Erigu said:I did already and mostly saw positive reactions to the show... Was there a long debate over the quality of the writing, really?.
Really.
Erigu said:I did already and mostly saw positive reactions to the show... Was there a long debate over the quality of the writing, really?.
cyclonekruse said:I think it's more that you came in and proclaimed it a mess without giving a reason why. Therefore, it's fair to tell you that you're wrong with giving a reason why.
We can guess your criticisms though. Usually it's that the show "never answered questions" when in reality, the number of mysteries that were not answered pales to the number that were. The only things really left (some of which aren't major) are:
1. The importance of Walt and Aaron
2. The cabin
3. Illana's backstory
4. How Jacob could leave the island at will
5. Outrigger shooting
6. Pallet drop
And even 5 and 6 are not complete mysteries. We have some likely guesses for those. Someone on Illana's outrigger probably got shot. And Eloise was likely behind the pallet drop. Plus, some of it might be answered in the epilogue. And if not there, maybe the encyclopedia.
Erigu said:I did already and mostly saw positive reactions to the show... Was there a long debate over the quality of the writing, really?
If you come in a big official thread for a show and say "I can't believe you guys like this mess" or whatever, you can't expect people to ask why or even care.Erigu said:I dunno, when I see negative criticism regarding about a work I appreciate, I ask the guy/gal to elaborate. I don't go all "fuck off little boy".
Snuggler said:It might not be going on in this thread anymore, only the fans remain, but I've seen plenty of discussion and especially criticism of Lost around here. You're certainly not the only one who feels that way. Hell, people are saying you're trolling but I've seen some far more inflammatory comments made even in just this thread.
For me, I'm fine with all of the little inconsistencies and unsolved mysteries. They may have not answered all of the questions, but I feel like they covered the most important ones regarding the island and the significance of the survivors. I watch the show and enjoy it for what it is, I simply don't care about that kind of stuff. I don't feel like the creators were obligated to spell out the answer to every single mystery for us.
I was only along for the ride, and I enjoyed (almost)* every single moment of it.
*Rose and Bernard flashback, blech.
Which is why I then posted a link to an article that echoes my main criticisms. But that didn't help much, apparently.cyclonekruse said:I think it's more that you came in and proclaimed it a mess without giving a reason why.
I would probably go with "the writers pretended they knew the answers to their mysteries when they introduced them, and that simply wasn't true", and "it wouldn't have been so bad if they weren't terrible at improvising as well, as the plot is inconsistent as hell".We can guess your criticisms though. Usually it's that the show "never answered questions"
Not showing the other end of that shootout is still piss-poor storytelling.Someone on Illana's outrigger probably got shot.
I would say the matter isn't so much "who was behind the food drops?", but rather "why didn't that someone ever do anything beyond the food drops?".Eloise was likely behind the pallet drop.
OK, but could you tell me where, then? Even approximately?oatmeal said:Really.
I just don't think it did "many awesome things", sorry... The premise was nice. There was some amusing misdirection in the opening scenes of a couple of seasons. Apart from that...brandonh83 said:The show did so many awesome things but as usual the stuff it did wrong is what actually matters.
Drealmcc0y said:The Rose and Bernard flashback held an incredibly important clue actually.
Erigu said:Could you explain why? Where was that article "straight up wrong", for example?
"Q: What point were the writers trying to make with the show's central themes (fate vs. free will, science vs. faith)?
A: They weren't.
Why it's stupid: Generally, themes are supposed to have some sort of purpose. Otherwise, what's the use in having them? This is the question I find myself asking over and over when thinking about Lost's themes, and the answer I keep coming back to is: there is no point. The writers assumed simply having them was enough. They never bothered to figure out what they were trying to say, or if they even had anything to say."
Now here's a brief sampling of things in Lost that seemed like they were significant in some way, only to subsequently be revealed as having no substantial bearing on the narrative:
The entirety of Season 5. They left the island, came back to the island, skipped through time, lived with the Dharma Initiative, and for what? So you'd be mislead when the writers introduced the alternate timeline in Season 6.
The entirety of Season 4. An excuse to throw some new characters into the mix, none of whom mattered.
Erigu said:OK, but could you tell me where, then? Even approximately?
.
The whole thread, maybe? The thing is, you act like some kind of lone warrior on a mission to expose the show's hidden follies. Plenty have agreed with your gripes, and we've had extensive passionate debates for the past few months about the show; the good, the bad, and the ugly. Over and over and over.... we're just kinda tired, dude.Erigu said:OK, but could you tell me where, then? Even approximately?
Erigu said:I just don't think it did "many awesome things", sorry... The premise was nice. There was some amusing misdirection in the opening scenes of a couple of seasons. Apart from that...
Blader5489 said:
"Synonymous to those themes" doesn't mean much to me... Could you elaborate?Nameless said:All of the major events of the show and most of the biggest character arcs were synonymous to those themes.
In the grand scheme of things? You could remove them and the time-travel plot altogether, as it turned out.I'd say Faraday was pretty fucking important, and Miles was far from pointless.
Like what? Some polar bear apparently managed to turn the Frozen Donkey Wheel?Even Charlotte wasn't THAT important but her story gave us some good information
How? They didn't reset anything, in the end. The whole thing didn't matter. They just conveniently reappeared in 2007, and that was it for that plot.and she served as the catalyst for Faraday wanting to reset things which of course led to half of Season 6.
Thank god for Lapidus, 'cause without him, it would have been so unbelievable that a plane like that could be fixed in a matter of minutes.Lapidus didn't do shit, though. The 06 swam back to the island and Ajira flew itself off the island in the finale.
Why did Ben kill him, anyway? What did he have to gain by doing that?Locke's death
Because, up to that point, Jack hadn't seen anything that could make him think that, perhaps, some supernatural stuff was going on? Like, an entire island disappearing, for example? And I guess he just wasn't phased by that giant man-eating monster in the pilot...Jack's taking his first path on the step towads faith
Explained (I'm using this term loosely) in the following season.Jacob vs MIB.
'Doesn't matter outside of time travel plots. And contradicted as far as Desmond is concerned, apparently. Supposedly because he's an "exception". How does that even work?"What happened happened"
What purpose did it serve?Ben/Sayid
A "mystery" that was introduced in the same season anyway ("dead is dead! so who's that revived Locke?!" ... yeah, "dead is dead", except Sayid came back to life, that girl in Eko's flashback came back to life... but yeah, OK).Flocke reveal...
And that's precisely why being told that "it's been discussed already" doesn't help me all that much...oatmeal said:This thread is 140 pages, 280 if you have it set to 50ppp.
I have no idea where it would be.
So you're saying the whole thread has been a debate regarding the quality of the writing? I've read twenty pages or so, and that's not the impression I got...Catalix said:The whole thread, maybe?
Not what I was posting for in the first place, but since I've been called a troll for stating my opinion, I guess it means I have to elaborate.You're not bringing anything new to the table for us to discuss. You're justifiably venting over the show's grievances right now
"Veiled insults"? Where?Critical discussion of the show (faults and all) is always welcome, but veiled insults toward the fanbase will instantly stifle any discussion you claim to have wanted.
It just bothers me how overrated this show has been for years... Terrible shows that fail? No problem here. But when they're met with that kind of success and praise, I'm concerned about the consequences: how many Lost copycats will we get in the next few years?brandonh83 said:Then the problem is that you're someone who largely doesn't like the show in a topic full of people who did like the show. It's one thing to discuss the flaws about something that you like overall but engaging with people who do like it overall, when you don't find much to enjoy about it, boggles my mind.
Nah, I understand that. It's not like I love being told that a series I like sucks. But like I said above, that's no excuse for simply going "fuck off". The way I see it, either you're willing to actually discuss, or you shouldn't bother replying.you're acting like it's a mystery why people in here are more or less turned off by your posts.
Erigu said:Which is why I then posted a link to an article that echoes my main criticisms. But that didn't help much, apparently.
I would probably go with "the writers pretended they knew the answers to their mysteries when they introduced them, and that simply wasn't true", and "it wouldn't have been so bad if they weren't terrible at improvising as well, as the plot is inconsistent as hell".
I realized soon enough that they didn't know where they were going, so I wasn't among the ones who were impatient regarding "answers".
Not showing the other end of that shootout is still piss-poor storytelling.
I would say the matter isn't so much "who was behind the food drops?", but rather "why didn't that someone ever do anything beyond the food drops?".
After all, not pushing that button meant the end of the world, right? That sounds pretty serious.
So... Why let two guys in charge of that button? Why not replace them? Why not send more people? Why simply drop food and call it a job well done? Are there higher priorities than the world potentially ending in the next 108 minutes?
"Ah, but Eloise did what she could to send Desmond to the island so he could push the button!"
Yeah (and let's not wonder how she knew where Desmond would try and buy a ring for Penny, or that the guy with the red shoes would die a brutal death), but that's just one guy. And not too late either, since Kelvin had apparently been alone for a while when Desmond showed up. One guy to push a button every 108 minutes or the world ends? 'Sounds pretty damn risky to me, but oh well!
Merguson said:Hey guys why does jack go from having a buzz cut to having a full head of hair
DeathNote said:Anways, that UK boxset is so lol.
I'm not going to gave that much extra cash to blow when the US one releases.
It's not limited edition right?
Erigu said:It just bothers me how overrated this show has been for years... Terrible shows that fail? No problem here. But when they're met with that kind of success and praise, I'm concerned about the consequences: how many Lost copycats will we get in the next few years?
It's cheaper than buying each season seperate. Until that changes for the people needing to buy all 6...Snuggler said:It's only it's appeal that's limited, am I right?
Erigu said:In the grand scheme of things? You could remove them and the time-travel plot altogether, as it turned out.
Like what? Some polar bear apparently managed to turn the Frozen Donkey Wheel?
How? They didn't reset anything, in the end. The whole thing didn't matter. They just conveniently reappeared in 2007, and that was it for that plot.
Thank god for Lapidus, 'cause without him, it would have been so unbelievable that a plane like that could be fixed in a matter of minutes.
And they really needed that plane, too, 'cause they didn't have a nice boat right there.
(and I guess all that stuff about needing the right bearings to leave the island wasn't so important after all...)
Why did Ben kill him, anyway? What did he have to gain by doing that?
Because, up to that point, Jack hadn't seen anything that could make him think that, perhaps, some supernatural stuff was going on? Like, an entire island disappearing, for example? And I guess he just wasn't phased by that giant man-eating monster in the pilot...
The "science vs. faith" thing was about as riveting as in the X Files. Gee, who's in the right? The guy who believes in aliens and the supernatural stuff that's been happening ever since the first episode of the show, or the skeptical one who's been proven wrong again and again but somehow still thinks aliens don't exist?
Explained (I'm using this term loosely) in the following season.
And what was the "loophole" that allowed MIB to kill Jacob, anyway? He did the exact same thing he tried with Richard long ago. Except this time, Jacob let himself be killed instead of defending himself (for some reason). Why was MIB so proud of himself?
'Doesn't matter outside of time travel plots. And contradicted as far as Desmond is concerned, apparently. Supposedly because he's an "exception". How does that even work?
What purpose did it serve?
Are we to understand that Ben is a lying manipulative SOB because he was cured by some magic water back when he was a child? Oh, and he has some kind of amnesia because of it, too, which is why he doesn't recognize Sayid. I guess we'll just have to assume Rousseau took a bath in that same water, and that's why she didn't recognize the guy who took her child from her.
Sayid killed a child!! Because he's a killer!! Yeah, I heard you just fine the first dozen times, show.
A "mystery" that was introduced in the same season anyway ("dead is dead! so who's that revived Locke?!" ... yeah, "dead is dead", except Sayid came back to life, that girl in Eko's flashback came back to life... but yeah, OK).
Erigu said:"Synonymous to those themes" doesn't mean much to me... Could you elaborate?
In the grand scheme of things? You could remove them and the time-travel plot altogether, as it turned out.I knew I was wasting my time. Dude seriously? So throw away all of the examples of circular causation, throw out everything with Jughead, and essentially throw out MIB's entire grand scheme to kill Jacob and yeah, throw away 815 crashing in the first place and yeah I guess time travel is pointless. :lol
Like what? Some polar bear apparently managed to turn the Frozen Donkey Wheel?
How? They didn't reset anything, in the end. The whole thing didn't matter. They just conveniently reappeared in 2007, and that was it for that plot.
Thank god for Lapidus, 'cause without him, it would have been so unbelievable that a plane like that could be fixed in a matter of minutes.
And they really needed that plane, too, 'cause they didn't have a nice boat right there.
(and I guess all that stuff about needing the right bearings to leave the island wasn't so important after all...)
-Uhh yeah, exactly. And being integral to Faraday's character and his bearing on the plot. And sense when did the value a character become incumbent up them making an astronomical mark on the broader narrative? Only with LOST do people apply these unrealistic rules & regulations.
-By creating "The Incident" and knocking over the first domino in a series of dominoes that would eventually lead to 815 crashing on the island. And why do you think the flashsideways existed in the first place? It was a result of the detonation merging with the island's energy.
--Why would they need a bearing in a plane? Flock's plan to take the boat was based off his assumption that the island would be destroyed, also negating the need for a radius.
Why did Ben kill him, anyway? What did he have to gain by doing that?
I really do regret bothering to respond. He killed him due to jealousy and his thirst for power. Their entire conflict must have completely flown over your head.
Because, up to that point, Jack hadn't seen anything that could make him think that, perhaps, some supernatural stuff was going on? Like, an entire island disappearing, for example? And I guess he just wasn't phased by that giant man-eating monster in the pilot...
The "science vs. faith" thing was about as riveting as in the X Files. Gee, who's in the right? The guy who believes in aliens and the supernatural stuff that's been happening ever since the first episode of the show, or the skeptical one who's been proven wrong again and again but somehow still thinks aliens don't exist?
I'm not going to sit here guide you by the hand through the narrative of LOST. It was a culmination of of Jack & Locke's entire feud coupled with the guilt Jack felt over leaving everyone behind, the emptiness he felt without the island, and the stress of his life completely falling apart since coming back.
Watch this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWeW-T1rtwE
Explained (I'm using this term loosely) in the following season.
And what was the "loophole" that allowed MIB to kill Jacob, anyway? He did the exact same thing he tried with Richard long ago. Except this time, Jacob let himself be killed instead of defending himself (for some reason). Why was MIB so proud of himself?
Free-Will
'Doesn't matter outside of time travel plots. And contradicted as far as Desmond is concerned, apparently. Supposedly because he's an "exception". How does that even work?
How do you call it a contradiction and two second later acknowledge that it's made clear that Desmond is the exception to the rule??? How does it work? He turned the fail safe key would be the short answer.
What purpose did it serve?
Are we to understand that Ben is a lying manipulative SOB because he was cured by some magic water back when he was a child? Oh, and he has some kind of amnesia because of it, too, which is why he doesn't recognize Sayid. I guess we'll just have to assume Rousseau took a bath in that same water, and that's why she didn't recognize the guy who took her child from her.
Sayid killed a child!! Because he's a killer!! Yeah, I heard you just fine the first dozen times, show.
Who says he doesn't recognize Sayid? What reason did he have to, hell, why would he if his aim is to manipulate the LOSTIES? What happened in the temple didn't wipe his mind of the previous 12 years of his life. "He won't remember any of this"... "THIS" wasn't referring to his whole life, simply the healing process and events right before.
And for a purpose Sayid shoots young Ben which causes Ben to grow up sinister which causes Sayid to shoot young Ben which causes Ben to grow up sinister. And this isn't even touching on how it played into MIB's grand scheme or the poetic nature of Ben & Sayid's relationship.
A "mystery" that was introduced in the same season anyway ("dead is dead! so who's that revived Locke?!" ... yeah, "dead is dead", except Sayid came back to life, that girl in Eko's flashback came back to life... but yeah, OK).
Characters on LOST communicate only as far as their knowledge extends. Dead is Dead is/was the case as far as everyone know.
You really need to rewatch the series and try again.
Erigu said:I guess I could have explained what I meant by "mess of a show", but so many people did that already...
For example:
http://www.alwayswatching.net/features/lost-sucks
Who do you need to be to criticize a movie/show? I don't see how that's "stepping out of line"...brandonh83 said:I think The Dark Knight is overrated but that doesn't make it so. Plenty of people love that film. Who am I to tell them that they're wrong and that it's overrated?
Well, again, that wasn't why I posted in the first place...I don't see you as a troll. I know trolls, we've had them, and thankfully we stopped seeing them as often after a while. But I don't get the point of coming in here to confess that you think its overrated-- I don't see what you'd get out of it.
The show didn't say anything about Jughead having prevented a catastrophe of island-sinking proportions... In fact, like Miles said, if "whatever happened, happened", Jughead was always supposed to play the role it played in the Incident...cyclonekruse said:Remove the time-travel plot and you gut the entire show. Without them going back in time and trying to change their past, they don't detonate Jughead during the Incident. Without that detonation, the Incident would have been a full-blown catastrophe that sank the island and allowed MiB to escape (ending everything).
Which is odd, considering Ben had to blow a wall up to get into that cave. The whole thing didn't look all that practical for polar bears, really.What we learned from the polar bear in the desert was that the DI completed their excavation to the donkey wheel and ran some tests with polar bears.
And what was the point of that, anyway?the point is, that's how Widmore knew to place cameras in the precise location that Locke would arrive.
Too bad they couldn't think of anything for him to do... until he fixed an airliner within minutes, that is (not that it was necessary as, once again, there was a boat.. which they left to go back to the island, get on a plane and get off the island).Lapidus was just a fun character in my mind. They needed a pilot in Season 4.
What was the point of those rules? Why prevent people from leaving the island? Just to be an ass?the bearings thing was because Jacob made it that way. He made the rules.
How did killing Locke help him accomplish that?Ben wanted to regain his power.
Because Locke was healed by the island? He wasn't the only one.And as explained in the finale, Ben was jealous of Locke.
The faith to stop asking questions? Because that appears to be what the show was saying, toward the end, and I'm not exactly comfortable with that kind of message... Don't be curious about the mysteries of the island, or you'll "inevitably" be murdered by the "good guys" who protect it (and couldn't think of another way to deal with you despite all their powers). Well, OK, then!Jack believed the supernatural things he saw (after some time) but the faith he finally developed was the faith that allowed for him to not constantly be in control. The faith that things would work out.
A reveal that wasn't connected to the time-travel plot in any way and could have been moved to season 4 or season 6, really. Point is, most of season 5 was meaningless in the end.But an important reveal in the 5th season.
Why? And did he really need the MIB for that anyway?Jacob wanted to die.
"Putting a plan into place" is one thing. But he still hadn't appointed that new protector by the time MIB and Ben showed up. To let himself killed right there and then? 'Sounds like a bad idea to me.But not until he had put into place his plan to get a new Island Protector.
My point is, "whatever happened, happened" is a model of time-travel that doesn't suffer any exception. You can't say "there's no way to change history... unless your name is xxxxx, in which case, sure, go ahead!" It makes no sense.Desmond was a little dislodged from time when he was exposed to the EM radiation in the hatch.
Wouldn't quite explain that though:The popular theory being bandied about here is that the light is time incarnate or something like that. So the pool water (which is the same as the cave water) has the ability to reverse time, as it did in Ben's case. That's why he had amnesia.
What does innocence have to do with anything?RICHARD: If I take him, he's not ever gonna be the same again.
KATE: What do you mean by that?
RICHARD: What I mean is that, he'll forget this ever happened, and that...his innocence will be gone. He will always be one of us.
:lolhow would you recognize anyone stealing your baby when all you could look at was the most horrendous hairpiece ever?
Well, even before he got sick, really...The thing with Sayid (and the "sickness" in general) is the notion of thoughts being implanted in your brain. Sayid was a killer because people told him he was.
Er... Are you saying the sickness made it so anybody could change Sayid's mind just by talking to him for a little while? That he couldn't take his own decisions anymore? 'Cause Claire sure needed a lot of convincing (and she killed that guy with an axe anyway).When people suggested otherwise, like Nadia or Desmond, he wasn't a killer. It was a "thought sickness." A belief you can't get out of your head.
So when the guys of the Temple said it wasn't their water that revived him, they didn't know what they were talking about?Again, the water can reverse time. It did it's job, but being less potent than normal (the water was not as bright), it took longer.
Again, that's an odd way to approach the whole thing... We already had the incident and Desmond not pushing the button as an explanation for the crash, prior to the time travel plot. No need for the time-travel plot or Jughead.InaudibleWhispa said:The fact that Erigu thinks the time travel/Jughead plot "didn't matter" says it all. Without those events, 815 doesn't crash.
How?Nameless said:Everything surrounding the hatch, Charlie's entire storyline, Locke's entire storyline, Jack's entire storyline, Eko's entire storyline, the detonation of Jughead, the 06 returning to the island, Jacob vs MIB's conflict, etc.. all constantly hearkened back to those major themes of the show.
My expectations aren't "unrealistic" at all, and are in fact met by a whole bunch of stories out there.Only with LOST do people apply these unrealistic rules & regulations.
Baseless speculation, really.why do you think the flashsideways existed in the first place? It was a result of the detonation merging with the island's energy.
So planes are an exception? Since when?Why would they need a bearing in a plane?
Yes, Jack wanted to go back because Locke told him bad things were happening to Sawyer and it was Jack's fault (for leaving the island). Except it wasn't, as it turned out. It was all because of the damn Frozen Donkey Wheel that hadn't been turned correctly. And when we got to the point where we actually saw that off-island conversation between Jack and Locke, Locke didn't say anything about it being Jack's fault (why would he?).It was a culmination of of Jack & Locke's entire feud coupled with the guilt Jack felt over leaving everyone behind
His father appearing to him who-knows-why...the emptiness he felt without the island, and the stress of his life completely falling apart since coming back.
I really don't see how that answers that part you bolded in any way.Free-Will
I think it's pretty clear that Richard saying he wouldn't remember what happened was the writers' way of dealing with that particular issue. What other purpose would that line serve?Who says he doesn't recognize Sayid?
Another gratuitous causal loop? We already had the compass one.And for a purpose Sayid shoots young Ben which causes Ben to grow up sinister which causes Sayid to shoot young Ben which causes Ben to grow up sinister.
Indeed, it isn't. Please elaborate.And this isn't even touching on how it played into MIB's grand scheme or the poetic nature of Ben & Sayid's relationship.
Isn't it odd how Ben told Locke he was to become the new leader of the Others, then?brandonh83 said:Ben used to view Locke as a threat when it came to having superiority on the island.
I would say he sums up somethings perfectly. I agree that Season 6 had problems, but no matter how disappointed I may be with it, it doesn't ruin the previous five seasons which are still great TV.yankeehater said:Thank you for posting that. He sums it up perfectly.
The Incident was and always has been Jughead going off. Whatever Happened Happened. Without Jughead, there would be no button to push. Jughead neutralised the growing energy from Dharma's drill which would have otherwise likely engulfed the island. This gave them time to build the swan hatch, and create the protocol that discharges the built-up energy every 108 minutes. Meanwhile Dharma fills the bomb site in with concrete to contain any radiation (Sayid, Season 2 - This looks just like Chernobyl). As Miles said "What if setting the bomb off doesn't change the future, it causes it?". That is exactly what happens.Erigu said:Again, that's an odd way to approach the whole thing... We already had the incident and Desmond not pushing the button as an explanation for the crash, prior to the time travel plot. No need for the time-travel plot or Jughead.
Not from the perpective of the audience (nor from the writers', really, as I seriously doubt Jughead and the time travel plot were planned from the beginning).InaudibleWhispa said:The Incident was and always has been Jughead going off.
Baseless speculation... The show didn't say anything about Jughead buying DHARMA time.Jughead neutralised the growing energy from Dharma's drill which would have otherwise likely engulfed the island. This gave them time to build the swan hatch, and create the protocol that discharges the built-up energy every 108 minutes.
I realize that (even if the show never really bothered to tell whether or not Miles was right, it simply makes more sense for him to be right). But that's a posteriori. Prior to the time-travel plot, we had an explanation for the plane crashing on the island, and it worked just fine.As Miles said "What if setting the bomb off doesn't change the future, it causes it?". That is exactly what happens.
Spotting plot holes and inconsistencies is fun. To me, anyway.thekad said:You're discussing details of a show this guy apparently did not like but watched for 100+ episodes.
Erigu said:Isn't it odd how Ben told Locke he was to become the new leader of the Others, then?
No, really:brandonh83 said:Not really.
Why tell Locke all that? Isn't that spectacularly counter-productive?LOCKE: What's that for?
BEN: I'm going somewhere cold.
LOCKE: Then where is mine?
BEN: You don't need one because you're not going with me.
LOCKE: Yes, I am going with you.
BEN: No, John, you're not.
LOCKE: Jacob told me what we had to do. You don't get to make all the decisions--
BEN: He told you what to do, but he didn't tell you how because he wants me to suffer the consequences.
LOCKE: What consequences?
BEN: Whoever moves the island can never come back. So I'd like you to get on the elevator, John, and go back up. Richard and my people will be waiting 2 miles east of the Orchid.
LOCKE: Waiting for me?
BEN: Ready, willing and able to share what they know. And then they will follow your every word. Good-bye, John. I'm sorry I made your life so miserable.
LOCKE: What do I tell 'em to do?
BEN: You'll find your way, John. You always do.
Calantus said:So what are the two writers working on next? i remember before people were talking about the book series (forget the name)
Blader5489 said:Damon Lindelof is writing Star Trek 2 and the Alien prequel.
No idea what Cuse is doing.
Dead said:I hope Orci and Kurtzman aren't involved in writing Trek 2
Erigu said:The show didn't say anything about Jughead having prevented a catastrophe of island-sinking proportions... In fact, like Miles said, if "whatever happened, happened", Jughead was always supposed to play the role it played in the Incident...
And that's an odd way to approach the whole thing, really... Prior to the time-travel plot, we knew there was an incident, and, obviously, it didn't sink the island. Remove the time-travel plot, and where's the problem, here? How does it "gut the entire show"?
Which is odd, considering Ben had to blow a wall up to get into that cave. The whole thing didn't look all that practical for polar bears, really.
And what was the point of that, anyway?
Too bad they couldn't think of anything for him to do... until he fixed an airliner within minutes, that is (not that it was necessary as, once again, there was a boat.. which they left to go back to the island, get on a plane and get off the island).
What was the point of those rules? Why prevent people from leaving the island? Just to be an ass?
How did killing Locke help him accomplish that?
Because Locke was healed by the island? He wasn't the only one.
And the guy was about to commit suicide... What was there to be jealous of, at that point?
The faith to stop asking questions? Because that appears to be what the show was saying, toward the end, and I'm not exactly comfortable with that kind of message... Don't be curious about the mysteries of the island, or you'll "inevitably" be murdered by the "good guys" who protect it (and couldn't think of another way to deal with you despite all their powers). Well, OK, then!
A reveal that wasn't connected to the time-travel plot in any way and could have been moved to season 4 or season 6, really. Point is, most of season 5 was meaningless in the end.
Why? And did he really need the MIB for that anyway?
"Putting a plan into place" is one thing. But he still hadn't appointed that new protector by the time MIB and Ben showed up. To let himself killed right there and then? 'Sounds like a bad idea to me.
And again, why was MIB so proud of himself, then? What was the "loophole" he said he found?
My point is, "whatever happened, happened" is a model of time-travel that doesn't suffer any exception. You can't say "there's no way to change history... unless your name is xxxxx, in which case, sure, go ahead!" It makes no sense.
Wouldn't quite explain that though:
What does innocence have to do with anything?
:lol
Seriously though... Doesn't it bother you? She catches the guy in one of her traps, and doesn't recognize him from that fateful night?
Well, even before he got sick, really...
Er... Are you saying the sickness made it so anybody could change Sayid's mind just by talking to him for a little while? That he couldn't take his own decisions anymore? 'Cause Claire sure needed a lot of convincing (and she killed that guy with an axe anyway).
So when the guys of the Temple said it wasn't their water that revived him, they didn't know what they were talking about?
lolgdt5016 said:I think they are.
In my mind, Damon is writing ST2 (in addition to producing, as he did in the first, which he didn't write) to pump up the script/offset O+K, which brought ST1 down a bit.
Seems to me people are getting hip to O+K's shit.
I wonder if JJ could've just had them off writing duties, but that'd probably be a whole can of worms.
Edit: I see that O+K did NOT produce ST2009. Just JJ and Damon.
Edit2: Ok, I'm totally putting together a narrative in my head where JJ and Damon want O+K off the ST sequel, but the studio doesn't. Instead, JJ/Damon just pitch Damon also taking a hand in the script. He then shelves most of their draft :lol .
Erigu said:Why tell Locke all that? Isn't that spectacularly counter-productive?
Dead said:lol
Though I wouldn't be surprised if Lindelof did some minor polish on the ST1 script in terms of the characters.