Sapiens
Member
God no, don't be cheap when buying a computer. That is some of the worst advice in a while.
I don't see the problem going to the used or refurbished route with a mac. Being cheap is good.
God no, don't be cheap when buying a computer. That is some of the worst advice in a while.
I don't see the problem going to the used or refurbished route with a mac. Being cheap is good.
I don't see the problem going to the used or refurbished route with a mac. Being cheap is good.
Macs are getting the same kind of malware that PCs are nowadays, just not as much but that's quickly changing.
The only malware a Mac could get would be a Trojan. Because anything installed onto a Mac that requires any sort of access to anything would require the user to manually allow it to come in the door.Um. No. They aren't. OS X prevents installation of apps that are not directly from the Mac App Store or from identified developers by default. That makes it pretty tough to infect a Mac with malware.
Usually when people say, "virus", they mean everything that makes their computer performance turn to shit. Viruses, Malware, Spyware, Rootkits, Ransomware. Those douchebag search bars that people accidentally agree to install when attempting to install something else and all that shit. The detrimental things clicking on the wrong of 8 possible "download" buttons on a webpage can take you to and put on your system.
Usually when people say, "virus", they mean everything that makes their computer performance turn to shit. Viruses, Malware, Spyware, Rootkits, Ransomware. Those douchebag search bars that people accidentally agree to install when attempting to install something else and all that shit. The detrimental things clicking on the wrong of 8 possible "download" buttons on a webpage can take you to and put on your system.
I am reminded of that Giant Bomb "The Internet Quick Look" video which demonstrates this very problem quite well.This bares repeating. I am happy for those of you who keep your Windows install unblemished but you are not most people. Those who aren't nerds like us with time will inevitably cripple their Windows machine through normal use unless it has been set up by a knowledgable relative or friend. They don't know what "sandboxie" is and they don't care.
Older Mac Pros right whereas the new one no longer has that option? One imagines they will continue along that line.
No, I'm talking about any rig with a compatible motherboard and Intel processor. My personal computer has a Corsair case, Gigabyte mobo, an off the shelf i7, and an EVGA GTX670. You can install OSX on some laptops too.
I made a post about that on the last page...I forget "hackintosh" is a thing. If it works without issues and lets you upgrade as you will then that's pretty great.
I made a post about that on the last page...
No one should be that last guy. He should rather use the same system setting as the middle guy, because that gets you to pay attention to unsigned app status and possibly lets you notice a fake. When you have an unsigned app, OS X refuses to run it on double-click, but you can override the system setting by right clicking the app and choosing "Open" to get the dialog with the "run" option.So there's three options:
The novice, which only downloads apps from the App Store and likes it.
...
The comfortable, which will occasionally download an app from a website but doesn't just grab everything they can willy nilly, but would occasionally like to install something they can't get from the Store for whatever reason or another. In this case the app will be signed by a licensed developer
...
The professional, who removes the wall for which app can run or not, but in the end still has to put their password in anyway so it's still quite safe.
No one should be that last guy. He should rather use the same system setting as the middle guy, because that gets you to pay attention to unsigned app status and possibly lets you notice a fake. When you have an unsigned app, OS X refuses to run it on double-click, but you can override the system setting by right clicking the app and choosing "Open" to get the dialog with the "run" option.
What's funny is how there is absolutely nothing about the OP that would suggest he's a candidate for building his own computer, let alone horsing around with a dang Hackintosh. It's funny how some folks just can't resist chiming in with, 'no wait, there's a harder way!'
In my experience with folks who are hardcore in any field, they tend to underestimate just how high the barrier to entry is to whatever they are hardcore about.
Can someone comment on what makes the Apple trackpad so good?
Yup. They're also overzealous about dumb shit.
I use a Windows PC at home for gaming but I use a MBP at work and it's awesome. For what the OP said he wanted to do, OSX is a great option if you want to spend the cash.
Nothing really. People talk about it like it's supernatural or something when in reality, it's just a good trackpad.
Is it perfect? No.
Is it marginally better than the trackpad on my Zenbook? Yes.
Does that justify spending hundreds of more dollars for me? No.
Nothing really. People talk about it like it's supernatural or something when in reality, it's just a good trackpad.
Is it perfect? No.
Is it marginally better than the trackpad on my Zenbook? Yes.
LOL. I can let some bullshit slide, but not this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtUuhZ3qxKg
I myself have over 40 gesture commands set up through BTT for my trackpad. There is absolutely nothing in the Windows world that can match OSX's support for gestures on the multitouch track pad. And yes, it alone makes a huge difference in experience. Between my 2 monitors, I have 5 different desktops that swipe through with ease and manage.
Since I switch between Win 8 and OSX constantly, I'm reminded constantly how much better general purpose computing is on OSX. For general computing, it's a difference worth paying for.
lol @ comparing any Windows PC trackpad experience to an Apple trackpad in OSX. If you didn't get to try out the BTT experience maaaaaaybe I can let this comment slide. Maybe.
lol @ comparing any Windows PC trackpad experience to an Apple trackpad in OSX. If you didn't get to try out the BTT experience maaaaaaybe I can let this comment slide. Maybe.
I find the keyboards to be average at best, especially recently. The keys are flat and the keys steps are extremely shallow. It makes sense in Macbooks Air somehow, because they're focused on thiness, but Apple even started to put the same KB into Pros for some bizzare reason, when there's plenty of space there. Plus whoever thought it was a good idea to get that sharp edge precisesly where the wrists rest should be taken behin the barn and shotPersonally, I feel that the keyboard and trackpad on a MacBook is the best on any laptop. Nothing comes close. The build quality is above and beyond anything I have used.
Macs are getting the same kind of malware that PCs are nowadays, just not as much but that's quickly changing.
You're so wrong.
LOL. I can let some bullshit slide, but not this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rtUuhZ3qxKg
I myself have over 40 gesture commands set up through BTT for my trackpad. There is absolutely nothing in the Windows world that can match OSX's support for gestures on the multitouch track pad. And yes, it alone makes a huge difference in experience. Between my 2 monitors, I have 5 different desktops that swipe through with ease and manage.
Since I switch between Win 8 and OSX constantly, I'm reminded constantly how much better general purpose computing is on OSX. For general computing, it's a difference worth paying for.
lol @ comparing any Windows PC trackpad experience to an Apple trackpad in OSX. If you didn't get to try out the BTT experience maaaaaaybe I can let this comment slide. Maybe.
Personally, I feel that the keyboard and trackpad on a MacBook is the best on any laptop. Nothing comes close. The build quality is above and beyond anything I have used.
Yeah but that's just like, your opinion man.
LOL.
Normal people don't use 40 different gestures. And yes Windows trackpad drivers suck.
Oh I agree. I have mine set to the second option myself. I have never really run into an instance where I've downloaded an app that wasn't signed. They just keep it in the system for the Greybeards who don't like change and don't want "The Man" telling them what they can and cannot install on their Mac because "it's a damn computer and I should be able to install whatever I want consarnit!"No one should be that last guy. He should rather use the same system setting as the middle guy, because that gets you to pay attention to unsigned app status and possibly lets you notice a fake. When you have an unsigned app, OS X refuses to run it on double-click, but you can override the system setting by right clicking the app and choosing "Open" to get the dialog with the "run" option.
If people think viruses are such a fucking issue, then go Ubuntu or Linux Mint.
This is baby back bullshit. I'm an IT professional, but I've also used Macs as my primary home system for 20 years. And I will totally admit, though out that entire time, I've always been scraping around on the seedy underbelly of the internet. Porn sites, emulation sites, file sharing programs/websites, etc. You name it. In that entire two decades, I've had a Mac infected with a virus exactly one time: It was almost 20 years ago, in like 1995 with a virus gotten through an illicit software sharing group on AOL back in the day. Screwed up my system a bit, put a CD in with Disinfectant, ran it, fixed. I've never even seen a malware infection on Mac OS since then.
To be fair, Windows (and even IE) is a lot more secure nowadays compared to the old days. It was probably at it's worse in the early 2000's before UAC, when browser hijack>adware/malware installations were at their peak. It's not that Macs are inherently more secure (this has been proven multiple times iirc at information security conventions over the years), but the fact is there's still to this day almost no malware on OSX, especially in comparison to Windows.
Um. No. They aren't. OS X prevents installation of apps that are not directly from the Mac App Store or from identified developers by default. That makes it pretty tough to infect a Mac with malware.
All wrong, even captain IT professional. I've handled more(likely) or at least, a better representative volume of Macs and PCs than you. The same type of malware and adware that are currently a problem with PCs are making their way onto Macs. Yes, you have to willingly install them (just like a PC). They do more than what you bargained for like install additional programs or make changes to your computer that you didn't want (just like a PC). MacKeeper, Geneio, Conduit. Macs are getting the love.
I'm the guy that has to explain to the mac user whats on their computer and how did they get it because Skunkers promised they were invincible.
I like how you opted to use the "40 different gestures" of liu to argue instead of the built in gestures I was mentioning.
Good job.
All wrong, even captain IT professional. I've handled more(likely) or at least, a better representative volume of Macs and PCs than you. The same type of malware and adware that are currently a problem with PCs are making their way onto Macs. Yes, you have to willingly install them (just like a PC). They do more than what you bargained for like install additional programs or make changes to your computer that you didn't want (just like a PC). MacKeeper, Geneio, Conduit. Macs are getting the love.
I'm the guy that has to explain to the mac user whats on their computer and how did they get it because Skunkers promised they were invincible.
So OP, cheaper iMacs it seems. Will you pull the trigger?
Oh, I misunderstood the article, I thought they added a new, less powerful iMac AND price-cut the existing ones. That sucks, 1.4Ghz dual core and no SSD sounds really bad for a modern machine running Mavericks/Yosemite, even my entry-level MBP has a 2.4Ghz dual core.Irrelevant to him. The prices of the existing iMacs didn't budge. Apple just added a cheaper one with a dualcore CPU with lower clocks than the existing quadcores (so CPU performance was cut in less than half) and HD 5000 graphics. I've said for a long time that it would make sense for Apple to put out a machine like that, since the quadcores and especially Iris Pro graphics are overkill for so many users, but they've made this new machine such a spectacularly bad deal that almost no one should touch it. It still costs $1100 and has no SSD. Actually, adding SSD costs $250 whereas they charge $200 on the former low end model, making the new low end even worse than it looks at first glance.
Here's a little history tour of Mac Malware. http://www.welivesecurity.com/2014/03/21/10-years-of-mac-os-x-malware/
refurbished is defo the way to go
would i be an absolute idiot to get a surface pro 3, use an external monitor and just have that be my pc. i'm not going to do this btw. but it does sound kind of appealing.