Full spoiler typically goes up on Monday before prerelease in the image gallery and late-Tuesday/early-Wednesday on gatherer.
It was almost certainly designed with DnT in mind (Legacy.)They pushed that Enchantment Creature, 3/1 for 2cc + good effect.
White weenie seems good. While I don't particularly like this standard because all the decks are pretty boring and straight forward, at least it's reasonably diverse.
It was almost certainly designed with DnT in mind (Legacy.)
It's not going to stick on the board very long in Standard. Also doesn't hit Jace.It makes Sphinx's Revelation into a more expensive Alabaster Potion (or one with a cantrip).
Yeah MaRo's wrong on that one, lol. Design doesn't, but Development will definitely throw things in there. (Uncounterable cycle in RTR, for instance.)I was thinking more of Modern than Standard. MaRo is pretty explicit that they don't create cards with actually Eternal Eternal formats in mind.
Death and Taxes can fit it in, to be sure, though its soft control isn't of the same sort as the rest of the deck (mana and permanent denial) so it's kind of inefficient from a deck design sense. Something to wreck Elves, at least.
So I redownloaded Magic 2014 on my new iPad Air (coming from ipad3) and none of my in game purchases are showing up.
Halp GAF!
I wouldnt even begin to know how to play this deck
Domain Zoo isn't really all that complicated. The hardest part from what I've seen seems to be appropriately sequencing your land drops. It also helps to draw Tribal Flames. Games where you draw Tribal Flames seem like you're cheating; games where you don't often seem like you're just not doing enough.
Am I understanding Tribal Flames correctly? If I have a Stomping ground and a Godless Shrine, it will hit for 4?
Yup.Am I understanding Tribal Flames correctly? If I have a Stomping ground and a Godless Shrine, it will hit for 4?
It won't have 4 Thoughtseize. No way.
Here is a version of it.
http://www.wizards.com/magic/magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/deck/1272
Others have Elspeth or Hero of Bladehold.
I mean, I know BW Tokens decks run Thoughtseize. I'm saying that I don't see Wizards putting out a product that has four copies of Thoughtseize in it.
Yeah, the card isn't for WW in Standard. It's absolutely for Death-and-Taxes in Legacy, and might see some play in Modern Hatebears (although opposing card draw isn't exactly what's keeping Hatebears down in Modern).
EDIT: By the way, if any of you have been following LSV's eternal struggle to draft and win with Storm on the MTGO cube, you should absolutely watch his latest video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PL04lbfeNAaS-oUW4ivfGMUgQikMEWagJ9&v=RRl1scAmOB0
I was thinking more of Modern than Standard. MaRo is pretty explicit that they don't create cards with actually Eternal Eternal formats in mind.
Is there a walkthrough vid on this deck? I don't follow anything past standards and wasn't sure what the hell was going on lol.
The Spirit is an interesting card but it just doesn't have that hatebear kick like a Thalia or Teeg. Ethersworn Canonist accomplishes the same thing against elves and is better against the bad matchups of D&T or Maverick.
Why didn't I buy ports.
It's like the one big legacy land I don't have besides Trops and the other non-U duals. Bah. Well, and ONS fetches, but those we can all wait out.My accidental purchase of 8 of them keeps getting better and better. I can't believe how high they are now.
It's like the one big legacy land I don't have besides Trops and the other non-U duals. Bah. Well, and ONS fetches, but those we can all wait out.
Could a Phenax-Fog BUG list work? Throw in a crap-ton of walls, core-set Jace, that stupid rat-lord comes to mind. Hell, Phenax+Pack Rat could probably do some real damage. Do the Pack Rat tokens count toward devotion?
706.2. When copying an object, the copy acquires the copiable values of the original object's characteristics and, for an object on the stack, choices made when casting or activating it (mode, targets, the value of X, whether it was kicked, how it will affect multiple targets, and so on). The "copiable values" are the values derived from the text printed on the object (that text being name, mana cost, color indicator, card type, subtype, supertype, rules text, power, toughness, and/or loyalty), as modified by other copy effects, by "as . . . enters the battlefield" and "as . . . is turned face up" abilities that set characteristics, and by abilities that caused the object to be face down. Other effects (including type-changing and text-changing effects), status, and counters are not copied.
This is a good decision.I'm thinking I might try and trade my Onslaught fetches to get Rishadan Ports.
They don't want Karametra in competitive constructed because of how much goddamn shuffling is involved.Maybe I answered my own question? Maybe R&D costed him at 5CC so that deckbuilders would know where in their gameplan to play him? But then you can't cast him with any sort of protection. I dunno. Phenax doesn't seem to have the scare factor that would make you want to make him overcosted. Then again, neither did Karametra really, and they put her at 5CC as well.
They don't want Karametra in competitive constructed because of how much goddamn shuffling is involved.
I'm not quite on their level on shuffling, (I love me some fetches/pods) but Karametra is just sort of an obnoxious card.I've heard this echoed a lot from Magic designers. I have a solution. It's time for basic land tokens.