LOST 06.17/18/18.5: "The End" (Everything Else Was Just Progress)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Any word on a box set for the seasons of the show yet? Or what the price of it will be like (in Canada)?

Just googling all I see are sites selling sets of Seasons 1-5 for what seems a very suspiciously low price - almost as little as local stores charge for a single season.

I'd like to get the seasons so that I can watch them with my girlfriend, who seems to get interested in the plot and characters of episodes when she sees them, but has never seen the show in order (or much of it at all really).
 
4 > 1 > 6 > 5 > 3 > 2

Zips said:
Any word on a box set for the seasons of the show yet? Or what the price of it will be like (in Canada)?

Just googling all I see are sites selling sets of Seasons 1-5 for what seems a very suspiciously low price - almost as little as local stores charge for a single season.

I'd like to get the seasons so that I can watch them with my girlfriend, who seems to get interested in the plot and characters of episodes when she sees them, but has never seen the show in order (or much of it at all really).
2mxhpfo.jpg
 
Discotheque said:
Erm. Juliet saying "it worked" was probably her response to unplugging the vending machine.
It was. It's part of the dialogue, and was blatantly used as a red herring to convince us that Jughead had worked (and created the X-timeline). But it didn't happen, Jughead only sent the Losties back to the future and, most importantly, contained the Incident. Without Jughead, DHARMA drilling a massive pocket of EM energy would have been akin to uncorking the island (everything would have probably fallen apart). Jughead being there is also the reason behind the Chernobyl-like concrete walls we saw in S2 (to contain the radiations leaking from an unexploded nuke).
 
Interesting article on WSJ about the impact the ending of filming the show 'Lost' will have on the local economy and people:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100...3173073230.html?mod=WSJ_LifeStyle_Lifestyle_5

The article contains a slideshow of some of the remaining sets still on the island, and here are some highlights from the article itself:

- During its six-season run, the show paid Mr. Coleman's Oahu foam-making company about $450,000 for 1.2 million feet of foam used to make sets, from hundreds of lava rocks to a marooned ship called the Black Rock. The show consumed so much foam that it prompted a spike in resin imports to Hawaii.

- According to state records, between 2004 and 2010, "Lost" spent about $400 million in Hawaii.

- But "Lost" was a rare island of stability in an otherwise erratic industry. The state hadn't had a long-running production since "Magnum, P.I." shut down in 1988 after eight seasons. Many hope that "Hawaii Five-O," a remake of the original series that started in the 1960s, will be a hit for CBS. The series begins filming in Hawaii this year, and features "Lost" star Daniel Dae Kim.

- In order to work for Mr. Kos, job candidates must answer a number of "Lost" questions, including: Who killed Shannon? (the Ana Lucia character) and, How did Goodwin die? (He was impaled on a walking stick during a fight.)

"I can train someone to drive a Hummer. I can't train them to be a "Lost" fan," Mr. Kos says.

:lol
 
Lafiel said:
I hated how they put a lot of red herrings in flashsideways, i mean it makes sense that it was all a purgatory, but they so many red herrings throughout the season that made it seem like it wasn't.

But...thats the point of a red herring ;) Misdirection!
 
Aesius said:
I love the implications of that. That Flight 815, the Swan implosion, Eko's church, etc, are all remnants of their time there, much as the Dharma stations/barracks, the Temple, Statue, etc are all icons of other people and civilizations that have come and gone over the years.

And there will be many more to come ;)
 
I still don't think Faraday's discussion with Desmond was a red herring. I think it was one of the most important conversations of the season. He was explaining to him how important it was that what happened, happened. This is what their lives were supposed to be. Where they were was not correct.
 
neoism said:
I it really scary? Been thinking of gettin it.

Its like Silent Hill. Plays more off your fear of what could be there than what is there. Then every once and a while, something IS there, and you shit your pants.
 
Son of Godzilla said:
That's fine, I guess. But being flabbergasted that some people considered it emotionally manipulative? Save that sappy shit for the specials and reunions and whatevers, I don't need to be reminded in-show the things I liked about the show.

ALL fiction is manipulative, so I dont get why LOST in particular gets shit on for it. The writers of whatever book/movie/TV show you are going through want you to hate character X, want to elicit shock from you in scene Y, want to make you cry with scene Z.
 
my ranking: 1 > 3 > 4 > 2 > 6 > 5

note: i love, love seasons 1-4. great stuff. but the last two seasons have been rather disappointing.
 
1>4>3>2>5>6

After watching the finale, I felt strangely unmoved. I understand everything that happened, so it's not ignorance on my part. I guess my main beef was the entire point of the afterlife. Why did we need to see it? I already knew that the characters had deep ties to one another, and that being on the Island together was a profound experience for all involved. I didn't need to have that be told to me over 18.5 episodes. And while it was cool a few times to see characters interacting under the auspices of being total strangers once again, it got old right around Recon. The reveal wasn't at all what I expected, but it still didn't make the flash-sideways seem anymore relevant.

I don't know. I just get slightly grumpy whenever I think about it. Perhaps I need to watch it again.
 
i'm going to rate the women as well because everyone's doing it. :lol

illana (best body in the series, imo) > kate > juliet > ana lucia > claire >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> zoe.

claire's more cute than hot.

i don't care if ana lucia has a dick or not. i'd still do her.
 
I'll post my wife's rankings.

3>1=4>5>6 (she sees the flashsideways the same way as Stooge [I think it was Stooge, sorry if not])>>>>>>>>>>2
 
Just watched all of S6 in a marathon over the last week

I liked a lot of it but it all felt ultimately pointless

I guess it's not a surprise I haven't been the biggest fan since s1-2 or so but damn
it really hit home that many things just seemed to be put in to be explained later

And when they were explained it's like we were just shown some scenes that make sense within the logic of the show, but right up until the end we still have stupid cryptic statements from characters going this is how it has to be... so nothing was really explained in the end :(

I dunno :( Just bummed about it now.
 
Solo said:
Lard
Banned
(Today, 02:11 AM)
Reply | Quote

Good christ, finally
I don't think i've ever seen a post by him where he wasn't bitching or crying about something.:lol
 
Just catching up on the thread, Michael Keaton would have been an awesome Jack. I like Fox, but Keaton is a significantly better actor. However Keaton's love interest with Kate would have been less convincing, and he wouldn't have brought the women audience like Fox did. But, they could have written the character much differently. So who knows how it would have turned out, very interesting.

I do know that Josh Holloway was the most perfectly cast actor since Harrison Ford in Star Wars.
 
One thing about this season - how come they never gave illana any form of backstory? i think she's the only main cast member that has never been given a flashback. (correct me if they have been others).

I think with what illana felt about jacob, a flashback of hers would have been a good way of fleshing out both her character and jacob.
 
Lafiel said:
One thing about this season - how come they never gave illana any form of backstory? i think she's the only main cast member that has never been given a flashback. (correct me if they have been others).

I think with what illana felt about jacob, a flashback of hers would have been a good way of fleshing out both her character and jacob.

Apparently she was first pitched as Jacob's daughter this season.

But that opens up a whole can of worms they didn't want to go through, I think.

(When Jacob had her, with who, did he love her, how much time he spent off the Island, etc etc etc)
 
I'm very sorry for what I did to you Solo. I was selfish, jealous, I wanted everything you had. You were special Solo, but I wasn't. :(
 
gdt5016 said:
Apparently she was first pitched as Jacob's daughter this season.

But that opens up a whole can of worms they didn't want to go through, I think.

(When Jacob had her, with who, did he love her, how much time he spent off the Island, etc etc etc)
I'm bad at paying attention to details like this, but did they leave it open enough to where she could theoretically have very well been his daughter?
 
gdt5016 said:
Apparently she was first pitched as Jacob's daughter this season.

But that opens up a whole can of worms they didn't want to go through, I think.

(When Jacob had her, with who, did he love her, how much time he spent off the Island, etc etc etc)[
The 1970s perhaps? which was around DI time, so jacob was away from the island at that time? :lol

I'm bad at paying attention to details like this, but did they leave it open enough to where she could theoretically have very well been his daughter?
Yeah, she could theoretically be jacobs daughter. As she said "jacob was the closet thing she had to a father" i assume jacob really was, and jacob never told her for whatever reason.
 
sykoex said:
I'm bad at paying attention to details like this, but did they leave it open enough to where she could theoretically have very well been his daughter?

Theoretically sure. It's not disputed in the show.

But thats like imagining up that Jacob was gay. There's no indication either way in the show.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom