• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Leaker warns against pre-ordering RTX 50 series as 3DMark tests show RX 9070 XT outperforming RTX 4080 Super

Draugoth

Gold Member
RX-9070-XT-3DMark-leak.jpg



via PcGuide

The RX 9070 and RX 9070 XT were recently confirmed by AMD in a pre-briefing shared by the company for CES 2025. However, they only revealed the names of the cards without sharing details about their specs or performance. As a result, we’ve had to rely on leaks to get an idea of what these cards can do. Fortunately, a new leak has surfaced, which indicates that the RX 9070 XT is shaping up to be a powerful card.

RX 9070 XT 3DMark tests leaked​


The information comes from nApoleon, an admin and reviewer on the Chiphell forum. While the original images shared by nApoleon have since been removed to avoid NDA issues, they revealed key performance details about the RX 9070 XT (courtesy of Wukongmyth on X). The 3DMark tests, specifically Time Spy Extreme and Speed Way, were both conducted at 4K resolution.


In the 3DMark Time Spy Extreme test, the RX 9070 XT scored 14,591 points. This is 1,253 points higher than the RTX 4080 and 497 points higher than the RTX 4080 Super. On the other hand, in the 3DMark Speed Way test, the RX 9070 XT scored 6,345 points, which is 844 points higher than the RTX 4070 Ti. These results place the RX 9070 XT slightly behind AMD’s RX 7900 XTX in Speed Way and a bit further behind in Time Spy Extreme.


speed-way-chiphell-712x.jpg

Image source: Chiphell

Time-Spy-Extreme-chiphell-712x.jpg

Image source: Chiphell

speed-way-chiphell-712x.jpg

Image source: Chiphell

Time-Spy-Extreme-chiphell-712x.jpg

Image source: Chiphell



Previous

Next

The leak also included a screenshot showing that the RX 9070 XT has an increased Total Board Power (TBP). Initially believed to be 256W, the card was shown consuming up to 329W in the Furmark stress test. Aside from that, another CPU-Z screenshot revealed some additional specifications of the card:


  • Base Clock: 2,520 MHz
  • Boost Clock: 3,060 MHz
  • Stream Processors: 4,096
  • VRAM: 16GB GDDR6

CPU-Z-712x.jpg

Image source: Chiphell

Furmark-test-712x.jpg
 

manfestival

Member
yeah but this is a nothing burger if anything. We have to compare the latest generation to each other. We already have the 7000 series that compares to the 4000 series. The 7900xtx already can outperform the 4080 super. So unless this 9070 costs like $500. This really isn't that big of a deal at least in the presentation of this article.
 

Crayon

Member
All these rumors. Another month and we'll have reviews out just chill.

Performance is just half the story anyhow. Need to know price to make anything of it.
 

SweetTooth

Gold Member
Pro will still be weak ass upgrade even if RDNA4 is very good.

Why? Because most of the GPU have nothing to do with RDNA4.

Weak ass upgrade? Make up your mind Bojji.. one day a %45 upgrade is weakass, other day ~30% is cool

Whether you liked it or not PS5Pro is the most powerful console on earth right now, and will remain like this for a while 😎
 
ok, cool AMD finally beat last gen with their next-gen card. Can it beat a 5080?
These are the vanilla and XT, there will be an XTX - then the final question . - price? Any cheaper than a 5080 within spitting distance would be a huge win- same as these are depending on what they cost. if the price isnt there- its nothing- but it does mean NVIDIA isnt sitting out there unchallenged. All good things.
 

winjer

Gold Member
To me that alone would be enough to make to make Radeon 9070 competitive with NVidia.

It's already possible to inject FSR3.1 or XeSS1.3 on most games with DLSS, using the program DLSS Enabler or Optiscaler.
It's also possible to enable AntiLag2 on all games with Reflex, using these programs, because they already have nvfake dll.
 

StereoVsn

Gold Member
yeah but this is a nothing burger if anything. We have to compare the latest generation to each other. We already have the 7000 series that compares to the 4000 series. The 7900xtx already can outperform the 4080 super. So unless this 9070 costs like $500. This really isn't that big of a deal at least in the presentation of this article.
$480-550 is the current price rumor. Which makes it pretty kick-ass if it is similar to 4080S in performance.
 
Last edited:

simpatico

Member
At this point we just need Epic to make a card. The only important thing to ask now when buying a GPU is "How does it handle Unreal?" because hardly any other engines are a problem for 90% of titles on basically any modern, enthusiast grade GPU. Going forward a studio that represented a big chunk of that missing 10% is going to Unreal, so maybe we can call it 98%.
 

M1987

Member
These are the vanilla and XT, there will be an XTX - then the final question . - price? Any cheaper than a 5080 within spitting distance would be a huge win- same as these are depending on what they cost. if the price isnt there- its nothing- but it does mean NVIDIA isnt sitting out there unchallenged. All good things.
AMD have already said they are not competing in the high end this gen,so I doubt there will be an XTX
 

Zathalus

Member
It’s not going to beat the 5090 in any capacity so no stopping me. But if I was looking at the 5070 or 5070 Ti I’d certainly wait until AMD shows what it has cooking.
 

Bojji

Member
Weak ass upgrade? Make up your mind Bojji.. one day a %45 upgrade is weakass, other day ~30% is cool

Whether you liked it or not PS5Pro is the most powerful console on earth right now, and will remain like this for a while 😎

BW upgrade over ada is not "cool" or impressive - it's mediocre compared to 3xxx series (and 4xxx series counting flagship GPU only).

But Pro upgrade is weak compared to PS4 Pro (100%) and super weak vs. Xbox One X (~200%). UP TO 45% when in most games it's ~30% and current version of PSSR has problems. I wouldn't have problem with Pro if price was reasonable.
 

SolidQ

Member
So current official price or launch official price?
i'd assuming current, if 7900XTX below 4080S

Guy who went to CES 2025 and tried Path Tracing AMD demo

- It's an internally developed demo using Unreal Engine.
- It's running on hardware being released in the near future, but couldn't disclose if it was on the top end model or not.
- It's doing pathtracing and the demo only has 3 toggles: denoising (which also is doing ML upscaling if I understood correctly), sampling and caching. Each step significantly increases IQ. All of these are using ML.
- Native resolution was 1440p, presentation on 4k.
- Performance was around 35 FPS, but without any ML and doing the 3 stages through shaders they say it would be running at 4 FPS.
- They say there's still room for improvement as they have only recently started serious work on ML optimizations for raytracing on the new GPUs.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom