The problem is nobody is allowed to be as big and as mighty as John Cena. Folks aren't allowed to step up and shine unless it's in the company's plans.
Beating a dead horse, but Punk was that guy, before and during the MitB 2011 angle he was hot, and after the PPV you can honestly say he rivalled Cena both in merch sales and popularity. Even little Jimmies were drinking the Punk kool-aid. But like always, "fuck him for not being our planned superstar", and the formula WWE always employs to "test" people by jobbing them was put into work.
And when their chosen ones don't cut it, even then they exhaust every possible method of forcing them through everybody's throat, like Ryback. Terrible in the mic, average and hazardous in the ring, but pushed like hell until they realized they couldn't sweeten up that shitcake.
WWE has a lot of potential stars that get the fan reactions and are talented, the question is, will they be allowed to go over the Cena-Ceiling and see if they cut it with a big push, or will they keep relying on the same old, same old methods. You can't job a guy and make him look like crap for months, and then say "well, we tried to push him, but nobody cared".
I don't know if this meets SoulPlaya's approval, but Roman's wife is oh so nice, baby girl.
Jobbing Punk out? How long did he hold that title?
Punk screwed Punk
WWE has a lot of potential stars that get the fan reactions and are talented, the question is, will they be allowed to go over the Cena-Ceiling and see if they cut it with a big push, or will they keep relying on the same old, same old methods. You can't job a guy and make him look like crap for months, and then say "well, we tried to push him, but nobody cared".
Do you think bringing back jobber matches would help? I feel like having named guys fight each other in every match means someone's always left looking bad, and it removes the "big match" feel that saving the encounter for a PPV used to have. Maybe it doesn't mean as much with the PPV model kind of eroding away now, but even so, you're right. It's hard to get people behind a guy that's always getting the short end of it.
We are calling that a good Raw now? A fucking Flo Rida concert and Stephanie being arrested for fifteen minutes of dead air? Come on brahs!
Jobbing Punk out? How long did he hold that title?
Punk screwed Punk
We are calling that a good Raw now? A fucking Flo Rida concert and Stephanie being arrested for fifteen minutes of dead air? Come on brahs!
I don't know how an ass so fat got lost in last night's thread but YO.
But but, you see, he wasn't in the Main Event of Wrestlemania, and often there was a match after his on PPVs, and he didn't have memorable feuds, and other goalpost shifting nonsense to keep the "WWE keeps our favs down" meme going despite having the belt for over a year. And I loved watching Punk, no less.
We are calling that a good Raw now? A fucking Flo Rida concert and Stephanie being arrested for fifteen minutes of dead air? Come on brahs!
It was a mediocre raw at best. The only thing that got a rise out of me was Paige turning and even that was on the weak end.
Jobber matches are the answer
Hang on a minute. The claim was "The problem is nobody is allowed to be as big and as mighty as John Cena". And your argument for why that isn't true is "sure Punk wasn't allowed to surpass Cena, but like he was right below him"?
As the major face of the company? 28 days.
As a midcarder, transitional champ while Rock & Cena lived their "Once in a lifetime" main event fantasy? 434 days.
So let's say this was what they decided to do. Is it too late for the guys they already have and have already watered down?
What?
That would be the sentiment I'm referring to.
Nope
Because they can get built up again with
JOBBER MATCHES! It's the perfect fix.
And managers.
I still wish they'd do an angle where Vince comes back and takes full control of the company somehow, then gets hit in the head or something and thinks it's 1985 all over again, changing the format back to old-style. Then when he snaps out of it in the story, they leave the show that way still.
I am tired of people kicking out of zigglers signature moves. Every time they kick out if the famaousser I just throw up my hands. Why is the wwe into making people's specials look so weak.
I'M AFRAID I'VE GOT SOME BAD NEWS!RAW was pretty decent last night. The crowd made it fun, anyway. I was surprised considering I always feel Miami crowds don't cheer all that much. They proved me wrong yesterday!
It's not his finisher, people kick out of everyone's signature moves all the time.
Do you think bringing back jobber matches would help? I feel like having named guys fight each other in every match means someone's always left looking bad, and it removes the "big match" feel that saving the encounter for a PPV used to have. Maybe it doesn't mean as much with the PPV model kind of eroding away now, but even so, you're right. It's hard to get people behind a guy that's always getting the short end of it.
You should watch more NXT.
Watching any would mean watching more. I think I've seen about five matches ever from NXT, if that. I've always been under the impression that it's the AAA-league to WWE's MLB. The presentation of what I saw surely sold it to me as such, which has its charm and all, but still.
I think my problem is that the show I want, doesn't exist and isn't viable any more. Whether that's the world and media changing, or good ol' bjork changing, I don't know. But I couldn't tell you the last time I got legitimately excited to see anything related to wrestling. So I dunno, maybe I complain because my time has passed and it's not "for" me any more?
The show you want is NXT you just haven't accepted it yet. Give it another shot. Promise it's good.
Watching any would mean watching more. I think I've seen about five matches ever from NXT, if that. I've always been under the impression that it's the AAA-league to WWE's MLB. The presentation of what I saw surely sold it to me as such, which has its charm and all, but still.
I think my problem is that the show I want, doesn't exist and isn't viable any more. Whether that's the world and media changing, or good ol' bjork changing, I don't know. But I couldn't tell you the last time I got legitimately excited to see anything related to wrestling. So I dunno, maybe I complain because my time has passed and it's not "for" me any more?
The only way to see new content is on the network, right?
We are calling that a good Raw now? A fucking Flo Rida concert and Stephanie being arrested for fifteen minutes of dead air? Come on brahs!
I like how they played up Cesaro's fall. Paul Heyman just needs to disappear. He will be just as bad as Cena in this feud....
As the major face of the company? 28 days.
As a midcarder, transitional champ while Rock & Cena lived their "Once in a lifetime" main event fantasy? 434 days.
Exactly.
I don't see how people can't understand how holding the title means nothing if he was kept playing second field for Cena the entire time.
Punk wasn't "the guy". Cena was. Title or no title.
There's a reason why Punk couldn't main event much when he was the champion.
He just wasn't as big of a draw.
How come Orton got 0 crowd reaction last night? Isnt he the top guy after Cena?
There's a reason why Punk couldn't main event much when he was the champion.
He just wasn't as big of a draw.
That makes no sense. He can't be more of a draw before he's given the ball and built into a draw. That's like saying "this foundation isn't a house, I should stop building it and go to the crumbling house I live in already".
LMAO, that almost looks believable.Heh, awesome.
Magic Choke Slam worthy
There's a reason why Punk couldn't main event much when he was the champion.
He just wasn't as big of a draw.
How can you even say that when he was never put in a position to be a huge draw? Dude felt like a placeholder champion for his entire reign
Not really but ok
For fuck's sake Cena was main event-ing B-tier PPVs. Who can forget Cena/Laurinitis getting top billing over Punk vs Bryan for the title? Fucking ridiculous.