One hour of recreational activity a day for the rest of his life? That would drive anyone insane. Does he get access to books and dvd's and the like?
Books and TV of some sort if his behavior is good.
One hour of recreational activity a day for the rest of his life? That would drive anyone insane. Does he get access to books and dvd's and the like?
I'm hoping for life then. Spending 60+ years in prison, knowing he'll die in there. Exactly what he deserves. A 'quick' death penalty is too easy.
endless appeals, actually housing him on death row, and the actual cocktail for lethal injection ain't cheap
Don't Death Penatly verdicts have expensive/lengthy appeals processes?
think of it as watering houseplants vs hosting a home & garden show.
It's absolutely true, mainly because of our appeal system.
(Can't wait for the "well we should take away their chance at appeals" argument that always pops up right about.....now.)
Do you actually believe that? They threw in that change because they could.
I defended you at first (albeit in regards to a different point you made), but stop now. You clearly don't know what you're talking about in regards to WMDs in both a practical and legal sense.
Is that really true? How can that be true?
One hour of recreational activity a day for the rest of his life? That would drive anyone insane. Does he get access to books and dvd's and the like?
What the fuck, I don't even...
Beyond the fact that I've stated that I think he needs life in prison, the fact that you think those two actions are at all similar is disturbing to me.
No, it's wrong that he would put two people on a level playing field as far as motivations go when considering why someone would want someone else dead. It's one thing to be against the death penalty, it's another thing to accuse people of being as bad as the person who bombed a public space of innocent people because they think that there are criminals whose crimes are so vile that they shouldn't get to keep their life. Not even the law treats everyone who killed someone else with that level of scrutiny, they're smart enough to realize that not every murder is done for the same reasons, and people shouldn't be judged as if they are.It's disturbing that he views death wrong regardless of the supposed moral justification you have?
Bringing the capital punishment argument down to dollars and cents always felt odd to me. Seems like such a huge disconnect from what the actual discussion should be about.
"You don't even" seem to be able to grasp a single thing I've said.
endless appeals, actually housing him on death row, and the actual cocktail for lethal injection ain't cheap
But how else can we force others to dole out short-term vengeance for us?No civilized country has the death penalty.
COEXIST broNo civilized country has the death penalty.
How is that relevant to what I'm saying? Are you trying to say that all laws are perfect or something? I'm saying that it's ridiculous to have the same definition from legal perspective for pressure cooker and a chemical weapon.
Oh, there's far more reasons why i think that shit should be completely abolished, no half-measures but some people seem to focus on the money aspect quite a bit, often getting it very wrong.
They used that charge because it's literally defined as detonating an explosive device to injure or kill people.
I'm implying that the fact you think it's ridiculous shows that you don't have any knowledge of the legal classification of a WMD in a civilian sense, and should therefore stop posting as if you do.
Obviously they threw in the charge because they could, but that doesn't mean that it has anything in particular to do with international examples like Iraq. The prosecution just aren't overly fond of people who kill civilians with bombs and wanted to throw as many charges at him that would stick hard as they could. It's an appropriate charge, after all.
Speaking of ridiculous...
Are you going to proceed to shit post now that you've been proven to be incorrect?
calling an apartment in San Francisco a cell is unfair
OK. maybe I'm wrong. Was Timothy McVeigh changed similarly? I really can't find definitive answer. And I mean specific language ("WMD"). If he was maybe I was biased by all the Iraq reporting. But as of now I'm convinced that that change was added for no particular reason...
OK. maybe I'm wrong. Was Timothy McVeigh changed similarly? I really can't find definitive answer. And I mean specific language ("WMD"). If he was maybe I was biased by all the Iraq reporting. But as of now I'm convinced that that change was added for no particular reason...
Only $4000 a month!calling an apartment in San Francisco a cell is unfair
Pretty sure the tv is all black and white bible shows.ayyoo!
TV though, huh? Hmm
This is two years old this story. No shit he is guilty. Lets move along. Did we really waste time and money trying to figure out what to do here. Why the fuck does this shit take two years to come to a conclusion for?
Fuck...
This is two years old this story. No shit he is guilty. Lets move along. Did we really waste time and money trying to figure out what to do here. Why the fuck does this shit take two years to come to a conclusion for?
Fuck...
OK. I take it back. Sorry
I blame Iraq.
I still don't think a pressure cooker should be called a WMD, but that's different debate.
Bringing the capital punishment argument down to dollars and cents always felt odd to me. Seems like such a huge disconnect from what the actual discussion should be about.
This is two years old this story. No shit he is guilty. Lets move along. Did we really waste time and money trying to figure out what to do here. Why the fuck does this shit take two years to come to a conclusion for?
Fuck...
OK. I take it back. Sorry
I blame Iraq.
I still don't think a pressure cooker should be called a WMD, but that's different debate.
ayyoo!
TV though, huh? Hmm
wtf?calling an apartment in San Francisco a cell is unfair
bloodlust, revenge, eye for an eyeBut how else can we force others to dole out short-term vengeance for us?
What didn't I grasp about you equating someone on an internet forum wanting the death penalty for a murder to someone actually murdering and maiming dozens of people? What am I missing?
No civilized country has the death penalty.
What if it's housing a dirty nuke?
The size of the delivery device doesn't matter. If it causes mass destruction and harm, It's a weapon of mass destruction.
A pressure cooker isn't considered a WMD. A pressure cooker turned into a bomb is considered a WMD.
30/30.
Guilty on all counts and sub-questions.
Sentencing will be in a week or so right?
A reporter on CNN was just saying that one of the jurors seemed like they were trying to make eye contact with Tsarnaev. I wonder if that means he probably isn't going to get the death penalty.
What the fuck kind of narrative is that?
Oh, CNN. Never mind!