Jawmuncher
Member
2001, no? My wife and I celebrate 12 years since we started dating today. 3 was out before I met her and I was working on my own JP4 by then.
July 16, 2001 (USA)
2001, no? My wife and I celebrate 12 years since we started dating today. 3 was out before I met her and I was working on my own JP4 by then.
2001, no? My wife and I celebrate 12 years since we started dating today. 3 was out before I met her and I was working on my own JP4 by then.
It's interesting that Trevorrow was being headhunted for the Star Wars and Jurassic Park franchises on the basis of one film. Safety not Guaranteed was cool and all, but the strengths of that film come from the quirky screenplay and not so much the direction.
Making that quirky script work in addition to getting really good performances and so on is all on him but I agree that it is a little strange. Still, it's amusing to go back and see some of the cynics claiming that they only picked Trevorrow so that they could boss him around when it's clear now that they gave him a lot of free reign to the point where they let not only him and his writing partner tackle the script for additional months but they also allowed for the budget/production expansion to accommodate for his vision.
If they just hired Trevorrow so that they could tell him what to do, they would have just went with Jaffa and Silver's script and told him to deal with it. So yeah, just another reason why I don't take internet cynics that act like they were at these meetings seriously.
Could part of that been do to Spielbergs weight on the project though? No one exactly says no to that guy, so I could see him being pretty defensive if they tried to do that.
Cool, so if it's crap we have an easy target!
Reading that timeline, this was the first thing I thought of. The know it all cynics who made those claims.Sure, but it just tells me that they cared, and again they let Trevorrow and Connolly do their thing with the script. It doesn't sound like the "suits" forced Colin into anything, and he was going to deny the job if they didn't let him bring his own thing into the story.
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=447132882Reading that timeline, this was the first thing I thought of. The know it all cynics who made those claims.
Guys, why is the only dino game coming out with playable dinos in open spaces a LEGO game? I'll take it and be happy but if you guys could plug into my brain...
I have the original Primal Carnage release. I just want it on PS4 already. I don't like PC gaming.
nevermind
Seeing the post before the edit.edit: nevermind
dang it ya'll, redacting your posts
I do think it's a movie's job to either change people's mind or live up to expectations. I don't see anything wrong with complaining about bad or underwhelming trailers.
Variety is reporting on the 100+ million expected opening as well.
http://variety.com/2015/film/news/jurassic-world-box-office-1201504981/
"Pre-release ticket sales have been robust since they kicked off on May 15, and Fandango reports that the film is one of its top five best sellers this week."
Universal is killing it this year.
There's nothing wrong with complaining about underwhelming trailers, but I would argue that there are variables that people should keep in check as they're doing so. I get a tinge of careless negativity from some posts, and by extension, yes, this makes me think that some are just naturally negative/cynical which leads me to think that they're not going to like something no matter what. Especially when the complaining dated back to before we even witnessed a shred of footage.
But I know it's just message board posting and everyone has an opinion. It's cool. I just like to be more open minded about things, is all.
Hopefully it hits the higher marks of around 130.
I just felt like posting this again.
I like the face, but it's got kind of a silly look. Humorous.
The face looks fine to me. It has a sorta Komodo Dragon look to it.
If there's one thing that really has continued to look off to me, it's the eyes:
Everything about that shot looks amazing IMO... expect for the eyes. They just look off.
So is 105 H, 102 V for an avatar acceptable?
The face looks fine to me. It has a sorta Komodo Dragon look to it.
If there's one thing that really has continued to look off to me, it's the eyes:
Everything about that shot looks amazing IMO... expect for the eyes. They just look off.
Why is that middle one different from the others? It's got sort of spikes on its eyebrows.
PERFECT. That's what I wanted but I forgot the meme.
http://i.imgur.com/tEh3r0K.png[MG][/QUOTE]
Nutted, but she still suckin
Why is that middle one different from the others? It's got sort of spikes on its eyebrows.
Oh, ok. And are there any males? Or they're still all females?
The Lego website has a profile for each of the four raptors, and what extra DNA has been thrown into each one (monitor lizard, iguana, bird, gecko). Has this been mentioned elsewhere?That one's Blue, she's the oldest.
To our left is Delta, who has the most bird DNA with round pupils and a larger nasal crest. In the far back is Echo who fought Blue for control of the pack and lost, and then finally there is Charlie to the far right who is the youngest and twitchiest of the bunch.
They all are strung together with different DNA, but the variation in skull shape could be an age or alpha type of thing anyways.
The face looks fine to me. It has a sorta Komodo Dragon look to it.
If there's one thing that really has continued to look off to me, it's the eyes:
Everything about that shot looks amazing IMO... expect for the eyes. They just look off.
TLW's large death count made many of them meaningless and more "Hollywood", while JP3 was... well, JP3.
TLW has already felt... weird to me. Like, it feels like a JP movie, but something has always felt off about it. Maybe the 2-part bit I've mentioned before. 3 is just a joked with shouting, screaming parents, unlikable characters (cept Grant) and talking raptors. I don't know what they were trying to be in that movie.