mohsinkhan
Member
Or during E3 when their Internet connection doesn't workGonna love the E3 presentation when they try to justify always online XD

Or during E3 when their Internet connection doesn't workGonna love the E3 presentation when they try to justify always online XD
Do people say I'm not using my iPhone and pay $100 a month for service anymore because it drops calls so frequently? I'm going to go back to using pay phones because it's more reliable and cheaper. No at worst they switch to Verizon or AT&T.
No, but I've had trouble with my internet in the past. Not too worried about that, as usually I just need to bounce the router, which doesn't take long. It would still be annoying, but not a dealbreaker.
No, what really bothers me is that XBOX Live was out for an entire week after I bought a 360. It's entirely possible that all the new connections on launch day and Christmas could bring XBOX Live down. If internet connectivity is required, every single system will be rendered useless in that situation.
This Internet going down thing is a nonsense argument. This is not going to scare people away. How many people won't subscribe to cable or satellite because there are occasionally service interruptions?
Do these people say I'm cancelling Comcast/DirecTV and going back to rabbit ears antenna and watching TV shows on DVD?
They just have to be prepared. Hell Steam does already a lot of what said in my post. Big games come out all the time on Steam and it rarely ever goes down. I know people who have steam on 24/7 and it does exactly what im saying the next xbox will do. Just automatic everything, available anytime, from any device. Only im sure MS will try to take it one step further and you know what, ive got no problems with that, if thats what it turns out to be.
Are you saying that MS are deliberately making themselves look bad just so an MS exec can say at durango's reveal "online is optional, so we are not the wankers you thought we were?"
Not bloody likely!!!
Let's just hope that's the case, but with the amount this rumour keeps popping up =SOr can you imagine all the goodwill and good publicity they would get if all these annoying rumours turned out to be false!, conspiracy theory?.
This seems more than likely, I hope the spin doesn't make most of GAF salivate at the Durango and forget about the always online aspect =/They wont say it outright. They will do a bleak reference to it and even then lavish it with window dressing. Leaving all of us wondering if they just announced an always online console.
So in short the spin doctors will lead us on a merry dance
Or during E3 when their Internet connection doesn't work![]()
HAHA okay dude.When my Internet connection goes down essentially everything I rely on for entertainment or information is down. My PC is a useless paper weight as is my Xbox. It's no different than losing electricity. I'm already living in this reality. I would never turn on my PC or Xbox if the Internet wasn't present. I've been living in that reality for most of the last generation.
Bullshit. When my internet was down for a week after Hurricane Sandy, I still could get internet through my cell phone tethered to my PC, but I sure as hell was not going to start watching Netflix. That's why I was glad to have my Blu-ray's, Games, and movies on my hard drive. The EXTREME bandwidth caps with wireless internet (3G/4G/LTE) make sure that you can't do anything with it. That's why requiring it to even start a game is nuts, and you can bet your ass that it will fail spectacularly in every country outside of the land of pickup trucks.Service interruptions are a part of modern life. We deal with it, complain about it, and come back because we are addicted. When my Internet connection goes down essentially everything I rely on for entertainment or information is down. My PC is a useless paper weight as is my Xbox. It's no different than losing electricity. I'm already living in this reality. I would never turn on my PC or Xbox if the Internet wasn't present. I've been living in that reality for most of the last generation.
They wont say it outright. They will do a bleak reference to it and even then lavish it with window dressing. Leaving all of us wondering if they just announced an always online console.
So in short the spin doctors will lead us on a merry dance
That's all fair and good if your only use cases are those that require online functionality. For console games, that's hardly the scenario.This Internet going down thing is a nonsense argument. This is not going to scare people away. How many people won't subscribe to cable or satellite because there are occasionally service interruptions? Do these people say I'm cancelling Comcast/DirecTV and going back to rabbit ears antenna and watching TV shows on DVD?
No the bottom line is that the content that people want access to are exclusive to the connected experience so they deal with limited service interruptions. If the service interruptions are so frequent or severe then they will change providers.
Do people say I'm not using my iPhone and pay $100 a month for service anymore because it drops calls so frequently? I'm going to go back to using pay phones because it's more reliable and cheaper. No at worst they switch to Verizon or AT&T.
Service interruptions are a part of modern life. We deal with it, complain about it, and come back because we are addicted. When my Internet connection goes down essentially everything I rely on for entertainment or information is down. My PC is a useless paper weight as is my Xbox. It's no different than losing electricity. I'm already living in this reality. I would never turn on my PC or Xbox if the Internet wasn't present. I've been living in that reality for most of the last generation.
And BTW the concept of "stickiness" is not just a buzz word. It has real meaning to publishers. You guys are all really high on Bioshock right now, but in a few months nobody here is going to be still talking about that game or playing it. The game has nothing in it to keep it in heavy rotation for a long time. It is a shortlived experience, in otherwords it's not sticky. You play it for a week and then trade it in at Gamestop. It may be a great single player game, but it's not going to end up being a long lasting money generating hit like many social games are.
So you are conceding you have no answer to this Q?This Internet going down thing is a nonsense argument. This is not going to scare people away. How many people won't subscribe to cable or satellite because there are occasionally service interruptions? Do these people say I'm cancelling Comcast/DirecTV and going back to rabbit ears antenna and watching TV shows on DVD?
No the bottom line is that the content that people want access to are exclusive to the connected experience so they deal with limited service interruptions. If the service interruptions are so frequent or severe then they will change providers.
Do people say I'm not using my iPhone and pay $100 a month for service anymore because it drops calls so frequently? I'm going to go back to using pay phones because it's more reliable and cheaper. No at worst they switch to Verizon or AT&T.
Service interruptions are a part of modern life. We deal with it, complain about it, and come back because we are addicted. When my Internet connection goes down essentially everything I rely on for entertainment or information is down. My PC is a useless paper weight as is my Xbox. It's no different than losing electricity. I'm already living in this reality. I would never turn on my PC or Xbox if the Internet wasn't present. I've been living in that reality for most of the last generation.
And BTW the concept of "stickiness" is not just a buzz word. It has real meaning to publishers. You guys are all really high on Bioshock right now, but in a few months nobody here is going to be still talking about that game or playing it. The game has nothing in it to keep it in heavy rotation for a long time. It is a shortlived experience, in otherwords it's not sticky. You play it for a week and then trade it in at Gamestop. It may be a great single player game, but it's not going to end up being a long lasting money generating hit like many social games are.
What does it benefit a consumer to deny them consumption of a product without online, instead of allowing additional content with?
Same. I just moved out of a shared house and the internet there was terrible; blocked ports, torrentors bringing it to a crawl, random disconnects. I could never have had this kind of console there and I'm sure I won't be the only one.I'm still in denial. I can't see MS sticking with this decision
Global internet use btw.
![]()
Sounds like source is confusing locked down dev hardware with retail hardware.
Or, MS is tired of leaks and putting out a bit of misinformation.
Easy enough to announce and then make fun of press for publishing "unfounded, unconfirmed" rumors.
Remember, of the existing consoles, the 360 probably has the most user friendly DRM requirement with its dual licenses and no need to "deactivate" a given 360 before transferring the console license.
The behavior that Kotaku is describing is currently present in Xbox 360 GoD titles that are NOT licensed to the current console. The only difference is that it is a 10 minute lockout, rather than a 3 minute one. The way to prevent the lockout is to do a license transfer, so that the current console has an active console license for the game.
Microsoft was talking about Durango at GDC. It just wasn't talking about it publically.
This Internet going down thing is a nonsense argument.
This is not going to scare people away. How many people won't subscribe to cable or satellite because there are occasionally service interruptions?
No the bottom line is that the content that people want access to are exclusive to the connected experience so they deal with limited service interruptions. If the service interruptions are so frequent or severe then they will change providers.
Service interruptions are a part of modern life.
We deal with it, complain about it, and come back because we are addicted. When my Internet connection goes down essentially everything I rely on for entertainment or information is down. My PC is a useless paper weight as is my Xbox. It's no different than losing electricity. I'm already living in this reality. I would never turn on my PC or Xbox if the Internet wasn't present. I've been living in that reality for most of the last generation.
Gamer plays Grant Theft Auto offline.
Xbox servers go down! (hackers FTW!)
PS4 users are playing offline!
Kids playing Rayman.
Something happens and Jess can't play due to internet (not sure what the problem) tech support must be $$$.
Jill is playing with no internet connection on her PS4. All the other kids want a PS4 now. Soon parents realize that the advantages of the PS4. This things is going to spiral.
If you gave people a Netflix alternative where you can watch previously watched movines offline, you can bet they'd choose it every time.
Comparing a situation where there is no alternative, is null and void.
Steam server was down and I was playing games offline! I was the condo during a blizzard with no internet connection playing Kingdom of Amalur on Origins.
PS4 I can play single player games during any fluke/maintence, Xbox Next I can not.
One now can do something the other can't.
Don't forget more service providers are going to bandwidth limits. Their is also the rumors that Comcast is going lower the current tier bandwidth limits as well. Usually Comcast is the first to take the initial anti consumer stance.
I don't get Penguin's analogies either. What does a single player game and a telephone have to do with one another, as he mentions?That's all fair and good if your only use cases are those that require online functionality. For console games, that's hardly the scenario.
I don't get Penguin's analogies either. What does a single player game and a telephone have to do with one another, as he mentions?
This doesn't really fit in with the rest of your argument.
Somebody being unsatisfied with the reliability of their provider and switching to a different one is analogous to somebody being unsatisfied with the reliability of the 720 and switching to the PS4.
The rest of your argument is like somebody quitting video games altogether because of the 720's required internet connectivity being problematic.
Global internet use btw.
![]()
lol i was joking although i did read a book once about stuff like this and apparently it does go on, they say that people only remember the 'current' stuff so they can get away with the bad stuff.
Global internet use btw.
![]()
No we're talking about the Internet going down. People blame their service provider for that, not the console manufacturer. If we're talking about Xbox Live or PSN going down frequently that's a different matter, but specifically we were talking about the unreliability of the Internet in general.
Switching consoles would be like someone switching phones and blaming dropped calls on the iPhone itself instead of on AT&T. As long as Xbox has exclusive content that is popular then the hardware will sell and people will find the most reliable service provider so that they can get reliable access to that content.
A console that plays single player games should not be compared to cellphones OR even a landline/payphone at that. Phones are social devices by their very nature. You might as well say all DVD, Blu-ray and CD players should require an online connection.Cellphones are notoriously unreliable communication devices. And yet increasingly people have come to depend upon them instead of landlines and pay phones. People tolerate service interruptions is the point.
Pretty simple analogy. Not sure what the difficulty is on your part.
HAHA okay dude.
So you are conceding you have no answer to this Q?
They just have to be prepared. Hell Steam does already a lot of what said in my post. Big games come out all the time on Steam and it rarely ever goes down. I know people who have steam on 24/7 and it does exactly what im saying the next xbox will do. Just automatic everything, available anytime, from any device. Only im sure MS will try to take it one step further and you know what, ive got no problems with that, if thats what it turns out to be.
What's ironic is using GAF as justification for an always online system when GAF is constantly down during high volume times like E3.
The fact people here still believe that Microsofts target market is us gamers are so blind.
This thing will live and die by the "living room market". The Netflix, cable TV type users.
Why aim for the small time gaming market alone when there is a much bigger potential audience out there?
A console that plays single player games should not be compared to cellphones OR even a landline/payphone at that. Phones are social devices by their very nature. You might as well say all DVD, Blu-ray and CD players should require an online connection.
Here's how it works with Steam. I have it start with Windows in the morning and if the internet goes out during the day, offline mode should kick in. As far as I know, Steam doesn't boot you out of your game after 3 minutes of inactivity and Steam does allow you to start games in offline mode.
So...how is Steam the same?
For some, it would be that way.
If your net goes down, your PS360 apps wouldn't work.
If your net goes down and you haven't done a licence transfer, your DLC and Arcade games wouldn't work.
What happens to free PS Plus games though? I might try this.
God dammit why doesn't the Internet have an offline mode?!?!Fucking EviLore and his always-online bullshit! *Shakesfist*
Gonna love to read the first few threads when MS does Xbox Live maintenance and no one who owns a 720 can play their games.
Really, if there is good content online that end users want, then they'll connect their devices. There's no need to mandate everyone to be always online "just because", unless it's for the purpose of DRM (no thanks).all the so-called "benefits" of an online-required console, don't actually require a console to always be online.
Sure, maybe on an individual game basis I can see "online required" being a thing, but there's no real reason to build it into a console (especially a console that'll be advertised with a large hard drive and a blu-ray player, not some kind of 100% cloud machine like OnLive) except for DRM purposes. Which obviously, I know they want to do, but as a consumer, DRM doesn't necessarily work in my favor, so I'm obviously not going to defend it.
I'm not seeing how the console will be vastly better from an online-requirement (I can certainly see online having huge benefits, as with my current consoles, but they should be benefits, not requirements for every single game)
Hell, even a purely networked device like a cell phone still allows you to use certain things offline (the stuff that makes sense...like games without online features)
God dammit why doesn't the Internet have an offline mode?!?!
Hey, IE and Firefox still has Work Offline! I don't think Chrome has that mode though (probably for obvious reasons).Hey, you can save some pages to work offline!