eggybob said:So i've just woken up. . .and am really confused.
Is he gone or is this just storyline?
Lost Fragment said:Dropped the ball? Bryan being gone does take away from the nxt angle a little bit, but the face of the nxt invasion is Barrett, not Bryan.
And nobody gives a shit about Bryan other than internet smarks so I don't see how it would automatically boost tna if he showed up there.
But Bryan is by far the best worker out of the group the guy out of the group who could be relied on to be able to hang with the top name guys. Losing him really takes away credibility that the group desperatly need.Lost Fragment said:Dropped the ball? Bryan being gone does take away from the nxt angle a little bit, but the face of the nxt invasion is Barrett, not Bryan.
And nobody gives a shit about Bryan other than internet smarks so I don't see how it would automatically boost tna if he showed up there.
Jeff Albertson said:If not a work then WWE have dropped the ball, if they drop the storyline because of it even worse.
The guy was on a massive roll and now could go to TNA and give them a major boost.
EDIT: The irony is I Remember Cena choking out both Umaga (with the ropes) and JBL (with handcuffs) in that last few years
Penguin said:My numbers may be slightly off, but I believe JBL was in 2005 and Umaga was at Rumble 2007, which would both be before the Benoit incident, which is where they seem to have the problem with.
And both before their hardcore push towards PG.
What the fuck are you talking about? If you don't understand how Twitter works, don't comment on it.Linkified said:Yeah but why not remove his account from NXT and wwe universe twitter accounts and recreate a NXT version of the accoiunt and have it linking to that on WWE.com
John Cena's Twitter said:CeNation. I will not be out of action. I have taken and passed Impact testing, and I can deal with mine hip and spine issues. Never give up
I remember one-man-rockband guy(the one who always puckers his lips) seemed to try at one point, then stopped midway as well...hmmm...Spirit of Jazz said:With that said I swore Young was was going to choke Cena with the ring-ropes at one point but thought otherwise for some unknown reason. Also the way they edited out just about everything Bryan did was always a little suspect, I even pointed that out here.
avatar299 said:If the E' wanted him back, he will be back. Matt left when the Lita/Hardy/Edge shit blew up in the WWE's face and they brought him back when the heat cooled down.
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:Kusagari, remember when you wrote that this was clearly a work?![]()
DKehoe said:Danielson is supposedly now looking for Indy dates. Still has 90 day no compete clause. Internally people were saying "we just handed TNA a main eventer in 90 days" but Danielson was told by WWE that he will be able to be back with them in the future.
ONS was before WWE went PG13. Besides, I think it PPVs and regular tv shows has different guidelines. Hell it it wasn't live on RAW, probably Daniel wouldn't be fired just got some warning.krae_man said:Cena Choked JBL with the ring ropes at One Night Stand 2008.
Lebron said:Now this sounds like the WWE I know. Way to fuck that one up, fellas.
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:Remember last month when Batista tried to run over Cena in a car?
Liu Kang Baking A Pie said:Remember last month when Batista tried to run over Cena in a car?
Polk said:ONS was before WWE went PG13. Besides, I think it PPVs and regular tv shows has different guidelines. Hell it it wasn't live on RAW, probably Daniel wouldn't be fired just got some warning.
I'm still hoping its some kind of work. If not, It's WWE I lost all reasons to watch WWE shows. Once again.
Nameless said:Or the month before when a 65 year old man was hit with chair shots for 10 minutes?
krae_man said:That's not the point. The point is how can you have an anti choke policy if you book a finish to include a choke?
Agreed. I also think a lot of people are acting like this isn't a business and is just a place for your dreams to come true. When a sponsor or partner says something was too much, you either drop the sponsor or the person responsible. They made a sensible choice, considering they can just rehire him again in a few months when the heat is off.BigBlackGamer said:I have no problem with Danielson leaving, Barrett has always been the stand-out guy in NXT. Still excited about the angle and Danielson leaving doesn't magically make the WWE writing horrible. The angle was/is gonna succeed with or without any singular wrestler and the writing will be horrible/have it's moments without him.
Just alot of internet fanboys over-reacting.
BigBlackGamer said:I have no problem with Danielson leaving, Barrett has always been booked to be the stand-out guy in NXT.
No offense but if the crux of your creative programming is at the mercy of outside forces (I'm not talking about shareholders here but people with greater influence than even Vince) then you might as well just throw in the towel.DKehoe said:Listening to audio report just now with Dave Meltzer and Bryan Alvarez. Meltzer is saying he was told that there was "no logic" to the decision. The call came from Vince but he was pressured into it by someone from outside of the company who is very important to them. Danielson is supposedly now looking for Indy dates. Still has 90 day no compete clause. Internally people were saying "we just handed TNA a main eventer in 90 days" but Danielson was told by WWE that he will be able to be back with them in the future.
Says that in theory it COULD still be a work but if it is then they are working the entire company (including office guys like Marketing) which would't make much sense.
Says that currently there is a "much bigger situation going on with a much bigger name that would just boggle your mind."