It hurts the older card prices without much value in return. Everyone plays 5 dual lands (or 2 in Commander) instead of 4. Hooray?
Modern Masters was a set that was intentionally short-printed. Do not read ANYTHING into it regarding normal products.I don't know if it would hurt the old card prices. As you said, everyone who had the original duals would still be running 4 of them, and they would still be the preferred land over the legendary ones.
What a Legendary dual does, is make it possible to run X fetchlands + 1 or 2 Legendaries and have a mana base that looks fairly close to one with the originals, without actually outclassing them or making them useless.
It's really hard to say how the economics of this would play out. Reprinting things no longer necessarily decreases their long-term value, as Modern Masters showed us.
Modern Masters was a set that was intentionally short-printed. Do not read ANYTHING into it regarding normal products.
The Mutavaults will tank back down to 20-ish.Lorwyn Thoughtseizes are at 40 and Morningtide Mutavaults are at 45. Seems reasonable that they'll continue to climb once the Standard sets with them go out of print.
Lorwyn Thoughtseizes are at 40 and Morningtide Mutavaults are at 45. Seems reasonable that they'll continue to climb once the Standard sets with them go out of print.
No problem. They're not going to think this is cute 9 months from now when their players are burned out.
They put a leader-board race at the top of their standings where they grab the top person every quarter and put them into their 16-man invitational. It's causing people in the top spots to go gank local IQs.What did SCG do now?
Yeah, I went through SCG to trade-in a lot of standard stuff towards Modern/Legacy about a year, year/half ago that's paid off in spades now as its ballooned in price. (Hi there, 30-33 dollar City of Traitors and 9.99 Transmute Artifact!)The thing that sucks about being a new player is not owning any of the older cards out there. I had a guy look at my trades and wanted a lot of standard cards from me. I saw a few cards I wanted for my commander deck, but he refused and only wanted to trade standard for standard, even tho the trade value was the same. :/ I've met a few players that are like that with their trades.
The thing that sucks about being a new player is not owning any of the older cards out there. I had a guy look at my trades and wanted a lot of standard cards from me. I saw a few cards I wanted for my commander deck, but he refused and only wanted to trade standard for standard, even tho the trade value was the same. :/ I've met a few players that are like that with their trades.
The Mutavaults will tank back down to 20-ish.
For Meddling Mage play means put on the stack right? So you can't aether vial it in as a counter to anything
The oracle text is actually "cast" now. But that doesn't actually change how the card functions, since when a card says "playing" it means either casting a spell or playing a land. It only stops casting it, so any other means of getting the card onto the battlefield still work.
Before or after rotation? Because man I need me some vaults.
In case you don't know, the reasoning is because Standard value is expected to drop post rotation. Modern/EDH/Legacy values hold steady barring a reprint.
Trading old value for new value is called trading down and a lot of traders don't like to do it.
The biggest eyesore is SCG's ESPN/Anchorman fanboy look, imo.With the whole crack scandal thing, I think some steps should be taken to raise the bar of what's an acceptable way to present oneself at a tournament.
I think that any tournament which requires an invite (so, Pro Tours and SCG invitiationals) ought to impose a dress code on the players - business casual at a minimum.
No one who has earned an invite and intends to go to those events is going to turn it down because they don't feel like getting dressed up, and I'd hope this would have sort of a domino effect, and at least make people more aware of how they look.
With the whole crack scandal thing, I think some steps should be taken to raise the bar of what's an acceptable way to present oneself at a tournament.
I think that any tournament which requires an invite (so, Pro Tours and SCG invitiationals) ought to impose a dress code on the players - business casual at a minimum.
No one who has earned an invite and intends to go to those events is going to turn it down because they don't feel like getting dressed up, and I'd hope this would have sort of a domino effect, and at least make people more aware of how they look.
With the whole crack scandal thing, I think some steps should be taken to raise the bar of what's an acceptable way to present oneself at a tournament.
I think that any tournament which requires an invite (so, Pro Tours and SCG invitiationals) ought to impose a dress code on the players - business casual at a minimum.
No one who has earned an invite and intends to go to those events is going to turn it down because they don't feel like getting dressed up, and I'd hope this would have sort of a domino effect, and at least make people more aware of how they look.
With the whole crack scandal thing, I think some steps should be taken to raise the bar of what's an acceptable way to present oneself at a tournament.
I think that any tournament which requires an invite (so, Pro Tours and SCG invitiationals) ought to impose a dress code on the players - business casual at a minimum.
No one who has earned an invite and intends to go to those events is going to turn it down because they don't feel like getting dressed up, and I'd hope this would have sort of a domino effect, and at least make people more aware of how they look.
You can make sponsored gear that isn't a tshirt. Sleeves are a huge one. Deck boxes, life counting pads, playmats, even branded business casual duds would do well.Players are sponsored and have to wear sponsored gear. This isn't happening.
The notion of a dress code is pretty absurd. Just let the community continue to grow older and the problem more or less fixes itself (along with a whole set of other issues).
The biggest eyesore is SCG's ESPN/Anchorman fanboy look, imo.
The vast majority of active Magic players will always be early to mid 20-somethings. The problem will never fix itself.
I'm sure contract bridge, something I have played for nearly as long as I have played Magic (almost 20 years) , also thought in the 1950s/1960s that it would always get new players too. Magic players are already older by a few years now than when I started playing. That trend will continue.
The game is a lifestyle game, like Bridge and D&D. The people playing it will age on average assuming that its current growth spurt will eventually level off.
The problem is that it takes a big time commitment and the money isn't enough to realistically make it a "profession" for a long period.
See how LSV took a full time job and hasn't been the same player? It's not easy
I'd rather see someone in a suit/tie on camera than a Ravnica guild t-shirt and blazer. *shudder*
Played a chromanticore deck in draft last night and had the most fun I've had in a while playing magic.
Now I want to make a standard deck with 4 of em.
COME TO THE DARK SIDE
It is currently my favorite thing to do in Standard
Whats your deck look like? I was thinking of basing it off of some kind of green hexproof/mana dork deck.
Whats your deck look like? I was thinking of basing it off of some kind of green hexproof/mana dork deck.
I think both the "Video Game Journalist" attire and the "ESPN Anchor" look are bad. The business casual they had at the last PT was perfect, imo.I feel the same way whenever I see that. I'm glad the casters are starting to wear a suit and tie like Patrick Chaplin. Professionalism never hurts.