Elop started at Nokia at the end of last September.canova said:He gets it after the facts, what so special about that? 'oh look our pie is gone, guess Apple and Google ate it.' duh!
Elop started at Nokia at the end of last September.canova said:He gets it after the facts, what so special about that? 'oh look our pie is gone, guess Apple and Google ate it.' duh!
markot said:Should be an interesting press conference anyway >.<
What would be great is phones that let you chose the OS.
giga said:Elop started at Nokia at the end of last September.
Burger said:Yeah I'm not sure a unified platform is a great idea for anyone.
Look at Android. Manufacturers only use it because it's essentially free/very low cost when compared to an internally developed operating system. The only problem is it becomes difficult to differentiate from everyone else who uses it. It's good for consumers as everyone ends up undercutting each other, but it's terrible for your margins.
Firestorm said:I wouldn't say it's too late really. The Nokia brand still holds sway I would think. It's just their software is an unusable mess. I'm thinking that if Microsoft and Nokia can do what Verizon and Motorola did for the Droid X, we will see them really turn around in the higher end.
markot said:lol? Smartphones are dead?
Tablets are the ones that are going to be in trouble, smart phones are getting more powerful and can do anything tablets can do. Laptops are there if you need anything srs, tablets are in an awful neverland between the two of simply being luxury devices that dont really fill any role well.
Haha.markot said:lol? Smartphones are dead?
Tablets are the ones that are going to be in trouble, smart phones are getting more powerful and can do anything tablets can do. Laptops are there if you need anything srs, tablets are in an awful neverland between the two of simply being luxury devices that dont really fill any role well.
D4Danger said:Nearly every computer you buy nowadays uses Windows and you never see anyone complaining that it's too difficult to differentiate yourself.
These companies build hardware, that's what they do and that how they differentiate themselves by building cool stuff.
Tablets aren't a smartphone replacement. They are a supplement. And honestly, aside from RIM and Samsung (I think), I haven't see even much interplay between the phone and tablet. It seems like everyone else is selling them as completely different products without relation.canova said:It is too late. While Nokia is busy figuring it out what their strategy for smartphones. Their competitors already moved on to the next phase, tablets.
This Nokia-WP7 partnership, if it indeed comes to fruition, doesn't make sense. They try to recapture their shrinking market share by going with a dead platform in smartphone? Even worse is that the platform maker, Microsoft, has no strategy or vision for tablets.
You realize that the CEO hasn't been with the company for 3 years, right? He just joined the company a few months ago coming from Microsoft.canova said:He gets it after the facts, what so special about that? 'oh look our pie is gone, guess Apple and Google ate it.' duh!
D4Danger said:Nearly every computer you buy nowadays uses Windows and you never see anyone complaining about this.
markot said:lol? Smartphones are dead?
Tablets are the ones that are going to be in trouble, smart phones are getting more powerful and can do anything tablets can do. Laptops are there if you need anything srs, tablets are in an awful neverland between the two of simply being luxury devices that dont really fill any role well.
Firestorm said:Tablets aren't a smartphone replacement. They are a supplement. And honestly, aside from RIM and Samsung (I think), I haven't see even much interplay between the phone and tablet. It seems like everyone else is selling them as completely different products without relation.
Android is a great platform. However, I can see the risks and cons of Android being particularly harsh on Nokia so it makes sense they would go with Microsoft if offered the right incentive. Given Elop's relationship with Microsoft, it's not too crazy to assume he has been able to work something out with them.
I have no answer to that. Dell seems to think it does. We'll see how it plays out.canova said:Let say Nokia does choose MS as partner, how do they expect to expand to tablet?
don't look at MS, because MS themselves has no idea to tackle tablet market
canova said:Let say Nokia does choose MS as partner, how do they expect to expand to tablet?
don't look at MS, because MS themselves has no idea to tackle tablet market
LCfiner said:where are you getting this doom and gloom about the tablet market from? 15 million ipads were sold in 9 months.
LCfiner said:the market is just starting. it's going to be huge - and, yeah, notebook sales are hurting because of it.
Firstly, size does matter. Even if they're identical on a hardware level there is still more than can be done on a bigger screen quicker and more efficiently.jim-jam bongs said:Which means that it still remains to be seen whether there will be an ongoing market for them. I get Markot's point, if your smartphone can do everything which a tablet can do and more then why do you need a tablet? At that stage it becomes a nice accessory to have, but it's far from being a necessity.
jim-jam bongs said:Which means that it still remains to be seen whether there will be an ongoing market for them. I get Markot's point, if your smartphone can do everything which a tablet can do and more then why do you need a tablet? At that stage it becomes a nice accessory to have, but it's far from being a necessity.
Has this ever been established? Not saying it hasn't, but the last thing I remember was a guy from Best Buy being misquoted by the press as saying notebooks when he actually said netbooks.
People who say smartphones can do everything tablets can completely miss the additional utility gained through a larger screen and resolution. Why would anyone buy an iPad over an iPod touch if that wasnt the case?jim-jam bongs said:Which means that it still remains to be seen whether there will be an ongoing market for them. I get Markot's point, if your smartphone can do everything which a tablet can do and more then why do you need a tablet? At that stage it becomes a nice accessory to have, but it's far from being a necessity.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/oct/14/ipad-netbook-salesHas this ever been established? Not saying it hasn't, but the last thing I remember was a guy from Best Buy being misquoted by the press as saying notebooks when he actually said netbooks.
LCfiner said:smartphone market is certainly bigger than the tablet market but he was assuming that notebook sales will squeeze out tablets. a tablet may not be a necessity but neither is a smartphone. what's gonna happen is that more and more people will find they prefer using a tablet for the basic web stuff (and some fun stuff) that they used to use a laptop for (it's lighter, easier to use, gets better battery, is more portable, etc).
Apple said at their last investor call that the ipad cannibalized macbook sales to a certain extent. and I am fairly certain that some other CEO's of computer companies said netbook sales had dropped for them and they "blamed" the ipad. but this is the only link I found in a quick search (sorry, don't fl like hunting for more)
canova said:Let say Nokia does choose MS as partner, how do they expect to expand to tablet?
don't look at MS, because MS themselves has no idea to tackle tablet market
crazy monkey said:do macbook sale even compare to idevices any ways. I thought they were not that famous anyways compare to I device.
markot said:Except that having a monopoly doesnt do crap for innovation.
jim-jam bongs said:The size factor is definitely an issue, but I think that the bulk of the market will always settle for the "good enough" technology over the best, hence the Windows hegemony. I guess I just see that as being the biggest problem for widespread tablet adoption, not just iPad.
Time will tell. At this stage I think the majority of consumers see tablets as being somewhere in between two places which they already bounce between, i.e. mobile/smartphone computing and desktop computing, whereas they see computers and smartphones as either necessary or close to it.
Firestorm said:I wouldn't say it's too late really. The Nokia brand still holds sway I would think. It's just their software is an unusable mess. I'm thinking that if Microsoft and Nokia can do what Verizon and Motorola did for the Droid X, we will see them really turn around in the higher end.
Burger said:My post was opinion and observation. Live with it.
DrFunk said:
It's amazing how many people still don't get what Apple does. You can't just have Steve announce any old phone and boom, get a winner.Firestorm said:Fun read to keep yourself occupied 'til Friday: http://mobilernr.com/had-apple-announced-the-nokia-n8/
Most people I know tend to prefer Turkey to Eagle, "Vic".DrFunk said:
Well those of us with WP7 devices would likely gain from increased developer interest - not that it's low right now. Other than that, it's an interesting spectacle. Like all device "wars" it's just a bit of fun to get involved with.Vyse The Legend said:Are people actually excited for a Microsoft-Nokia union? I'm unsure if some people are being serious here or not.
Tobor said:It's amazing how many people still don't get what Apple does. You can't just have Steve announce any old phone and boom, get a winner.
The N8 would never have been cleared by Jobs for release, let alone him announcing it on stage.
Also, lol at Google trolling. WP7 + Nokia must be real.
Jtwo said:What an asshole! :lol
That's such a hilarious burn.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/15/nokia_on_siemens-benq/The folks at Nokia certainly know how to give good quote. Here's the mobile phone giant's take on Siemens' sale of its handset division to Taiwan's BenQ:
"Two turkeys won't make an eagle," the company believes.