Support NeoGAF

[ultron87]

That really looks photoshopped with all the artifacting around the text.

Also, Dack is the worst first name.

 

[kirblar]

That really looks photoshopped with all the artifacting around the text.

Also, Dack is the worst first name.

He sounds like a Star Wars character, its awful.

 

[Angry Grimace]

That really looks photoshopped with all the artifacting around the text.

Also, Dack is the worst first name.

The person who re-posted it from the first person says that is scanning artifacts.

He sounds like a Star Wars character, its awful.

Duck Faygo, Greatest Thief in the Multiverse™

 

[WanderingWind]

If that's true, Dack will be 50 bucks to preorder. 3cmc steal your Batterskull for good? Yeah, that sounds pretty good.

 

[Angry Grimace]

 

[Grakl]

kitty!

 

[Angry Grimace]

The emblem on the Duck card sounds suspicious too, to me. When would you ever target an opposing creature with something other than removal?

 

[kirblar]

The emblem on the Duck card sounds suspicious too, to me. When would you ever target an opposing creature with something other than removal?

Bolt a Tarmogoyf, for instance.

 

[Fragamemnon]

If that Dack card is real I am playing him in Vintage for sure.

 

[Angry Grimace]

Bolt a Tarmogoyf, for instance.

Well, sure, you bolt practically anything that would live and it would apply, I guess. Its just weird.

 

[WanderingWind]

Vapor snag legacy playable with Dack?

Yes.

 

[The Technomancer]

This is uncommon? Shitty blue wizard who gets you extra turns is mythic, but this is uncommon?

 

[Angry Grimace]

This is uncommon? Shitty blue wizard who gets you extra turns is mythic, but this is uncommon?

You only get the extra turns in magical combo christmasland.

 

[ultron87]

Vapor snag legacy playable with Dack?

Yes.

I'm not seeing the connection here.

 

[WanderingWind]

I'm not seeing the connection here.

Do you not gain control of target creature for 1cmc? Or does it go back to their hand regardless of the emblem trigger?

 

[The Technomancer]

Do you not gain control of target creature for 1cmc? Or does it go back to their hand regardless of the emblem trigger?

I think the way it goes on the stack you'll gain control of it but then it will get returned to their hand.

 

[WanderingWind]

I think the way it goes on the stack you'll gain control of it but then it will get returned to their hand.

I thought it would go Vapor Snag goes on stack, emblem trigger stacks. Stack resolves, you now control creature. Since you own the creature the snag trigger fizzles.

 

[The Technomancer]

I thought it would go Vapor Snag goes on stack, emblem trigger stacks. Stack resolves, you now control creature. Since you own the creature the snag trigger fizzles.

I don't think swapping control disjoints targets, and Vapor Snag doesn't specify "an opponent controls"

 

[ultron87]

Nah, that'd only happen if Vapor Snag said "Target creature you don't control" or something like that (see Cyclonic Rift). You can Snag your own creatures all day long.

 

[WanderingWind]

WELL FUCK

 

[Angry Grimace]

Wizards, when will you finally make a Cat Lord?

 

[acheron_xl]

Wizards, when will you finally make a Cat Lord?

But you probably mean a 1WW 2/2 that buffs cats and gives them Double Strike or something.

 

[Karakand]

http://bmkgaming.com/product/lounging-brian-playmat/ Sometimes, I appreciate a dumb joke being run far enough into the ground to produce something like this

on the one hand kibler stopped being cool when he went from people's champion to the harbinger of creature porn magic

on the other hand, ripping this out at a competition would always be hilarious

 

[Angry Grimace]

 

[f0rk]

If that's true, Dack will be 50 bucks to preorder. 3cmc steal your Batterskull for good? Yeah, that sounds pretty good.

This doesn't really do anything if it's already equiped to a germ/creature.

 

[Maledict]

The emblem on the Duck card sounds suspicious too, to me. When would you ever target an opposing creature with something other than removal?

Um, it's a block full of enchantments with a specific 'enchant creature' mechanic. Doesn't that emblem just turn every enchant spell you have into steal creature?

 

[The Technomancer]

Um, it's a block full of enchantments with a specific 'enchant creature' mechanic. Doesn't that emblem just turn every enchant spell you have into steal creature?

This is actually going to be in Conspiracy. But yeah, it will just be following up Theros

 

[Angry Grimace]

Um, it's a block full of enchantments with a specific 'enchant creature' mechanic. Doesn't that emblem just turn every enchant spell you have into steal creature?

Its not playable in Standard or Modern, only in Legacy and Vintage (lol).

 

[red13th]

I <3 Kibler but I don't really want that mat.

on the one hand kibler stopped being cool when he went from people's champion to the harbinger of creature porn magic

on the other hand, ripping this out at a competition would always be hilarious

Kibler vs Zvi! Aren't we all getting old.

 

[The Adder]

The emblem on the Duck card sounds suspicious too, to me. When would you ever target an opposing creature with something other than removal?

When you know you're going to gain control of it?

 

[kirblar]

on the one hand kibler stopped being cool when he went from people's champion to the harbinger of creature porn magic

on the other hand, ripping this out at a competition would always be hilarious

"What are the best decks?"

"OK, I'm just going to play Zoo."

 

[keeblerdrow]

I keep leaning in and then shying away from MTGO. I always queue up a draft pack in the store, then chicken out because I don't want to split my collection between online and real cards. But I also want to play more actual games of Magic so I can develop my deck building and play skills more. Argh.

 

[Angry Grimace]

I keep leaning in and then shying away from MTGO. I always queue up a draft pack in the store, then chicken out because I don't want to split my collection between online and real cards. But I also want to play more actual games of Magic so I can develop my deck building and play skills more. Argh.

I personally find the beta works fine, although it does have some funky errors. Some people really hate it though.

The digital vs. online thing is annoying, but in reality, I play with my online cards 10 times as much as I play my paper ones, so its hard to say they "aren't worth anything."

 

[Fragamemnon]

I keep leaning in and then shying away from MTGO. I always queue up a draft pack in the store, then chicken out because I don't want to split my collection between online and real cards. But I also want to play more actual games of Magic so I can develop my deck building and play skills more. Argh.

I play on MTGO because I can play Legacy and (soon) Vintage on demand. It's a build->test->refine paradise in that regard, though I wish they had more daily events I could play in since 2mans are trash.

 

[The Technomancer]

Well this seems like a Limited bomb

 

[Lucario]

 

[OnPoint]

haha That's pretty... frustrating.

 

[Crocodile]

Seeing the full spoiler is always a shock because I'm always reminded that 90% of cards in a Magic set SUCKKKKKKKKK Some interesting cards in the spoiler though. For an "enchantment matters" block, its nice to actually get an "enchantment matters" set

bigkrev are you okay? Post if you're ok!

Spoiler

Kappa

 

[Lucario]

the pillow fort is real

 

[Grakl]

im building hexproof #1

 

[Karakand]

this is me irl whenever i play a hexproof creature

 

[WanderingWind]

This doesn't really do anything if it's already equiped to a germ/creature.

Okay, I still don't get this one. How does that ruling work?

JUDGE

 

[Haly]

Still equipped to their germ, since taking control doesn't reset equip and they still control the germ.

 

[WanderingWind]

Still equipped to their germ, since taking control doesn't reset equip and they still control the germ.

That's one of those rules that just doesn't seem to vibe with how the rest of the game is played. The card says "take artifact." Oh, but not that artifact because reasons.

Bah.

On another note, has green ever had destroy land as part of its color pie?

 

[kirblar]

That's one of those rules that just doesn't seem to vibe with how the rest of the game is played. The card says "take artifact." Oh, but not that artifact because reasons.

Bah.

On another note, has green ever had destroy land as part of its color pie?

Green's had it forever, it can blow up noncreature permanents.

 

[Sinatar]

On another note, has green ever had destroy land as part of its color pie?

 

[WanderingWind]

Hm. I am just wrong all over the place today.

 

[Maledict]

All the way back to Desert Twister in revised - green can destroy lands (or put them on top of your deck) but it's generally very expensive.

 

[acheron_xl]

All the way back to Desert Twister in revised - green can destroy lands (or put them on top of your deck) but it's generally very expensive.

Don't forget the OG.

 

[bigkrev]

WHY

Are they really that content just destroying the game?