I just thought of it as a reboot with a new timeline but I guess if you really wanted to have fun with it you could look at it as after Mad Max where Toecutter ascends to become Immortan Joe; but before Beyond Thunderdome where that little guy becomes Master. Hell in this timeline maybe even Toast becomes Aunty Entity who runs Gastown, later renamed Bartertown.Onward to the second!
Also; small semi-spoiler in a sense:
I know it's a reboot but could you, in a sense, place it between the first and second chronologically? The first culminates in Max becoming a shell of his former self and destined to roam the outback following the murder of his wife/kid. This reboot has him surviving the landscape after an undetermined amount of time following the murders (I appreciate Miller didn't sacrifice a lot of screen time to it) and he's visibly screwed up from it - both visibly and with his general demeanor. Mad Max 1.5 :3
Onward to the second!
Also; small semi-spoiler in a sense:
I know it's a reboot but could you, in a sense, place it between the first and second chronologically? The first culminates in Max becoming a shell of his former self and destined to roam the outback following the murder of his wife/kid. This reboot has him surviving the landscape after an undetermined amount of time following the murders (I appreciate Miller didn't sacrifice a lot of screen time to it) and he's screwed up from it - both visibly and with his general demeanor. Mad Max 1.5 :3
I was so jazzed to see it a second time in the first week, but I got busy. Now I think I'm a little fatigued... I've spent so much time thinking about this movie, I might be a little burnt out by the concept.
But I seem to remember the movie being so much more than its concept.. It was like being on a roller coaster or hearing a great song again. The experience was visceral.
GAF, convince me to see it again ><
That's what I want to hear. No kidding you just got me pumped up to go.It may be the last time you get to see it on the Big Screen for the rest of your life...
Witness!
Saw a screening movie was brutal, unforgiving, visually stunning and very entertaining seeing it in a regular 3D cinema does no justice, don't be me see it in IMAX.
Did anyone see the 3D for this? Was it decent? I went to the 2D showing but was wondering about the 3D version.
Onward to the second!
Also; small semi-spoiler in a sense:
I know it's a reboot but could you, in a sense, place it between the first and second chronologically? The first culminates in Max becoming a shell of his former self and destined to roam the outback following the murder of his wife/kid. This reboot has him surviving the landscape after an undetermined amount of time following the murders (I appreciate Miller didn't sacrifice a lot of screen time to it) and he's screwed up from it - both visibly and with his general demeanor. Mad Max 1.5 :3
I watched for the third (and last) time yesterday. Still think it's an amazing movie.
I dreamed of seeing a new mad max movie since i was a kid. The wait was worth it.
That's what I want to hear. No kidding you just got me pumped up to go.
Saw this today. It was like watching the twisted apocalyptic version of a domestic dispute through the warped imagination of a teenage boy in the 80s who is obsessed with the aesthetic of Heavy Metal magazine.
Very well done, quite unique and worth watching, but I didn't think it was the best action movie ever. Not as thought provoking as the Matrix.
I really don't know how Miller can top Fury Road. It's like trying to top The Dark Knight or The Raid...the bar is set unexpectedly high. The magic formula for making an awesome action movie (if you're not marvel) is simple. Do not treat audience like idiots by spoonfeeding everything and trying to create a larger than life situation. The Raid 2 kinda failed when it tried to make it a tale about The Godfather and revenge whereas the first one was a masterpiece due to its simplicity which allowed the hero to shine. All I hope is Miller does't go with "bigger is better" idea.Miller initially presented Hardy with three-or-so scripts and obviously the second's going to be called The Wasteland, I just wonder about what direction it's going to take. Will it be more introverted? More dialogue and less action? Will it try and one-up Fury Road with its set pieces being larger? That could obviously adversely affect the focus and grandeur of the action sequences but Miller's clearly savvy to that, especially given the fact that both the world and vehicles are effectively pivotal characters in the film.
I can't wait to see how it goes.
I really don't know how Miller can top Fury Road. It's like trying to top The Dark Knight or The Raid...the bar is set unexpectedly high. The magic formula for making an awesome action movie (if you're not marvel) is simple. Do not treat audience like idiots by spoonfeeding everything and trying to create a larger than life situation. The Raid 2 kinda failed when it tried to make it a tale about The Godfather and revenge whereas the first one was a masterpiece due to its simplicity which allowed the hero to shine. All I hope is Miller does't go with "bigger is better" idea.
change the genre. it's not going to be another chase movie.
he could do a survival thriller movie in the wasteland, more dialed back on the action front but still just as atmospheric and detailed as ever.
Did anyone see the 3D for this? Was it decent? I went to the 2D showing but was wondering about the 3D version.
It's fine. Certainly not necessary, but it doesn't detract from the experience either.
I want a sequel with a "central piece", but not one that is a car chase again. What I liked about this film the most, that I want to see again, is the constant forward motion, and distinct lack of time jumps. It was one ongoing movement.
Infiltrating a warlord's compound, defending a compound, exploring a ruined city... something that isn't just another adventure movies broken up into too many parts.
Really? How so? I've never seen the General.This movie is just the most incredible, expensive homage to Buster Keaton's The General I'd never thought in a million years to expect to see.
Sorry but isn't demanding a Mad Max movie without a car chase as ridiculous as demanding a Star Wars film without space scenes or a Michael Bay film without a single explosion?
I didn't say there shouldn't be a car chase. I said the sequel shouldn't revolve around a car chase.Sorry but isn't demanding a Mad Max movie without a car chase as ridiculous as demanding a Star Wars film without space scenes or a Michael Bay film without a single explosion?
Yup, you get it.Not really. Also, it still can have cars and chases (how do you traverse the wasteland otherwise) but i think it doesn't has to be only centered around car chases and "another" big truck/bus/train for the action.
change the genre. it's not going to be another chase movie.
he could do a survival thriller movie in the wasteland, more dialed back on the action front but still just as atmospheric and detailed as ever.
I want to see a George Miller helmed Star Wars movie.
I really don't know how Miller can top Fury Road. It's like trying to top The Dark Knight or The Raid...the bar is set unexpectedly high. The magic formula for making an awesome action movie (if you're not marvel) is simple. Do not treat audience like idiots by spoonfeeding everything and trying to create a larger than life situation. The Raid 2 kinda failed when it tried to make it a tale about The Godfather and revenge whereas the first one was a masterpiece due to its simplicity which allowed the hero to shine. All I hope is Miller does't go with "bigger is better" idea.
Just checked the BO stats over at Boxofficemojo.com
Domestic: $115,915,000 41.3%
+ Foreign: $165,000,000 58.7%
= Worldwide: $280,915,000
Prod.budget is $150,000,000
Just imagine:
George Miller's: Star Wars - The Kessel Run
Those are really bad numbers I guess? Don't movies have to gross at least 2,5 of the budget to be profitable?
Those are really bad numbers I guess? Don't movies have to gross at least 2,5 of the budget to be profitable?
For an R-rated movie of Fury Road's type I think they're pretty good for this point in time.
Watched it yesterday. I dunno, I've mixed feelings on it. The music, the art design, the world building, the direction, the acting ... all that was excellent.
But I still walked out of the theater feeling very "meh" about the movie. I just don't feel like the film had quite enough characterization, cause I didn't really care what happened. It all just felt like a two hour live action Twisted Metal match.
I'm honestly excited for the BluRay cause I'd love to see more about the making of the movie, but I dunno that I'll ever watch the movie again.
I have to say, I'm very pleased with the way they handled the violence. I was expecting some really crappy, tacky CG bood splatters thrown around for added violence, but it was proper vehicular mayhem without much gore on camera.
It was brutal, but it wasn't as graphic as something as Neil Marshall's Doomsday (which was heavily influenced by Mad Max itself). People were sent trashing across the road and shot in multiple ways, yet it didn't feel crass or gratuitious. It was proper Mad Max violence. I love my gore dearly and I made my feelings on this particular issue rather clear, but it was perfectly handled.
Major kudos are owed to Miller.
Fury Road still has weeks to go in the theatres in the US and worldwide. It should have no problem getting $300 mill. Even though the BO amount might come in below expectations, you have to consider the VOD and BD/DVD sales and add that to the equation in the end.