GetInTheRobot
Banned
This took me from meh to excited...always been a big fan of Yusuke, but I still want an african based game...a Zulu assassin centered around spear based combat.
AC: Levantine (Arabic)Ubitrash doing ubitrash things... Go to hell, never ever i buy a game from this trash anti-white company.
AC: Levantine (Arabic)
ACII: Italian (White)
ACIII: British/Native American (Mixed)
ACIV: Welsh (White)
AC Unity: French (White)
AC Rogue: British (White)
AC Syndicate: British (White)
AC Origins: Egyptian/Nubian (Mixed)
AC Odyssey: Greek (White)
AC Valhalla: Norseman (White)
AC Mirage: Arabic
Out of the 11 mainline AC games, the protagonist is white 7 times and the list two titles featured white protagonists and Ubisoft is a "trash anti-white company"?
I swear, some people really don't think before typing stupid shit. Of course, for your ass it's a problem because the protagonist might be black and it hurts your soul.
Yeah, I only counted mainline games but Aveline was cool. Looking at it now, Lady Maria from Bloodborne remind me of her.Don't forget my favorite design:
![]()
Except Origins is honestly completely unplayable compared to any other entry in the franchise.I think the biggest question is: Will it be fun to play like Origins and earlier?
We should establish a baseline for you.
How woke is this situation on a scale from 1 to 10:
![]()
How about this one:
![]()
Your mindset sounds poisoned by the culture wars. Look at your own reaction to a historically sound black protagonist without any other information.Oh come on...
If the game really does star Yasuke then it's set in late XVI century with Nobunaga as Daimyo.
Historical records say there were hundreds of thousands of samurais during that period, 30k samurai under Nobunaga alone.
So assuming (minimum) 200 000 samurai during that period, why exactly do you think they went with the only African Samurai in recorded history?
Why did they specifically choose to represent the (maximum) 0.0005% of the samurai population, if not to:
1 - Virtue Signaling
2 - Fan Baiting
3 - Have that "racist gamers" shield if the game turns out a turd and people complain
?
But for me, the most egregious part of it all is that the series was created around the Assassins, specifically the Hashashyin Order from Persia.
Japan already has their historical equivalent to the Hashashyin, the Shinobi / Ninja, a mix between intelligence officers and assassins through subterfuge, which fits perfectly with the game series and is exactly why people have been asking for an AC title set in Japan.
Instead, their fixation on virtue signaling and sUbVeRt eXpEcTaTiOnS is so high on their priority that their heads located far up their ass became unable to see what made the game series so good.
It doesn't even make sense to do an Assassin out of a Samurai. The Assassins' method are completely opposite to the Bushido. At least in Ghost of Tsushima they approach that theme pretty well.
If they wanted a black Assassin (again) that much, why not do it in a place where it made sense? Why is no one asking for a blond Assassin set in the Zulu Kingdom nor an asian Assassin doing jobs for Simon Bolivar.
We all know why they're going after that 0.0005% representation. Let's just stop lying to ourselves.
You're literally answering your own question. Why pick the most unique of the known samurais? Geez, I wonder why? There are hundreds of games and media featuring other samurais but precious few featuring Yasuke. It's a vacuum that hasn't been exploited and Ubisoft is moving in on that. It doesn't have to be any of what you're claiming unless you're incredibly narrow-minded.Oh come on...
If the game really does star Yasuke then it's set in late XVI century with Nobunaga as Daimyo.
Historical records say there were hundreds of thousands of samurais during that period, 30k samurai under Nobunaga alone.
So assuming (minimum) 200 000 samurai during that period, why exactly do you think they went with the only African Samurai in recorded history?
Why did they specifically choose to represent the (maximum) 0.0005% of the samurai population, if not to:
1 - Virtue Signaling
2 - Fan Baiting
3 - Have that "racist gamers" shield if the game turns out a turd and people complain
?
Your mindset sounds poisoned by the culture wars. Look at your own reaction to a historically sound black protagonist without any other information.
There are hundreds of games and media featuring other samurais but precious few featuring Yasuke. It's a vacuum that hasn't been exploited and Ubisoft is moving in on that.
Oh come on...
If the game really does star Yasuke then it's set in late XVI century with Nobunaga as Daimyo.
Historical records say there were hundreds of thousands of samurais during that period, 30k samurai under Nobunaga alone.
So assuming (minimum) 200 000 samurai during that period, why exactly do you think they went with the only African Samurai in recorded history?
Why did they specifically choose to represent the (maximum) 0.0005% of the samurai population, if not to:
1 - Virtue Signaling
2 - Fan Baiting
3 - Have that "racist gamers" shield if the game turns out a turd and people complain
?
But for me, the most egregious part of it all is that the series was created around the Assassins, specifically the Hashashyin Order from Persia.
Japan already has their historical equivalent to the Hashashyin, the Shinobi / Ninja, a mix between intelligence officers and assassins through subterfuge, which fits perfectly with the game series and is exactly why people have been asking for an AC title set in Japan.
Instead, their fixation on virtue signaling and sUbVeRt eXpEcTaTiOnS is so high on their priority that their heads located far up their ass became unable to see what made the game series so good.
It doesn't even make sense to do an Assassin out of a Samurai. The Assassins' method are completely opposite to the Bushido. At least in Ghost of Tsushima they approach that theme pretty well.
If they wanted a black Assassin (again) that much, why not do it in a place where it made sense? Why is no one asking for a blond Assassin set in the Zulu Kingdom nor an asian Assassin doing jobs for Simon Bolivar?
We all know why they're going after that 0.0005% representation. Let's just stop lying to ourselves.
And at the very least, I'm expecting this game to suck because their priorities suck. It's been happening with games, with TV series and with movies all over the place. Just look at Disney.
Are you joking? AC Odyssey features demi-god protagonists and has you journey in a simulation of Ancient Greek mythology and you go "Samurais don't fit my assassins?"Why would it feature a Samurai protagonist in the first place, if Samurais don't fit the Assassins' methods at all?
So filled up that you had to scrounge up this pathetic list that includes 3 works that have yet to come out of 5. You managed to come up with a TV series and a movie. A whopping two pieces of media for a person who died over 400 years ago. Bang up job and thank you for proving my point.And about Yasuke:
- There is a Yasuke netflix series
- There is a Yasuke Hollywood movie that started production in 2019 but was postponed because Chadwick Boseman passed away. The film is still coming out
- A movie called Yasuke: Descendents released this year.
- Another movie called "The Legend of Yasuke" in production
- Another movie called Yasuke: Soul of a Samurai in pre-production
Quite the filled up vacuum.
Assassin's Creed hasn't been about assassins for a very long time. The last protagonist was a Viking, the previous one an Ancient Greek hero, the one before that a Medjay. You're outraged about a ship that sailed circa Black Flag a decade ago. It's a third person action adventure franchise with a revisionist historical backdrop now, not a series about assassins.Why would you generalize my reaction to Yasuke based on the single context of an Assassin's Creed game?
There is nothing wrong in doing a Yasuke videogame. It's the bending over backwards to make Yasuke the protagonist of the next Assassin's Creed that is representative of the game directors' virtue signaling priorities. They kicked the Shinobi out of the equation just so they could virtue signal on Yasuke.
Why would it feature a Samurai protagonist in the first place, if Samurais don't fit the Assassins' methods at all?
Holding a weapon in feudal Japan means Samurai to you? Here's a pitchfork, great now you're a Samurai?
Like this hasn't been memed to death.Assassin's Creed hasn't been about assassins for a very long time. The last protagonist was a Viking, the previous one an Ancient Greek hero, the one before that a Medjay. You're outraged about a ship that sailed circa Black Flag a decade ago. It's a third person action adventure franchise with a revisionist historical backdrop now, not a series about assassins.
Like this hasn't been memed to death.
![]()
Everyone familiar with the series know the entire "assassin's and Templars" angle is still played because they have to somehow include it. Traditional AC completely died with Origins and they dropped the pretense of historical accuracy years ago.
"?" is probably ESG score.Obviously the answer is "?".
That part of the last 3 games sucks, and Ubisoft knows it sucks. Which is why they're claiming the game is "returning to its roots" with Assassin's Creed Mirage.Assassin's Creed hasn't been about assassins for a very long time. The last protagonist was a Viking, the previous one an Ancient Greek hero, the one before that a Medjay. You're outraged about a ship that sailed circa Black Flag a decade ago. It's a third person action adventure franchise with a revisionist historical backdrop now, not a series about assassins.
"?" is probably ESG score.
Or maybe, just maybe, they are trying to differentiate themselves from Tsushima (and the forthcoming sequel) and Rise of the Ronin.
Ok name 3 games that had a better stealth system that came out in the past 10 years.
Ok name 3 games that had a better stealth system that came out in the past 10 years.
They would differentiate from Ghost of Tsushima by using a Shinobi protagonist which would actually disguise themselves to assassinate targets instead of going with Samurais who were bound by honor to announce their attack beforehand.Or maybe, just maybe, they are trying to differentiate themselves from Tsushima (and the forthcoming sequel) and Rise of the Ronin.
Or maybe..Or maybe, just maybe, they are trying to differentiate themselves from Tsushima (and the forthcoming sequel) and Rise of the Ronin.
They would differenciate from Ghost of Tsushima by using a Shinobi protagonist which would actually disguise themselves to assassinate targets instead of going with Samurais who were bound by honor to announce their attack beforehand.
If you think this Assassin's Creed game is going to differentiate a lot from Ghost of Tsushima by using again a Samurai but with a different color value for the skin, you're in for a bad time.
Well my Alexios lived until circa 2019 so that's perfectly feasible in my AC multiverse.I would pay a thousand dollars if there a big opnening scene with a masked samurai just kicking ass.... Then after the big battle he slowly pulls his mask down to reveal........
Alexios the Samurai!!!
![]()
You're projecting, Valhalla was the biggest AC launch of all time and is the 2nd highest ubisoft game overall when it comes to earnings; it's the only AC that has hit 1b revenue thus far.That part of the last 3 games sucks, and Ubisoft knows it sucks.
No, AC mirage ironically started as DLC for valhalla, but it grew to be big enough to be a standalone game; the only reason it's "returning to its roots" is because it's about the assassin that trains the protagonist of valhalla and gives them the hidden blade; 99% of valhalla can already be played completely in stealth, so mirage isn't doing anything special there; only difference is that it's a smaller scale game (because of how it started) and you're an assassin from an assassin order.Which is why they're claiming the game is "returning to its roots" with Assassin's Creed Mirage.
Or maybe..
![]()
Lol.. Mirage was a DLC for Valhalla "for a few weeks and only on paper".No, AC mirage ironically started as DLC for valhalla, but it grew to be big enough to be a standalone game
Samurai engaged in surprise attacks and misdirection all the time, and had no such stipulations about announcing attacks or fighting head-on.They would differentiate from Ghost of Tsushima by using a Shinobi protagonist which would actually disguise themselves to assassinate targets instead of going with Samurais who were bound by honor to announce their attack beforehand.
This is a fairy tale, or you're getting your history from anime or something, there was no honor on the battlefieldinstead of going with Samurais who were bound by honor to announce their attack beforehand.
Yes, that doesn't change anything I said; it (the scope) grew too big and it will make more money as a standalone game. It has nothing to do with your claim that ubisoft dislikes valhalla (they don't, it made them all the money).Lol.. Mirage was a DLC for Valhalla "for a few weeks and only on paper".
You don't seriously believe that. This comes from the same school that thinks samurais didn't use guns.They would differentiate from Ghost of Tsushima by using a Shinobi protagonist which would actually disguise themselves to assassinate targets instead of going with Samurais who were bound by honor to announce their attack beforehand.
Sold.Cover Art and screenshots!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Just poking fun at their similar names. This thread is hilarious by the way.
Samurai engaged in surprise attacks and misdirection all the time, and had no such stipulations about announcing attacks or fighting head-on.
The most famous samurai of all time constantly screwed with his opponents and never fought fair.
Kind it is, u have 19377948849224729938 japanese samurai and u choose the only black one, like, lets represent japanese culture by not using a japanese person.lol.....this isn't "woke" anything.
Cover Art and screenshots!
![]()
![]()
I made no such claim.It has nothing to do with your claim that ubisoft dislikes valhalla (they don't, it made them all the money).
They would be a Rōnin, would they not?Surprise attacks, yes.
Stealth killing, debatable to say the least.
![]()
So much this.Second, there's so much missed opportunity here, like the rivalry between the Koga / Iga ninjas here, all you could be a ninja under Hattori Hanzo. But hey, Ubi gonna Ubi.