They also had very gritty promo pictures, if I recall correctly. I'm glad they went with the saturated look, though.yeah the shooting footage looked very gritty for sure. loved it, but i'm a bigger fan of the over-stylized look they went with in post.
They also had very gritty promo pictures, if I recall correctly. I'm glad they went with the saturated look, though.
Ah right, yeah. Forgot how brown they were.Nah that was also color graded in a much worse (post apocalyptic video game/book of eli) way. He's talking about the raw shooting footage.
But yeah since it was apparent they were planning on messing with the colors either way I'm so glad they went this route instead of the older promo pics
Its not that simple. There's a lot of color correction and effort done when converting the movie to B&W.Pardon my ignorance but couldn't you just set your TVs color to zero and watch the regular bluray?
So they both still suck?Its not that simple. There's a lot of color correction and effort done when converting the movie to B&W.
Think of this as watching a movie in 3D that was properly shot or converted to 3D versus watching a 2D movie in 3D with the forced simulation you can make a 3DTV output. Night and day difference isn't it?
Honest question.
Why would anyone want to watch this in black and white?
I mean, after watching the 4k movie in HDR, or even the normal 1080p bluray, for me colors in this movie are incredible and take part in setting the mood for a lot of moments of the film....
So.. yeah.
Why?
I don't get it. People prefer this:
...to this?
Is this the full blown Black & Chrome, sans dialog and everything? Or just a graded black and white print of the original cut?
... once you see it in 4k HDR why bother with anything else?
Honest question.
Why would anyone want to watch this in black and white?
I mean, after watching the 4k movie in HDR, or even the normal 1080p bluray, for me colors in this movie are incredible and take part in setting the mood for a lot of moments of the film....
So.. yeah.
Why?
It's not about preferring one over the other, which is why the release is including both. It's about using black and white to create a different, stylized version of the film. The color palette in Fury Road lends itself well to the shift to B&W and the pictures demonstrate that, though clearly that is up to personal preference. The relative lack of dialogue in Fury Road means it also lends itself well to a treatment as a silent film, ala Buster Keaton, which people have been noting since it came out. The B&W version is responding to that demand.
Personally, I think the B&W shots lend the film a bleakness that it didn't have with the intense colors used in the film, and I dig the tonal shift. It's like Ansel Adams gone metal.
Excited, but where is the link, or when can I preorder?
Once again we send off my Wallet to bring back a Double Dip from Amazon and Special Features from the Warner Bros. Once again I salute my fellow NeoGAFer Simo and I salute my half-life GAFers who will post with me eternal on the servers of GAFhalla!
ONCE AGAIN, WHERE IS THE LINK, OR WHEN CAN I PREORDER?
This is what I'd like to know too. The original Miller story made it a silent black and white version of the film with no dialogue and only a soundtrack.
Does this set mean that or just a B&W remaster?
It is the director's desire to have a true black and white version to capture his vision of how the film ought to be viewed. Color was a compromise that he made for the studio.
Understood then.
If black and white was teh director's vision for the movie I can understand wanting to see this in black and white.
“Not in cinemas. The best version of Road Warrior was what we called a ‘slash dupe’, a cheap, black-and-white version of the movie for the composer. Something about it seemed more authentic and elemental.
So I asked Eric Whipp, the [Fury Road] colorist, ‘Can I see some scenes in black and white with quite a bit of contrast?’ They looked great. So I said to the guys at Warner, ‘Can we put a black-and-white version on the DVD?’ There wasn’t enough room. [It’ll end up] on another version with commentary and other features”
We spent a lot of time in DI (digital intermediate), and we had a very fine colorist, Eric Whipp. One thing I’ve noticed is that the default position for everyone is to de-saturate post-apocalyptic movies. There’s only two ways to go, make them black and white — the best version of this movie is black and white, but people reserve that for art movies now. The other version is to really go all-out on the color. The usual teal and orange thing? That’s all the colors we had to work with. The desert’s orange and the sky is teal, and we either could de-saturate it, or crank it up, to differentiate the movie. Plus, it can get really tiring watching this dull, de-saturated color, unless you go all the way out and make it black and white.
The best version of Road Warrior was… they used to do a “slash dupe” in music. To make a really cheap print, they’d make a black and white version for the composer. They used to put lines [across it], if you see old documentary footage of composers in the past, you’d see them looking at the screen and conducting, that was a slash dupe, and it was black and white. And you’d mix the sound that way [too]. And every time I saw the black and white I thought “oh, my god!” It just reduces it to this really gutsy high-con black and white, very, very powerful.
It really wasn't. The dialog fits perfectly with the whole tone of that world.Yeah I hope the dialog is gone. Some of it was kinda cringy. The musical score is god-tier though. I listen to "Brothers in Arms" all the time.
It's not about preferring one over the other, which is why the release is including both. It's about using black and white to create a different, stylized version of the film. The color palette in Fury Road lends itself well to the shift to B&W and the pictures demonstrate that, though clearly that is up to personal preference. The relative lack of dialogue in Fury Road means it also lends itself well to a treatment as a silent film, ala Buster Keaton, which people have been noting since it came out. The B&W version is responding to that demand.
Personally, I think the B&W shots lend the film a bleakness that it didn't have with the intense colors used in the film, and I dig the tonal shift. It's like Ansel Adams gone metal.
So it's a black and white version? Why?
Honestly, I just think the whole idea is a terrible idea and a bad gimmick.
And that's fine, it's why the original version of the film exists, and this is coming out seperate or in a collector's package. I like black and white photography and Miller is pretty passionate about this version of the film, so I'm eager to check it out.
Terribly overrated film, good for those who enjoyed it though.
I like black and white photography too. Not color pictures with black and white filters, which is what Miller did with this movie.
Miller also applied filters and color correction to get the film looking how it looks now, which is lovely. I do not see this as an issue.
I think it also removes spoken dialog.Is this a different cut of the film, or is the only difference the color scheme?
If they do that while upping the soundtrack ill be extatic and pushed to buy this film.I think it also removes spoken dialog.
I think it also removes spoken dialog.
http://i.imgur.com/1w2mO4v.jpg
Just taking the film as is and making it black and white seems pretty gimmicky to me. Black and white really needs to be lit differently than how you would light for color in most cases. I feel like just about anything slow and/or focused on the characters will look pretty great, since the film has some terrific and very graphic framing, but a lot of the larger action sequences (which is like half the movie) will probably look pretty messy.
I like black and white photography too. Not color pictures with black and white filters, which is what Miller did with this movie.
The movie was shot in color. My point still stands. Adding a B&W filter on a movie that was shot and lite with the intention of being viewed in color is still nothing but a bad gimmick. Much like adding a B&W filter on a color photo is not B&w photography.
And replace it with...subtitles? Or just cut out all scenes with dialogue?
The movie was shot in color. My point still stands. Adding a B&W filter on a movie that was shot and lite with the intention of being viewed in color is still nothing but a bad gimmick. Much like adding a B&W filter on a color photo is not B&w photography.