My point was that I think it would be difficult for him to get that many shots off playing outside of their system, unless the team worked to just get him the ball and get it off (as they did last night). I guess they could do it but I think it would require the whole team working together for him to just put up a huge number. It is not his game to just iso and create that many shots by himself. He is a different kind of player.
.
Allow me to burry Kobe and this misconception of great shooting night. When someone is lighting me up for 60 points idk about you but by half time I am double teaming that player. The fact that they didn't do any adjustments just shows how much of a choreographed stunt this was that was set up by the nba.
They were doubling the man at the three point line, fam. Come on now...
I don't see why everyone would not go after Curry.
But why the hell would he leave Golden State?
Except for wanting to play for the Lakers or for money, I dont see why he'd leave either.
And doesn't GS have the ability to offer a Max Contract higher than anybody else?
I guess if GS foolishly low balled him and attempted to entice him without offering him the max dollar amount I could see him bouncing for a "larger market".
They can get curry for max and sign another max free agent. He has no reason at all to leave.
Yeah, I don't think he'd do it under those circumstances. Though I wouldn't be surprised if he did though. But if he did, he'd have the entire Laker Stage to himself which hasn't been the case in LA since before Kobe, so there's that of course. But it isn't the logical play to make if you want to ride out this potential multi-championship winning run that they look geared up to go on.
I guess what I should have said it is not his strength to create his shot via his athleticism, but more so from his skill.Their 'system' is predicated on having enough secondary weapons around Steph that he doesn't have to break their offensive sets. He can play within the offense, and he's such a versatile shooter. There's nothing however, just from watching Steph play, to indicate any lack of 'capability' in creating his own shot. His handles are elite, like all-time great elite, coupled with all-time great range and accuracy. There's been plenty of times where he's broken a guy down off the dribble and either gotten off a 3, or gone to the rim, where he also finishes as a high clip.
So he's not just a 30 foot bomber, this guy has one of the all-time great offensive skillsets highlighted by high volume, game breaking 3 point shooting ability. The previous mark of a great 3 point shooter was a guy that could shoot 40 percent on 4-5 attempts a game. Curry is shooting 45% on 11 attempts a game, this is redefining the parameters of great shooting. Your comment makes it sound like he's a system player, which I don't agree with.
They can get curry for max and sign another max free agent. He has no reason at all to leave.
You have my Molotov...Jim Buss is gonna max deal one or two of the following:
DeMar DeRozan
Hasan Whiteside
Harrison Barnes
and we will riot.
I think Shaq is great and all, but I don't get why people think he's top ten. Pound for pound, I think Kobe, LBJ, AI, etc. had better skill. I open to correction, but no way is Shaq in my top 10.
I guess what I should have said it is not his strength to create his shot via his athleticism, but more so from his skill.
I think Shaq is great and all, but I don't get why people think he's top ten. Pound for pound, I think Kobe, LBJ, AI, etc. had better skill. I open to correction, but no way is Shaq in my top 10.
The NBA decided to crush the Utah fanbase in one night because Kobe.
I'll never understand why people pretend shooting in basketball is a negative. Especially for a scorer. It's a fact you can't score if you don't shoot.
Who's in your top 10 and how is Shaq not in itI think Shaq is great and all, but I don't get why people think he's top ten. Pound for pound, I think Kobe, LBJ, AI, etc. had better skill. I open to correction, but no way is Shaq in my top 10.
Shaq is arguably not a top 3 center.Who's in your top 10 and how is Shaq not in it
Skill is relative to position. A guard's skills and a centers are two different things, so skill is kind of a weird thing to use as a gauge here. And skill-wise, while Shaq was known for his power he was actually fundamentally sound in post play. Not Hakeem-level in terms of moveset, but a small range of baby hooks, bankers and drop-steps/spin moves complimented by tremendous power.
Shaq is EASILY a top ten player all-time. In fact, had he stayed in better shape, not fallen out with Kobe and won a few more titles, and been at least a 65-70% foul shooter and not such a liability down the stretch, he could have credibly challenged MJ as an arguable GOAT. He was that dominant at his peak.
I'll never understand why people pretend shooting in basketball is a negative. Especially for a scorer. It's a fact you can't score if you don't shoot.
The NBA is fixed, news at 11.
Really hard to say "easily". Agreed, he was super dominant for a 3 year stretch, but not as dominant otherwise. Really really good but those 3 seasons stand out. If I have to take a center, give me Kareem or Hakeem before Shaq.
Jim Buss is gonna max deal one or two of the following:
DeMar DeRozan
Hasan Whiteside
Harrison Barnes
and we will riot.
Actually it's quite easy to say. Outside his championship peak he was 23 and 14 as a rookie, 29 and 13 his second year, 29 and 13 his third year leading the Magic to the finals, and basically a 27/11 type player before the 3 year window. I'm not sure in what universe that's 'not as dominant'. That's not unlike someone like Jordan, who was superb from the get-go but peaked in the first 3peat.
I love Hakeem, but people tend to forget that he was a routine first round casualty for a number of years before he broke through. Hakeem himself 'peaked' between 93 and 95. In no way was his 'non-peak' years more dominant than Shaq's 'non-peak' years. Frankly much of Hakeem's reputation is based on 94 and 95, especially the 95 playoff run and famous beatdown of David Robinson. Before that period, he wasn't considered better than Robinson of Patrick Ewing for that matter. I have Kareem over Shaq in the GOAT list because he accomplished more, but there's no wide chasm as players in terms of effectiveness.
DeRosan and Whiteside and your team becomes a playoff team. Assuming Hasan doesn't lose his shit in LA.
Well to be fair, Hakeem won his titles with Otis Thorpe, Mad Max and Kenny Smith. And there lies the reason why he was a first round casualty for a long stretch of his career.
I think Shaq is great and all, but I don't get why people think he's top ten. Pound for pound, I think Kobe, LBJ, AI, etc. had better skill. I open to correction, but no way is Shaq in my top 10.