That second sentence was my own thinking.
Oh.
Eh, I wouldn't stretch eye contact into compassion.
That second sentence was my own thinking.
Bringing the capital punishment argument down to dollars and cents always felt odd to me. Seems like such a huge disconnect from what the actual discussion should be about.
No, it's wrong that he would put two people on a level playing field as far as motivations go when considering why someone would want someone else dead. It's one thing to be against the death penalty, it's another thing to accuse people of being as bad as the person who bombed a public space of innocent people because they think that there are criminals whose crimes are so vile that they shouldn't get to keep their life. Not even the law treats everyone who killed someone else with that level of scrutiny, they're smart enough to realize that not every murder is done for the same reasons, and people shouldn't be judged as if they are.
He's attempting to frame everyone who supports Tsarnaev getting the death penalty as bloodthirsty manics that are no better then the criminal they're decrying, when in reality, the motivations of why these people want him dead are completely different then the motivations of why Tsarnaev wanted to bomb a marathon as a terrorist attack.
Oh.
Eh, I wouldn't stretch eye contact into compassion.
At no point have I said that asking for the death penalty is "equal" to what he did, for fucks sake man try to read.
Even acknowledging that his crimes are terrible and deserving of punishment, how does sitting on an online forum (or anywhere) clamoring for death make you any better than him? How do you or anyone else feel comfortable with that? Does the gravity of your words even occur to you? You sit there and say "well I haven't killed anyone, I would never kill anyone" but you slash his life away with barely a thought and a few punches on a keyboard, with as much disregard as he had for the lives of the people he hurt and killed. How does this make you a better person?
It's pure rhetoric. People support the death penalty because they say it's better for society to remove violent, useless criminals from the population. People opposed to the death penalty try to show that it's not helping society because it costs more for the condemned to exhaust their appeals. I think the death penalty is used too often, but I think we need it for situations like this. I don't care if it's more expensive. I'd pay a premium for this one to die screaming.
Being torn apart by starving dogs is too good for Tsarnaev, but I suppose lethal injection is going to have to be enough. Traitorous, murdering little shit.
Its crazy to think that right now, each juror can individually decide if this man dies or doesn't. All it takes is one vote against death. One adamant person that doesn't believe he should die. Imagine the rest of your life knowing that this man lived because you said No.
We are so not beyond that. Not even close.I really hope he doesn't get sentenced to death. We are beyond that as a society
OK. maybe I'm wrong. Was Timothy McVeigh changed similarly? I really can't find definitive answer. And I mean specific language ("WMD"). If he was maybe I was biased by all the Iraq reporting. But as of now I'm convinced that that change was added for no particular reason...
THE VERDICTS
COUNT 1: Guilty
Conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction against persons in the United States and against federal property, resulting in death, grievous bodily injury and destruction of the building.
COUNT 2: Guilty
Use of a weapon of mass destruction, resulting in death and personal injury.
COUNT 3: Guilty
Destruction by explosive of a federal building, causing death and injury.
COUNTS 4-11: Guilty
First-degree murder of eight federal law enforcement officers.
I know it's awful, but I hope we get the videos shown in court, just to quiet some of the ridiculous talks out there. I know you can't quiet everyone, but the naive majority who believe he was framed should see this guy for the monster he is.
I know it's awful, but I hope we get the videos shown in court, just to quiet some of the ridiculous talks out there. I know you can't quiet everyone, but the naive majority who believe he was framed should see this guy for the monster he is.
Its crazy to think that right now, each juror can individually decide if this man dies or doesn't. All it takes is one vote against death. One adamant person that doesn't believe he should die. Imagine the rest of your life knowing that this man lived because you said No.
How much granularity is really needed, given how sentencing works? We could draw up a scale of destructive capacity, or we could keep the definitions simple and let the courts determine the severity of the punishment.Sure, but there must be some lines drawn somewhere. Being capable of killing thousands of people vs being capable of killing dozens of people should have huge distinction (at least from legal perspective).
Wow at the inhumane execution urges on this page.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/national/longterm/oklahoma/stories/guilty2.htm
Edit: I Google'd "timothy mcveigh list of charges" and it was the sixth result, iirc.
Oh.
Eh, I wouldn't stretch eye contact into compassion.
True, it could mean literally anything.
Wow at the inhumane execution urges on this page.
I tried using wikipedia.
Yes. It. Is.Is that really torture? Solitary is entirely acceptable for someone who did something as terrible as he did. And showing the happy faces of those he injured/killed prior to the bombing can't really qualify as torture.
Inhumane is probably a poor choice of words here.
List of countries that used capital punishment in 2014:
- China
- Iran
- Saudi Arabia
- Iraq
- Yemen
- Jordan
- Afghanistan
- Japan
- Vietnam
- Malaysia
- Palestine
- Singapore
- UAE
- North Korea
- Belarus
- Equatorial Guinea
- Sudan
- Egypt
- Somalia
And the USA. With few exceptions on that list, that's... interesting company to keep.
So some people are cool with him staying in a box in isolation for the rest of his life but being executed is somehow the "inhumane" thing?
I don't get it. If I was him I'd want the death penalty.
Yeah lets show mercy on the guy who blew up 5 people and mutilated dozens more.
First sketch
Wow at the inhumane execution urges on this page.
His courtroom behavior has been described as jittery. Fussing with his beard and hair constantly.That sketch looks really weird. They made Tsarnaev look like he's playing charades instead of hearing a verdict that could mean the death penalty.
How much granularity is really needed, given how sentencing works? We could draw up a scale of destructive capacity, or we could keep the definitions simple and let the courts determine the severity of the punishment.
That massive-scale chemical weapons and pressure cooker bombs fall under the same category doesn't mean that they have to be treated as being of the same magnitude.
Is there a humane option for him at this point? As far as I understand it's either death or 23 hours per day of solitary confinement for the rest of his life.
No it's not. Bloodlust doesn't make a death sentence humane.
I get why people want it. Bloodlust and certainty of guilt make the choice easier, but it's still vengeance that motivates that scentence.
An attempt at rehabilitation?
I understand that might anger people, but it's certainly the most humane option.
Wow at the inhumane execution urges on this page.
I care what happens. More people could have died. It was deliberate. The bomb was aimed for death. He should suffer. I dont know if Death or Life would cause him more suffering, but whatever is worst for him it is what i want.. He killed this kid...
It feels to me like a decent amount of people who are arguing against the death penalty aren't doing so because of the opposition to the penalty, but instead because they want an even worse punishment. It's pretty disturbing tbh.