swaffles23
Member
i thought Dion was the best character in the gameDion (not sure if it written well) in Final Fantasy 16 was very well made imho.
i thought Dion was the best character in the gameDion (not sure if it written well) in Final Fantasy 16 was very well made imho.
Calibrations?!!No one cares who you sleep with. Stop trying to act like you’re special. You’re not.
That's fair. It is not something that needs or should be forced.I dunno.... I do my best to altogether avoid.
I agree. I hate checkmark quotas and preachy bullshit. I don't have to be represented at all times just because I am part of a minority.Can be done right, just not by the usual brain rot writers that are assigned to the task. First off DEI and BS consulting firms should be avoided, then secondly would be to make an actual character with real universal flaws rather than just a pandering puppet.
Bill is fucking awesome.Write them like normal people. Bill in TLOU is a great example from what I recall. Besides their sexual orientation, there’s often no difference between a straight and gay person.
man, I forgot about that game due to the last two games being such disappointments. I played through the first three games in the series about a year or two ago for the first time and noticed diminishing returns with each new entry.The original Dragon Age games did it pretty right. Those characters felt like normal people, with their charms and struggles, and I definitely could resonant with their character development.
Wasn't there a group of cannibals in TLOU? They definitely got the point across.Psychopathologies have been shown in video games for a long time, of course you can do that right. It really isn't any different than any other entertainment medium. But what does that have to do with representation? Do cannibals need to be represented in games, too?
I don't like it being forced or in game preachy, no. I gain nothing by being preached at as if it were an agenda checkbox. I just want some in games that dont have to wear it on their sleeves all the time and give us lines like "bigot sandwiches" from Ellie in TLOU2Does sexual preference need to be represented at all or is it a private matter?
Disagree with you,the transexual was only put in to go with the whole "every show on netflix has to have a lgbt/dei representation and we make more money by doing this than if we dont"
What game is this?
Is there a way to do it right
No
are western devs forever going to suck at it?
Yes
Do people who dislike mustard need representation? A guy who insists on having mushrooms on his pizza perhaps? Why do these people need constant external validation? I like older broads on the chubby side. Where does the Diablo IV character creator represent me? Will Remedy find a way to shoehorn me into a story?
Probably, but still better executed than in most cases and a bold move considering the show is Korean.
Honkai Star Rail.
I did not know that he was. Interesting.Solid Snake is done perfectly.
Dont take this the wrong way bit i dont think it needs representation, I don't care if the characters in a game are straight,bi,gay whatever.what a fictional character made on a computer programs sexual orientation is plays no part in making a game fun or interesting.
It's unnecessary, whether I'm jumping on shells in mario or stealth taking down a soldier in mgs not once does it cross my mind what mario or snake do in their sex life's.
I admit I have not gotten very far into that game yet.BG3?
No, I mean natural as in not pretentious and annoying during the games story or scenes. It can come up, but not in a ham fisted "love is love you bigot" kind of way. It is not how I act in real life, and I expect better in my games if it is to be there.Natural like less than .00001% of the global population? Like actual statistical representation?
Hmm. I do not know. it was fine with Tracer because they were more upfront about it. Now it just seems that whenever people increase their bitching about the game, they reveal that another character was gay and then deflect with the whole "it was always there you bigots!" when people point it out.This is the right angle, I think. If you are giving traits to a character just to showcase them it's never going to feel natural because underlining a trait is the goal.
I know this will probably be an unpopular opinion but I think Overwatch does this pretty well when it comes to the game itself. All characters feel like tridimensional people and they are not flashing out minority status, it feels more like flair. When it comes to gender or sexual stuff it's not preachy and in your face like other games.
Outside of the game (stories, comics and such) there is an overt pandering approach so as an IP as a whole OW is not a good example but the game itself does it well without bending over backwards to please someone or antagonizing the user by preaching. That's saying something for a game with a character that goes by they/them...
I did not know that he was. Interesting.
I don't know, I think that as long as it's made for "representation", it will always be bad.
On top of that, I think that the radical left actually ruined "representation", and it will never be like before anymore, it's over.
You mentionned Nier Replicant, and that no one complained, that's true, however if it was a brand new game releasing today, people would complain for sure.
I don't blame it on the people complaining though, I blame it on the people who kept trying to push representation down our throat for years. This led to people now not being able to stand these concepts anymore, because of being tired of it and never being sure if something was done naturally or if it was something to check on an agenda list.
I see this in myself all the time nowadays. I used to just don't care about topics like that, wether it was there or not, I didn't think much about it. Now though? I can't keep myself from thinking that something might be "woke" if it includes such stuff, I learned to be cautious when media include these concepts, and therefore it's never as natural as it used to be.
The people always pushing for representation did the opposite of what they were trying to do. They turned something that was part of the daily life, into something that now stands out and feels different. Well done, good job.
Maybe it will go back to the way it was, feeling like something more natural and not something political, in many years from now, if things start to cool down now. I think it will take a long time and some generations though.
I read your post, I just don't think that studios can do much about it now, because of how damaged this issue is in our current days, that's what I was trying to say in my message.I respect that. I fear I may have misrepresented my own stance in that topic title though because in typical internet fashion, there are several people in her who will either not read past my topic title and reply negatively anyway, or will read the body as well, but still choose to ignore it in their own response. Most people in here have been very fair though, which I very mich appreciate.
Well said. Often times in western games, a characters gender or orientation has to be so on the nose especially when it's irrelevant to the gameplay or storey. That's what makes players resent it.Write them like normal people. Bill in TLOU is a great example from what I recall. Besides their sexual orientation, there’s often no difference between a straight and gay person.
Enough of this bender shite I say. We need a AA Rise of the Footsoldier game where we get to play as real men - bashing your rivals’ heads in unprovoked while shagging slags and snorting lines of coke.
Because that's just their personalities and who they are, and they aren't pushing an agenda or preaching/fence building with their politics.Now that I think of it why is there no outrage over japanese representation of sexy women/famboyant males/ethnic characters.