And people will eat it up, just like they did for Simcity, Diablo 3 and so on. If you got powerful IPs, and good marketing, shit like this won't matter much in the grand scheme of things.
sadly, you are correct
And people will eat it up, just like they did for Simcity, Diablo 3 and so on. If you got powerful IPs, and good marketing, shit like this won't matter much in the grand scheme of things.
They got away with charging for XBL, making consumers pay for a service on top of their ISP service. They also got away with raising the price of XBL. Everyone was up in arms, but they still pay.
Well, maybe there is some option to play offline anyway. Like a one-time fee, or a subscription model.
I'm already convinced that I want a Ps4 this Holiday, you aren't making things harder for me Microsoft. Always online helps out who exactly?
They'll get away with this. I still only expect this console to be massively successful in NA, however.
I'm starting to think that Durango will be a "subscription only" console, cheap to buy like a cell phone.
This past gen: MS charges people for them to be able to use the internet capabilities of the console.Well, maybe there is some option to play offline anyway. Like a one-time fee, or a subscription model.
MS makes more money by taking that existing non-Internet 50% and dividing them up into those who will connect to play and those who will not (or cannot).
Connected people buy digital goods and services. They buy more content. Most importantly, everyone needs to pay given the always-on security. And that removes the temptation a lot of gamers have to pirate, which is an increasing concern as a generation is brought-up looking for loopholes to avoid paying for digital content. My wife and I make over $250K a year, and even I am tempted if the loophole is wide enough (such as R1 carts for NDS).
Cannot connect? At least the PS4 and PC are there.
I think piracy is too easy to justify these days. "Everyone else is doing it, so I'm not a bad person if I do too." Kudos to MS for putting their foot down, with a solution that will not impact me at all. My internet has gone down for 3+ minutes a handful of times in the past few years. I just don't care.
It's not about the likelihood of it happening, it's about the principle. It's an unneccessary roadblock that doesn't serve the end-user experience, and it honestly verges on an assault of the very concept of ownership (along with blocking used games, etc).
Number of times my internet has been out this gen = once or twice
Number of times I have not been able to play a single player game because of "always online" connectivity = nonzero
Do you understand the real problem?
"Xbox 720 needs to be online to handle next-gen calculations not possible on an inferior offline console. Technology is now a connected experience. Get used to it folks." - Gies after Xbox E3 reveal
did you buy 3, 4 or 5, xbox?Hey thanks for calling me, and others, a stupid, uneducated, moron consumer.
xbox live required to access online
online required to play games
lol in seriousness this would be such a bad move by MS, there's a huge percentage of 360 owners who not only don't have gold but don't even connect their boxes to the internet.
Living in a country where the internet is shit, this isn't the console for me
You are talking to millions of people who pay 60$ a year to "unlock" their consoles for online play. I don't think principles are high on the priority list.
You can blame the morons that bought three, four, or even five 360s because of the red ring. Or the people that still paid for Live even though they raised the price. Or the people that shelled out ridiculous amounts of money for things like WiFi adapters and hard drives. Or the people that love a paywall. This is the fault of stupid, uneducated consumers that have no problem shelling out cash for anti-consumer business practices. This has made Microsoft arrogant as hell.
That does not make sense at all...why whould MS do that when they know a lot of folks don't have internet connection specially in other less developed countries. They don't plan to sell their box to the demographic who can't always be online??? that makes 0 sense.
did you buy 3, 4 or 5, xbox?
whenever my internet goes out I can only play the trial versions of any XBLA games I have bought, so they are just transferring this to ALL my games...? great.
That said, a caution and a caveat: other sources familiar with the codenamed Durango console have told us that they are still unaware of any Microsoft plans regarding an online requirement. No one has been able to say it's not true and some have speculated that this is required at the operating system level and therefore isn't something Microsoft has to tell all developers or retail partners. Microsoft also has the ability to change this type of requirement seemingly at a moment's notice through changes in firmware or networking infrastructure.
Every person we've talked to about the always-online connection, internally and externally, has been incredulous. They predict a fiasco. They detect hubris in a Microsoft riding high off of the Xbox 360's incredible post-Kinect sales performance. But they also detect, as I have, an intensified interest in Microsoft's part to position the next Xbox as an entertainment device, to not emphasize games as significantly as they had with past Microsoft consoles. Add that to far shakier rumors of the next Xbox working as a cable box or DVR or some other TV-viewing enabler--something not a single source of mine could confirm--and you might wonder: if my cable box always has to be connected, why not my next Xbox?
Next gen is last gen, 2nd vidoegame crash confirmed. Lets see what awesomeness can crawl out of the ashes. Last time we got Mario and Zelda.