• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Kobe Bryant Scores 60 points in his final game.

Status
Not open for further replies.
My point was that I think it would be difficult for him to get that many shots off playing outside of their system, unless the team worked to just get him the ball and get it off (as they did last night). I guess they could do it but I think it would require the whole team working together for him to just put up a huge number. It is not his game to just iso and create that many shots by himself. He is a different kind of player.

.

Their 'system' is predicated on having enough secondary weapons around Steph that he doesn't have to break their offensive sets. He can play within the offense, and he's such a versatile shooter. There's nothing however, just from watching Steph play, to indicate any lack of 'capability' in creating his own shot. His handles are elite, like all-time great elite, coupled with all-time great range and accuracy. There's been plenty of times where he's broken a guy down off the dribble and either gotten off a 3, or gone to the rim, where he also finishes as a high clip.

So he's not just a 30 foot bomber, this guy has one of the all-time great offensive skillsets highlighted by high volume, game breaking 3 point shooting ability. The previous mark of a great 3 point shooter was a guy that could shoot 40 percent on 4-5 attempts a game. Curry is shooting 45% on 11 attempts a game, this is redefining the parameters of great shooting. Your comment makes it sound like he's a system player, which I don't agree with.
 
Allow me to burry Kobe and this misconception of great shooting night. When someone is lighting me up for 60 points idk about you but by half time I am double teaming that player. The fact that they didn't do any adjustments just shows how much of a choreographed stunt this was that was set up by the nba.

They were doubling the man at the three point line, fam. Come on now...
 

R-User!

Member
I don't see why everyone would not go after Curry.

But why the hell would he leave Golden State?

Except for wanting to play for the Lakers or for money, I dont see why he'd leave either.
And doesn't GS have the ability to offer a Max Contract higher than anybody else?

I guess if GS foolishly low balled him and attempted to entice him without offering him the max dollar amount I could see him bouncing for a "larger market".
 

theWB27

Member
Except for wanting to play for the Lakers or for money, I dont see why he'd leave either.
And doesn't GS have the ability to offer a Max Contract higher than anybody else?

I guess if GS foolishly low balled him and attempted to entice him without offering him the max dollar amount I could see him bouncing for a "larger market".

They can get curry for max and sign another max free agent. He has no reason at all to leave.
 

norm9

Member
Loved his performance last night. Loved him shooting so much. Loved that last five minutes when he couldn't miss. Loved seeing everyone in the crowd in awe and going nuts like it's the 2010 Game 7 Finals. Loved that they needed his 60 to win. Loved that the other Lakers knew if they were going to shoot, it had better be a dunk or another spectacular move. Loved the Kobe haters commercial. Loved Kanye loving Kobe.

Only way this could have been better is if he scored 101 points, but 60 is amazing. Mamba out.
 

R-User!

Member
They can get curry for max and sign another max free agent. He has no reason at all to leave.

Yeah, I don't think he'd do it under those circumstances. Though I wouldn't be surprised if he did though. But if he did, he'd have the entire Laker Stage to himself which hasn't been the case in LA since before Kobe, so there's that of course. But it isn't the logical play to make if you want to ride out this potential multi-championship winning run that they look geared up to go on.
 

diffusionx

Gold Member
Yeah, I don't think he'd do it under those circumstances. Though I wouldn't be surprised if he did though. But if he did, he'd have the entire Laker Stage to himself which hasn't been the case in LA since before Kobe, so there's that of course. But it isn't the logical play to make if you want to ride out this potential multi-championship winning run that they look geared up to go on.

Curry has the entire country stage to himself. He's the top dog. Doesn't need LA.
 

bionic77

Member
Their 'system' is predicated on having enough secondary weapons around Steph that he doesn't have to break their offensive sets. He can play within the offense, and he's such a versatile shooter. There's nothing however, just from watching Steph play, to indicate any lack of 'capability' in creating his own shot. His handles are elite, like all-time great elite, coupled with all-time great range and accuracy. There's been plenty of times where he's broken a guy down off the dribble and either gotten off a 3, or gone to the rim, where he also finishes as a high clip.

So he's not just a 30 foot bomber, this guy has one of the all-time great offensive skillsets highlighted by high volume, game breaking 3 point shooting ability. The previous mark of a great 3 point shooter was a guy that could shoot 40 percent on 4-5 attempts a game. Curry is shooting 45% on 11 attempts a game, this is redefining the parameters of great shooting. Your comment makes it sound like he's a system player, which I don't agree with.
I guess what I should have said it is not his strength to create his shot via his athleticism, but more so from his skill.

He is definitely not a system player IMO. His stats benefited from playing in a more wide open offense under Kerr, but that would be true of pretty much every player so only an idiot would hold that against him.

For me Curry is taking the mantle from Kobe as being the most entertaining player in the league to watch. Lebron was far more physically dominant than either player, but for me personally I have always preferred skill over power.
 

Surfinn

Member
kobe commercial from last night regarding the hate lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQYz0I5dE_A

Look I'm a long time Kings fan (back all the way to 2001 in the rivalry series) and I've never liked Kobe (his personality, not his abilities), but this is the best thing he's ever done.

That's an awesome video. Even I'll go ahead and say damn, what a fantastic basketball player.

One of the best ever. Good for him that he was able to go out on such a crazy high note.
 
I think Shaq is great and all, but I don't get why people think he's top ten. Pound for pound, I think Kobe, LBJ, AI, etc. had better skill. I open to correction, but no way is Shaq in my top 10.
 
I guess what I should have said it is not his strength to create his shot via his athleticism, but more so from his skill.

Ok but what difference does it make? If he can create his own shot, then he can create his own shot. That actually bodes well for his game aging well because his skillset isn't overly reliant on athleticism like an Iverson, or a modern example: Derrick Rose. Strip away that incredible athleticism and you're left with an above average player at best. Even after Curry becomes a role player 7-8 years from now, that kind of shooting prowess is going to make him valuable to any team even if he's just used as a spot-up shooter. Ray Allen and Reggie Miller's shooting kept them in the league when they were 39-40 years old.
 
I think Shaq is great and all, but I don't get why people think he's top ten. Pound for pound, I think Kobe, LBJ, AI, etc. had better skill. I open to correction, but no way is Shaq in my top 10.

Skill is relative to position. A guard's skills and a centers are two different things, so skill is kind of a weird thing to use as a gauge here. And skill-wise, while Shaq was known for his power he was actually fundamentally sound in post play. Not Hakeem-level in terms of moveset, but a small range of baby hooks, bankers and drop-steps/spin moves complimented by tremendous power.

Shaq is EASILY a top ten player all-time. In fact, had he stayed in better shape, not fallen out with Kobe and won a few more titles, and been at least a 65-70% foul shooter and not such a liability down the stretch, he could have credibly challenged MJ as an arguable GOAT. He was that dominant at his peak.
 

Jeff-DSA

Member
The NBA decided to crush the Utah fanbase in one night because Kobe.

Only half the Jazz team played, so I don't think many people cared that Kobe went off. Dude would have never got anywhere near the rim with Favors and Gobert playing. Still, 60 is an accomplishment, despite the 50 shots and the relaxed attitude from the Jazz.
 
Holy bejeezus at the Kobe salt in this thread. Yikes.

Everyone needs to take a deep breath and look back on what this guy has accomplished in 20 years. Amazing player regardless of his position on the GOAT list.
 

bionic77

Member
Who's in your top 10 and how is Shaq not in it
Shaq is arguably not a top 3 center.

Russell, Kareem, Wilt, Hakeem, etc. It is hard to put Shaq above any of those 4 (especially Kareem). You could argue he is top 3 for sure though.

I don't get why NBA fans are so obsessed with lists. Especially when most only know Magic, Larry and Jordan as past great players....
 
Skill is relative to position. A guard's skills and a centers are two different things, so skill is kind of a weird thing to use as a gauge here. And skill-wise, while Shaq was known for his power he was actually fundamentally sound in post play. Not Hakeem-level in terms of moveset, but a small range of baby hooks, bankers and drop-steps/spin moves complimented by tremendous power.

Shaq is EASILY a top ten player all-time. In fact, had he stayed in better shape, not fallen out with Kobe and won a few more titles, and been at least a 65-70% foul shooter and not such a liability down the stretch, he could have credibly challenged MJ as an arguable GOAT. He was that dominant at his peak.

Really hard to say "easily". Agreed, he was super dominant for a 3 year stretch, but not as dominant otherwise. Really really good but those 3 seasons stand out. If I have to take a center, give me Kareem or Hakeem before Shaq.

Finally people are putting Kareem at the top in their "all time" lists. He was missing from the conversation for years. Which is incredible when the guy had a peak so long that he had time to dominate both Wilt and Hakeem. Don't even have to mention numbers and accomplishments because those put him right up there with the GOAT conversation. And he played before charter flights became the norm, which is incredible.

Won't argue for Russell or Wilt, but Wilt should be up there on numbers alone. Didn't see either of them play outside of a few games on tape so hard to comment. Factor in all the other positions in basketball and Shaq is borderline top 10. Somewhere in that range but never top 5. Ever ever ever. For that 3 year stretch then yes, but that's not his whole career.
 

PBY

Banned
I'll never understand why people pretend shooting in basketball is a negative. Especially for a scorer. It's a fact you can't score if you don't shoot.

Shooting is a negative if you miss more than a replacement level player would make? This is basic math.
 
Really hard to say "easily". Agreed, he was super dominant for a 3 year stretch, but not as dominant otherwise. Really really good but those 3 seasons stand out. If I have to take a center, give me Kareem or Hakeem before Shaq.

Actually it's quite easy to say. Outside his championship peak he was 23 and 14 as a rookie, 29 and 13 his second year, 29 and 13 his third year leading the Magic to the finals, and basically a 27/11 type player before the 3 year championship window. I'm not sure in what universe that's 'not as dominant'. That's not unlike someone like Jordan, who was superb from the get-go but peaked in the first 3peat.

I love Hakeem, but people tend to forget that he was a routine first round casualty for a number of years before he broke through. Hakeem himself 'peaked' between 93 and 95. In no way was his 'non-peak' years more dominant than Shaq's 'non-peak' years. Frankly much of Hakeem's reputation is based on 94 and 95, especially the 95 playoff run and famous beatdown of David Robinson. Before that period, he wasn't considered better than Robinson or Patrick Ewing for that matter. I have Kareem over Shaq in the GOAT list because he accomplished more, but there's no wide chasm as players in terms of effectiveness. The only thing keeping Shaq from being an arguable top 3 player was lack of discipline and conditioning, he burnt too many bridges when he left teams and he ring-chased his final 3 years. But IMO, he's firmly in the top 8 all-time, once you get past MJ, Kareem, Russell, Wilt, Magic he's very much in the tier of Duncan, Bird, and Hakeem. However you want to shuffle them around is preference, but he easily deserves a top 10 spot.
 
Actually it's quite easy to say. Outside his championship peak he was 23 and 14 as a rookie, 29 and 13 his second year, 29 and 13 his third year leading the Magic to the finals, and basically a 27/11 type player before the 3 year window. I'm not sure in what universe that's 'not as dominant'. That's not unlike someone like Jordan, who was superb from the get-go but peaked in the first 3peat.

I love Hakeem, but people tend to forget that he was a routine first round casualty for a number of years before he broke through. Hakeem himself 'peaked' between 93 and 95. In no way was his 'non-peak' years more dominant than Shaq's 'non-peak' years. Frankly much of Hakeem's reputation is based on 94 and 95, especially the 95 playoff run and famous beatdown of David Robinson. Before that period, he wasn't considered better than Robinson of Patrick Ewing for that matter. I have Kareem over Shaq in the GOAT list because he accomplished more, but there's no wide chasm as players in terms of effectiveness.

Well to be fair, Hakeem won his titles with Otis Thorpe, Mad Max and Kenny Smith. And there lies the reason why he was a first round casualty for a long stretch of his career.

And Robinson was unbelievable. Maybe not as skilled but as an athlete. He was pretty high in steals and blocked everything is sight. Back issues ruined his last years but he got a title out of them. Ewing was incredible as well, but he wasted most of his career in bad teams and then Riley came to save him.

Kareem is in his own league to me. He had so much more to his game than the hook, which was unstoppable. Can't believe no big guys after him haven't worked on it more. His numbers took a hit when he joined the Lakers but that just goes to show what a team oriented player he was.
 
Well to be fair, Hakeem won his titles with Otis Thorpe, Mad Max and Kenny Smith. And there lies the reason why he was a first round casualty for a long stretch of his career.

Let's not forget Clyde Drexler, Robert Horry, and Sam Cassell. The main point is, Hakeem's rep is based on two years, 94 and 95. Outside of that he wasn't more dominant than Shaq. If anything, he's more a fringe top 10 guy than Shaq is, because Lebron has come into the mix which muddles up the 6-10 range. Shaq, Duncan, Kobe,Lebron, Hakeem all warrant top 10 status but who do you leave out from that list? Not Shaq, not Duncan, and I'd say not Lebron.
 

Tekniqs

Member
I think Shaq is great and all, but I don't get why people think he's top ten. Pound for pound, I think Kobe, LBJ, AI, etc. had better skill. I open to correction, but no way is Shaq in my top 10.

because they don't rank players based on "pound for pound". this ain't boxing fam lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom