Thinking it'll probably be broken up like this:
Founding/Star Wars/Indy
Post-Star Wars (first CG in Young Sherlock Holmes, first morph in Willow)
Advent of CG
etc...
They could do:Thinking it'll probably be broken up like this:
Founding/Star Wars/Indy
Post-Star Wars (first CG in Young Sherlock Holmes, first morph in Willow)
Advent of CG
etc...
I'm worried this will be full of random vignettes by f-tier pop culture celebs, poorly done reenactments, or the TERRIBLE forced drama "The XXX that made us" series has devolved into when they don't think the subject matter alone is interesting enough.
I haven't seen anything from him in forever. So that's a nice surprise...It's directed by Lawrence Kasdan...
How does one "direct" a documentary?...It's directed by Lawrence Kasdan...
Is this just one season?Wife and I watched the first 2 eps which have been amazing and eye opening. Do the later episodes move away from Star Wars though?
Wife and I watched the first 2 eps which have been amazing and eye opening. Do the later episodes move away from Star Wars though?
Well now I have something to watch tonight.
Is this just one season?
Just 6 episodes as far as I know.
I would love if they went over everything from when the SFX Studio was formed to 2022. Still a disappointing to hear but I'm gonna to give this a watch
Damn should have been 10 to 20 episodesIt does, but the first 3 episodes are more deep dives. Gets more general in Episode 4, and then 5 is a quick rush through Cameron and Jurassic Park and the Prequels, and then the Volume is dealt with in Episode 5.
It does, but the first 3 episodes are more deep dives. Gets more general in Episode 4, and then 5 is a quick rush through Cameron and Jurassic Park and the Prequels, and then the Volume is dealt with in Episode 6.
That Disney didn't just trust this guy's ideas and input to further develop Star Wars is just foolish.
The devil is in the details. The concept of a broken Luke is fine, but virtually every aspect of the execution of VIII was dogshit. It ignored what little momentum VII had and then led to the dumpster fire of plot continuity of IX.Except they did adapt his version of Episode VII. People fucking hated it.
[/URL]
The devil is in the details. The concept of a broken Luke is fine, but virtually every aspect of the execution of VIII was dogshit. It ignored what little momentum VII had and then led to the dumpster fire of plot continuity of IX.
Palatines return could not have been Lucas original idea. I mean maybe because he had Death Star 1 and 2.
Well, I’m watching the final episode now and I can tell you they are 100% for sure using the fan-made Jurassic.Park.1993.35mm.1080p.Cinema.DTS.v2.0 release - I compared it and it’s pixel-for-pixel exactly the same, except they graded it a tiny bit more towards teal.
Wife and I watched the first 2 eps which have been amazing and eye opening. Do the later episodes move away from Star Wars though?
They do...thankfully.
Personally, I think they spent too much time on the Star Wars stuff, which has been covered to death in other documentaries. I found the episodes involving The Abyss and T2 to be really entertaining, and I appreciated them showing how Phil Tippet got outshined on Jurassic Park by Dippe and Spaz. Must have been brutal.
In fact, I got inspired to watch Jurassic Park again and did so, but couldn't make it past the Brachiosaurus scene in the beginning. I'm sorry, but some of this has just not aged as well as people would like to pretend it has. That said, I skipped ahead to the Trex scene...it's still got the goods.
Some scenes past the test of time , and this was 91 -92, if you look how they did it back then it’s mind boggling .. they basically invented how we work and model today . With bones/muscles/skinning . But I agree that scene is a bit of, the darker scenes work beter because in the dark you can take short cuts .They do...thankfully.
Personally, I think they spent too much time on the Star Wars stuff, which has been covered to death in other documentaries. I found the episodes involving The Abyss and T2 to be really entertaining, and I appreciated them showing how Phil Tippet got outshined on Jurassic Park by Dippe and Spaz. Must have been brutal.
In fact, I got inspired to watch Jurassic Park again and did so, but couldn't make it past the Brachiosaurus scene in the beginning. I'm sorry, but some of this has just not aged as well as people would like to pretend it has. That said, I skipped ahead to the Trex scene...it's still got the goods.
Some thoughts, I'm a major Tron fan and it was noticeable how they didn't give that film any mention (ok, they briefly showed a clip quickly). Obviously that film wasn't made by ILM, but in hindsight I'm curious if that was a sore point at the time (1982). Supposed to be Disney's answer to a Star Wars type effects fest, and though it bombed at the time, it changed filmmaking - and in a way they kind of lapped ILM, who I'd imagine were otherwise considered to be the absolute cream of the crop in the VFX world at that point. Surely Disney had their own clout to some degree (I haven't paid any attention to what that was, I'm sure there are people much better informed about it than I) and the guys who did all the actual CG stuff were basically outsiders to filmmaking, at least in the mainstream/big stage. I wonder if it caused some issues - and has anything to do with the visionary director of Tron essentially completely falling off the radar after this film. He directed one more film years later, I believe, and then that was the end of it..
Cameron spent much of COVID remastering the first Avatar and it's being re-released in theaters next month.Do they ever remaster CGI for older films? Is it technically possible or too much effort?