIM and Apple products are the most expensive when it comes to phones here, the rest drops in price very quickly if they are even expensive to start out with.
 
Sephiroth said:
This guy is an idiot but he's right about one thing. Engadget is Apple's bitch and I expect them to falsify tests to make iphone look better.

So you are an idiot too?
 
Sephiroth said:
This guy is an idiot but he's right about one thing. Engadget is Apple's bitch and I expect them to falsify tests to make iphone look better.

I wouldn't put it past Engadget either, the bias towards Apple on that website is just plain appalling, the editor always writes the Apple reviews and they are always glowing and they glaze over glaring faults whilst the competition is always held to a different standard.
 
Zinga said:
I wouldn't put it past Engadget either, the bias towards Apple on that website is just plain appalling, the editor always writes the Apple reviews and they are always glowing and they glaze over glaring faults whilst the competition is always held to a different standard.
Or because the products are...good?
 
MagniHarvald said:
Was never comparing the HW, just the prices. RIM and Apple products are the most expensive when it comes to phones here, the rest drops in price very quickly if they are even expensive to start out with.
I was. ;)

Well of course you can get low end smartphones. What are the prices for something similar to the hardware of the iPhone 4? Nexus S, Droid X, Galaxy S, G2, and so on. In the US these are all standard $150+ on contract.
 
Lagspike_exe said:
You don't want to know.
They didn't include in survey.

Apple (iPhone 4); Motorola (Droid 2, Droid X); RIM BlackBerry (Torch, Bold, Curve); HTC (EVO 4G, Droid Incredible); and Samsung (Galaxy S)
 
It's about fucking time they adopted something. Symbian is an appallingly sluggish and poorly supported OS. Nokia still make a fair amount of decent smartphone hardware but being stuck with Symbian is going to kill them in the longterm.
 
Gamer @ Heart said:
Is that just in America?

Because Nokia fucking owns Europe and i doubt they hate it.

Probably because its a European brand like Fiat. Now that Nokia has a Canadian boss who puts Microsoft OS in their phone, the Europeans won't have any reason to buy their phones anymore.
 
giga said:
Well of course you can get low end smartphones. What are the prices for something similar to the hardware of the iPhone 4? Nexus S, Droid X, Galaxy S, G2, and so on. In the US these are all standard $150+ on contract.
Ok.
I've checked on Orange store in Poland.
Prices for 24month contract 50/25 euro/month
Iphone 4 16GB 146/411
HTC Desire - 0,20*/0,20
HTC Desire Z - 0,20/180
HTC Desire HD - 13/220
Samsung Galaxy S - 0,20/13
Iphone 3GS 8GB - 25/240
Nokia N8 - 0,20/103


*yes, that's 20 eurocents.
 
Nokia fanboys are so weird to me because they find ways to convince themselves that Symbian is a perfectly acceptable mobile OS.
 
Riddick said:
You may whine about my post but it's the truth. Apple is a terrible company that treats its customers like idiots.

1.Make pretty UI and hardware so that the customers can brag about it to their friends (pretty but limited)
2.Bombard customers with ads
3.Sell at twice the value of the product
....
4.Profit
Hahaha. Oh, god, I'm sick and not feeling well, but this ridiculous post put a smile on my face. Thanks for the laugh.
 
Polk said:
Ok.
I've checked on Orange store in Poland.
Prices for 24month contract 50/25 euro/month
Iphone 4 16GB 146/411
HTC Desire - 0,20*/0,20
HTC Desire Z - 0,20/180
HTC Desire HD - 13/220
Samsung Galaxy S - 0,20/13
Iphone 3GS 8GB - 25/240
Nokia N8 - 0,20/103


*yes, that's 20 eurocents.
iPhone 4 is free on Orange UK plans for an 24 month contract and 50 euro/month.
http://shop.orange.co.uk/iphone/choose-your-4g-plan

The prices will be different based on the carriers and market worldwide. Apple sells it to the carriers at standard prices and carriers can gouge or subsidize customers as much as they want, depending on what the local consumer market can bear.
 
dream said:
Nokia fanboys are so weird to me because they find ways to convince themselves that Symbian is a perfectly acceptable mobile OS.
Hows it being a fanboy if you like something and find it perfectly fine? Im sorry that I dont find ios or android the mind blowing experiences that you seem to think that they are compared to Symbian.
 
markot said:
Hows it being a fanboy if you like something and find it perfectly fine? Im sorry that I dont find ios or android the mind blowing experiences that you seem to think that they are compared to Symbian.

I just moved from the N97 to the Desire HD and my feelings towards Symbian have nothing to do with thinking that Android is mind-blowing and everything to do with feeling that Symbian is a seriously sub-par mobile OS.
 
jim-jam bongs said:
I just moved from the N97 to the Desire HD and my feelings towards Symbian have nothing to do with thinking that Android is mind-blowing and everything to do with feeling that Symbian is a seriously sub-par mobile OS.
To be honest Symbian at least knows the basic concept of both appointments and tasks (although lack of categories still baffled me after switching from WM6).
I don't have to install some third party PIM to manage them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom