WHY DO I GET MATCHED WITH PEOPLE LIKE THIS: http://www.lolking.net/summoner/na/35271481#ranked-stats
dat creep score
dat creep score
Well it makes sense if youre bronze too.WHY DO I GET MATCHED WITH PEOPLE LIKE THIS: http://www.lolking.net/summoner/na/35271481#ranked-stats
dat creep score
I'm Silver IV, he's Bronze III.Well it makes sense if youre bronze too.
I'm Silver IV, he's Bronze III.
Nope to both.Close enough right =p
Maybe he's on a win streak atm (or you're on a losing one)
There are better choices for what she does but I've been playing her again recently and FLASH TIBBERS MOTHERFUCKERS works like it always did.Is Annie viable at all anymore? something smething flash nerf something pandas
Xin Zhao does the opposite of what she wants...There are better choices for what she does but I've been playing her again recently and FLASH TIBBERS MOTHERFUCKERS works like it always did.
edit: if the flash nerf worries you about using Annie as an initiator you're right, she's not very good at it and longer cooldowns just hurt her more for it. Don't run her into a comp where you don't have an Amumu or Jarvan or Xin Zhao or whatever, or you'll have trouble engaging due to the low ult range (it's 600 but the actual AoE area makes it about 750 range). She's better off chaining AoE CC together or catching people with her Q.
C'mon man, clearly I wasn't referring to his ult. He can engage without it.Xin Zhao does the opposite of what she wants...
Oh. I thought you were specifically talking about champions she combos well with when it comes to ult initiating. Xin is still all about team separation when it comes to team fights though...C'mon man, clearly I wasn't referring to his ult. He can engage without it.
WHY DO I GET MATCHED WITH PEOPLE LIKE THIS: http://www.lolking.net/summoner/na/35271481#ranked-stats
dat creep score
It was just meant to show that Annie's not the best initiate when it comes to teamfights, specially if her flash's on cd, so you're better off having another initiator and having her chain her ult stun with theirs.Oh. I thought you were specifically talking about champions she combos well with when it comes to ult initiating. Xin is still all about team separation when it comes to team fights though...
Ah that makes sense. Still no excuse for TF unless he really liked that wraith campFor some reason, lolking doesnt include jungle monsters in your creep score, I've noticed.
It was just meant to show that Annie's not the best initiate when it comes to teamfights, specially if her flash's on cd, so you're better off having another initiator and having her chain her ult stun with theirs.
Xin may be a bad example, just use the other two.
Ah that makes sense. Still no excuse for TF unless he really liked that wraith camp
Is Annie viable at all anymore? something smething flash nerf something pandas
Does anyone know if you automatically rank down if you don't play? I got placed into Silver I, but I haven't been playing recently, and I haven't done a single ranked game yet. I guess my question is, does your rank... decay if you haven't played a single ranked game yet?
I'm in bronze II, but I doubt I'll ever rank up.
Matchmaking is Russian roulette of the highest order.
0 peel in solo queue gg
The odds are actually in your favour.
4 randoms on your team vs 5 on theirs. So this is a gamble you should eventually win
I like your way of thinking.
Just played a ranked now.
Mundo jungle, did really well, only died three times, tons of assists.
We still lost, crap Ezreal carry, tons of flaming all game.
Sigh.
I guess it makes sense, valuation of half the players made no sense, and most players were unknown.
I still stand by my theory
- You have a 50% chance of winning or losing.
- You will typically win-lose-win-lose-win-lose
- Because of this, you'll stay in the same elo forever unless:
1. You can carry yourself enough to win enough of the losing games and;
2. You don't screw up the winning games
Theory assumes that you are at the "elo equilibrium"
staying up late, rex mate?
The odds are actually in your favour.
4 randoms on your team vs 5 on theirs. So this is a gamble you should eventually win
In theory, over many games it will average out to have bad players on the opposing team, so if you are way better than the people you play with, then you will slowly gain rank. It can take a long time, however.Is it possible to rank up if I play well personally in pretty much every game, but still lose about 50% due to circumstances beyond my control.
If not I am going nowhere.
In theory, over many games it will average out to have bad players on the opposing team, so if you are way better than the people you play with, then you will slowly gain rank. It can take a long time, however.
Is it possible to rank up if I play well personally in pretty much every game, but still lose about 50% due to circumstances beyond my control.
If not I am going nowhere.
No matter how well you do, you are nothing without your team
I generally agree with this but take exception to the bolded, which I feel is too much of a generalization. To take an extreme example, if you have 2 or 3 people who are afk the entire game, I think you are unlikely to win no matter how good you are, and I think it's fair to say it is not your fault in that case.Honestly, stop thinking it's out of your control. If you lose the game, then it's your fault. There's always something you could have done to better your chances of winning. Just winning the lane isn't everything. Do something when you get ahead.
Basically, focus on improving your play rather than being angry at bad teammates. Focus less on the Elo gains and more on just getting better yourself.
I generally agree with this but take exception to the bolded, which I feel is too much of a generalization.