I hope so.
It would be incredible stupid of them not to show anything since this is the only CC they can, next year is too late.
Jurassic World |Production Thread| Filming has wrapped!
- Thread starter Demoncarnotaur
- Start date
- Status
I hope so.
It would be incredible stupid of them not to show anything since this is the only CC they can, next year is too late.
SJRB
Gold Member
Chris Nolan-tier paranoia.
Woody Allen did it first.
GrayFoxPL
Member
I take this with bucket of popcorn.
Demoncarnotaur
Member
While I have no clue if this will pan out, it is true one of the ADs told extras that a scene they were filming was a key scene that will be in the film and trailer, and that they could see it in action this Thanksgiving in a trailer.
I think we may have just got a MASSIVE SPOILER about the role of the raptors and why they are missing from the leaked booklet!!!
Confirmation that Jurassic World will also have some sort of presence at Comic Con too.
Confirmation that Jurassic World will also have some sort of presence at Comic Con too.
Demoncarnotaur
Member
First look at the T-Rex, from Comic Con!
Cow Mengde
Banned
First look at the T-Rex, from Comic Con!
Surprise? Looks just like the T.rex?
I mean, the JP T.rex always looked pretty good so I'm not disappointed... much.
More_Badass
Member
Graphics Horse
Member
I assume it means they're just wild and hang around the old park.
Pretty much what I think is going on. The raptors weren't cloned for Jurassic World, because the owners knew from Jurassic Park that they were far too smart and aggressive to be handled safely by staff and viewed by the public. These guys are either from Isla Sorna and found away to Nubler or they were already on Nublar and the park owners just didn't realize they were still alive.
Banjotanooki
Member
First look at the T-Rex, from Comic Con!
Reminds me of this T-rex toy I still have to this day:
Didnt they all die because of the storm? Hammond mentioned it in the beginning of Lost World.
Graphics Horse
Member
Unreliable narrator.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-28407381
I find it embarrassing that they completely ignore science.
I find it embarrassing that they completely ignore science.
Escape Goat
Member
You mean they completely ignored one study?
RandyBobandy
Banned
It's almost like Jurassic World is a Hollywood movie and not a dinosaur documentary
That one study just suggests that feathers were even more widespread than we've known from countless other studies for years.
To completely ignore what happened in the last 20 years is ridiculous, no matter how much they wished it wasn't true because it doesn't fit with image and preconception.
Then make a film about an alternate history or a different planet.
Creative license is absolutely fine, but at least somewhat bed it in reality.
To completely ignore what happened in the last 20 years is ridiculous, no matter how much they wished it wasn't true because it doesn't fit with image and preconception.
Then make a film about an alternate history or a different planet.
Creative license is absolutely fine, but at least somewhat bed it in reality.
This feather nonsense is just hilariously sad to me. Is there any other movie franchise where fans go apeshit over the accuracy of scientific details?
Let's get upset over Back to the Future for incorrectly portraying temporal mechanics! Let's riot because because the Ghostbusters' proton packs break the laws of physics! How dare Lucas make a Star Wars movie that has sound effects in space!!!
It's a science FICTION movie.
Let's get upset over Back to the Future for incorrectly portraying temporal mechanics! Let's riot because because the Ghostbusters' proton packs break the laws of physics! How dare Lucas make a Star Wars movie that has sound effects in space!!!
It's a science FICTION movie.
MickeyPhree
Member
These aren't dinos in the movies. They never had complete DNA strands. Whose to say the geneticists didn't exsise the gene that causes feathers when they cloned them?
Fair enough, I guess we'll see if there's some sort of storyline around it or if they just ignore it.
As for the general scientific accuracy in films, imo it would add to the stories and immersion in most cases.
Ingueferroque
Banned
Reminds me of this T-rex toy I still have to this day:
As a kid that 'bent tail' due to the cramped packaging never got fixed.. it always looked limp.
If you added scientific accuracy, it would be sheep world and it'd feature the skeleton of one dead sheep. Because the entire idea of how cloning works in these movies is bullshit.
Ixion
Member
Yeah, it would be cool if Wu mentions feathers in Jurassic World and how they suppressed that trait to please the public. That would make Jurassic World both scientifically accurate and consistent with the look of the first three movies.
shinobi602
Member
Banjotanooki
Member
lol, I thought I was the only one! I just found out the other day the T-rex is worth a LOT! Glad I never threw it away.!
Ixion
Member
I think the spoiler is that the raptors may have been loose in the island the whole time, still existing from the ruins of the first park.
Cow Mengde
Banned
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P9bKxRQfvs8
Watch that video. Watch the part where the film makers specifically said they wanted the most accurate dinosaurs ever seen. Watch the part where they HIRED EXPERTS as consultants for their movie.
Now tell me, did Back to the Future, Ghostbusters, or Star Wars hire actual experts as consultants for their movie for accuracy?
Reminds me of this T-rex toy I still have to this day:
Goddam I had one of these as well... 1 ticket for the nostalgia train
robertsan21
Member
I agree on this, its sad that they are not "updating" the jurassic movies with what we know today.
Well, we already know that velociraptors and dilophasaurus aren't even close and were a piece of fiction. The feather thing didn't get big until later. You could say that "updating" the dinosaurs now would kind of ruin continuity. The fact that raptors had feather quills in the third movie meant that they evolved in just a few years. I find that more silly.
I don't think it's embarrassing but it is kinda sad, the books and the first movies were responsible for getting a lot of kids into real dinosaurs and palaeontology and other sciences. I think a significant number of those kids never would have persevered if the first thing they'd learnt was "Oh that's not what real dinosaurs looked like".
Couldn't you explain away that inconsistency in them being engineered differently? I mean the ones in the Lost World look different from those in Jurassic Park.
shinobi602
Member
Right, I thought that was pretty much a given at this point...
I understand the a higher level of accuracy on details is a quality of the JP series, but the bottom line is that this is a 20 year-old franchise and they can't simply change the look of the dinosaurs to something radically different. If this was a fresh reboot, then they would have the freedom needed to go with a radical redesign that includes feathers.
Just because they hired experts, doesn't mean they are going to be 100% accurate. Just look at the first film. The cloning process they explain is total bull. Raptors are not that large. Dr. Grant is shown digging up a Raptor in Montana, USA; however, that species is found in central Asia. Brachiosaurs can't stand of 2 legs-- impossible. Dilophosaurs didn't shoot venom as pray or have a neck frill. The list goes on and on...
http://www.sparknotes.com/mindhut/2013/04/11/top-10-biggest-scientific-errors-in-jurassic-park
This is why the feather debate is so silly.
Well I guess you could say that... Feather growth is a bit extreme though, I would think.
Yeah it is a bit extreme. It's a shame there's not much consistency in the display of raptors in I-III.
Ixion
Member
Was that mentioned before this poster? All I recall hearing about raptors was that Chris Pratt's character was training them.
RyanardoDaVinci
Member
Just bend the rod in the tail. I have two of them and I bent both of their tails straight.
Jawmuncher
Member
Nothing shown at comic con.
Man wth the poster was cool but not enough to be the only thing shown.
Man wth the poster was cool but not enough to be the only thing shown.
brandonh83
Banned
Colin just shared this on Twitter with the caption "see you next summer Star-Lord"
SJRB
Gold Member
I'm kinda pissed off they didn't even bother with the super-predictable "T-Rex footstep in the mud with the water rumbling" teaser I totally expected.
- Status