Treefingers said:
You and your Paragon
You know why I like their 2 apps (Paragon NTFS, Paragon HFS+) so much?
Because I don't even know they're there. Sometimes Tuxtera and the NFTS program that company makes would push my CPU up to 90% when making copies. The speed was mediocre and I swear my computer start-up speed took a hit too. You could tell it was an add-on, you know? But Paragon has never been a burden on my CPU. its speeds are where you'd expect them to be when transferring large or small files. I've never had a corrupted file in the year I've been using it. I think the best compliment I can give is that it seems native.
As for HFS+, I've only recently switched to that. I had been using MacDrive for a year or so. It was sometimes moody and inconsistent. Sometimes copies would hang (transfer window unable to close and no longer copying anything). Sometimes the HFS-formatted drives would not show up. Other times, they'd show up whenever they felt like it (sometimes 5 minutes after start up; sometimes an hour after startup). Very inconvenient in all cases. And with applications like Zune, sometimes music would be added...and sometimes it wouldn't. It was like the automated searching for music on the HFS-formatted drive still had bugs.
But with HFS+? Again, everything seems native. The drives don't have any special symbols attached to them like we see in MacDrive. The drives are there when the computer boots every time. Transfer speeds are normal. Software that acted flaky with MacDrive had no such problems with HFS+.
My only frustration is that it took me a solid year to realize Paragon sold a Windows app for HFS+ read/write.
So yea, out of 3 or 4 NTFS programs for OS X that I've tried, Paragon's has been the most stable and consistent. And between HFS+ and MacDrive, the advantage goes with HFS+...though I've only been using it for a couple of months. Who knows...maybe HFS+ has some issues I haven't encountered yet. But so far so good.