LOST 06.17/18/18.5: "The End" (Everything Else Was Just Progress)

Status
Not open for further replies.
cyclonekruse said:
I think it's more that you came in and proclaimed it a mess without giving a reason why. Therefore, it's fair to tell you that you're wrong with giving a reason why.

We can guess your criticisms though. Usually it's that the show "never answered questions" when in reality, the number of mysteries that were not answered pales to the number that were. The only things really left (some of which aren't major) are:

1. The importance of Walt and Aaron
2. The cabin
3. Illana's backstory
4. How Jacob could leave the island at will
5. Outrigger shooting
6. Pallet drop

And even 5 and 6 are not complete mysteries. We have some likely guesses for those. Someone on Illana's outrigger probably got shot. And Eloise was likely behind the pallet drop. Plus, some of it might be answered in the epilogue. And if not there, maybe the encyclopedia.

Exactly, these people just love to look at the negative, why not look at what the show done gloriously for a change

Edit: I figured Jacob could leave the island whenever and however he wants because he is the protector and makes all the rules, he can do whatever he wants. He could probably magic a boat out of thin air if he wanted to lol
 
Erigu said:
I did already and mostly saw positive reactions to the show... Was there a long debate over the quality of the writing, really?

It might not be going on in this thread anymore, only the fans remain, but I've seen plenty of discussion and especially criticism of Lost around here. You're certainly not the only one who feels that way. Hell, people are saying you're trolling but I've seen some far more inflammatory comments made even in just this thread.

For me, I'm fine with all of the little inconsistencies and unsolved mysteries. They may have not answered all of the questions, but I feel like they covered the most important ones regarding the island and the significance of the survivors. I watch the show and enjoy it for what it is, I simply don't care about that kind of stuff.

I don't feel like the creators were obligated to spell out the answer to every single mystery for us. In addition to that, I find that mysteries are much more fun than answers. The intrigue is much more exciting than the almost inevitably underwhelming explanation for it. Just look at the polar bears and the voices in the woods.
I was only along for the ride, and I enjoyed (almost)* every single moment of it.

*Rose and Bernard flashback, blech.
 
Erigu said:
I dunno, when I see negative criticism regarding about a work I appreciate, I ask the guy/gal to elaborate. I don't go all "fuck off little boy".
If you come in a big official thread for a show and say "I can't believe you guys like this mess" or whatever, you can't expect people to ask why or even care.

Maybe if could have elaborated on what you thought was wrong with the show in the first place, there could have been a discussion.
 
Snuggler said:
It might not be going on in this thread anymore, only the fans remain, but I've seen plenty of discussion and especially criticism of Lost around here. You're certainly not the only one who feels that way. Hell, people are saying you're trolling but I've seen some far more inflammatory comments made even in just this thread.

For me, I'm fine with all of the little inconsistencies and unsolved mysteries. They may have not answered all of the questions, but I feel like they covered the most important ones regarding the island and the significance of the survivors. I watch the show and enjoy it for what it is, I simply don't care about that kind of stuff. I don't feel like the creators were obligated to spell out the answer to every single mystery for us.
I was only along for the ride, and I enjoyed (almost)* every single moment of it.

*Rose and Bernard flashback, blech.

The Rose and Bernard flashback held an incredibly important clue actually.

Isaac of Uluru explained the island is the right place for Locke and Rose to be healed. Isaac: "There are certain places with great energy, spots on the Earth like the one we're above now. Perhaps this energy is geological, magnetic.... or perhaps it's something else... It's not that you can't be healed. Like I said, there's different energies. This is not the right place for you."

I noticed this on my rewatch
 
cyclonekruse said:
I think it's more that you came in and proclaimed it a mess without giving a reason why.
Which is why I then posted a link to an article that echoes my main criticisms. But that didn't help much, apparently.

We can guess your criticisms though. Usually it's that the show "never answered questions"
I would probably go with "the writers pretended they knew the answers to their mysteries when they introduced them, and that simply wasn't true", and "it wouldn't have been so bad if they weren't terrible at improvising as well, as the plot is inconsistent as hell".
I realized soon enough that they didn't know where they were going, so I wasn't among the ones who were impatient regarding "answers".

Someone on Illana's outrigger probably got shot.
Not showing the other end of that shootout is still piss-poor storytelling.

Eloise was likely behind the pallet drop.
I would say the matter isn't so much "who was behind the food drops?", but rather "why didn't that someone ever do anything beyond the food drops?".
After all, not pushing that button meant the end of the world, right? That sounds pretty serious.
So... Why let two guys in charge of that button? Why not replace them? Why not send more people? Why simply drop food and call it a job well done? Are there higher priorities than the world potentially ending in the next 108 minutes?
"Ah, but Eloise did what she could to send Desmond to the island so he could push the button!"
Yeah (and let's not wonder how she knew where Desmond would try and buy a ring for Penny, or that the guy with the red shoes would die a brutal death), but that's just one guy. And not too late either, since Kelvin had apparently been alone for a while when Desmond showed up. One guy to push a button every 108 minutes or the world ends? 'Sounds pretty damn risky to me, but oh well!


oatmeal said:
OK, but could you tell me where, then? Even approximately?


brandonh83 said:
The show did so many awesome things but as usual the stuff it did wrong is what actually matters.
I just don't think it did "many awesome things", sorry... The premise was nice. There was some amusing misdirection in the opening scenes of a couple of seasons. Apart from that...
 
Drealmcc0y said:
The Rose and Bernard flashback held an incredibly important clue actually.

Never noticed that. I just found those two characters painfully boring and kind of annoying, so it was hard for me to sit through an entire episode devoted to them.
 
Erigu said:
Could you explain why? Where was that article "straight up wrong", for example?

I'm not going to spend an hour or two quoting the entire article but:


"Q: What point were the writers trying to make with the show's central themes (fate vs. free will, science vs. faith)?
A: They weren't.

Why it's stupid: Generally, themes are supposed to have some sort of purpose. Otherwise, what's the use in having them? This is the question I find myself asking over and over when thinking about Lost's themes, and the answer I keep coming back to is: there is no point. The writers assumed simply having them was enough. They never bothered to figure out what they were trying to say, or if they even had anything to say."

This is WRONG on so many levels. All of the major events of the show and most of the biggest character arcs were synonymous to those themes.


Now here's a brief sampling of things in Lost that seemed like they were significant in some way, only to subsequently be revealed as having no substantial bearing on the narrative:

The entirety of Season 5. They left the island, came back to the island, skipped through time, lived with the Dharma Initiative, and for what? So you'd be mislead when the writers introduced the alternate timeline in Season 6.

The entirety of Season 4. An excuse to throw some new characters into the mix, none of whom mattered.

Yeah the ENTIRETY of Season 4 was just an excuse to introduce three characters. :lol Even pretending we're in an imaginary world where such a BS state was the truth, I'd say Faraday was pretty fucking important, and Miles was far from pointless. Even Charlotte wasn't THAT important but her story gave us some good information and she served as the catalyst for Faraday wanting to reset things which of course led to half of Season 6. Lapidus didn't do shit, though. The 06 swam back to the island and Ajira flew itself off the island in the finale.

And yeah. I guess season 5 was pointless. Nevermind his article would have been twice as long had there been no answers to the myriad of questions and mysteries S5 tackled. To call the entire season insignificant should prove my point alone. Locke's death, Jack's taking his first path on the step towads faith, Jacob vs MIB. "What happened happened", Ben/Sayid, Flocke reveal... Should I go on?

Just read the article. He's angrily dismissive and constantly ignores large chunks of the narrative while make his "points."
 
29fsgu1.gif
 
Erigu said:
OK, but could you tell me where, then? Even approximately?
The whole thread, maybe? The thing is, you act like some kind of lone warrior on a mission to expose the show's hidden follies. Plenty have agreed with your gripes, and we've had extensive passionate debates for the past few months about the show; the good, the bad, and the ugly. Over and over and over.... we're just kinda tired, dude.

You're not bringing anything new to the table for us to discuss. You're justifiably venting over the show's grievances right now, which is totally fine, but it could've been done without the initial combative attitude and passive aggressive linking to that broad, cliched article.

Critical discussion of the show (faults and all) is always welcome, but veiled insults toward the fanbase will instantly stifle any discussion you claim to have wanted.
 
Erigu said:
I just don't think it did "many awesome things", sorry... The premise was nice. There was some amusing misdirection in the opening scenes of a couple of seasons. Apart from that...

Then the problem is that you're someone who largely doesn't like the show in a topic full of people who did like the show. It's one thing to discuss the flaws about something that you like overall but engaging with people who do like it overall, when you don't find much to enjoy about it, boggles my mind. There are plenty of threads about things I don't like, but I don't go in them and pursue arguments. I didn't like Inception, for example, and after I finished up my initial reasoning about why, I didn't continue to sound off about it because I was in the minority and I knew they didn't want to sift through my bullshit.

I don't have a problem with you not liking Lost. Whatever. You're not alone. But you're acting like it's a mystery why people in here are more or less turned off by your posts.
 
Nameless said:
All of the major events of the show and most of the biggest character arcs were synonymous to those themes.
"Synonymous to those themes" doesn't mean much to me... Could you elaborate?

I'd say Faraday was pretty fucking important, and Miles was far from pointless.
In the grand scheme of things? You could remove them and the time-travel plot altogether, as it turned out.

Even Charlotte wasn't THAT important but her story gave us some good information
Like what? Some polar bear apparently managed to turn the Frozen Donkey Wheel?

and she served as the catalyst for Faraday wanting to reset things which of course led to half of Season 6.
How? They didn't reset anything, in the end. The whole thing didn't matter. They just conveniently reappeared in 2007, and that was it for that plot.

Lapidus didn't do shit, though. The 06 swam back to the island and Ajira flew itself off the island in the finale.
Thank god for Lapidus, 'cause without him, it would have been so unbelievable that a plane like that could be fixed in a matter of minutes.
And they really needed that plane, too, 'cause they didn't have a nice boat right there.
(and I guess all that stuff about needing the right bearings to leave the island wasn't so important after all...)

Locke's death
Why did Ben kill him, anyway? What did he have to gain by doing that?

Jack's taking his first path on the step towads faith
Because, up to that point, Jack hadn't seen anything that could make him think that, perhaps, some supernatural stuff was going on? Like, an entire island disappearing, for example? And I guess he just wasn't phased by that giant man-eating monster in the pilot...
The "science vs. faith" thing was about as riveting as in the X Files. Gee, who's in the right? The guy who believes in aliens and the supernatural stuff that's been happening ever since the first episode of the show, or the skeptical one who's been proven wrong again and again but somehow still thinks aliens don't exist?

Jacob vs MIB.
Explained (I'm using this term loosely) in the following season.
And what was the "loophole" that allowed MIB to kill Jacob, anyway? He did the exact same thing he tried with Richard long ago. Except this time, Jacob let himself be killed instead of defending himself (for some reason). Why was MIB so proud of himself?

"What happened happened"
'Doesn't matter outside of time travel plots. And contradicted as far as Desmond is concerned, apparently. Supposedly because he's an "exception". How does that even work?

Ben/Sayid
What purpose did it serve?
Are we to understand that Ben is a lying manipulative SOB because he was cured by some magic water back when he was a child? Oh, and he has some kind of amnesia because of it, too, which is why he doesn't recognize Sayid. I guess we'll just have to assume Rousseau took a bath in that same water, and that's why she didn't recognize the guy who took her child from her.
Sayid killed a child!! Because he's a killer!! Yeah, I heard you just fine the first dozen times, show.

Flocke reveal...
A "mystery" that was introduced in the same season anyway ("dead is dead! so who's that revived Locke?!" ... yeah, "dead is dead", except Sayid came back to life, that girl in Eko's flashback came back to life... but yeah, OK).


oatmeal said:
This thread is 140 pages, 280 if you have it set to 50ppp.
I have no idea where it would be.
And that's precisely why being told that "it's been discussed already" doesn't help me all that much...


Catalix said:
The whole thread, maybe?
So you're saying the whole thread has been a debate regarding the quality of the writing? I've read twenty pages or so, and that's not the impression I got...

You're not bringing anything new to the table for us to discuss. You're justifiably venting over the show's grievances right now
Not what I was posting for in the first place, but since I've been called a troll for stating my opinion, I guess it means I have to elaborate.

Critical discussion of the show (faults and all) is always welcome, but veiled insults toward the fanbase will instantly stifle any discussion you claim to have wanted.
"Veiled insults"? Where?


brandonh83 said:
Then the problem is that you're someone who largely doesn't like the show in a topic full of people who did like the show. It's one thing to discuss the flaws about something that you like overall but engaging with people who do like it overall, when you don't find much to enjoy about it, boggles my mind.
It just bothers me how overrated this show has been for years... Terrible shows that fail? No problem here. But when they're met with that kind of success and praise, I'm concerned about the consequences: how many Lost copycats will we get in the next few years?

you're acting like it's a mystery why people in here are more or less turned off by your posts.
Nah, I understand that. It's not like I love being told that a series I like sucks. But like I said above, that's no excuse for simply going "fuck off". The way I see it, either you're willing to actually discuss, or you shouldn't bother replying.
 
Erigu said:
Which is why I then posted a link to an article that echoes my main criticisms. But that didn't help much, apparently.

The criticisms in the article aren't any different than what we've encountered and dealt with, though. Plus it shows laziness on your part. Rather than taking the time to explain what you found wrong with the show, you post a link.

I would probably go with "the writers pretended they knew the answers to their mysteries when they introduced them, and that simply wasn't true", and "it wouldn't have been so bad if they weren't terrible at improvising as well, as the plot is inconsistent as hell".
I realized soon enough that they didn't know where they were going, so I wasn't among the ones who were impatient regarding "answers".

They've been foreshadowing things for the entire show. Sure, some things changed along the way. Walt's actor grew too fast. Eko's actor wanted off the show. But that doesn't mean they didn't have a general idea of what was going on. And I think, beyond some minor quibbles, the show was quite consistent.


Not showing the other end of that shootout is still piss-poor storytelling.

It's one of the few legitimate gripes. Not many people here deny that.

I would say the matter isn't so much "who was behind the food drops?", but rather "why didn't that someone ever do anything beyond the food drops?".
After all, not pushing that button meant the end of the world, right? That sounds pretty serious.
So... Why let two guys in charge of that button? Why not replace them? Why not send more people? Why simply drop food and call it a job well done? Are there higher priorities than the world potentially ending in the next 108 minutes?
"Ah, but Eloise did what she could to send Desmond to the island so he could push the button!"
Yeah (and let's not wonder how she knew where Desmond would try and buy a ring for Penny, or that the guy with the red shoes would die a brutal death), but that's just one guy. And not too late either, since Kelvin had apparently been alone for a while when Desmond showed up. One guy to push a button every 108 minutes or the world ends? 'Sounds pretty damn risky to me, but oh well!

Eloise already knew that Desmond would successfully push the button. She knew that the world wouldn't end until at least after Faraday got to the island so he could go back and time for her to shoot him.
 
Don't even know why I bothered. Carry on.
 
Anways, that UK boxset is so lol.

I'm not going to gave that much extra cash to blow when the US one releases.

It's not limited edition right?
 
DeathNote said:
Anways, that UK boxset is so lol.

I'm not going to gave that much extra cash to blow when the US one releases.

It's not limited edition right?

It's only it's appeal that's limited, am I right?
 
Erigu said:
It just bothers me how overrated this show has been for years... Terrible shows that fail? No problem here. But when they're met with that kind of success and praise, I'm concerned about the consequences: how many Lost copycats will we get in the next few years?

I think The Dark Knight is overrated but that doesn't make it so. Plenty of people love that film. Who am I to tell them that they're wrong and that it's overrated? For the record, everyone alive have things they think are overrated. If something is widely seen as good, that's enough ammunition for someone else to point fingers and yell "it's overrated!"

I'm just saying that while you likely have valid criticisms of the show, I just don't see a point in trying to discuss such in a topic populated by people who are fans of the show. You're likely to have better conversations in a more general topic about television or whatever where there isn't a huge concentration of people who loved it. And from my experience here, most people that have posted in these threads have all sounded off about things that they don't like about it. I'm one of them. Some of the biggest contributors to these threads have endlessly went over things they don't like about it, but they really like the show overall and thus it was easier to see that they had valid complaints that they wanted to touch on.

Yet, here you are, 2-3 months after the finale, trying to stir debate about how the show is overrated and how there aren't that many good things about it. I don't see you as a troll. I know trolls, we've had them, and thankfully we stopped seeing them as often after a while. But I don't get the point of coming in here to confess that you think its overrated-- I don't see what you'd get out of it.
 
Erigu said:
In the grand scheme of things? You could remove them and the time-travel plot altogether, as it turned out.

Remove the time-travel plot and you gut the entire show. Without them going back in time and trying to change their past, they don't detonate Jughead during the Incident. Without that detonation, the Incident would have been a full-blown catastrophe that sank the island and allowed MiB to escape (ending everything). Thanks to that detonation, the Dharma Initiative were able to complete work on the Swan station. Desmond was able to push a button in that station. And then the Losties were able to return to the Island when Desmond failed to push the button.

Like what? Some polar bear apparently managed to turn the Frozen Donkey Wheel?

What we learned from the polar bear in the desert was that the DI completed their excavation to the donkey wheel and ran some tests with polar bears. Because of those tests, they discovered where the "exit" to the donkey wheel was, Tunisia. I suppose the Others might have done that test. But the point is, that's how Widmore knew to place cameras in the precise location that Locke would arrive.

How? They didn't reset anything, in the end. The whole thing didn't matter. They just conveniently reappeared in 2007, and that was it for that plot.

No, they didn't reset anything. But it made Faraday believe (or want to believe) that they could which drove Jack to finish his work and detonate Jughead which as I explained above was necessary for EVERYTHING.

Thank god for Lapidus, 'cause without him, it would have been so unbelievable that a plane like that could be fixed in a matter of minutes.
And they really needed that plane, too, 'cause they didn't have a nice boat right there.
(and I guess all that stuff about needing the right bearings to leave the island wasn't so important after all...)

Lapidus was just a fun character in my mind. They needed a pilot in Season 4. But he was so well-liked that they decided to keep him. And the bearings thing was because Jacob made it that way. He made the rules. Those rules changed when he gave control of the Island over to Jack.

Why did Ben kill him, anyway? What did he have to gain by doing that?

Ben wanted to regain his power. And as explained in the finale, Ben was jealous of Locke.

Because, up to that point, Jack hadn't seen anything that could make him think that, perhaps, some supernatural stuff was going on? Like, an entire island disappearing, for example? And I guess he just wasn't phased by that giant man-eating monster in the pilot...
The "science vs. faith" thing was about as riveting as in the X Files. Gee, who's in the right? The guy who believes in aliens and the supernatural stuff that's been happening ever since the first episode of the show, or the skeptical one who's been proven wrong again and again but somehow still thinks aliens don't exist?

Jack believed the supernatural things he saw (after some time) but the faith he finally developed was the faith that allowed for him to not constantly be in control. The faith that things would work out.

Explained (I'm using this term loosely) in the following season.

But an important reveal in the 5th season.

And what was the "loophole" that allowed MIB to kill Jacob, anyway? He did the exact same thing he tried with Richard long ago. Except this time, Jacob let himself be killed instead of defending himself (for some reason). Why was MIB so proud of himself?

Jacob wanted to die. But not until he had put into place his plan to get a new Island Protector. So he stopped Richard and didn't stop Ben.

'Doesn't matter outside of time travel plots. And contradicted as far as Desmond is concerned, apparently. Supposedly because he's an "exception". How does that even work?

Desmond was a little dislodged from time when he was exposed to the EM radiation in the hatch.

What purpose did it serve?
Are we to understand that Ben is a lying manipulative SOB because he was cured by some magic water back when he was a child? Oh, and he has some kind of amnesia because of it, too, which is why he doesn't recognize Sayid. I guess we'll just have to assume Rousseau took a bath in that same water, and that's why she didn't recognize the guy who took her child from her.

First things first. The popular theory being bandied about here is that the light is time incarnate or something like that. So the pool water (which is the same as the cave water) has the ability to reverse time, as it did in Ben's case. That's why he had amnesia. Yes, it's a little contrived, but it does work. Second, how would you recognize anyone stealing your baby when all you could look at was the most horrendous hairpiece ever?

Sayid killed a child!! Because he's a killer!! Yeah, I heard you just fine the first dozen times, show.

This was explained in a podcast. Sort of. The thing with Sayid (and the "sickness" in general) is the notion of thoughts being implanted in your brain. Sayid was a killer because people told him he was. When people suggested otherwise, like Nadia or Desmond, he wasn't a killer. It was a "thought sickness." A belief you can't get out of your head. A recent movie played with this idea.
Inception

I will give you that this was not explained in the show very well at all and is one of my personal gripes.

A "mystery" that was introduced in the same season anyway ("dead is dead! so who's that revived Locke?!" ... yeah, "dead is dead", except Sayid came back to life, that girl in Eko's flashback came back to life... but yeah, OK).

Again, the water can reverse time. It did it's job, but being less potent than normal (the water was not as bright), it took longer. The girl in Eko's flashback never died. Though she did get glimpses of the Great Beyond where she talked to Yemi. Kind of like how Juliet said that she and Sawyer could "go Dutch."
 
I'd say that the only sin the show committed is that it switched genres without warning. For example, you never question why the stones glow when near to each other in Temple of Doom or how is it that immortals can only be killed by chopping their heads off in Highlander. We learn to accept these arbitrary rules.

Since Lost started off as a mystery show, or was at least presented as one, it set up expectations of resolutions which ultimately never came once it went into full-on fantasy mode. There was a Christopher Nolan movie that had a similar problem, except it was two hours long as opposed to six seasons.

Anyway, I think even the most zealous fans admit that Lost has massive problems. However, it never stopped being entertaining. I really don't see the point in showing the unwashed masses that the emperor has no clothes, because brother, the masses - including myself - have been staring at his privates for six years now and enjoying every minute of it.
 
The fact that Erigu thinks the time travel/Jughead plot "didn't matter" says it all. Without those events, 815 doesn't crash. We have no show. As always, 90% of the "questions" are due to people not paying full attention. It's understandable; not everyone put the time and effort to discuss/read-up on events as the show progressed, and as such they miss out on a lot. But now that they didn't get all of these answers in the finale, they bombard us with massive lists of questions that we have, over the last 6 years, figured out gradually.
 
Erigu said:
"Synonymous to those themes" doesn't mean much to me... Could you elaborate?

What do I have to elaborate on? Didn't you watch the show? Everything surrounding the hatch, Charlie's entire storyline, Locke's entire storyline, Jack's entire storyline, Eko's entire storyline, the detonation of Jughead, the 06 returning to the island, Jacob vs MIB's conflict, etc.. all constantly hearkened back to those major themes of the show. I'm not even sure how anyone could argue otherwise unless they weren't paying attention.


In the grand scheme of things? You could remove them and the time-travel plot altogether, as it turned out.
I knew I was wasting my time. Dude seriously? So throw away all of the examples of circular causation, throw out everything with Jughead, and essentially throw out MIB's entire grand scheme to kill Jacob and yeah, throw away 815 crashing in the first place and yeah I guess time travel is pointless. :lol

Like what? Some polar bear apparently managed to turn the Frozen Donkey Wheel?


How? They didn't reset anything, in the end. The whole thing didn't matter. They just conveniently reappeared in 2007, and that was it for that plot.


Thank god for Lapidus, 'cause without him, it would have been so unbelievable that a plane like that could be fixed in a matter of minutes.
And they really needed that plane, too, 'cause they didn't have a nice boat right there.
(and I guess all that stuff about needing the right bearings to leave the island wasn't so important after all...)

-Uhh yeah, exactly. And being integral to Faraday's character and his bearing on the plot. And sense when did the value a character become incumbent up them making an astronomical mark on the broader narrative? Only with LOST do people apply these unrealistic rules & regulations.

-By creating "The Incident" and knocking over the first domino in a series of dominoes that would eventually lead to 815 crashing on the island. And why do you think the flashsideways existed in the first place? It was a result of the detonation merging with the island's energy.

--Why would they need a bearing in a plane? Flock's plan to take the boat was based off his assumption that the island would be destroyed, also negating the need for a radius.

Why did Ben kill him, anyway? What did he have to gain by doing that?

I really do regret bothering to respond. He killed him due to jealousy and his thirst for power. Their entire conflict must have completely flown over your head.

Because, up to that point, Jack hadn't seen anything that could make him think that, perhaps, some supernatural stuff was going on? Like, an entire island disappearing, for example? And I guess he just wasn't phased by that giant man-eating monster in the pilot...
The "science vs. faith" thing was about as riveting as in the X Files. Gee, who's in the right? The guy who believes in aliens and the supernatural stuff that's been happening ever since the first episode of the show, or the skeptical one who's been proven wrong again and again but somehow still thinks aliens don't exist?

I'm not going to sit here guide you by the hand through the narrative of LOST. It was a culmination of of Jack & Locke's entire feud coupled with the guilt Jack felt over leaving everyone behind, the emptiness he felt without the island, and the stress of his life completely falling apart since coming back.

Watch this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWeW-T1rtwE


Explained (I'm using this term loosely) in the following season.
And what was the "loophole" that allowed MIB to kill Jacob, anyway? He did the exact same thing he tried with Richard long ago. Except this time, Jacob let himself be killed instead of defending himself (for some reason). Why was MIB so proud of himself?


Free-Will




'Doesn't matter outside of time travel plots. And contradicted as far as Desmond is concerned, apparently. Supposedly because he's an "exception". How does that even work?

How do you call it a contradiction and two second later acknowledge that it's made clear that Desmond is the exception to the rule??? How does it work? He turned the fail safe key would be the short answer.


What purpose did it serve?
Are we to understand that Ben is a lying manipulative SOB because he was cured by some magic water back when he was a child? Oh, and he has some kind of amnesia because of it, too, which is why he doesn't recognize Sayid. I guess we'll just have to assume Rousseau took a bath in that same water, and that's why she didn't recognize the guy who took her child from her.
Sayid killed a child!! Because he's a killer!! Yeah, I heard you just fine the first dozen times, show.

Who says he doesn't recognize Sayid? What reason did he have to, hell, why would he if his aim is to manipulate the LOSTIES? What happened in the temple didn't wipe his mind of the previous 12 years of his life. "He won't remember any of this"... "THIS" wasn't referring to his whole life, simply the healing process and events right before.

And for a purpose Sayid shoots young Ben which causes Ben to grow up sinister which causes Sayid to shoot young Ben which causes Ben to grow up sinister. And this isn't even touching on how it played into MIB's grand scheme or the poetic nature of Ben & Sayid's relationship.

A "mystery" that was introduced in the same season anyway ("dead is dead! so who's that revived Locke?!" ... yeah, "dead is dead", except Sayid came back to life, that girl in Eko's flashback came back to life... but yeah, OK).

Characters on LOST communicate only as far as their knowledge extends. Dead is Dead is/was the case as far as everyone know.

You really need to rewatch the series and try again.
 
brandonh83 said:
I think The Dark Knight is overrated but that doesn't make it so. Plenty of people love that film. Who am I to tell them that they're wrong and that it's overrated?
Who do you need to be to criticize a movie/show? I don't see how that's "stepping out of line"...

I don't see you as a troll. I know trolls, we've had them, and thankfully we stopped seeing them as often after a while. But I don't get the point of coming in here to confess that you think its overrated-- I don't see what you'd get out of it.
Well, again, that wasn't why I posted in the first place...
But if people say they can answer all of the show's mysteries... well, I'm curious.


cyclonekruse said:
Remove the time-travel plot and you gut the entire show. Without them going back in time and trying to change their past, they don't detonate Jughead during the Incident. Without that detonation, the Incident would have been a full-blown catastrophe that sank the island and allowed MiB to escape (ending everything).
The show didn't say anything about Jughead having prevented a catastrophe of island-sinking proportions... In fact, like Miles said, if "whatever happened, happened", Jughead was always supposed to play the role it played in the Incident...
And that's an odd way to approach the whole thing, really... Prior to the time-travel plot, we knew there was an incident, and, obviously, it didn't sink the island. Remove the time-travel plot, and where's the problem, here? How does it "gut the entire show"?

What we learned from the polar bear in the desert was that the DI completed their excavation to the donkey wheel and ran some tests with polar bears.
Which is odd, considering Ben had to blow a wall up to get into that cave. The whole thing didn't look all that practical for polar bears, really.

the point is, that's how Widmore knew to place cameras in the precise location that Locke would arrive.
And what was the point of that, anyway?

Lapidus was just a fun character in my mind. They needed a pilot in Season 4.
Too bad they couldn't think of anything for him to do... until he fixed an airliner within minutes, that is (not that it was necessary as, once again, there was a boat.. which they left to go back to the island, get on a plane and get off the island).

the bearings thing was because Jacob made it that way. He made the rules.
What was the point of those rules? Why prevent people from leaving the island? Just to be an ass?

Ben wanted to regain his power.
How did killing Locke help him accomplish that?

And as explained in the finale, Ben was jealous of Locke.
Because Locke was healed by the island? He wasn't the only one.
And the guy was about to commit suicide... What was there to be jealous of, at that point?

Jack believed the supernatural things he saw (after some time) but the faith he finally developed was the faith that allowed for him to not constantly be in control. The faith that things would work out.
The faith to stop asking questions? Because that appears to be what the show was saying, toward the end, and I'm not exactly comfortable with that kind of message... Don't be curious about the mysteries of the island, or you'll "inevitably" be murdered by the "good guys" who protect it (and couldn't think of another way to deal with you despite all their powers). Well, OK, then!

But an important reveal in the 5th season.
A reveal that wasn't connected to the time-travel plot in any way and could have been moved to season 4 or season 6, really. Point is, most of season 5 was meaningless in the end.

Jacob wanted to die.
Why? And did he really need the MIB for that anyway?

But not until he had put into place his plan to get a new Island Protector.
"Putting a plan into place" is one thing. But he still hadn't appointed that new protector by the time MIB and Ben showed up. To let himself killed right there and then? 'Sounds like a bad idea to me.
And again, why was MIB so proud of himself, then? What was the "loophole" he said he found?

Desmond was a little dislodged from time when he was exposed to the EM radiation in the hatch.
My point is, "whatever happened, happened" is a model of time-travel that doesn't suffer any exception. You can't say "there's no way to change history... unless your name is xxxxx, in which case, sure, go ahead!" It makes no sense.

The popular theory being bandied about here is that the light is time incarnate or something like that. So the pool water (which is the same as the cave water) has the ability to reverse time, as it did in Ben's case. That's why he had amnesia.
Wouldn't quite explain that though:
RICHARD: If I take him, he's not ever gonna be the same again.
KATE: What do you mean by that?
RICHARD: What I mean is that, he'll forget this ever happened, and that...his innocence will be gone. He will always be one of us.
What does innocence have to do with anything?

how would you recognize anyone stealing your baby when all you could look at was the most horrendous hairpiece ever?
:lol
Seriously though... Doesn't it bother you? She catches the guy in one of her traps, and doesn't recognize him from that fateful night?

The thing with Sayid (and the "sickness" in general) is the notion of thoughts being implanted in your brain. Sayid was a killer because people told him he was.
Well, even before he got sick, really...

When people suggested otherwise, like Nadia or Desmond, he wasn't a killer. It was a "thought sickness." A belief you can't get out of your head.
Er... Are you saying the sickness made it so anybody could change Sayid's mind just by talking to him for a little while? That he couldn't take his own decisions anymore? 'Cause Claire sure needed a lot of convincing (and she killed that guy with an axe anyway).

Again, the water can reverse time. It did it's job, but being less potent than normal (the water was not as bright), it took longer.
So when the guys of the Temple said it wasn't their water that revived him, they didn't know what they were talking about?


InaudibleWhispa said:
The fact that Erigu thinks the time travel/Jughead plot "didn't matter" says it all. Without those events, 815 doesn't crash.
Again, that's an odd way to approach the whole thing... We already had the incident and Desmond not pushing the button as an explanation for the crash, prior to the time travel plot. No need for the time-travel plot or Jughead.


Nameless said:
Everything surrounding the hatch, Charlie's entire storyline, Locke's entire storyline, Jack's entire storyline, Eko's entire storyline, the detonation of Jughead, the 06 returning to the island, Jacob vs MIB's conflict, etc.. all constantly hearkened back to those major themes of the show.
How?

Only with LOST do people apply these unrealistic rules & regulations.
My expectations aren't "unrealistic" at all, and are in fact met by a whole bunch of stories out there.

why do you think the flashsideways existed in the first place? It was a result of the detonation merging with the island's energy.
Baseless speculation, really.

Why would they need a bearing in a plane?
So planes are an exception? Since when?

It was a culmination of of Jack & Locke's entire feud coupled with the guilt Jack felt over leaving everyone behind
Yes, Jack wanted to go back because Locke told him bad things were happening to Sawyer and it was Jack's fault (for leaving the island). Except it wasn't, as it turned out. It was all because of the damn Frozen Donkey Wheel that hadn't been turned correctly. And when we got to the point where we actually saw that off-island conversation between Jack and Locke, Locke didn't say anything about it being Jack's fault (why would he?).
The writers fucked up. And as result, Jack's motivation for going back to the island made no sense.

the emptiness he felt without the island, and the stress of his life completely falling apart since coming back.
His father appearing to him who-knows-why...

Free-Will
I really don't see how that answers that part you bolded in any way.

Who says he doesn't recognize Sayid?
I think it's pretty clear that Richard saying he wouldn't remember what happened was the writers' way of dealing with that particular issue. What other purpose would that line serve?

And for a purpose Sayid shoots young Ben which causes Ben to grow up sinister which causes Sayid to shoot young Ben which causes Ben to grow up sinister.
Another gratuitous causal loop? We already had the compass one.
And explaining Ben's dark side by magic? Really? That passes for good storytelling?

And this isn't even touching on how it played into MIB's grand scheme or the poetic nature of Ben & Sayid's relationship.
Indeed, it isn't. Please elaborate.
 
yankeehater said:
Thank you for posting that. He sums it up perfectly.
I would say he sums up somethings perfectly. I agree that Season 6 had problems, but no matter how disappointed I may be with it, it doesn't ruin the previous five seasons which are still great TV.

I actually never understood the "its so bad it retroactively ruins the previous installments" argument, its just stupid hyperbole.
 
Erigu said:
Again, that's an odd way to approach the whole thing... We already had the incident and Desmond not pushing the button as an explanation for the crash, prior to the time travel plot. No need for the time-travel plot or Jughead.
The Incident was and always has been Jughead going off. Whatever Happened Happened. Without Jughead, there would be no button to push. Jughead neutralised the growing energy from Dharma's drill which would have otherwise likely engulfed the island. This gave them time to build the swan hatch, and create the protocol that discharges the built-up energy every 108 minutes. Meanwhile Dharma fills the bomb site in with concrete to contain any radiation (Sayid, Season 2 - This looks just like Chernobyl). As Miles said "What if setting the bomb off doesn't change the future, it causes it?". That is exactly what happens.
 
You're discussing details of a show this guy apparently did not like but watched for 100+ episodes. Think about that for a second.
 
InaudibleWhispa said:
The Incident was and always has been Jughead going off.
Not from the perpective of the audience (nor from the writers', really, as I seriously doubt Jughead and the time travel plot were planned from the beginning).
You're basically saying that the time-travel plot was needed because of the time-travel plot. That's circular logic.

Jughead neutralised the growing energy from Dharma's drill which would have otherwise likely engulfed the island. This gave them time to build the swan hatch, and create the protocol that discharges the built-up energy every 108 minutes.
Baseless speculation... The show didn't say anything about Jughead buying DHARMA time.

As Miles said "What if setting the bomb off doesn't change the future, it causes it?". That is exactly what happens.
I realize that (even if the show never really bothered to tell whether or not Miles was right, it simply makes more sense for him to be right). But that's a posteriori. Prior to the time-travel plot, we had an explanation for the plane crashing on the island, and it worked just fine.


thekad said:
You're discussing details of a show this guy apparently did not like but watched for 100+ episodes.
Spotting plot holes and inconsistencies is fun. To me, anyway.
I had a lot of fun with Lost.
 
Erigu said:
Isn't it odd how Ben told Locke he was to become the new leader of the Others, then?

Not really. Ben takes things to the absolute extreme before turning the tables. It's part of being a successful manipulative bastard.
 
brandonh83 said:
Not really.
No, really:
LOCKE: What's that for?
BEN: I'm going somewhere cold.
LOCKE: Then where is mine?
BEN: You don't need one because you're not going with me.
LOCKE: Yes, I am going with you.
BEN: No, John, you're not.
LOCKE: Jacob told me what we had to do. You don't get to make all the decisions--
BEN: He told you what to do, but he didn't tell you how because he wants me to suffer the consequences.
LOCKE: What consequences?
BEN: Whoever moves the island can never come back. So I'd like you to get on the elevator, John, and go back up. Richard and my people will be waiting 2 miles east of the Orchid.
LOCKE: Waiting for me?
BEN: Ready, willing and able to share what they know. And then they will follow your every word. Good-bye, John. I'm sorry I made your life so miserable.
LOCKE: What do I tell 'em to do?
BEN: You'll find your way, John. You always do.
Why tell Locke all that? Isn't that spectacularly counter-productive?
 
Calantus said:
So what are the two writers working on next? i remember before people were talking about the book series (forget the name)

Damon Lindelof is writing Star Trek 2 and the Alien prequel.

No idea what Cuse is doing.
 
Blader5489 said:
Damon Lindelof is writing Star Trek 2 and the Alien prequel.

No idea what Cuse is doing.

Damon is also producing Star Trek 2, like he did the first.

I forget, he wrote Cowboys and Aliens, but is he also producing?
 
Dead said:
I hope Orci and Kurtzman aren't involved in writing Trek 2

I think they are.

In my mind, Damon is writing ST2 (in addition to producing, as he did in the first, which he didn't write) to pump up the script/offset O+K, which brought ST1 down a bit.

Seems to me people are getting hip to O+K's shit.

I wonder if JJ could've just had them off writing duties, but that'd probably be a whole can of worms.

Edit: I see that O+K did NOT produce ST2009. Just JJ and Damon.

Edit2: Ok, I'm totally putting together a narrative in my head where JJ and Damon want O+K off the ST sequel, but the studio doesn't. Instead, JJ/Damon just pitch Damon also taking a hand in the script. He then shelves most of their draft :lol .
 
Erigu said:
The show didn't say anything about Jughead having prevented a catastrophe of island-sinking proportions... In fact, like Miles said, if "whatever happened, happened", Jughead was always supposed to play the role it played in the Incident...
And that's an odd way to approach the whole thing, really... Prior to the time-travel plot, we knew there was an incident, and, obviously, it didn't sink the island. Remove the time-travel plot, and where's the problem, here? How does it "gut the entire show"?

Yes, Jughead was always part of the Incident. That's not the point. What the time-travel plot line showed us was that our characters were directly responsible for bringing themselves to the island (via a chain reaction). How is that not significant?

As yes, we knew the Incident didn't sink the island. But we didn't know the implications of the Incident and all the events surrounding it.

Which is odd, considering Ben had to blow a wall up to get into that cave. The whole thing didn't look all that practical for polar bears, really.

The DI sealed the room away after they tested it with the polar bear. Perhaps they decided playing with the time-space continuum like that was inadvisable and wanted some distance from the light. It's not that hard to come up with a plausible explanation for the room being sealed.

And what was the point of that, anyway?

Widmore was trying to get back to the Island. He scouted the exit point to see if he could use someone to reach that goal. Locke came through. He used Locke.

Too bad they couldn't think of anything for him to do... until he fixed an airliner within minutes, that is (not that it was necessary as, once again, there was a boat.. which they left to go back to the island, get on a plane and get off the island).

Lapidus wasn't aware of any boat, IIRC. And there was some major seismic activity going on when they were taking off. The plane was safer than the boat because of the choppy waves.

What was the point of those rules? Why prevent people from leaving the island? Just to be an ass?

Jacob wanted to control events as much as possible so he could correct his mistake (i.e. kill MiB) and also find a replacement.

How did killing Locke help him accomplish that?

Locke was his main rival. If they both arrived on the Island, Locke would be given leadership of the Others again. Ben was just trying to eliminate his competition.

Because Locke was healed by the island? He wasn't the only one.
And the guy was about to commit suicide... What was there to be jealous of, at that point?

Ben was jealous of Locke's communion with the Island. It was something Ben had pretended to have. Ben wanted to be special. But all he was was manipulative. And jealousy doesn't go away even when the other person is down. Not necessarily.

The faith to stop asking questions? Because that appears to be what the show was saying, toward the end, and I'm not exactly comfortable with that kind of message... Don't be curious about the mysteries of the island, or you'll "inevitably" be murdered by the "good guys" who protect it (and couldn't think of another way to deal with you despite all their powers). Well, OK, then!

The faith to let go. Jack's main issue was his constant need to fix things. Once he let go of that incessant urge, things started working out.

A reveal that wasn't connected to the time-travel plot in any way and could have been moved to season 4 or season 6, really. Point is, most of season 5 was meaningless in the end.

And they could have put the show in chronological order. Why would that be a good idea?

Why? And did he really need the MIB for that anyway?

He needed the MiB to feel like he'd won. It forced his hand. Instead of staying in the background, he revealed himself and allowed people to coalesce and work against him. Ultimately it spelled his downfall.

"Putting a plan into place" is one thing. But he still hadn't appointed that new protector by the time MIB and Ben showed up. To let himself killed right there and then? 'Sounds like a bad idea to me.

Jacob knew what was up. He had set all the pieces in motion. Thousands of years on an island can let you plan out every last detail.

And again, why was MIB so proud of himself, then? What was the "loophole" he said he found?

The rule was that he couldn't hurt his brother. In the end, he didn't. He manipulated someone else into hurting his brother.

My point is, "whatever happened, happened" is a model of time-travel that doesn't suffer any exception. You can't say "there's no way to change history... unless your name is xxxxx, in which case, sure, go ahead!" It makes no sense.

What exactly did Desmond do that you couldn't apply "whatever happened, happened" to?

Wouldn't quite explain that though:

What does innocence have to do with anything?

They marked him somehow? I don't know. Does it matter? Maybe Richard was lying.

:lol
Seriously though... Doesn't it bother you? She catches the guy in one of her traps, and doesn't recognize him from that fateful night?

No. People that have guns to their faces become less reliable witnesses. Plus, the next time she saw him was 16 years later. That's a long time to remember a face. And we can't forget that Rousseau was a little jungle crazy.

Well, even before he got sick, really...

Yes, but the sickness exacerbated the issue.

Er... Are you saying the sickness made it so anybody could change Sayid's mind just by talking to him for a little while? That he couldn't take his own decisions anymore? 'Cause Claire sure needed a lot of convincing (and she killed that guy with an axe anyway).

Yes and no. The MiB was able to change Sayid's mind. I think we can infer that both he and Jacob were persuasive in a profound way. That's why you need to stab them before they speak. Part of it is that MiB makes promises for things that he knows you want (since he can read your past). So he makes Sayid a soulless killing machine. However, the one thing that can overcome this affliction is love (the greatest cure of all). As Desmond's speech demonstrates.

So when the guys of the Temple said it wasn't their water that revived him, they didn't know what they were talking about?

Could be. If we learned anything throughout Lost it's that the people who we think know what's going on invariably don't.

A lot of these questions can be answered with just a little bit of effort. And there are some things that you just have to suspend your disbelief and accept (as it is with every single story ever). Because if you keep asking questions, as Crazy Mommy says, the answers will just lead to more questions. Don't misunderstand that to mean you should ask questions. But some of your questions are just silly, IMO.
 
gdt5016 said:
I think they are.

In my mind, Damon is writing ST2 (in addition to producing, as he did in the first, which he didn't write) to pump up the script/offset O+K, which brought ST1 down a bit.

Seems to me people are getting hip to O+K's shit.

I wonder if JJ could've just had them off writing duties, but that'd probably be a whole can of worms.

Edit: I see that O+K did NOT produce ST2009. Just JJ and Damon.

Edit2: Ok, I'm totally putting together a narrative in my head where JJ and Damon want O+K off the ST sequel, but the studio doesn't. Instead, JJ/Damon just pitch Damon also taking a hand in the script. He then shelves most of their draft :lol .
lol

Though I wouldn't be surprised if Lindelof did some minor polish on the ST1 script in terms of the characters.
 
Erigu said:
Why tell Locke all that? Isn't that spectacularly counter-productive?

At that point Ben had to work together with Locke. In season 5, however, Ben saw an opportunity. He found Locke at his lowest point and then learned that Locke had Jin's wedding ring, which he could use to manipulate Sun and possibly go from there when it comes to gaining his "superiority" back. Ben was still more or less being sincere to Locke right up until he saw that Locke had Jin's ring which proves that he's alive. Ben, at that point, was basically misdirected and lost. He just goes with the flow until he can find some way to make a gain.

Anyway I'm done recounting the events of the show. If you have all these questions, watch it and pay attention, the show speaks for itself. It's there to answer your questions. Most of them, anyway. Don't clam up and assume that because you personally didn't understand something that it's the show's fault. Pretty much every question you've asked was clearly answered.
 
Dead said:
lol

Though I wouldn't be surprised if Lindelof did some minor polish on the ST1 script in terms of the characters.

They wanted to change a lot but if you recall that was writer strike era and he was legally bound to not do any script changes whatsoever.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom