Rocco Schiavone
Member
Yeah great for the year 2013.PS4 level is great if true.
Yeah great for the year 2013.PS4 level is great if true.
Ps4 perf mobileBy performance they must mean framerate because they are not the same.
Why not? If the Switcheroo boogaloo 2 comes out in2024,it would be close to 2 years since jetson agx orin has released.Lol, not gonna happen.
It never fails. Wiiu insiders saying it's 3 x 360 and switch suppose to be between half the power of ps4 lol.We're gonna have a new Nvidia Nintendo chip leaks with insider posts every few weeks for the next couple of months, each getting more and more ridiculous ultimately leading to disappointment when it finally appears
X to doubt. I hope it will be true but yeahhhh... Probably not. If it is, day one.Ps4 perf mobile
Ps4 pro perf docked
Most likely what it means.
The PS4 is extremely weak by now, I dont think its that hard to believe but lets hope.X to doubt. I hope it will be true but yeahhhh... Probably not. If it is, day one.
Unless Nintendo goes for a small form factor console, similar to mini PCs, it's almost impossible to get PS4 pro performance in a handheld.I mean.. who knows if this is real or not... but PS4 Pro came out 7 years ago.
I guess, Ps4 games still look great to this day to me. Everyone's different I suppose. And really we are talking about a portable here, how powerful do you want it to be exactly? That sounds like a good middle ground between affordable and powerful.Yeah great for the year 2013.
Yeah but it's still 3x as powerful as a current Switch, it's the Pro part that is making me doubt it. I would love it to be true, might get some decent AA in their games. Would love to play a great looking Mario Kart.The PS4 is extremely weak by now, I dont think its that hard to believe but lets hope.
It's not a matter of price, with current tech a handheld device can't possibly match PS5/XSX performance. The most powerful AMD mobile APU (7840u) is a bit weaker than Series S despite being very expensive.If they release a console as pwoerful as PS5/XSX they will be unable to sell at $299
That's because those games are well optimized and they run at lower settings, resolution and fps, on Switch compared to PS4.But technically the current Nintendo Switch has the power similar to a PS4... It can run Doom Eternal, Hellblade and The Witcher 3
why are people saying $299? Lol
It’s going to be $399 if we are lucky possibly $449
not really behind considering the scaling tech and the handheld form factor... also power usage and cooling. the ps4 Pro sounds like a jet when pushing some games and is a stationary console.Seems pretty par for the course being behind a gen or so in specs
What if they do now? They have these new handheld computers emulating switch games almost every month, even if sales are not the big right now, they could be in the future.PS4 its just a little abit believable.
But PS4 pro? You guys are way too obessessed with this power stuff. To the point of stupidly and blindy believe Nintendo even cares about those aspects in a new console. They don't.
We are reaching Bloodborne port rumors levels of rumors. Just wishfull thinking.
Well, Switch's GPU doubles its clock speed when docked, going from 0.2 TF to 0.4 TF approximately.One of those pie-in-the-sky threads.
First of all, XB1s (1.2 fp32 TF) is more along what anyone should expect from the SWitch 2. The steam deck doesn't even have PS4 TF. And there is no amount of docking that is going to take a handheld from 1.2TF all the way up to 4TF. Shit just doesn't that way.
A more realistic optimistic expectation would be 1.2TF (XB1s) in handheld mode and 1.8TF (PS4 perf) in docked mode.
If all their old games will be patched/improved to run at 4k/1440p 60 FPS docked then I'm 100% in. I have a lot of games to play. BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUT its nintendo lmao. Enjoy hardware worse than your phones.
Nintendo gave Iwata credit in the Mario movie. It’s still his Nintendo.What if they do now?
You will never get that with Nintendo again. People need to accept it and just enjoy the games. The Wii and Switch have sold more than the NES and SNES combined. Iwata’s philosophy of low cost hardware has given Nintendo more success than Yamauchi ever did. They’re not changing.It’s time for a generational leap, and not so much a baby step forward.
I’m guessing it will be around a Steam Deck
Well - if they had a cooling assembly that can scale from 5W to 30W it could - but I doubt Nintendo would want their handheld to be as heavy or big as those mobile PCs are.And there is no amount of docking that is going to take a handheld from 1.2TF all the way up to 4TF.
Arm... X86...Well, Switch's GPU doubles its clock speed when docked, going from 0.2 TF to 0.4 TF approximately.
A x10 performance in the next console doesn't sound that unreasonable to me, but I agree that it will probably be a bit weaker (IMHO something like 1.5TF handheld, 3TF docked).
Also, Steam Deck runs on AMD, Switch is ARM + Nvidia, comparing apples to oranges is not that useful.
From the Wii U to the next hardware? It needs to be different. In two generations I think it’s fair to ask of them to seem like they have moved atleast one.You will never get that with Nintendo again. People need to accept it and just enjoy the games. The Wii and Switch have sold more than the NES and SNES combined. Iwata’s philosophy of low cost hardware has given Nintendo more success than Yamauchi ever did. They’re not changing.
Of course it won't be game over to every other console in the market...far from it. Nintendo don't even compete with ms or playstation. They are in their own world.Kopite7kimi is a trustable source when it comes to Nvidia leaks. I would take this leak honestly seriously.
and if we going to have PS4 level in portable mode, I will say game over to every console in the market.
Deck is 1.6TF, but when comparing handhelds the power consumption and battery life is more important. Deck is consuming 26-28W with ~60-80min battery life to get to its max performance. Switch 2 will probably be running 8-10W.Has to be better
Under Snapdragon XR gen 2 would be incredibly awkward. Qualcomm did propose the chipset to Nintendo, so picking Nvidia over a chipset that will be mass produced, is proven to be cheap and performs in the 2.4TFlop range for a chipset made by nvidia for under Steam deck's 1.4 TFlop?
I mean.. Nintendo right.. but Nvidia must have some pride also to showcase their tech on console space.
Also the idea that Nvidia would propose Nintendo to scale to 4TF to meet PS4 pro is ridiculous. There's no way they aim for that nowadays, the age of native brute force is over. It could reach PS4 pro quality with the usual dock overclock and DLSS. The architectures have changed so much too between then and now. 2.5~3 Tflops from Nvidia's recent architectures ain't playing fair with AMD's PS4 solutions. PS4 pro with Jaguar CPUs
Nintendo will never join the arms race. Accept it.From the Wii U to the next hardware? It needs to be different. In two generations I think it’s fair to ask of them to seem like they have moved atleast one.
That’s setting the bar low as is.
Iirc Switch on FP16 is anyway half what Xbone performance in raw GF since it only has FP32 precision, not counting Nvidia flops for that generation are way more efficient than AMD's.One of those pie-in-the-sky threads.
First of all, XB1s (1.2 fp32 TF) is more along what anyone should expect from the SWitch 2. The steam deck doesn't even have PS4 TF. And there is no amount of docking that is going to take a handheld from 1.2TF all the way up to 4TF. Shit just doesn't that way.
A more realistic optimistic expectation would be 1.2TF (XB1s) in handheld mode and 1.8TF (PS4 perf) in docked mode.
It’s not an arms race. It’s comparing Nintendo to…Nintendo. A switch successor should produce games that cannot run on the Wii U. Unlike the switch.Nintendo will never join the arms race. Accept it.
Deck is also utilizing AMD, Nvidia knows how to control power usage.Deck is 1.6TF, but when comparing handhelds the power consumption and battery life is more important. Deck is consuming 26-28W with ~60-80min battery life to get to its max performance. Switch 2 will probably be running 8-10W.
I keep reading that but it never showed cause Xbox games and switch are not even xlose graphically.Iirc Switch on FP16 is anyway half what Xbone performance in raw GF since it only has FP32 precision, not counting Nvidia flops for that generation are way more efficient than AMD's.