One of the interesting things about the Modern Masters format (and one of the things that makes it so good) is that there truly is no dominant archetype. Even the nuts version of a given archetype has a glaring weakness, generally to a common.
So, for example, if you do what I just did and draft a BW Rebels deck, with 6 (!!!) searchers and multiple Trappers, Avian Changelings, and Bound in Silences, plus some other sweet stuff like a Redcap and a couple of Scullers, you still have a glaring weakness. Specifically, as I just learned, you can never beat a deck that takes advantage of this card.
(Especially when he also has Scion of Oona both games - ugh).
Even though it was incredibly frustrating to get crushed by that faeries deck, it really did make me appreciate just how well designed the set is. And it's not like the nuts Fae deck has no weaknesses either; a well-built green fatties deck or Domain deck is perfectly capable of stomping all over it. And so on and so on.
(And I just checked; I've been doing terribly over the past couple of weeks and my limited rating is in the toilet - it's actually dipped below 1700 for the first time in a very long time. Ugh. I was never amazing; it had been hovering around 1730-50, but I've been on quite the losing streak lately.)
EDIT: #$@@#$!!!@#$! And then I lose to Thundercloud Shaman two games in a row. Holy shit - Modern Masters
hates me this week! This was what I drafted:
It's not the best Rebels deck I've ever seen (there are no real bombs to speak of, and the imps are kinda meh). But it's certainly better than the 0-4 showing it gave me.